Specifics of Russian paradiplomacy in the post-Soviet space // Russian Journal of Regional Studies. 2025. Vol. 33, Issue 4 (133). P. 578-593. DOI 10.15507/2413-1407.129.033.202504.578-593.
ISSN 2413-1407
Introduction. The start of a special military operation in 2022 led to a rethinking of the priorities for the development of subnational foreign relations and an aggravation of the problem of lack of interaction with Russia's closest partners, the former territories of the USSR, which actualizes the study of the features of the paradiplomacy in the post-Soviet space. The purpose of the article is to study the specifics of paradiplomatic relations with the regions of the former Soviet republics and their participation in the development of integration processes.
Materials and Methods. The empirical basis of the study was formed by the available publications on the topic of interregional relations, the main documents regulating paradiplomatic relations, as well as materials from the websites of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation, institutional platforms through which external relations between regions and cities are carried out. The following methods are applied: historical and descriptive, comparative and qualitative content analysis.
Results. It has been revealed that the transition of the regions from solving purely practical development issues within the framework of a paradigm shift to participating in integration projects began after the growing interdependence required progressive movement towards the introduction of further mechanisms for the freedom of movement of people, goods and services. After 2022, the regions became more actively involved in paradiplomacy with the countries of the former Soviet Union, because they could help compensate for the lost supplies of goods, as well as fill the gap in cultural and leisure activities. It is determined that the objective prerequisites for interest in paradiplomacy in the post-Soviet space were the growth of interaction with business structures and societies in the wake of relocation, as well as demand from government structures. Discussion and Conclusion. The events of 2022 showed that there are significant limitations to paradiplomacy as a tool for influencing international relations, but it is a real tool for moving integration from below, through the involvement of local governments in solving common problems in the field of governance, socio-economic and problems related to cross-border threats in the post-Soviet space. The factors of trust in regional players as intermediaries of integration are the participation of representatives of non-governmental structures in projects of paradiplomacy, their focus on solving common development problems, taking into account territorial specifics. The results of the work can form the basis for further research, and will also be useful in developing foreign policy decisions by ministries and departments responsible for regional foreign relations in the post-Soviet space.
Ключевые слова: paradiplomacy | sister cities | post-Soviet space | integration | socio-economic standard of living of the population | public diplomacy | cultural diplomacy |
Размещено в РИНЦ
Ссылка при цитировании:
Rustamova L., Кальдерон А. Specifics of Russian paradiplomacy in the post-Soviet space. – Russian Journal of Regional Studies. 2025. Vol. 33, Issue 4 (133). P. 578-593. DOI 10.15507/2413-1407.129.033.202504.578-593.
ДРУГИЕ ПУБЛИКАЦИИ НА ЭТУ ТЕМУ:
Великая А.А.
Soviet public diplomacy // Place Branding and Public Diplomacy. 2020. DOI 10.1057/s41254-020-00193-0. URL: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1057%2Fs41254-020-00193-0. Published online: 13.11.2020.
Харитонова Е.М., Прохоренко И.Л.
Russian Science Diplomacy // Velikaya A., Simons G. (eds.). Russia's Public Diplomacy: Evolution and Practice. SID book series. Palgrave Macmillan. 2020. P. 133-146. DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-12874-6_8.
Бубнова Н.И.
Russia's Policy and International Cooperation: The Challenges and Opportunities of Soft Power // Velikaya A., Simons G. (eds.). Russia's Public Diplomacy: Evolution and Practice. SID book series. Palgrave Macmillan. 2020. P. 79-101. DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-12874-6_5.
Артамонова У.З.
“Popcorn Diplomacy”: American Blockbusters and World Order // Russia in Global Affairs. 2022. Vol. 20, Issue 2. P. 105-128. DOI 10.31278/1810-6374-2022-20-2-105-128.
Офицеров-Бельский Д.В.
Instrumental Factors of Soft Power in an Era of Global Turbulence // Russia in Global Affairs. 2024. Vol. 22, Issue 2. P. 179-195. DOI 10.31278/1810-6374-2024-22-2-179-195.
Никитина Е.Н., Kelman I., Sydnes A.K.
