1. Lipset S.M., Rokkan S. Party systems and voter alignments: Cross-national perspectives. New York, Toronto, The Free Press, 1967. 554 p.

2. Lijphart A. Patterns of democracy: Government forms and performance in thirty-six countries. New Heaven, Yale University Press, 1999. 351 p.

3. Taagapera R., Grofman B. Rethinking Duverger’s Law: Predicting the Effective Number of Parties in Plurality and PR Systems – Parties Minus Issues Equals One. European Journal of Political Research, 1985, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 341-352. Available at: https://www.socsci.uci.edu/~bgrofman/42%20Grofman.%20Rethinking%20Duverger's%20Law..pdf (accessed 12.06.2022).

4. Laakso M., Taagepera R. “Effective” Number of Parties: A measure with Application to West Europe. Comparative Political Studies, 1979, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 3-27. DOI: 10.1177/001041407901200101

5. Sartori G. Parties and Party Systems. A Framework for Analysis. Vol. 1. New York, Cambridge University Press, 1976. 368 p.

6. Blondel J. Party Systems and Patterns of Government in Western Democracies. Canadian Journal of Political Science, 1968, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 180-203.

7. Макаренко Б. и др., ред. Партии и партийные системы: современные тенденции развития. Москва, РОССПЭН, 2015. 302 с.
Makarenko B. et al., eds. Parties and party systems: current development trends. Moscow, ROSSPEN, 2015. 302 p. (In Russ.)

8. Crozier M., Huntington S., Watanuki J. The Crisis of Democracy. New York, New York University Press, 1975. 221 p.

9. Hooghe L., Marks G. Cleavage theory meets Europe’s crises: Lipset, Rokkan, and the transnational cleavage. Journal of European Public Policy, 2018, vol. 25, iss. 1, pp. 109-135. DOI: 10.1080/13501763.2017.1310279/

10. Kitchcelt H. Party Systems. The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Politics. Boix C., Stokes S., eds. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2007, pp. 522-554.

11. Dalton J., Farrell D., McAllister I. Political Parties & Democratic Linkage. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2011. 238 p.

12. Kitschelt H. The Formation of Party Cleavages in Post-Communist Democracies: Theoretical Propositions. Party Politics, 1995, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 447-472. Available at: http://rochelleterman.com/ComparativeExam/sites/default/files/Bibliography%20and%20Summaries/Kitschelt%201995.pdf (accessed 12.06.2022).

13. Харпфер К.В. и др., ред. Демократизация. Москва, Изд-во ВШЭ, 2015. 708 c.
Harper K.V. et al., eds. Democratization. Moscow, HSE Publishing House, 2015. 708 p. (In Russ.)

14. Farrell D. Electoral Systems: A Comparative Introduction. London, Palgrave Macmillan, 2011. 279 p.

15. Kirchheimer O. The Transformation of the Western European Party Systems. Political Parties and Political Development. La Palombara J., Weiner M., eds. Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press, 1966. Ch. 6, pp. 177-200.

16. Maraval J.M. Elections and the challenge of more democracy. Democracy in a Russian Mirror. Przeworski A., ed. New York, Cambridge University Press, 2015, pp. 147-172.

17. Mudde C. The 2019 EU Elections: Moving the Center. Journal of Democracy, 2019, October, vol. 30, nо. 4, pp. 20-34. DOI: 10.1353/jod.2019.0066

18. Mudde C. The Populist Zeitgeist. Government and Opposition, 2004, vol. 39, iss. 4, pp. 541-563. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-7053.2004.00135.x

19. Макаренко Б. Популизм и политические институты: сравнительная перспектива. Вестник общественного мнения, январь–июнь 2017, № 1–2 (123), сс. 8-21.
Makarenko B. Populism and Political Institutions. A Comparative Perspective. Vestnik Obshchestvennogo mneniya, Jan-June 2017, no. 1–2 (123), pp. 8-21. (In Russ.) Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/populizm-i-politicheskie-instituty-sravnitelnaya-perspektiva/viewer (accessed 12.06.2022).

20. Fagerholm A. The radical right and the radical left in contemporary Europe: two min–max definitions. Journal of Contemporary European Studies, 2018, vol. 26, iss. 4, pp. 411-424. DOI: 10.1080/14782804.2018.1515728

21. Fagerholm A. Radical right and radical left party ideologies: a pan-European mapping of necessary attributes, differences and similarities. European Politics and Society, 2018, vol. 19, iss. 5, pp. 540-55. DOI: 10.1080/23745118.2018.1474547

22. Marcos-Marne H. The Effects of Basic Human Values on Populist Voting. An Analysis of 13 European Democracies. Political Behavior, 13.02.2021. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-021-09689-8

23. Meguid B. Competition between Unequals: The Role of Mainstream Party Strategy in Niche Party Success. American Political Science Review, 2005, vol. 99, no. 3. Available at: https://web.pdx.edu/~mev/PS475_FALL_19/Meguid_Niche%20Parties.pdf (accessed 12.06.2022).

24. Mounk Y. The week democracy died. Slate, 14.08.2016. Available at: http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/cover_story/2016/08/the_week_democracy_died_how_brexit_nice_turkey_and_trump_are_all_connected.html?via=gdpr-consent (accessed 12.06.2022).

25. Eiermann M., Mounk Y., Gultchin L. European Populism: Trends, Threats and Future Prospects. Tony Blair Institute for Global Change, 29.12.2017. Available at: https://institute.global/insight/renewing-centre/european-populism-trends-threats-and-future-prospects (accessed 12.06.2022).

26. Mudde C. On Extremism and Democracy in Europe. London, Routledge, 2016. 163 p. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315622170

27. Бунин И. Выборы Макрона или выбор Франции: французская политика в 2017–2018 гг. Москва, Школа гражданского просвещения, 2018. 200 с.
Bunin I. Elections of Macron or the Choice of France: French Politics in 2017–2018. Moscow, School of Civic Education, 2018. 200 p. (In Russ.)

28. Siaroff A. Comparative European Party Systems: An Analysis of Parliamentary Elections since 1945. 2nd ed. London, Routledge, 2019. 568 p.