The National Endowment for Democracy at 40: Back to Basics?

DOI: 10.20542/0131-2227-2023-67-12-16-27
A. Davydov,
Primakov National Research Institute of World Economy and International Relations, Russian Academy of Sciences (IMEMO), 23, Profsoyuznaya Str., Moscow, 117997, Russian Federation.
The National Archives, Kew, Richmond, Surrey TW9 4DU, United Kingdom.

Статья поступила 19.07.2023. После доработки 24.08.2023. Принята к печати 04.10.2023.

Аннотация. The world system is increasingly characterized by a New Cold War competition between the USA, Russia and China, framed as a battle between “democracy” and “autocracy” by the Biden Administration. This article focuses on the National Endowment for Democracy (NED), a key instrument of U.S. democracy promotion in support of national security over the last 40 years. It analyses the extent to which it will remain a valid and effective actor in U.S. foreign policy during the New Cold War. The first two sections focus on the two structural elements that enable the NED to function. The first section focuses on the conceptual framework which has legitimated democracy promotion as an element of U.S. foreign policy. While this has been a U.S. policy imperative since the foundation of the state, its salience and the methods used to pursue it have been determined by shifts in the power of the United States and American perceptions of threats from foreign actors. The second section analyses the factors that have shaped the institutional and strategic position of the NED in U.S. foreign policy since the Cold War. When the U.S. foreign policy elite perceives a unitary threat from a political-ideological actor, coupled with a need to transform closed regimes, the Executive and Congress align to empower the NED through provision of support and resources. The third section examines the position of the NED in the Biden Administration’s strategy and argues it is being supported to the maximum as the lead institution for promoting democracy in hostile authoritarian competitors. It concludes that the NED has shown a high level of institutional survivability but that its model of democracy promotion is increasingly challenged by closing political space in other states, and the erosion of the U.S. economic, military, and ideological power.

Статья посвящена анализу деятельности Национального фонда демократии (НФД)в определении и реализации внешней политики США. Авторы уделяют внимание концепции продвижения демократии, эволюции институциональной и стратегической значимости Фонда с момента его создания в 1983 г. до прихода к власти администрации Дж. Байдена. Авторы указывают на высокий уровень институциональной устойчивости НФД благодаря поддержке американского политического истеблишмента. Эффективность же практик Фонда ставится под сомнение из-за “закрытия” политических пространств в странах, где он работает, и относительного сокращения мощи США в глобальном масштабе.

Ключевые слова: United States, U.S. foreign policy, liberal world order, hegemony, democracy promotion, political aid, National Endowment for Democracy, State and non-state actors

США, внешняя политика США, либеральный мировой порядок, гегемония, продвижение демократии, политическая помощь, Национальный фонд демократии, государственные и негосударственные организации


1. Brands H., Gaddis J.L. The New Cold War: America, China, and the Echoes of History. Foreign Affairs, 2021, vol. 100, no. 6, pp. 10-21. Available at: (accessed 19.09.2023).

2. Krauthammer C. The Unipolar Moment Revisited. The National Interest, 2002/2003, no. 70, pp. 5-17. Available at: (accessed 19.09.2023).

3. Bouchet N., Sedaca N. Holding Steady? U. S. Democracy Promotion in a Changing World. London, Chatham House, 2014. 30 p.

4. Carothers T. The NED at 10. Foreign Policy, 1994, no. 95, pp. 123-138. Available at:  

5. Баталов Э.Я. Проблема демократии в американской политической мысли XX века. Москва, Прогресс-Традиция, 2010. 376 с.
Batalov E.Ya. The Problem of Democracy in American Political Thought of the 20th Century. Moscow, Progress-Traditsiya, 2010. 376 p. (In Russ.)

6. Washington G. Farewell Address. 17.09.1796. The American Presidency Project. Available at: (accessed 04.07.2023).

7. Mead W. Special Providence: American Foreign Policy and How It Changed the World. New York, Routledge, 2002. 400 p.

8. American Frontier. Encyclopedia Britannica. Available at: (accessed 05.07.2023).

9. Monroe J. Seventh Annual Message. 02.12.1823. The American Presidency Project. Available at: (accessed 03.08.2023).

10. Monten J. The Roots of the Bush Doctrine: Power, Nationalism, and Democracy Promotion in U. S. Strategy. International Security, 2003, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 112-156. Available at:  

11. Heidler D., Heidler J. Manifest Destiny. Encyclopedia Britannica. Available at: (accessed 05.07.2023).

12. Cox M., Lynch T., Bouchet N., eds. U. S. Foreign Policy and Democracy Promotion: from Theodore Roosevelt to Barack Obama. New York, Routledge, 2013. 224 p.

