351Н. Кавешников, МГИМО МИД России, РФ, 119454 Москва, пр-т Вернадского, 76; Институт Европы РАН, РФ, 125993 Москва, ул. Моховая, 11-3В (n.kaveshnikov@inno.mgimo.ru)
Статья поступила в редакцию 28.12.2020.
Аннотация. В статье на примере реформы Системы торговли квотами на выброс (СТВ) парниковых газов Европейского союза проведено исследование сравнительного влияния Совета ЕС и Европарламента в обычной законодательной процедуре. Работа выполнена на основе метода отслеживания процесса. Всего проанализирован 21 важный элемент реформы, по которым позиции ЕП и Совета существенно различались. Сделан вывод, что определяющую роль в реформе СТВ играли государства-члены, а итоговые положения Директивы отражают прежде всего баланс интересов и влияния в Совете ЕС. Показано, каким образом были учтены интересы отдельных групп стран ЕС, в частности стран ЦВЕ. Идентифицирован ряд факторов, при наличии которых Европарламент способен более эффективно отстаивать свою позицию.
Ключевые слова: Европейский союз, процесс принятия решений в ЕС, обычная законодательная процедура, Европейский парламент, Совет ЕС, энергетическая политика, климатическая политика, система торговли выбросами, парниковые газы
Статья подготовлена при финансовой поддержке ИМИ МГИМО в рамках проекта № 2022-02-01.
СПИСОК ЛИТЕРАТУРЫ
1. Кавешников Н. Методы управления в Европейском союзе. Мировая экономика и международные отношения, 2015, № 8, cc. 49-60. [Kaveshnikov N. Methods of Governance in the European Union. Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya, 2015, no. 8, pp. 49-60. (In Russ.)] Available at: https://doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227-2015-8-49-60
2. Druner D., Kluver H., Mastenbroek E., Schneider G. The core or the winset? Explaining decision-making duration and policy change in the European Union. Comparative European Politics, 2018, vol. 16, pp. 271-289. DOI: 10.1057/cep.2015.26
3. Steunenberg B., Selck T.J. Testing procedural models of EU legislative decision-making. The European Union Decides. Thomson R., Stokman F.N., Achen C.H., Konig T., eds. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2006, pp. 54-85. DOI: 10.1017/cbo9780511492082.004
4. Konig T. Analysing the Process of EU Legislative Decision-Making. To Make a Long Story Short… European Union Politics, 2008, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 145-165. DOI: 10.1177/1465116507085960
5. Kluver H. and Sagarzazu I. Ideological congruency and decision-making speed: The effect of partisanship across European Union institutions. European Union Politics, 2013, vol. 14, iss. 3, pp. 388-407. DOI: 10.1177/1465116512472938
6. Rasmussen A., Reh C. The consequences of concluding co-decision early: Trilogues and intra institutional bargaining success. Journal of European Public Policy, 2013, no. 20 (7), pp. 1006-1024. DOI: 10.1080/13501763.2013.795391
7. Thomson R., Hosli M. Who Has Power in the EU? The Commission, Council and Parliament in Legislative Decisionmaking. Journal of Common Market Studies, 2006, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 391-417. DOI: 10.1080/13501763.2016.1264081
8. Mariotto C., Franchino F. Explaining outcomes of Conciliation Committee’s negotiations. Paper prepared for the “Decision making before and after Lisbon workshop”, Leiden University, 3–4 November 2011. Available at: https://www.academia.edu/1292029/Explaining_outcomes_of_Conciliation_Committees_negotiations (accessed 14.12.2020).
9. Кавешников Н.Ю. Трансформация институциональной структуры Европейского союза. Москва, Навона, 2010. 480 с. [Kaveshnikov N.Yu. Transformation of the Institutional Structure of the European Union. Moscow, MGIMO-University, Navona, 2010. 480 р.]
10. Стрежнева М. Структурирование политического пространства в Европейском союзе (многоуровневое управление). Мировая экономика и международные отношения, 2009, № 12, cc. 38-49. [Strezhneva M. Structuring the political space in the European Union (multilevel governance). Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya, 2009, no. 12, pp. 38-49. (in Russ.)]
11. Стрежнева М.В. Многоуровневое финансовое управление на пространстве Европейского союза. Вестник Московского университета. Серия 25, 2011, № 4, cc. 106-125. [Strezhneva M.V. Multilevel Financial Governance in the European Union. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 25, 2011, no. 4, pp. 106-125. (In Russ.)]
12. Кавешников Н. Создание системы торговли выбросами парниковых газов ЕС: кто определил дизайн? Современная Европа, 2017, № 6, сс. 58-69. [Kaveshnikov N. Establishment of the EU Emission Trading System: Who defined the design? Contemporary Europe, 2017, no. 6, pp. 58-69. (in Russ.)]
13. Skjaerseth J., Wettestad J. The Origin, Evolution and Consequences of the EU Emissions Trading System. Global Environmental Politics, 2009, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 101-122. DOI: 10.1162/glep.2009.9.2.101
14. Convery F. Origins and Development of EU ETS. Environmental and Resource Economics, 2009, vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 391-412. DOI: 10.1007/s10640-009-9275-7
15. Jevnaker T., Wettestad J. Ratcheting Up Carbon Trade: The Politics of Reforming EU Emissions Trading. Global Environmental Politics, 2017, vol. 17, no 2, pp. 105-124. DOI: 10.1162/GLEP_a_00403
16. George A.L., Bennett A. Case studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences. Cambridge Massachusetts, London, MIT Press, 2005. 331 p.
17. Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 October 2003 establishing a scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the Community and amending Council Directive 96/61/EC. Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/en/ALL/?uri=CELEX%3A32003L0087 (accessed 14.12.2020).
18. Directive 2009/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2009 amending Directive 2003/87/EC so as to improve and extend the greenhouse gas emission allowance trading scheme of the Community. Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32009L0029 (accessed 14.12.2020).
19. Ellerman A.D. Pricing Carbon: The European Union Emission Trading Scheme. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2010. 390 p.
20. Muuls M., Colmer J., Martin R., Wagner U.J. Evaluating the EU Emissions Trading System: Take it or leave it? An assessment of the data after ten years. Grantham Institute Briefing Paper 21. London, Imperial College, 2016. 48 p.
21. Башмаков И.А. Эффективность Европейской системы торговли квотами на выбросы ПГ и ее эволюция. Экологический вестник России, 2018, № 4, сс. 28-37. [Bashmakov I.A. Efficiency of the European Emission Trading System and its Evolution. Ekologicheskii vestnik Rossii, 2018, no. 4, pp. 28-37. (In Russ.)]
22. Branger F., Lecuyer O., Quirion P. The European Union Emissions Trading Scheme: should we throw the flagship out with the bathwater? WIREs Climate Change, 2015, vol. 6, pp. 9-16. DOI: doi.org/10.1002/wcc.326
23. European Environment Agency. Emissions Trading Viewer. Available at: https://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/dashboards/emissions-trading-viewer-1 (accessed 14.12.2020).
24. Кавешников Н. Стратегия ЕС в области климата и энергетики. Современная Европа, 2015, № 1, cc. 93-103. [Kaveshnikov N. European Union’s climate and energy strategy’. Contemporary Europe, 2015, no. 1, pp. 93-103. (In Russ.)] DOI: 10.15211/soveurope1201593103
25. European Council. Conclusions on 2030 Climate and Energy Policy Framework. SN79/14. October 23, 2014. Available at: http://data.consilium.europa.eu/doc/document/ST-169-2014-INIT/en/pdf (accessed 14.12.2020).
26. Commission. Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 2003/87/EC to enhance cost-effective emission reductions and low-carbon investments. COM(2015) 337. 15.07.2015. Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52015PC0337&from=EN (accessed 14.12.2020).
27. Rasmussen A. Twenty Years of Co-decision since Maastricht: Inter- and Intrainstitutional Implications. European Integration, 2012, no. 34 (7), pp. 735-751. DOI: 10.1080/07036337.2012.726012
28. Roederer-Rynning C. Passage to bicameralism: Lisbon’s ordinary legislative procedure at ten. Comparative European Politics, 2019, no. 17, pp. 957-973. DOI: 10.1057/s41295-018-0141-2
29. Кавешников Н. Обычная законодательная процедура в ЕС как пример кооперативных практик. Вестник МГИМО-Университета, 2021, № 14 (1), сс. 126-147. [Kaveshnikov N. Ordinary legislative procedure in the EU as an example of cooperative practices. MGIMO Review of International Relations, 2021, no. 14 (1), pp. 126-147. (In Russ.)] DOI: 10.24833/2071-8160-2021-1-76-126-147
30. Brandsma G.J. Co-decision after Lisbon: The politics of informal trilogues in European Union lawmaking. European Union Politics, 2015, no. 16 (2), pp. 300-319. DOI: 10.1177/1465116515584497
31. Amendments adopted by the European Parliament on 15 February 2017 on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 2003/87/EC. Ordinary legislative procedure: first reading. European Parliament. P8_TA (2017)0035. 15 February 2017. Available at: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2017-0035_EN.html (accessed 14.12.2020).
32. General Secretariat of the Council. General approach on Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 2003/87/EC. Agreed by the Environment Council at its meeting on 28 February 2017. ST 6841/17. 1 March 2017. Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/AUTO/?uri=consil:ST_6841_2017_INIT (accessed 14.12.2020).
33. Roederer-Rynning C., Greenwood J. The European Parliament as a Developing Legislature: Coming of Age in Trilogues? Journal of European Public Policy, 2017, no. 24 (5), pp. 735-754. DOI: 10.1080/13501763.2016.1184297
34. Directive 2018/410 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 March 2018 amending Directive 2003/87/EC to enhance cost-effective emission reductions and low-carbon investments, and Decision (EU) 2015/1814. Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32018L0410 (accessed 14.12.2020).
35. Regulation (EU) No. 421/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 April 2014 amending Directive 2003/87/EC establishing a scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the Community. Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32014R0421&from=EN (accessed 14.12.2020).
36. Commission. Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 2003/87/EC to continue current limitations of scope for aviation activities and to prepare to implement a global market-based measure from 2021. COM (2017) 54. 03.02.2017. Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=COM:2017:54:FIN (accessed 14.12.2020).
37. Treaty on European Union (Consolidated version 2016). Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/AUTO/?uri=CELEX:12016M/TXT (accessed 14.12.2020).
38. Fabbrini S., Puetter U. Integration without supranationalisation: studying the lead roles of the European Council and the Council in post-Lisbon EU politics. Journal of European Integration, 2016, vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 481-495. DOI: 10.1080/07036337.2016.1178254
39. Bickerton C., Hodson D., Puetter U. The New Intergovernmentalism: European Integration in the Post-Maastricht Era. Journal of Common Market Studies, 2014, no. 1, pp. 1-20. DOI: 10.1111/jcms.12212
Размещено в РИНЦ
Нет комментариев