1. Грачиков Е.Н. КНР и международная система: формирование собственной модели мироустройства. Вестник международных организаций: образование, наука, новая экономика, 2022, т. 17, № 1, сс. 7-24.
Grachikov E.N. China and the international system: Formation of its own model of world order. Bulletin of International Organizations: Education, Science, New Economy, 2022, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 7-24. (In Russ.) Available at: https://doi.org/10.17323/1996-7845-2022-01-01

2. Грачиков Е.Н. Становление китайской школы международных отношений: аналитические подходы и методы исследований. Вестник РУДН. Серия: Международные отношения, 2019, т. 19, № 2, сс. 187-200.
Grachikov E.N. Formation of the Chinese school of international relations: analytical approaches and research methods. Vestnik RUDN. International Relations, 2019, no. 2, pp. 187-200. (In Russ.) Available at: https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-0660-2019-19-2-187-200

3. Кривохиж С.В., Соболева Е.Д. Древность на службе современности: теория морального реализма Янь Сюэтуна и будущее мирового порядка. Мировая экономика и международные отношения, 2017, т. 61, № 11, сс. 76-84.
Krivokhizh S.V., Soboleva E.D. The Past serving the present: Yan Xuetong’s theory of moral realism and the future of the Global Order. World Economy and International Relations, 2017, vol. 61, no. 11, pp. 76-84. (In Russ.) Available at: https://doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227-2017-61-11-76-84

4. Amitav A. From Heaven to Earth: ‘Cultural idealism’ and ‘moral realism’ as Chinese contributions to global international relations. The Chinese Journal of International Politics, 2019, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 467-494. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/cjip/poz014

5. 秦亚青. 国际关系理论中国学派生成的可能和必然., 2006, 第3期，第7-13页.
Qin Yaqing. The road of independent development: The debate of the “Chinese school”. World Economy and Politics, 2006, no. 23, pp. 7-13. (In Chin.)

6. Грачиков Е.Н., Чжоу Сяоюй. Национальные интересы Китая: коннотации, иерархия, балансирование. Мировая экономика и международные отношения, 2023, т. 67, № 8, сс. 70-83.
Grachikov E.N., Zhou Xiaoyu. National interests of China: connotations, hierarchy, balancing. World Eсonomy and International Relations, 2023, vol. 67, no. 8, pp. 70-83. (In Russ.) Available at: https://doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227-2023-67-8-70-83

7. Понька Т.И., Бельченко А.С., Забелла А.А. Китайский взгляд на теорию международных отношений. Мировая экономика и международные отношения, 2017, т. 61, № 10, сс. 76-86.
Ponka T.I., Belchenko A.S., Zabella A.A. Chinese view on the theory of international relations. World Economy and International Relations, 2017, vol. 61, no. 10, pp. 76-86. (In Russ.) Available at: https://doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227-2017-61-10-76-86

8. Оганесян А.Л. Теория “морального реализма” и вопрос формирования российско-китайского союза. Русская политология, 2017, т. 4, № 5, сс. 28-32.
Oganesan A.L. The Theory of “Moral Realism” and the Question of Forming the Russian-Chinese Union. Russian Political Science, 2017, vol. 4, no. 5, pp. 28-32. (In Russ.)

9. Florian S. Reconceptualising world order: Chinese political thought and its challenge to international relations theory. Review of International Studies, 2014, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 683-703. (In Russ.) Available at: https://10.1017/S0260210513000508

10. Noesselt N. Is there a “Chinese school” of IR? German Institute of Global and Area Studies (GIGA), 2012. Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/resrep07521 (accessed 04.06.2025).

11. Perez M. Farewell to revolution: the ‘Chinese school of IR’ and the depoliticisation of IR theory in post-Mao China. International Politics, 2024, vol. 61, pp. 703-717. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41311-023-00468-2

12. Hwang Y.-J. Reappraising the Chinese school of international relations: A postcolonial perspective. Review of International Studies, 2021, vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 311-330. Available at: http://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210521000152

13. Ren Xiao. Why there is now Non-Western international relations theory. The Chinese Journal of International Politics, 2024, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 262-276. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/cjip/poae014

14. 胡守钧. 社会共生论. 社会科学论坛, 2001年第1卷，第4期，第20-23页.
Hu Shoujun. Social symbiosis theory. Social Science Forum, 2001, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 20-23. (In Chin.) Available at: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1003-8477.2000.03.005

15. 胡守钧. 社会共生论. 上海， 复旦大学出版社, 2006 (第一版)，2012 (第二版). 281页.
Hu Shoujun. Social Symbiosis Theory. Shanghai, Fudan University Press, 2006, 2012. 281 p. (In Chin.)

