Аничкина Т.Б.
Limit missile defense - or expand it?: A Russian response [Text] / T. Anichkina // Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. – 2015. – V. 71. – Issue 2. – Р. 17 – 20.
ISSN 0096-3402 (Print), 1938-3282 (Online)
DOI: 10.1177/0096340215571903
Limit missile defense - or expand it?: A Russian response [Text] / T. Anichkina // Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. – 2015. – V. 71. – Issue 2. – Р. 17 – 20.
Тип публикации:
ISSN 0096-3402 (Print), 1938-3282 (Online)
DOI: 10.1177/0096340215571903
Since 2002, when the United States withdrew from the Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty, the international arms control regime has included no limits on missile defense. Washington wants to keep it that way, insisting that it "will continue to reject any negotiated restraints on US ballistic missile defenses." Many experts believe that missile defense undermines strategic stability; but some argue that missile defense can play a role in denuclearization. Here, Wu Riqiang of China (2015), Tatiana Anichkina of Russia, and Oliver Thränert of Germany (2015) debate whether arms control arrangements should include limits on missile defense—or whether advances in missile defense should be encouraged because they might contribute to disarmament.
Журнал входит в базу данных Web of Sciense, Scopus.
Ключевые слова: anti-ballistic missile treaty | China | intermediate-range nuclear forces | treatymissile defense adaptive approach | radar | Russia | strategic stability | third site | United States |
Размещено в РИНЦ
Ссылка при цитировании:
Anichkina T. Limit missile defense - or expand it?: A Russian response. – Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. – 2015. – V. 71. – Issue 2. – Р. 17 – 20.
ДРУГИЕ ПУБЛИКАЦИИ НА ЭТУ ТЕМУ:
Арбатов А.Г.
Arms control in outer space: The Russian angle, and a possible way forward [Text] / A. Arbatov // Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. – 2019. – Vol. 75. – Issue 4. – P. 151-161. DOI: 10.1080/00963402.2019.1628475.
Арбатов А.Г.
The vicissitudes of Russian missile defense [Text] / А. Arbatov // Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. – 2018. – Vol. 74. – Issue 4. – P. 227-237. DOI: 10.1080/00963402.2018.1486595
Аничкина Т.Б.
The future of US-Russian nuclear deterrence and arms control [Text] / T. Anichkina, A. Pezceli, N. Roth // Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. – 2017. – Vol. 73. – No 4. – P. 271-278.
Савельев А.Г., Александрия О.
What Factors Affect Strategic Stability? // Russia in Global Affairs. 2022. Vol. 20, Issue 1. P. 93-111. DOI 10.31278/1810-6374-2022-20-1-93-111.
Арбатов А.Г.
Saving Nuclear Arms Control [Text] / A. Arbatov // Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. – 2016. – Vol. 72. – № 3. – P. 165 – 170.
Арбатов А.Г.
Global Stability in the Nuclear World // Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences. 2021. Vol. 91, Issue 3. P. 364-373. DOI 10.1134/S1019331621030023.
Савельев А.Г.
China and Nuclear Arms Control // Russia in Global Affairs. 2020. Vol. 18, Issue 3 (71). P. 54-69. DOI 10.31278/1810-6374-2020-18-3-54-69.
Non-Nuclear Factors of Nuclear Disarmament (Ballistic Missile Defense, High-Precision Conventional Weapons, Space Arms). Alexei Arbatov, Vladimir Dvorkin, Sergey Oznobishchev. Moscow, IMEMO RAN, 2010, 67 p.
Дынкин А.А., Пантин В.И.
A Peaceful Clash. The US and China: Which Model Holds Out Promise for the Future? [Text] / A. Dynkin, V. Pantin // World Futures: The Journal of Global Education. – 2012.– V.68. – Issue 7. – P. 506 – 517.
Топычканов П.В.
Nuclear disarmament summits: A proposal to break the international impasse [Text] / K. Davenport, J. Puglierin, P. Topychkanov // Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. – 2017. – V. 73. – No 4. – P. 264-270.
Куприянов А.В.
Exploring the Impact of Submarine Saturation on Strategic Stability in South Asia // The National Security Journal. 2022. Vol. 3, Issue 4. Art. 8. DOI 10.36878/nsj20220227.08.
Problems and prospects of Russia – US / NATO cooperation in the sphere of ballistic missile defense. Executive editor: Trubnikov V.I. - Moscow, IMEMO RAN, 2011. - 40 p.
Арбатов А.Г.
Understanding of the US-Russia Nuclear Schism [Text] / A. Arbatov // Survival. – 2017. – Vol. 59. – No 2. – P. 33-66.
Киреева А., Куприянов А.В.
Russia and Quad Plus Is There a Way Forward? // Journal of Indo-Pacific Affairs. 2020. Vol. 3, Issue 5. P. 210-228.
The prospects of engaging European nuclear-weapon states in strategic arms control. Edited by Alexei Arbatov, Vladimir Dvorkin, Sergey Oznobishchev. Moscow, IMEMO RAN, 2012, 94 p.
Карасев П.А.
Cyber factors of Strategic Stability // Russia in Global Affairs. 2020. Vol. 18, Issue 3 (71). P. 24-52. DOI 10.31278/1810-6374-2020-18-3-24-52.
Стефанович Д.В.
Missile Trends in South-East Asia // Новый оборонный заказ. Стратегии. 2022. № 1 (72). P. 71-76.
Войтоловский Ф.Г.
Transformation of External Conditions for the National Security of Russia [Text] / F. G. Voitolovskii // Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences. – 2019. – Vol. 89. – Issue 2. – P. 128-133. DOI: 10.1134/S1019331619020254
Куприянов А.В.
Cold War as a Special Type of Conflict: A Strategic Sketch // Russia in Global Affairs. 2022. Vol. 20, Issue 1. P. 78-93. DOI 10.31278/1810-6374-2022-20-1-78-92.
Войтоловский Ф.Г.
US Strategy in a Changing World Order: Challenges for Russia // Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences. 2021. Vol. 91, Issue 4. P. 393-402. DOI 10.1134/S1019331621040080.
Еще публикации по теме
![Limit missile defense - or expand it?: A Russian response [Text] / T. Anichkina // Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. – 2015. – V. 71. – Issue 2. – Р. 17 – 20.](/dreamedit/pfoto/C608158D_B98F_09F8_BF60_6011E7758B84_b.jpg)






Нет комментариев