13. Markakis D. U. S. Democracy Promotion in the Middle East: The Pursuit of Hegemony. New York, Routledge, 2016. 204 p.

14. Kagan R. Power and Weakness. Policy Review, 2002, no. 113, pp. 3-28. Available at: (accessed 19.09.2023).

15. Robinson W. The Global Police State. London, Pluto Press, 2020. 208 p.

16. Hook S., ed. Democratic Peace in Theory and Practice (Symposia on Democracy). Kent (OH), The Kent State University Press, 2010. 328 p.

17. Doyle M.W. Kant, Liberal Legacies, and Foreign Affairs, Part 2. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 1983, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 205-235. Available at: (accessed 19.09.2023).

18. Russett B. Grasping the Democratic Peace: Principles for a Post-Cold War World. Princeton, Princeton University Press, 1993. 192 p.

19. Морозов Г.И., ред. Общественность и проблемы войны и мира. Москва, Международные отношения, 1978. 464 с.
Morozov G.I., ed. Society and Problems of War and Peace. Moscow, Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya, 1978. 464 p. (In Russ.)

20. Schmitz D.F. Thank God They’re on Our Side: The United States and Rightwing Dictatorships, 1921–1965. Chapel Hill and London, The University of North Carolina Press, 1999. 240 p.

21. Taffet J.E. Foreign Aid as Foreign Policy: The Alliance for Progress in Latin America. Abingdon, Routledge. 2007. 322 p.

22. Latham M.E. Ideology, Social Science, and Destiny: Modernization and the Kennedy-Era Alliance for Progress. Diplomatic History, 1998, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 199-229. Available at: (accessed 19.09.2023).

23. Ish-Shalom P. Theory Gets Real, and the Case for a Normative Ethic: Rostow, Modernization Theory, and the Alliance for Progress. International Studies Quarterly, 2006, vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 287-311. Available at: (accessed 19.09.2023).

24. Давыдов А.А. Зарубежная помощь США: помощь развитию как инструмент внешней политики (Часть 2). Пути к миру и безопасности, 2018, № 2, сс. 9-21.
Davydov A.A. U. S. Foreign Aid: Development Aid as a Foreign Policy Tool (Part 2). Pathways to Peace and Security, 2018, no. 2, pp. 9-21. (In Russ.) Available at:  

25. Brands H. Making the Unipolar Moment: U. S. Foreign Policy and the Rise of the Post-Cold War Order. Ithaca, NY, Cornell University Press, 2016. 480 p.

26. Douglas W. Developing Democracy. Washington, D.C., Heldref, 1972. 232 p.

27. Douglas W., Goldman R., eds. Promoting Democracy: Opportunities and Issues. New York, Praeger, 1988. 285 p.

28. Samuels M.A., Douglas W.A. Promoting Democracy. Washington Quarterly, 1981, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 52-65. Available at:  

29. Pee R. Democracy Promotion, National Security and Strategy: Foreign Policy under the Reagan Administration. New York, Routledge, 2016. 229 p.

30. Epstein S., Serafino N., Miko F. Democracy Promotion: Cornerstone of U. S. Foreign Policy? CRS Report for Congress. Congressional Research Service, 26.12.2007. Available at: (accessed 27.06.2023).

31. Pee R., Lucas S. Reevaluating Democracy Promotion: The Reagan Administration, Allied Authoritarian States, and Regime Change. Journal of Cold War Studies, 2022, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 151-199. Available at:  

32. Schmidli W.M. Freedom on the Offensive: Human Rights, Democracy Promotion, and U. S. Interventionism in the Late Cold War. Ithaca, NY & London, Cornell University Press, 2022. 324 p.

33. Bouchet N. Democracy Promotion as U. S. Foreign Policy: Bill Clinton and Democratic Enlargement. Abingdon and New York, Routledge, 2015. 199 p.

34. Poppe A.E., Wolff J. Democracy Promotion and the Challenge of Shrinking Civic Spaces. Democracy Promotion in Times of Uncertainty: Trends and Challenges. External Democracy Promotion (EDP) Network. PRIF Report 13/2018. Available at: (accessed 01.07.2023).


1. National Security Strategy. The White House, 12.10.2022. Available at: (accessed 20.06.2023).

2. Remarks by President Biden on the United Efforts of the Free World to Support the People of Ukraine. The White House, 26.03.2022. Available at: (accessed 20.06.2023).

3. Address to Members of the British Parliament. The Ronald Reagan Presidential Library and Museum, 08.06.1982. Available at: (accessed 19.06.2023).

4. United States: Cuts to Democracy Funds Reduce U. S. Security. Freedom House, 11.02.2018. Available at: (accessed 20.06.2023).

5. Democracy Assistance: State Should Improve Accountability Over Funding; USAID Should Assess Whether New Processes Have Improved Award Documentation. United States Government Accountability Office, December 2017. Available at: (accessed 21.06.2023).