16. 胡守钧. 优化共生关系化解社会问题. 探索与争鸣, 2012年, 第10期, 第14-15页.
Hu Shoujun. Optimizing symbiotic relationships to resolve social problems. Exploration and Free Views, 2012, no. 10, pp. 14-15. (In Chin.)

17. 金应忠. 为什么要研究 “国际社会共生性”– 兼议和平发展时代国际关系理论. 国际展望, 2011年，第5期， 第1-17页.
Jin Yingzhong. “Symbiosis of international society” and IR Theory of Peace and Development. Global Review, 2011, no. 5, pp. 1-17. (In Chin.)

18. 金应忠. 再论共生理论—关于当代国际关系的哲学思维. 国际观察, 2019年，第1期，第14-35页.
Jin Yingzhong. Second research on symbiosis theory: Philosophical thinking on contemporary international relations. International Review, 2019, no. 1, pp. 14-35. (In Chin.)

19. 金应忠. 共生理论:当代国际关系的哲学思维. 中国社会科学文摘, 2019年，第7期，第103-104页.
Jin Yingzhong. Symbiosis theory: philosophical thinking of contemporary international relations. Chinese Social Science Digest, 2019, no. 7, pp. 103-104. (In Chin.)

20. 任晓. 论东亚“共生体系”原则 – 对外关系思想和制度研究之一. 世界经济与政治, 2013年, 第7期, 第4-22页.
Ren Xiao. On the principles of East Asian “symbiotic system” – one of the studies in foreign relations ideas and systems. World Economy and Politics, 2013, no. 7, pp. 4-22. (In Chin.)

21. 苏长和. “共生型国际体系的可能 – 在一个多极世界中如何构建新型大国关系?”. 世界经济与政治, 2013 年, 第9期, 第4-22页.
Su Changhe. The Possibility of symbiotic international system: How to build a new type of big countries relations in a multi-polar world. World Economics and Politics, 2013, no. 9, pp. 4-22. (In Chin.)

22. 苏长和. 关系理论的学术路线. 世界经济与政治, 2016年, 第10期, 第29-38, 156-157页.
Su Changhe. A research agenda for the relational theory of international politics. World Economics and Politics, 2016, no. 10, pp. 29-38, 156-157. (In Chin.)

23. 苏长和. 从关系到共生—中国大国外交理论的文化和制度阐释. 世界经济与政治, 2016年,第1期, 第5-25, 156页.
Su Changhe. From relations to symbiosis: A cultural and institutional interpretation to China’s diplomatic theory. World Economics and Politics, 2016, no. 1, pp. 5-25+156. (In Chin.)

24. 熊李力. 共生型国际体系还是竞合型国际体系 – 兼议亚太地区国际体系的历史与现实. 探索与争鸣, 2014年, 第4期, 第36-40页.
Xiong Lili. Symbiotic International System or Competitive International System: On the History and Reality of the International System in the Asia-Pacific Region. Exploration and Free Views, 2014, no. 4, pp. 36-40. (In Chin.)

25. 陈雪飞. 中国应建立文明导向的世界秩序观 – 兼与苏长和、任晓先生商榷. 探索与争鸣, 2014, 第4期，第 41-44页.
Chen Xuefei. China should establish a world order oriented towards civilization: a discussion with Su Changhe and Ren Xiao. Exploration and Free Views, 2014, no. 4, pp. 41-44. (In Chin.)

