Arms control in outer space: The Russian angle, and a possible way forward [Text] / A. Arbatov // Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. – 2019. – Vol. 75. – Issue 4. – P. 151-161. DOI: 10.1080/00963402.2019.1628475.
ISSN 0096-3402
DOI 10.1080/00963402.2019.1628475
Against the background of new US-Russia and US-China political confrontation and the comprehensive crisis surrounding nuclear arms control treaties, there may be little immediate hope for successful talks on the non-weaponization of space. Even so, if and when political preconditions change and serious arms control negotiations resume, the non-militarization of outer space will inevitably return to the disarmament agenda. The United States and Russia, as a minimum, have an obvious common security interest in space – limiting as much as possible the dedicated anti-satellite (ASAT) systems that threaten the satellites that are designed to warn each nation of a ballistic missile attack by any state. A focus on the verifiable ban on the testing of such anti-satellite systems would give the United States and Russia a practical starting point for further negotiations on the non-militarization of space.
This article has been supported by a grant of the Russian Science Foundation (project №18-18-00463 “Prospects of arms control under the effect of new military-political and technological factors”).
Ключевые слова: satellites | anti-satellite weapons | ballistic missile defense | nuclear arms | launch-on-warning | strategic stability | non-weaponization of outer space |
Размещено в РИНЦ
Ссылка при цитировании:
Arbatov A. Arms control in outer space: The Russian angle, and a possible way forward. – Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. – 2019. – Vol. 75. – Issue 4. – P. 151-161. DOI: 10.1080/00963402.2019.1628475.
ДРУГИЕ ПУБЛИКАЦИИ НА ЭТУ ТЕМУ:
Аничкина Т.Б.
Limit missile defense - or expand it?: A Russian response [Text] / T. Anichkina // Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. – 2015. – V. 71. – Issue 2. – Р. 17 – 20.
Савельев А.Г., Александрия О.
What Factors Affect Strategic Stability? // Russia in Global Affairs. 2022. Vol. 20, Issue 1. P. 93-111. DOI 10.31278/1810-6374-2022-20-1-93-111.
Савельев А.Г.
Nuclear Deterrence, Strategic Stability, Missile Defence // Russia in Global Affairs. 2023. Vol. 21, Issue 4 (84). P. 10-23. DOI 10.31278/1810-6374-2023-21-4-10-23.
Non-Nuclear Factors of Nuclear Disarmament (Ballistic Missile Defense, High-Precision Conventional Weapons, Space Arms). Alexei Arbatov, Vladimir Dvorkin, Sergey Oznobishchev. Moscow, IMEMO RAN, 2010, 67 p.
Аничкина Т.Б.
The future of US-Russian nuclear deterrence and arms control [Text] / T. Anichkina, A. Pezceli, N. Roth // Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. – 2017. – Vol. 73. – No 4. – P. 271-278.
Арбатов А.Г.
The vicissitudes of Russian missile defense [Text] / А. Arbatov // Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. – 2018. – Vol. 74. – Issue 4. – P. 227-237. DOI: 10.1080/00963402.2018.1486595
Арбатов А.Г.
Saving Nuclear Arms Control [Text] / A. Arbatov // Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. – 2016. – Vol. 72. – № 3. – P. 165 – 170.
Арбатова Н.К.
Domestic Debate in Russia About Arms Control and Nuclear Weapons In: Cotta-Ramusino, P., Lowenthal, M., Maiani, L., Pellecchia, E. (eds) Nuclear Risks and Arms Control - Problems and Progresses in the Time of Pandemics and War. EAC 2022. Springer Proceedings in Physics, vol 291. Springer, Cham. 2023. P.65-70. DOI 10.1007/978-3-031-29708-3_8.
Арбатов А.Г.
Global Stability in the Nuclear World // Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences. 2021. Vol. 91, Issue 3. P. 364-373. DOI 10.1134/S1019331621030023.
Стефанович Д.В.
Nuclear Posture and Technology Trends in South Asia and Ways Ahead // The National Security Journal. 2022. Vol. 3, Issue 4. Art. 11. DOI 10.36878/nsj20220301.11.
Куприянов А.В.
Exploring the Impact of Submarine Saturation on Strategic Stability in South Asia // The National Security Journal. 2022. Vol. 3, Issue 4. Art. 8. DOI 10.36878/nsj20220227.08.
Карасев П.А.
Cyber factors of Strategic Stability // Russia in Global Affairs. 2020. Vol. 18, Issue 3 (71). P. 24-52. DOI 10.31278/1810-6374-2020-18-3-24-52.
Богданов К.В., Стефанович Д.В.
Global Missile Proliferation: Challenges and Solutions // Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences. 2022. Vol. 92, Issue Suppl. 4. P. S293–S300. DOI 10.1134/S1019331622100057.
Problems and prospects of Russia – US / NATO cooperation in the sphere of ballistic missile defense. Executive editor: Trubnikov V.I. - Moscow, IMEMO RAN, 2011. - 40 p.
Стефанович Д.В.
Missile Trends in South-East Asia // Новый оборонный заказ. Стратегии. 2022. № 1 (72). P. 71-76.
Russia: arms control, disarmament and international security / IMEMO supplement to the Russian edition of the SIPRI Yearbook 2018. Edited by A. Arbatov, S. Oznobishchev, N. Bubnova. – Moscow: IMEMO, 2019. – 152 p.
Топычканов П.В.
US–Soviet/Russian Dialogue on the Nuclear Weapons Programme of India [Text] / P. V. Topychkanov // Strategic Analysis. – 2018. – Vol. 42. – Issue 3. – P. 251-259 . DOI: 10.1080/09700161.2018.1463958.
Арбатов А.Г.
The Hidden Side of the U.S. – Russian Strategic Confrontation [Text] / A. Arbatov // Arms Control Today. – 2016. – Vol. 46. – P. 20 – 24.
The prospects of engaging European nuclear-weapon states in strategic arms control. Edited by Alexei Arbatov, Vladimir Dvorkin, Sergey Oznobishchev. Moscow, IMEMO RAN, 2012, 94 p.
Арбатов А.Г.
Mad Momentum Redux? The Rise and Fall of Nuclear Arms Control [Text] / A. Arbatov // Survival. – 2019. – Vol. 61. – Issue 3. – P. 7-38. DOI: 10.1080/00396338.2019.1614785.
Еще публикации по теме
Нет комментариев