Аничкина Т.Б.
Limit missile defense - or expand it?: A Russian response [Text] / T. Anichkina // Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. – 2015. – V. 71. – Issue 2. – Р. 17 – 20.
Тип публикации:


ISSN 0096-3402 (Print), 1938-3282 (Online)

DOI 10.1177/0096340215571903

Since 2002, when the United States withdrew from the Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty, the international arms control regime has included no limits on missile defense. Washington wants to keep it that way, insisting that it "will continue to reject any negotiated restraints on US ballistic missile defenses." Many experts believe that missile defense undermines strategic stability; but some argue that missile defense can play a role in denuclearization. Here, Wu Riqiang of China (2015), Tatiana Anichkina of Russia, and Oliver Thränert of Germany (2015) debate whether arms control arrangements should include limits on missile defense—or whether advances in missile defense should be encouraged because they might contribute to disarmament. 
 
Журнал входит в базу данных Web of Sciense, Scopus.

Ключевые слова: anti-ballistic missile treaty | China | intermediate-range nuclear forces | treatymissile defense adaptive approach | radar | Russia | strategic stability | third site | United States |

Размещено в РИНЦ


Ссылка при цитировании:

Anichkina T. Limit missile defense - or expand it?: A Russian response. – Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. – 2015. – V. 71. – Issue 2. – Р. 17 – 20.




ДРУГИЕ ПУБЛИКАЦИИ НА ЭТУ ТЕМУ:

Савельев А.Г.
Nuclear Deterrence, Strategic Stability, Missile Defence // Russia in Global Affairs. 2023. Vol. 21, Issue 4 (84). P. 10-23. DOI 10.31278/1810-6374-2023-21-4-10-23.

Арбатов А.Г.
Arms control in outer space: The Russian angle, and a possible way forward [Text] / A. Arbatov // Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. – 2019. – Vol. 75. – Issue 4. – P. 151-161. DOI: 10.1080/00963402.2019.1628475.

Арбатов А.Г.
The vicissitudes of Russian missile defense [Text] / А. Arbatov // Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. – 2018. – Vol. 74. – Issue 4. – P. 227-237. DOI: 10.1080/00963402.2018.1486595

Аничкина Т.Б.
The future of US-Russian nuclear deterrence and arms control [Text] / T. Anichkina, A. Pezceli, N. Roth // Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. – 2017. – Vol. 73. – No 4. – P. 271-278.

Арбатов А.Г.
Controlling Nuclear Arms in a Multipolar World // Survival. 2024. Vol. 66, Issue 6. P. 87-102. DOI 10.1080/00396338.2024.2432195.

Савельев А.Г., Александрия О.
What Factors Affect Strategic Stability? // Russia in Global Affairs. 2022. Vol. 20, Issue 1. P. 93-111. DOI 10.31278/1810-6374-2022-20-1-93-111.

Арбатов А.Г.
Saving Nuclear Arms Control [Text] / A. Arbatov // Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. – 2016. – Vol. 72. – № 3. – P. 165 – 170.

Арбатов А.Г.
Global Stability in the Nuclear World // Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences. 2021. Vol. 91, Issue 3. P. 364-373. DOI 10.1134/S1019331621030023.

Савельев А.Г.
China and Nuclear Arms Control // Russia in Global Affairs. 2020. Vol. 18, Issue 3 (71). P. 54-69. DOI 10.31278/1810-6374-2020-18-3-54-69.

Кютт М., Кюн У., Стефанович Д.В.
Remote monitoring: Verifying geographical arms limits // Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. 2023. Vol. 79, Issue 1. P. 17-21. DOI 10.1080/00963402.2022.2155006.

Евтодьева М.Г.
Development of the Chinese A2/AD System in the Context of US–China Relations // Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences. 2022. Vol. 92, Issue Suppl. 6. P. S534–S542. DOI 10.1134/S1019331622120048.

Non-Nuclear Factors of Nuclear Disarmament (Ballistic Missile Defense, High-Precision Conventional Weapons, Space Arms). Alexei Arbatov, Vladimir Dvorkin, Sergey Oznobishchev. Moscow, IMEMO RAN, 2010, 67 p.

Борейко А.В., Вернигора А.А., Кислицын С.В.
The Infrastructure Competition between the United States and China in Developing Countries // Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences. 2022. Vol. 92, Issue Suppl. 7. P. S627–S635. DOI 10.1134/S1019331622130159.

Селезнева Д.А.
Negotiations on Articles I and II of NPT: History and Lessons Learned In: Orlov, V.A., Semenov, S.D. (eds) Russian-American Nuclear Nonproliferation Dialogue: Lessons Learned and Road Ahead. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. 2022. P. 17-47. DOI 10.1007/978-981-19-1716-5_3.

Дынкин А.А., Пантин В.И.
A Peaceful Clash. The US and China: Which Model Holds Out Promise for the Future? [Text] / A. Dynkin, V. Pantin // World Futures: The Journal of Global Education. – 2012.– V.68. – Issue 7. – P. 506 – 517.

Куприянов А.В.
Exploring the Impact of Submarine Saturation on Strategic Stability in South Asia // The National Security Journal. 2022. Vol. 3, Issue 4. Art. 8. DOI 10.36878/nsj20220227.08.

Топычканов П.В.
Nuclear disarmament summits: A proposal to break the international impasse [Text] / K. Davenport, J. Puglierin, P. Topychkanov // Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. – 2017. – V. 73. – No 4. – P. 264-270.

Problems and prospects of Russia – US / NATO cooperation in the sphere of ballistic missile defense. Executive editor: Trubnikov V.I. - Moscow, IMEMO RAN, 2011. - 40 p.

Макаревич Г.Г.
Same Same, but Different: Strategic Relations in the Russia-India-China-U.S. Quadrangle // Russia in Global Affairs. 2023. Vol. 21, Issue 3. P. 205-208. DOI 10.31278/1810-6374-2023-21-3-205-208.

Арбатов А.Г.
Understanding of the US-Russia Nuclear Schism [Text] / A. Arbatov // Survival. – 2017. – Vol. 59. – No 2. – P. 33-66.
Еще публикации по теме


Комментарии (0)

Нет комментариев

Добавить комментарий







Актуальные комментарии
Новости Института
27.03.2025

Состоялся научно-теоретический семинар «Международные отношения без отношений? Европейские исследования в условиях международной напряженности». Организаторы – Базовая кафедра ИМЭМО РАН в МГИМО МИД России совместно с Советом молодых ученых ИМЭМО РАН.

подробнее...

26.03.2025

Сотрудники ИМЭМО РАН приняли участие во Всероссийской научной конференции «Британия в первый год правления правительства лейбористов: политические и экономические проблемы», организованной Центром британских исследований Института Европы РАН.

подробнее...

Вышли из печати