26. 任晓. 共生体系的存在和持久性 – 对熊李力、陈雪飞先生的回应. 探索与争鸣, 2014年, 第11期, 第32-35页.
Ren Xiao. The existence and durability of the symbiotic system: a response to Xiong Lili and Chen Xuefei. Exploration and Free Views, 2014, no. 11, pp. 32-35. (In Chin.) Available at: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1004-2229.2014.11.010 

27. 苏长和. 以新普遍主义建构世界秩序——对共生问题的进一步思考. 探索与争鸣, 2014年, 第11, 第35-38页.
Su Changhe. Constructing the world order with new universalism: further thinking on the issue of symbiosis. Exploration and Free Views, 2014, no. 11, pp. 35-38. (In Chin.)

28. 苏长和. “共生型国际体系的可能 – 在一个多极世界中如何构建新型大国关系?” 中国社会科学院国际研究 学部集刊, 2016年, 第9期, 第20-50页.
Su Changhe. The possibility of symbiotic international system: how to build a new type of big countries relations in a multi-polar world. Journal of International Studies, CASS, 2016, no. 9, pp. 20-50. (In Chin.)

29. 陈雪飞. 博鳌时间,全新共生体系是可能的吗？– 兼与苏长和, 任晓先生商榷. 新华月报, 2015年, 第8期, 第 76-81页.
Chen Xuefei. Boao Time: Is a New Symbiotic System Possible? – Discussing with Su Changhe and Ren Xiao. Xinhua Monthly, 2015, no. 8, pp. 76-81. (In Chin.)

30. 任晓. 共生 – 上海学派的兴起. 上海译文出版社, 2015年, 208页.
Ren Xiao. The Rise of Shanghai School. Shanghai Translation Publishing House, 2015. 208 p. (In Chin.)

31. 刘雪莲, 欧阳皓玥. 从共存安全到共生安全:基于边境安全特殊性的思考.国际安全研究, 2019年, 第37卷, 第 2 期, 第3-23页.
Liu Хuelian, Ouyang Haoyue. From coexistent security to symbiotic security: Reflections on the particularity of border security. Journal of International Security Studies, 2019, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 3-23. (In Chin.) Available at: https://doi.org/10.14093/j.cnki.cn10-1132/d.2019.02.001

32. 姚璐. 论国际关系中的“共生安全”. 国际观察, 2019, 第1 期, 第51-66页.
Yao Lu. Research on “symbiotic security” in international relations. International Review, 2019, no. 1, pp. 51-66. (In Chin.)

33. 任晓. 从世界政府到“共生和平”. 国际观察, 2019年, 第1期, 第36-50页.
Ren Xiao. From world government to “coexistence and peace”. International Review, 2019, no. 1, pp. 36-50. (In Chin.)

34. 鲁鹏. 中国特色国际关系理论建设的阶段性进展与不足. 国际关系研究, 2019年, 第4期, 第74-83页.
Lu Peng. The phased progress and shortcomings of the construction of international relations theory with Chinese characteristics. Journal of International Relations, 2019, no. 4, pp. 74-83. (In Chin.)

35. 余潇枫. 国际关系伦理学与“中国学派”. 国际观察, 2025年,第1期, 第52-75页.
Yu Xiaofeng. International relations ethics and the “Chinese school”. International Review, 2025, no. 1, pp. 52-75. (In Chin.)

36. 张旗, 白云真. 中国国际关系规范理论与多元世界的秩序构建. 国际观察, 2023年, 第6期, 第35-58页.
Zhang Qi, Bai Yunzhen. China’s normative theory of international relations and the construction of order in a pluralistic world. International Review, 2023, no. 6, pp. 35-58. (In Chin.)

37. 谢清果. 文明共生论：世界文明交往范式的“中国方案” – 习近平关于人类文明交流互鉴重要论述的思想体系. 新疆师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2019年, 第40卷, 第6期, 第72-83页.
Xie Qingguo. Theory of civilization symbiosis: The “Chinese solution” of the world civilization exchange paradigm – Xi Jinping’s ideological system on the important discussion on the exchange and mutual learning of human civilizations. Journal of Xinjiang Normal University (Edition of Philosophy and Social Sciences), 2019, vol. 40, no. 6, pp. 72-83. (In Chin.) Available at: https://doi.org/10.14100/j.cnki.65-1039/g4.20190722.001

