Russia’s implementation of the Polar Code on the Northern Sea Route // Polar Journal. 2021. Vol. 11, Issue 1. P. 30-42. DOI 10.1080/2154896X.2021.1911044.
DOI 10.1080/2154896X.2021.1911044
Russia has taken numerous steps to harmonise its national legislation with the provisions of the Polar Code. Since its entry into force, there have been a small number of registered violations of the Polar Code on the Northern Sea Route (NSR). To a large extent, this could be explained by the fact that the bulk of navigation on the NSR falls out of the scope of the Polar Code. Another reason is that Russia continues to implement its national navigation rules, which in some cases impose stricter requirements than those of the Polar Code. However, potential risks related to the navigation of vessels in violation of the Polar Code in Arctic waters should not be underestimated. This article also proposes the establishment of an Arctic Port State Control mechanism to address potential challenges associated with the implementation of the Code in the future.
Ключевые слова: Arctic | Russia | Polar Code | maritime safety | port state control | Northern Sea Route | law of the sea |
Ссылка при цитировании:
Todorov A. Russia’s implementation of the Polar Code on the Northern Sea Route. – Polar Journal. 2021. Vol. 11, Issue 1. P. 30-42. DOI 10.1080/2154896X.2021.1911044.
ДРУГИЕ ПУБЛИКАЦИИ НА ЭТУ ТЕМУ:
Тодоров А.А.
Coping with deficiencies in the Polar Code: a Russian perspective // Polar Journal. 2020. DOI 10.1080/2154896X.2020.1799615. URL: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/2154896X.2020.1799615?journalCode=rpol20. Published online: 07.09.2020.
Тодоров А.А.
Dire straits of the Russian Arctic: Options and challenges for a potential US FONOP in the Northern Sea Route // Marine Policy. 2022. Vol. 139, Art. 105020. DOI 10.1016/j.marpol.2022.105020.
Вылегжанин А., Буник И., Торкунова Е., Киенко Е.В.
Navigation in the Northern Sea Route: interaction of Russian and international applicable law // Polar Journal. 2020. Vol. 10, Issue 2. P. 285-302. DOI 10.1080/2154896X.2020.1844404.
Григорьев М.Н.
Development of Transit Potential of the Northern Sea Route // Контуры глобальных трансформаций: политика, экономика, право. 2021. Vol. 14, Special Issue. P. 81-97. DOI 10.23932/2542-0240-2019-12-5-109-129.
Куприянов А.В.
Constructing the Arcto-Pacific: New Challenges and Opportunities // Russia in Global Affairs. 2020. Issue 4. P. 178-191. DOI 10.31278/1810-6374-2020-18-4-178-191
Загорский А.В.
Konflikt in den Köpfen: Kritik der Versicherheitlichung der Arktis // Osteuropa. 2020. Issue 5. P. 81-98. DOI 10.35998/oe-2020-0031.
Пусенкова Н.Н.
Arctic Offshore Oil in Russia: Optimism, Pessimism and Realism // Контуры глобальных трансформаций: политика, экономика, право. 2021. Vol. 14, Special Issue. P. 62-80. DOI 10.23932/2542-0240-2019-12-5-86-108.
Хантингтон Х., Олсен Дж., Загорский А.В.
Effects of Arctic commercial shipping on environments and communities: context, governance, priorities // Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment. 2023. Vol. 118, Art. 103731. DOI 10.1016/j.trd.2023.103731.
Russia: arms control, disarmament and international security. IMEMO supplement to the Russian edition of the SIPRI Yearbook 2019 / ed. by Alexey Arbatov, Sergey Oznobishchev and Marianna Yevtodyeva. – Moscow: IMEMO, 2020. – 175 p.
Хантингтон Генри П., Загорский А.В., Кальтенборн Бьорн П., Хен Чхоль Шин, Доусон Д., Лукин М., Даль П., Пейцин Го, Томас Д.
Societal implications of a changing Arctic Ocean // Ambio. 2021. DOI 10.1007/s13280-021-01601-2. URL: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs13280-021-01601-2. Published: 19.07.2021.
Никитина Е.Н.
Сlimate Change in the Arctic: Adaptation to New Challenges // Контуры глобальных трансформаций: политика, экономика, право. 2021. Vol. 14, Special Issue. P. 111-128. DOI 10.23932/2542-0240-2019-12-5-177-200.
Тодоров А.А.
Russia in maritime areas off Spitsbergen (Svalbard): Is it worth opening the Pandora's Box? // Marine Policy. 2020. DOI 10.1016/j.marpol.2020.104264. URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0308597X20309106?via%3Dihub#!. Published online: 22.10.2020.
Никитина Е.Н., Kelman I., Sydnes A.K.
Norway-Russia disaster diplomacy for Svalbard // Safety Science. 2020. Vol. 130, P. 104896. DOI 10.1016/j.ssci.2020.104896.
Гудев П.А.
Les problématiques et perspectives de la route maritime arctique [Text] / P. A. Gudev // Perspectives Libres. – 2019. – Issue №24-25. – Р. 173-212. – URL:https://cerclearistote.com/2019/05/parution-du-perspectives-libres-n24-les-nouvelles-routes-de-la-soie/
Канаев Е.А., Сумский В.В.
Russia’s Place in a Polycentric Naval Setup [Text] / V. Sumsky, E. Kanaev // Maritime Affairs: Journal of the National Maritime Foundation of India. – 2015. – V. 24. – Issue 2. – P. 9 – 15.
Загорский А.В.
The Future of European Arms Control and the OSCE after the War in Ukraine // Security and Human Rights Monitor. 2024. DOI 10.58866/DIFB8733. URL: https://www.shrmonitor.org/the-future-of-european-arms-control-and-the-osce-after-the-war-in-ukraine/.
Арбатов А.Г.
Arms control in outer space: The Russian angle, and a possible way forward [Text] / A. Arbatov // Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. – 2019. – Vol. 75. – Issue 4. – P. 151-161. DOI: 10.1080/00963402.2019.1628475.
Загорский А.В.
Arms Control Must Remain the Goal // Arms Control Today. 2022. Vol. 52, URL: https://www.armscontrol.org/act/2022-04/features/arms-control-must-remain-goal. Date of publication: 04.04.2022.
Степанова Е.А.
The “Islamic State” as a Security Problem for Russia: The Nature and Scale of the Threat [Text] / E. Stepanova // PONARS Eurasia Policy Memos. – 2015. – № 393. – С. 1 – 6.
Луконин С.А.
Far East Development Policy in Putin's Fourth Term and New Directions for Korea - Russia Economic Cooperation [Text] / Joungho Park, Boogyun Kang, Jiyoung Min, Sergey Lukonin, Olga Kuznetsova // World Economy Brief. – 2019. – Vol. 9. – Issue 2. – P. 2233-9140.
Еще публикации по теме
Нет комментариев