“ìÿãêàÿ ñèëà”, êóëüòóðíûé êàïèòàë, Ïüåð Áóðäüå, êèíîèíäóñòðèÿ

ÑÏÈÑÎÊ ËÈÒÅÐÀÒÓÐÛ  

1. Nye J.S. Soft Power. Foreign policy, 1990, no. 80, pp. 153-171.
2. Nye J.S. Get Smart: Combining Hard and Soft Power. Foreign Affairs, 2009, vol. 88, no. 4, pp. 160-163.
3. Noya J. The Symbolic Power of Nations. Place Branding, 2006, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 53-67.
4. Áóðäüå Ï. Ôîðìû êàïèòàëà. Ýêîíîìè÷åñêàÿ ñîöèîëîãèÿ, 2002, ò. 3, ¹ 5, ññ. 60-74. [Bourdieu P. Formy kapitala [Forms of Capital]. Economic Sociology, 2002, vol. 3, no. 5, pp. 60-74.]
5. Bourdieu P. Social Space and Symbolic Power. Sociological Theory, 1989, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 14-25.
6. Bourdieu P., Nice R. Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge, Cambridge University press, 1977. 249 p.
7. Fan Y. Soft Power: Power of Attraction or Confusion? Place Branding and Public Diplomacy, 2008, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 147-158. DOI: 10.1057/pb.2008.4
8. Svendsen G.L.H., Svendsen G.T. On the Wealth of Nations: Bourdieuconomics and Social Capital. Theory and Society, 2003, vol. 32, no. 5-6, pp. 607-631. DOI: 10.1023/B:RYSO.0000004967.97783.c4
9. Bigo D. Pierre Bourdieu and International Relations: Power of Practices, Practices of Power. International Political Sociology, 2011, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 225-258. DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-5687.2011.00132.x
10. Adler-Nissen R., ed. Bourdieu in International Relations: Rethinking Key Concepts in IR. London, Routledge, 2012. 230 p.
11. Yang L. American Soft Power Spurred by American Dream in Hollywood Movies. Available at: http://www.academia.edu/6826345/American_Soft_Power_Spurred_by_American_Dream_In_Hollywood_Movies (accessed 04.01.2020).
12. Peng W. China, Film Coproduction and Soft Power Competition. Queensland, Queensland University of Technology, 2015. 232 p.
13. Ðàäàåâ Â.Â. Ïîíÿòèå êàïèòàëà, ôîðìû êàïèòàëîâ è èõ êîíâåðòàöèÿ. Ýêîíîìè÷åñêàÿ ñîöèîëîãèÿ, 2002, ò. 3, ¹ 4, ññ. 20-32. [Radaev V.V. Ponyatie kapitala, formy kapitalov i ikh konvertatsiya [The Definition of Capital, Forms of Capital and their Conversion]. Economic Sociology, 2002, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 20-32.]
14. Hesmondhalgh D. Bourdieu, the Media and Cultural Production. Media, Culture and Society, 2006, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 211-231. DOI: 10.1177/0163443706061682
15. Hill J. UK Film Policy, Cultural Capital and Social Exclusion. Cultural Trends, 2004, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 29-39. DOI: 10.1080/0954896042000267134
16. Heise T., Tudor A. Constructing (Film) Art: Bourdieu’s Field Model in a Comparative Context. Cultural Sociology, 2007, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 165-187. DOI:10.1177/1749975507078186
17. Kelley J.G., Simmons B.A. Politics by Number: Indicators as Social Pressure in International Relations. American Journal of Political Science, 2015, vol. 59, no. 1, pp. 55-70. DOI: 10.1111/ajps.12119
18. Elliott C., Simmons R. Determinants of UK Box Office Success: the Impact of Quality Signals. Review of Industrial Organization, 2008, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 93-111. DOI: 10.1007/s11151-008-9181-0
19. Leheny D. A Narrow Place to Cross Swords: Soft Power and the Politics of Japanese Popular Culture in East Asia. Beyond Japan: the dynamics of East Asian regionalism. Katzenstein P.J., Shiraishi T., eds. Ithaca, Cornell University Press, 2006, pp. 211-233.
20. Venice Film Festival. History 1932–2019. Available at: https://www.labiennale.org/en/history-venice-film-festival (accessed 07.06.2020).
21. Berlinale – Golden Bear Winners (1951–2020). Available at: https://rateyourmusic.com/list/samservice/berlinale-golden-bear-winners-1951-2018/ (accessed 07.06.2020).
22. Cannes award winners and runner-ups: 2019–1939. Available at: https://www.imdb.com/list/ls027347239/?sort=list_order,asc&st_dt=&mode=detail&page=1 (accessed 07.06.2020).
23. Experience over eight decades of the Oscars from 1927 to 2020. Available at: http://www.oscars.org/oscars/ceremonies (accessed 07.06.2020).
24. Marvasti A. International Trade in Cultural Goods: a Cross-Sectional Analysis. Journal of Cultural Economics, 1994, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 135-148. DOI: 10.1007/BF01078936
25. Mukherjee R. The False Promise of India’s Soft Power. Geopolitics, History and International Relations, 2014, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 46-62.
26. Êîíöåïöèÿ âíåøíåé ïîëèòèêè Ðîññèéñêîé Ôåäåðàöèè. Ìèíèñòåðñòâî èíîñòðàííûõ äåë Ðîññèéñêîé Ôåäåðàöèè, 2016. [Foreign Policy Concept of Russian Federation. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation, 2016 (In Russ.)] Available at: https://www.mid.ru/foreign_policy/official_documents/-/asset_publisher/CptICkB6BZ29/content/id/2542248 (accessed 04.01.2020).
27. Filimonov G. Russia’s soft power potential. Russia in Global Affairs, 2010, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 146-157.
28. UIS Statistics. Available at: http://data.uis.unesco.org/# (accessed 05.01.2020).
29. Ëàòóõèíà Ê. Êèíî äëÿ âñåõ. Ðîññèéñêàÿ ãàçåòà, 17.10.2019. [Latukhina K. Kino dlya vsekh [Cinema for Everyone]. Rossiyskaya Gazeta, 17.10.2019.]
30. Strukov V. Russian “Manipulative Smart Power”: Zviagintsev’s Oscar Nomination, (non-) Government Agency and Contradictions of the Globalized World. New Cinemas: Journal of Contemporary Film, 2016, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 31-49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1386/ncin.14.1.31_1