38. 刘洋, 李益斌. “全球南方” 如何突破群体性崛起困境？– 基于国际共生理论与“一带一路”倡议的分析.太 平洋学报, 2024年, 第32卷, 第10期, 第42-53页.
Liu Yang, Li Yibin. How can the “Global South” break through the dilemma of collective rise? – An analysis based on the theory of international symbiosis and the “One Belt and One Road” initiative. Pacific Journal, 2024, vol. 32, no. 10, pp. 42-53. (In Chin.) Available at: https://doi.org/10.14015/j.cnki.1004-8049.2024.10.004

39. 梁颖, 黄立群. 共生型国际秩序与命运共同体建设. 南洋问题研究, 2017年, 第1期, 第39-50页.
Liang Ying, Huang Liqun. Symbiotic international order and the construction of a community with a shared future. Southeast Asian Affairs, 2017, no. 1, pp. 39-50. (In Chin.) Available at: https://doi.org/10.14073/j.cnki.nywtyj.2017.01.004

40. 杨佳琪, 杨东晓. 共生理论视角下的中国—马来西亚共建“一带一路”合作的模式与挑战研究. 东南亚纵横, 2025年,第3期, 第 1-13页.
Yang Jiaqi, Yang Dongxiao. A study on the mode and challenges of China-Malaysia cooperation in building the “One Belt and One Road” from the perspective of symbiosis theory. Crossroads: Southeast Asian Studies, 2025, no. 3, pp. 1-13. (In Chin.) Available at: https://doi.org/10.20226/j.cnki.issn1003-2479.20250617.001

41. 夏立平.论共生系统理论视阈下的“一带一路”建设.同济大学学报(社会科学版), 2015年,第26卷, 第2期, 第 30-40页.
Xia Liping. On the construction of the “One Belt and One Road” from the perspective of symbiotic system theory. Journal of Tongji University (Social Science Edition), 2015, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 30-40. (In Chin.)

42. 余晓钟, 罗霞. “一带一路”能源共生合作：框架分析与推进路径.甘肃社会科学, 2021年, 第2期, 第198-206页.
Yu Xiaozhong, Luo Xia. “One Belt and One Road” energy symbiosis cooperation: framework analysis and promotion path. Gansu Social Sciences, 2021, no. 2, pp. 198-206. (In Chin.) Available at: https://doi.org/10.15891/j.cnki.cn62-1093/c.2021.02.027

43. 张立辉, 黄建平. “一带一路”共建国家应对气候危机的困境与战略选择：基于国际共生理论的分析. 太平洋 学报, 2025年, 第30卷, 第4期, 第50-62页.
Zhang Lihui, Huang Jianping. Dilemmas and strategic choices of “One Belt and One Road” countries in coping with the climate crisis: an analysis based on international symbiosis theory. Pacific Journal, 2025, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 50-62. (In Chin.) Available at: https://doi.org/10.14015/j.cnki.1004-8049.2025.04.004

44. Katzenstein P.J. Is There a Chinese School of IR Theory? The Chinese Journal of International Politics, 2024, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 222-241. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/cjip/poae012

45. Smith S.N. Community of common destiny: China’s “new assertiveness” and the changing Asian order. International Journal, 2018, vol. 73, no. 3, pp. 449-463. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0020702018790278

46. Grydehoj А., Su Ping. China and the pursuit of harmony in world politics: understanding Chinese International Relations theory. Abingdon and New York, Routledge, 2022. 84 p. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003259794 (accessed 10.02.2025).

47. Mena P.F. The trap of diversity: What constitutes ‘non-western IR theory’. E-INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS, 08.05.2020. Available at: https://www.e-ir.info/2020/05/08/the-trap-of-diversity-what-constitutes-non-western-ir-theory/ (accessed 10.02.2025).

1. 上海国际问题研究院课题组. 海纳百川、包容共生的“上海学派”. 国际展望, 2014年, 第6期，第1-17页.
Research Group of Shanghai Institutes for International Studies. The Inclusiveness and Coexistence of “Shanghai Schoo”. Global Review, 2014, no. 6, pp. 1-17. (In Chin.) Available at: https://doi.org/10.13851/j.cnki.gjzw.2014.06.002