Аничкина Т.Б.
Limit missile defense - or expand it?: A Russian response [Text] / T. Anichkina // Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. – 2015. – V. 71. – Issue 2. – Р. 17 – 20.
Тип публикации:


ISSN 0096-3402 (Print), 1938-3282 (Online)

DOI 10.1177/0096340215571903

Since 2002, when the United States withdrew from the Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty, the international arms control regime has included no limits on missile defense. Washington wants to keep it that way, insisting that it "will continue to reject any negotiated restraints on US ballistic missile defenses." Many experts believe that missile defense undermines strategic stability; but some argue that missile defense can play a role in denuclearization. Here, Wu Riqiang of China (2015), Tatiana Anichkina of Russia, and Oliver Thränert of Germany (2015) debate whether arms control arrangements should include limits on missile defense—or whether advances in missile defense should be encouraged because they might contribute to disarmament. 
 
Журнал входит в базу данных Web of Sciense, Scopus.

Ключевые слова: anti-ballistic missile treaty | China | intermediate-range nuclear forces | treatymissile defense adaptive approach | radar | Russia | strategic stability | third site | United States |

Размещено в РИНЦ


Ссылка при цитировании:

Anichkina T. Limit missile defense - or expand it?: A Russian response. – Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. – 2015. – V. 71. – Issue 2. – Р. 17 – 20.




ДРУГИЕ ПУБЛИКАЦИИ НА ЭТУ ТЕМУ:

Савельев А.Г.
Nuclear Deterrence, Strategic Stability, Missile Defence // Russia in Global Affairs. 2023. Vol. 21, Issue 4 (84). P. 10-23. DOI 10.31278/1810-6374-2023-21-4-10-23.

Арбатов А.Г.
Arms control in outer space: The Russian angle, and a possible way forward [Text] / A. Arbatov // Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. – 2019. – Vol. 75. – Issue 4. – P. 151-161. DOI: 10.1080/00963402.2019.1628475.

Арбатов А.Г.
The vicissitudes of Russian missile defense [Text] / А. Arbatov // Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. – 2018. – Vol. 74. – Issue 4. – P. 227-237. DOI: 10.1080/00963402.2018.1486595

Аничкина Т.Б.
The future of US-Russian nuclear deterrence and arms control [Text] / T. Anichkina, A. Pezceli, N. Roth // Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. – 2017. – Vol. 73. – No 4. – P. 271-278.

Савельев А.Г., Александрия О.
What Factors Affect Strategic Stability? // Russia in Global Affairs. 2022. Vol. 20, Issue 1. P. 93-111. DOI 10.31278/1810-6374-2022-20-1-93-111.

Арбатов А.Г.
Saving Nuclear Arms Control [Text] / A. Arbatov // Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. – 2016. – Vol. 72. – № 3. – P. 165 – 170.

Арбатов А.Г.
Global Stability in the Nuclear World // Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences. 2021. Vol. 91, Issue 3. P. 364-373. DOI 10.1134/S1019331621030023.

Савельев А.Г.
China and Nuclear Arms Control // Russia in Global Affairs. 2020. Vol. 18, Issue 3 (71). P. 54-69. DOI 10.31278/1810-6374-2020-18-3-54-69.

Кютт М., Кюн У., Стефанович Д.В.
Remote monitoring: Verifying geographical arms limits // Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. 2023. Vol. 79, Issue 1. P. 17-21. DOI 10.1080/00963402.2022.2155006.

Евтодьева М.Г.
Development of the Chinese A2/AD System in the Context of US–China Relations // Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences. 2022. Vol. 92, Issue Suppl. 6. P. S534–S542. DOI 10.1134/S1019331622120048.

Non-Nuclear Factors of Nuclear Disarmament (Ballistic Missile Defense, High-Precision Conventional Weapons, Space Arms). Alexei Arbatov, Vladimir Dvorkin, Sergey Oznobishchev. Moscow, IMEMO RAN, 2010, 67 p.

Борейко А.В., Вернигора А.А., Кислицын С.В.
The Infrastructure Competition between the United States and China in Developing Countries // Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences. 2022. Vol. 92, Issue Suppl. 7. P. S627–S635. DOI 10.1134/S1019331622130159.

Селезнева Д.А.
Negotiations on Articles I and II of NPT: History and Lessons Learned In: Orlov, V.A., Semenov, S.D. (eds) Russian-American Nuclear Nonproliferation Dialogue: Lessons Learned and Road Ahead. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. 2022. P. 17-47. DOI 10.1007/978-981-19-1716-5_3.

Дынкин А.А., Пантин В.И.
A Peaceful Clash. The US and China: Which Model Holds Out Promise for the Future? [Text] / A. Dynkin, V. Pantin // World Futures: The Journal of Global Education. – 2012.– V.68. – Issue 7. – P. 506 – 517.

Топычканов П.В.
Nuclear disarmament summits: A proposal to break the international impasse [Text] / K. Davenport, J. Puglierin, P. Topychkanov // Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. – 2017. – V. 73. – No 4. – P. 264-270.

Куприянов А.В.
Exploring the Impact of Submarine Saturation on Strategic Stability in South Asia // The National Security Journal. 2022. Vol. 3, Issue 4. Art. 8. DOI 10.36878/nsj20220227.08.

Макаревич Г.Г.
Same Same, but Different: Strategic Relations in the Russia-India-China-U.S. Quadrangle // Russia in Global Affairs. 2023. Vol. 21, Issue 3. P. 205-208. DOI 10.31278/1810-6374-2023-21-3-205-208.

Problems and prospects of Russia – US / NATO cooperation in the sphere of ballistic missile defense. Executive editor: Trubnikov V.I. - Moscow, IMEMO RAN, 2011. - 40 p.

Арбатов А.Г.
Understanding of the US-Russia Nuclear Schism [Text] / A. Arbatov // Survival. – 2017. – Vol. 59. – No 2. – P. 33-66.

Мишин И.О.
U.S. Policy in the South China Sea During the Presidency of D. Trump // Russian Politics & Law. 2021. Vol. 58, Issue 3-4. P. 155-172. DOI 10.1080/10611940.2022.2111939. URL: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/10611940.2022.2111939?journalCode=mrup20. Published online: 06.10.2022
Еще публикации по теме


Комментарии (0)

Нет комментариев

Добавить комментарий







Актуальные комментарии
Новости Института
19.07.2024

На протяжении 2023 г. динамика развития мировой экономики находилась под мощным влиянием геополитических факторов, связанных с вооружённым конфликтом на территории Украины и сопутствующим санкционным противостоянием России с ведущими экономически развитыми странами. Аналитика Сергея Афонцева на сайте РСМД.

подробнее...

19.07.2024

На сайте РСМД опубликована статья Александра Ломанова и Леонида Гамзы «Китай: поиск устойчивого роста». Анализируются главные направления и тенденции развития Китая в 2023 году. Рассмотрено поступательное развитие российско-китайских связей и дальнейшее укрепление двусторонних отношений всестороннего стратегического партнерства.

подробнее...

Вышли из печати