Семененко И.С., Бардин А.Л., Лапкин В.В., Пантин В.И.
Between the state and the nation: Dilemmas of identity politics in post-soviet societie [Text] / I. Semenenko, V. Lapkin, A. Bardin, V. Pantin // Social Sciences. – 2018. – Vol. 49. – Issue 2. – P. 52-74. DOI: 10.21557/SSC.51262187.
Тип публикации:

ISSN 0134-5486

Two closely related but essentially different political projects coexist in the post-Soviet states. One is designed to form a modern civic nation, the other, to consolidate the state institutions and national (nation-state) identity. The profound social differences and ethnocultural divides that emerge as these states promote the projects are putting on the agenda the need to find the means to consolidate the political community and focus the political discourse on problems of national and civic identity. This article presents comparative analyses of identity politics pursued by three post-Soviet republics-Kazakhstan, Armenia and Belarus-that differ markedly in terms of their ethnic and cultural composition, cultural and civilizational nature, and social and economic development resources. The research is based on in-depth interviews taken at research and expert centers in the three republics and is preceded by a critical overview of the local nation and nation-building concepts in the context of post-Soviet transformations. The conclusion is that their political practices prioritize state-building, with civic nation consolidation coming second. The article notes the steady divergence of the two projects' trajectories and often the opposite effects of using the potential of civic identity in political and intellectual discourses.

Ключевые слова: ethnic and cultural composition | post-Soviet states | post-Soviet transformations |

Ссылка при цитировании:

Semenenko I., Bardin A., Lapkin V., Pantin V. Between the state and the nation: Dilemmas of identity politics in post-soviet societie. – Social Sciences. – 2018. – Vol. 49. – Issue 2. – P. 52-74. DOI: 10.21557/SSC.51262187.


Голунов С.В.
Book review: Ilya Yablokov, Fortress Russia: Conspiracy Theories in Post-Soviet Russia [Cambridge and Medford, MA: Polity, 2018. 288 p.] // Political Studies Review. – 2020. – Vol. 18, Issue 4. – P. NP23-NP24. DOI 10.1177/1478929920903643.

Рябов А.В.
Disintegrating community or coherent region? / A.V. Ryabov // Russian Politics and Law. – 2012. – V. 50. - Issue 4. – Р. 7-22.

Monitoring of Mutual Direct Investments in the Post-Soviet Area [Text] /А.V. Kuznetzov, , А.М. Anisimov // World Finance Review. – 2013. – № 2. – Р. 33 – 35.

Афонцев С.А.
The Urban Household in Russia and the Soviet Union, 1900–2000: Patterns of Family Formation in a Turbulent Century / S. Afontsev, G. Kessler, A. Markevich, V. Tyazhelnikova, T. Valetov // The History of the Family. – 2008. – V.13. – Issue 2. – P. 178–194.

Голунов С.В.
Pandemic Borders of Post-Soviet De Facto States // Journal of Borderlands Studies. 2021. DOI 10.1080/08865655.2021.1943495. URL: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/08865655.2021.1943495?journalCode=rjbs20. Published online: 20.06.2021.

Кравцов А.А.
Russia’s Scientific Collaboration with the Post-Soviet States: Assessment on Web of Science Publications [Text] / A. A. Kravtsov // Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences. – 2019. – Vol. 89. – Issue 4. – P. 351-369. DOI: 10.1134/S1019331619040051

Рябов А.В.
Post-Soviet gravitation: On the results of the presidential elections in Ukraine / A.V. Ryabov // Russian Politics and Law. – 2011. – V. 49. - Issue 5. – Р. 34-42.

Загорский А.В.
Auf verlorenem Posten? Die Zukunft der OSZE / А. Zagorskij // Osteuropa. – 2012. – Jg. 62. – Heft 2. – S.117–133.

Квашнин Ю.Д.
Mutual Direct Investment in the Commonwealth of Independent States: Problems, Prospects, and Lessons of the Ukrainian Crisis [Text] / Yu.D. Kvashnin // Studies on Russian Economic Development. – 2016. – Vol. 27. – № 2. – P. 222 – 229.

Малышева Д.Б.
Foreign policy trajectories of post-Soviet Central Asia // Geopolitica. Roma. 2023. Vol. XII, Issue 1. P. 107-120.

Рябов А.В.
The Post-Soviet states. A shortage of development in a context of political and economic diversity / A.V. Riabov // Russian Politics and Law. – 2014. – V. 52. –Issue 2. – P. 30-43

Великая А.А.
Soviet public diplomacy // Place Branding and Public Diplomacy. 2020. DOI 10.1057/s41254-020-00193-0. URL: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1057%2Fs41254-020-00193-0. Published online: 13.11.2020.

Садовая Е.С.
Social Challenges of the Digital Economy: Russia in a Global Context // Social Sciences : A Quarterly Journal of the Russian Academy of Sciences. 2021. Vol. 52, Issue 4. P. 35-48. DOI 10.21557/SSC.72349728.

Стефанович Д.В., Миронюк М.
Foundations of current and future security relations between Russia and NATO member states: Narratives, capabilities, perceptions and misperceptions // Soviet and Post-Soviet Politics and Society : Воок series. 2021. Vol. 229, P. 221-236.

Жуков С.В., Копытин И.А., Масленников А.О., Синицын М.В.
Oil Exporting Countries: Analysis of Economic Growth Opportunities Through Export Diversification in a Low-Carbon World // Studies on Russian Economic Developmen. 2023. Vol. 34, Issue 5. P. 573-582. DOI 10.1134/S1075700723050179.

Полетаев А.В.
Gross Domestic Product of the Russian Federation in Comparison with the United States, 1960–2004 / A.V. Poletayev // Scandinavian Economic History Review. – 2008. – V. 56. – Issue 1. – P. 41–70.

Рябов А.В.
The missed opportunity for a revolution of values / A.V. Ryabov // Russian Politics and Law. – 2011. – V. 49. - Issue 3. – Р. 86-95.

Арбатова Н.К.
Security Relations in the Black Sea Region: Russia and the West after the Ukranian Crisis [Text] / N. Alexandrova-Arbatova // Southeast European and Black Sea Studies. – 2015. – V. 15. – Issue 2. – 129 – 139.

Барановский В.Г.
Responsibility to Protect: Russia's Approaches [Text] / V. Baranovsky, A. Mateiko // The International Spectator. – 2016. – Vol. 51. – № 2. – P. 49 – 69.

Косолапов Н.А.
E - Equality // Russia in Global Affairs. 2020. Vol. 18, Issue 1 (69). P. 80-84. DOI 10.31278/1810-6374-2020-18-1-80-84.
Еще публикации по теме

Комментарии (0)

Нет комментариев

Добавить комментарий

Актуальные комментарии
Новости Института

Чтобы оценить жизнеспособность выдвинутой российским руководством концепции евразийской безопасности в южноазиатском контексте, Глеб Макаревич рассматривает несколько ранее обозначенных принципов системы безопасности  в статье на сайте РСМД.



Александр Дынкин принял участие в круглом столе «Война и мир в XXI веке. Активная миротворческая деятельность в контексте трансформации системы международных отношений» в рамках подготовки к вручению первой Международной премии мира имени Льва Николаевича Толстого.


Вышли из печати