Four Methodenstreits between behavioral and mainstream economics [Text] / V. Avtonomov // Journal of Economic Methodology. – 2019. – Vol. 26. – Issue 3. – P. 179-194. DOI: 10.1080/1350178X.2019.1625206
The concept of Methodenstreits is used to analyse the relationship between behavioral and mainstream economics. A Methodenstreit is understood by the authors as a dispute between the more abstract and the less abstract canons of the economic science. It undergoes several necessary stages: discovery of a new research instrument, an exaggerated debate between the canons, and mutual enrichement after the debate. The article reviews the following Methodenstreits: empirical investigations of Hall, Hitch, and Lester vs neoclassical theory of the firm (the ‘full cost controversy’ and the ‘marginalist controversy’); Katona’s consumer research vs Keynesian macroeconomics; Simon’s bounded rationality approach vs neoclassical maximization; and experiments of Allais and others vs expected utility theory.
Ключевые слова: Methodenstreit | mainstream | neoclassical economics | behavioral economics | marginalist controversy | Katona | Simon | Allais |
Ссылка при цитировании:
Avtonomov V. Four Methodenstreits between behavioral and mainstream economics. – Journal of Economic Methodology. – 2019. – Vol. 26. – Issue 3. – P. 179-194. DOI: 10.1080/1350178X.2019.1625206
ДРУГИЕ ПУБЛИКАЦИИ НА ЭТУ ТЕМУ:
Капелюшников Р.И.
Behavioral economics and new paternalism [Text] / R. Kapeliushnikov // Russian Journal of Economics. – 2015. – Volume 1. – Issue 1. – Р. 81 – 107.
Автономов В.C.
Austrian economics and its reception in different countries [Text] / V. Avtonomov // Russian Journal of Economics. – 2018. – Vol. 4. – Issue 1. – P. 1-7. DOI: 10.3897/j.ruje.4.26012.
Автономов В.C.
The Austrian school of economics in Russia: From criticism and rejection to absorption and adoption [Text] / V. Avtonomov, N. Makasheva // Russian Journal of Economics. – 2018. – Vol. 4. – Issue 1. – P. 31-43. DOI: 10.3897/j.ruje.4.26002.
Кудров В.М.
Модернизация и инновации – главные моторы современного прогресса / В.М. Кудров // Современная Европа. – 2012. – № 3. – С. 65–76.
Салицкий А.И., Таций В.В.
Зарождение биполярности или солидерство? / А.И. Салицкий, В.В. Таций // Восток. Афро-Азиатские общества: История и современность. – 2012. – № 3. – С. 87–97.
Загорский А.В.
German Policy through the Lens of Russian Mainstream Thinking [Text] / A. Zagorski // German Politics. – 2018. – Vol. 27. – Issue 4. – P. 573-590. DOI: 10.1080/09644008.2018.1481954.
Белянин А.В.
Ричард Талер и поведенческая экономика: от лабораторных экспериментов к практике подталкивания (Нобелевская премия по экономике 2017 года) [Текст] = Richard Thaler and behavioral economics: From the lab experiments to the practice of nudging (Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences 2017) / А. В. Белянин // Вопросы экономики = Voprosy Ekonomiki. – 2018. – № 1. – С. 5-25.
Автономов В.C.
The Fate of "Grand Theories" in Economics // Social Sciences. 2024. Vol. 55, Issue 2. P. 66-75. DOI 10.21557/SSC.98116371.
Д. Люссанж, Белянин А.В., С. Буржуа-Жиронд, Б. Гуткин
Learning and cognition in financial markets: A paradigm shift for agent-based models. Intelligent Systems Conference, IntelliSys 2020. London; United Kingdom, 3-4.09.2020 // Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing (AISC) book series. 2021. Vol. 1252 : Intelligent Systems and Applications. P. 241-255. DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-55190-2_19.
Капелюшников Р.И.
Whither modern economics? Subjective semi-sociological observations [Text] / Rostislav Kapeliushnikov Rostislav // Russian Journal of Economics. – 2018. – Vol. 4. – Issue 3. – P. 285-304. DOI: 10.3897/j.ruje.4.30171.
Габарта А.А., Коммиссарова Ж., Волков А.М.
European Union // Bulatov, A. (ed.) World Economy and International Business. Contributions to Economics book series. Springer, Cham. 2023. P. 299-336. DOI 10.1007/978-3-031-20328-2_16.
Касаткин П., Сумин А., Шелюбская Н.В.
International Knowledge Transfer // Bulatov, A. (ed.) World Economy and International Business. Contributions to Economics book series. Springer, Cham. 2023. P. 765-781. DOI 10.1007/978-3-031-20328-2_38.
Капелюшников Р.И.
О современном состоянии экономической науки: полусоциологические наблюдения [Текст] = On current state of economics: Subjective semi-sociological observations / Р. И. Капелюшников // Вопросы экономики = Voprosy Ekonomiki. – 2018. – № 5. – С. 110-128.
Капелюшников Р.И.
Polarization or upgrading? Evolution of employment in transitional Russia [Text] / R. Kapeliushnikov // Russian Journal of Economics. – 2016. – Vol. 2. – № 2. – P. 192 – 218.
Иллерицкий Н.И.
Issues of Natural Gas Infrastructure Development in South-Eastern Europe [Text] / G. O. Khalova, E. A. Isayeva, N. I. Illeritsky, V. A. Smirnova // International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy. – 2019. – Vol. 9. – Issue 6. – P. 415-420. DOI: 10.32479/ijeep.8548.
Белянин А.В., Денисова И.А.
Бедность не порок, но научная проблема (Нобелевская премия по экономике 2015 года - Ангус Дитон) [Текст] = Poverty is no crime, but a problem to study (Nobel Memorial Prize in economics 2015 - Angus Deaton) / А.В. Белянин, И.А. Дениcова // Вопросы экономики = Voprosy Economiki. – 2016. – № 1. – С. 107 – 116.
Копытин И.А., Пильник Н.П., Станкевич И.П.
Modelling Five Variables BVAR for Economic Policies and Growth in Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan and Russia: 2005–2020 // International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy. 2021. Vol. 11, Issue 5. P. 510-518. DOI 10.32479/ijeep.11324.
Панкова Л.В., Гусарова О.В.
World Innovative Digital Expansion: Characteristics of the Moment // Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences. 2022. Vol. 92, Issue 5. P. 617-628. DOI 10.1134/S1019331622050124.
Автономов В.C.
West–Russia–West: Early cases of interaction in economic thought // Russian Journal of Economics. 2021. Vol. 7, Issue 1. P. 9-18. DOI 10.32609/j.ruje.7.55458.
Энтов Р.М.
The state-owned company: "State failure" or "market failure"? [Text] / R. Entov, A. Radygyn, Y. Simachev // Russian Journal of Economics. – 2015. – V. 1. – Issue 1. – Р. 55 – 80.
Еще публикации по теме
Нет комментариев