Norway-Russia disaster diplomacy for Svalbard // Safety Science. 2020. Vol. 130, P. 104896. DOI 10.1016/j.ssci.2020.104896.
Рябов А.В.
Disintegrating community or coherent region? / A.V. Ryabov // Russian Politics and Law. – 2012. – V. 50. - Issue 4. – Р. 7-22.
Устюжанцева О.В.
From Protocol to Partnership: India’s Digital Public Infrastructure // Science Diplomacy. 2025. Vol. 9, Issue 1. P. 5-9.
Семененко И.С., Бардин А.Л., Лапкин В.В., Пантин В.И.
Between the state and the nation: Dilemmas of identity politics in post-soviet societie [Text] / I. Semenenko, V. Lapkin, A. Bardin, V. Pantin // Social Sciences. – 2018. – Vol. 49. – Issue 2. – P. 52-74. DOI: 10.21557/SSC.51262187.
Monitoring of Mutual Investments in the CIS / Writing team: A.V. Kuznetsov (leader of the writing team), Y.D. Kvashnin, E.A. Sidorova, S.B. Khavronin, Institute of World Economy and International Relations (IMEMO) ; Project coordinator: A.M. Anisimov. Report № 6. Saint Petersburg, EDB Centre for Integration Studies, 2012, 52 p. (перевод с русск.)
Квашнин Ю.Д.
Mutual Direct Investment in the Commonwealth of Independent States: Problems, Prospects, and Lessons of the Ukrainian Crisis [Text] / Yu.D. Kvashnin // Studies on Russian Economic Development. – 2016. – Vol. 27. – № 2. – P. 222 – 229.
Притчин С.А.
Middle powers' in the post-Soviet space in the context of the necessity for regionalization of international relations // Caucasus. Strategic Perspectives. 2024. Issue 1. P. 93-100.
Ленчук Е.Б., Войтоловский Ф.Г., Кувалин Д.
Strategic Planning in Public Administration: Experience, Opportunities and Prospects // Studies on Russian Economic Development. 2020. Vol. 31, Issue 6. P. 621-628. DOI 10.1134/S1075700720060106.
Жуков С.В., Копытин И.А., Масленников А.О., Синицын М.В.
Oil Exporting Countries: Analysis of Economic Growth Opportunities Through Export Diversification in a Low-Carbon World // Studies on Russian Economic Developmen. 2023. Vol. 34, Issue 5. P. 573-582. DOI 10.1134/S1075700723050179.
Цапенко И.П.
An Intercultural Program of Migrant Integration [Text] / I.P. Tsapenko // Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences. – 2017. – Vol. 87. – № 5. – P. 454-463.
Наумкин В.В.
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia in the Late 1920-s – Early 1930-s: Lessons from the Soviet – British Competition // Современная Европа. 2023. № 5. С. 161-177. DOI 10.31857/S0201708323050133.
Прокопова С., Усенюк-Кравчук С., Устюжанцева О.В.
Beyond the physical: Conceptual model of intangible comfort in Russian Arctic cities // New Design Ideas . 2025. Vol. 9, Issue 1. P. 77-101. DOI 10.62476/ndi.91.77.
Афонцев С.А.
The Urban Household in Russia and the Soviet Union, 1900–2000: Patterns of Family Formation in a Turbulent Century / S. Afontsev, G. Kessler, A. Markevich, V. Tyazhelnikova, T. Valetov // The History of the Family. – 2008. – V.13. – Issue 2. – P. 178–194.
Голунов С.В.
Book review: Ilya Yablokov, Fortress Russia: Conspiracy Theories in Post-Soviet Russia [Cambridge and Medford, MA: Polity, 2018. 288 p.] // Political Studies Review. – 2020. – Vol. 18, Issue 4. – P. NP23-NP24. DOI 10.1177/1478929920903643.
Клинова М.В.
The Transformation of State Enterprises in Russian Networks, 1990-2005 / Transforming public enterprise in Europe and North America: networks, integration and transnationalisation. Ed. by J. Clifton, F. Comín, D. Díaz-Fuentes. London: PALGRAVE MACMILLAN, 2007. - P. 157-171.
Еще публикации по теме






Нет комментариев