1. Buzan B., Hanson L. The evolution of international security studies. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2009. 400 p.

2. Walt S. M. International relations: one world, many theories. Foreign Policy, 1998, no. 110, pp. 29-46. DOI: 10.2307/1149275

3. Haftendorn H. The security puzzle: theory-building and discipline-building in international security. International Studies Quarterly, 1991, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 3-17. DOI: 10.2307/2600386

4. Buzan B. Rethinking security after the Cold War. Cooperation and conflict. Cooperation and Conflict: Journal of the Nordic International Studies Association, 1997, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 5-28. DOI: 10.1177/0010836797032001001

5. Williams P. Transnational criminal organisations and international security. Survival, 1994, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 96-113. DOI:10.1080/00396339408442726

6. Buzan B., Waever O., Wilde de J. Security: A new framework for analysis. London, Lynne Rienner Publishers, 1998. 239 p.

7. Арбатов А. Уравнение безопасности. Москва, РОДП Яблоко, 2010. 296 с. [Arbatov A. Uravnenie bezopasnosti [Security Formula]. Moscow, RODP Yabloko, 2010. 296 p.]

8. Krause K. Theorizing security, state formation and the “Third World” in the post-Cold War world. Review of International Studies, 1998, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 125-136. DOI: 10.1017/S0260210598001259

9. Buzan B., Waever O. Regions and powers: the structure of international security. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2003. 598 p.

10. Hopf T. The promise of constructivism in international relations theory. International security, 1998, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 171-200. DOI: 10.2307/2539267

11. Freedman L. International security: changing targets. Foreign Policy, 1998, no. 110, pp. 48-63. DOI: 10.2307/1149276

12. Воскресенский А.Д. Концепции регионализации, региональных подсистем, региональных комплексов и региональных трансформаций в современных международных отношениях. Сравнительная политика, 2012, № 2 (8), cс. 30-58. [Voskresenskii A.D. Kontseptsii regionalizatsii, regional’nykh podsistem, regional’nykh kompleksov i regional’nykh transformatsii v sovremennykh mezhdunarodnykh otnosheniyakh [Concepts of Regionalization, Regional Subsystems, Regional Complexes and Regional Transformations in Contemporary IR]. Comparative Politics Russia, 2012, no. 2 (8), pp. 30-58.] DOI: 10.18611/2221-3279-2012-3-2(8)-30-58

13. Кулагин В.М. Современная международная безопасность. Москва, КНОРУС, 2012. 432 с. [Kulagin V.M. Sovremennaya mezhdunarodnaya bezopasnost’ [Modern international security]. Moscow, KNORUS, 2012. 432 p.]

14. Choucri N. Migration and security: some key linkages. Journal of International Affairs, 2002, vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 97-122.

15. Agnew J. The territorial trap: the geographical assumptions of international relations theory. Review of International Political Economy, 1994, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 53-80. DOI: 10.1080/09692299408434268

16. O’loughlin J., Anselin L. Bringing geography back to the study of international relations: Spatial dependence and regional context in Africa. International Interactions, 1991, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 29-61. DOI: 10.1080/03050629108434769

17. Vayrynen R. Regional conflict formations: An intractable problem of international relations. Journal of Peace Research, 1984, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 337-359. DOI: 10.1177/002234338402100403

18. Buhaug H., Gates S. The geography of civil war. Journal of Peace Research, 2002, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 417-433.

19. Raleigh C. Seeing the forest for the trees: does physical geography affect a state’s conflict risk? International Interactions, 2010, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 384-410. DOI: 10.1080/03050629.2010.524524

20. Юргенс И.Ю., Дынкин А.А., Барановский В.Г., под общ. ред. Архитектура евроатлантической безопасности. Москва, Экон-Информ, 2009. 124 с. [Yurgens I.Yu., Dynkin A.A., Baranovskii V.G., eds. Arkhitektura evroatlanticheskoi bezopasnosti [Euro-Atlantic Security Architecture]. Moscow, Ekon-Inform, 2009. 124 p.]

21. Тимофеев И.Н. Формула евроатлантической безопасности: стабильное сдерживание и его альтернативы. Доклад международного дискуссионного клуба “Валдай”, 2017. [Timofeev I.N. Formula evroatlanticheskoi bezopasnosti: stabil’noe sderzhivanie i ego al’ternativy [Euro-Atlantic Security Formula: Stable Containment and Alternatives]. Doklad mezhdunarodnogo diskussionnogo kluba “Valdai”, 2017 [Report of the International discussion club “Valdai”, 2017]] Available https://russiancouncil.ru/analytics-and-comments/analytics/formula-evroatlanticheskoy-bezopasnosti-stabilnoe-sderzhivanie-i-ego-alternativy/ (accessed 10.06.2020).

22. Sawada M. Global spatial autocorrelation indices – Moran’s I, Geary’s C and the general cross-product statistic. LPC publications. Available at http://www.lpc.uottawa.ca/publications/moransi/moran.htm (accessed 17.02.2020).

23. Local Spatial Autocorrelation. GeoDa. An Introduction to Spatial Data Analysis. Available at: https://geodacenter.github.io/workbook/6a_local_auto/lab6a.html (accessed 23.12.2019).

24. Anselin L. A local indicator of multivariate spatial association: extending Geary’s C. Geographical Analysis, 2019, vol. 51, no. 2, pp. 133-150. DOI: 10.1111/gean.12164

25. Окунев И.Ю. Политическая география. Москва, Аспект-Пресс, 2019. 512 c. [Okunev I.Yu. Politicheskaya geografiya [Political geography]. Moscow, Aspekt Press, 2019. 512 p.]

26. Rhodes A. Thinking in Space: The Role of Geography in National Security Decision-Making. Texas National Security Review, 2019, vol. 2, no. 1. Available at: https://tnsr.org/2019/11/thinking-in-space-the-role-of-geography-in-national-security-decision-making/ (accessed 03.02.2020).