6. Remarks at a White House Ceremony Inaugurating the National Endowment for Democracy. The Ronald Reagan Presidential Library and Museum, 16.12.1983. Available at: (accessed 21.06.2023).

7. President Bush Discusses Freedom in Iraq and Middle East. The White House, 06.11.2003. Available at: (accessed 20.06.2023).

8. Thomas Jefferson to Roger C. Weightman, June 24, 1826. Library of Congress. Available at: (accessed 04.07.2023).

9. Neutrality Proclamation, 22 April 1793. Founders Online. Available at: (accessed 04.07.2023).

10. Annual Report 1984. National Endowment for Democracy, 30.11.1984. 51 p.

11. Promoting Democracy: National Endowment for Democracy’s Management of Grants Needs Improvement. Report to Congressional Committees. United States General Accounting Office, March 1991. Available at: (accessed 27.06.2023).

12. Democracy Assistance: U. S. Agencies Take Steps to Coordinate International Programs but Lack Information on Some U. S.-funded Activities. Report to Congressional Committees. United States Government Accountability Office, September 2009. Available at: (accessed 27.06.2023).

13. Events Leading to the Establishment of the National Endowment for Democracy. Report to Senator Malcolm Wallop. The U. S. General Accounting Office, 06.07.1984. Available at: (accessed 27.06.2023).

14. Strategy Document. National Endowment for Democracy, January 2002. Available at: (accessed 03.06.2023).

15. George W. Bush. Remarks at Whitehall Palace in London, United Kingdom. The American Presidency Project, 19.11.2003. Available at: (accessed 07.03.2023).

16. Grant No. 674-0306-6-00-6025-00. Agency for International Development, 30.09.1986. Available at (accessed 30.05.2023).

17. Annual Report 1990. National Endowment for Democracy, 30.09.1990. 64 p.

18. Strategy Document, 2007. National Endowment for Democracy, 2007. 21 p.

19. Congressional Budget Justification. Department of State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs. Fiscal Year 2016. Available at: (accessed 25.06.2023).

20. Congressional Budget Justification. Department of State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs. Fiscal Year 2019. Available at: (accessed 25.06.2023).

21. Renewing America’s Advantages – Interim National Security Strategic Guidance. President Joseph R. Biden, Jr. The White House, March 2021. Available at: (accessed 27.06.2021).

22. A Strategy for Democratic Renewal: Meeting the Challenges Ahead. National Endowment for Democracy, 2020. 13 p.

23. Remarks by President Biden at the Summit for Democracy Opening Session. The White House, 09.12.2021. Available at: (accessed 01.07.2023).

24. Fact Sheet: Announcing the Presidential Initiative for Democratic Renewal. The White House, 09.12.2021. Available at: (accessed 01.07.2023).

25. Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights and Labour (DRL). Functional Bureau Strategy, 22.01.2022. Available at: (accessed 01.07.2023).

26. Administrator Samantha Power Remarks at the National Press Club: “A Global Revolution of Dignity”. United States Agency for International Development, 07.06.2022. Available at: (accessed 14.07.2023).

27. Congressional Budget Justification. Department of State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs. Fiscal Year 2022. Available at: (accessed 01.07.2023).

Ссылка для цитирования:

Davydov A., Pee R. The National Endowment for Democracy at 40: Back to Basics?. Мировая экономика и международные отношения, 2023, т. 67, № 12, сс. 16-27. EDN: TOZNIG

Комментарии (0)

Нет комментариев

Добавить комментарий






Уважаемые авторы, обращаем ваше внимание, что в Перечне ВАК рецензируемых научных изданий, в которых должны быть опубликованы основные научные результаты диссертаций на соискание ученых степеней кандидата и доктора наук для журнала “МЭ и МО” зафиксированы следующие специальности:
экономические науки:
5.2.5. Мировая экономика
5.2.1. Экономическая теория
5.2.3. Региональная и отраслевая экономика
политические науки:
5.5.4. Международные отношения
5.5.1. История и теория политики
5.5.2. Политические институты, процессы, технологии
Текущий номер
т. 68, № 7, 2024
Актуальные темы номера:
  • Несущая конструкция глобальной безопасности  
  • Институциональные особенности четвертого энергетического перехода
  • Эволюция современной германской христианской демократии
  • Аравийские монархии и Центральная Азия
Отправить статью
Редакция журнала приглашает авторов к написанию аналитических статей по следующим темам:
  • изменения в процессах глобализации в современных условиях
  • формирование нового мирового порядка
  • цивилизационные сдвиги на этапе перехода к “цифровому обществу”

Также редакция заинтересована в публикации обобщающих статей / научных обзоров, раскрывающих основные тенденции в развитии отдельных регионов мира – Латинской Америки, Африки, Южной Азии и др.