7Received 16.01.2026. Revised 15.03.2026. Accepted 25.05.2026.
Abstract. The authors of the article oppose the expert mainstream, which is based on methodological individualism and reduces social well-being to the standard of living, education, and freedom of individuals. Mainstream measurements do not consider historically established communities as subjects of development, and therefore do not notice the obvious paradox: maximizing what is commonly considered to be well-being exacerbates the anthropological crisis by destroying the basic forms of sociality – religion, family, and nation – and depopulating the most “well-being” communities. The authors propose a change in the methodological paradigm and formulate a substantive understanding of social well-being as the social production of life and such institutional organization, that makes it possible to reduce human suffering. The Community Social Well-Being Index is calculated as the arithmetic mean of seven private indices of the following indicators: fertility, family size, infant mortality, longevity, mortality from external causes, poverty level, and children’s access to secondary education. The article traces the dynamics of social well-being in the constituent entities of the Russian Federation since 2014 and analyzes current trends and the geography of social well-being. The study showed that the dynamics of social well-being in Russia are contradictory. Increased life expectancy, a significant decrease in infant mortality, and a decrease in intentional homicides and overall mortality from external causes provide grounds for optimism. However, the stagnant poverty of a significant portion of our fellow citizens, coupled with an exemplary liberal income gap between the rich and the poor, undermines civic solidarity and confidence in the future. The main threats to social well-being in Russia are the destruction of the family institution and a critical decline in the birth rate. There is a radical discrepancy between social realities and public discourse about adherence to traditional values: in fact, these values are shared by a minority that is steadily declining.
Keywords: social well-being, sustainable development, human development, demographics, family institute, regions of Russia
REFERENCES
1. Metreau E., Young K.E., Eapen Sh.G. World Bank country classifications by income level for 2024–2025. Available at: https://blogs.worldbank.org/en/opendata/world-bank-country-classifications-by-income-level-for-2024-2025 (accessed 07.04.2025).
2. Malkina M.Yu. Assessment of the social well-being of Russian regions, the level and dynamics of interregional differences based on welfare functions. Terra Economicus, 2016, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 29-48. (In Russ.) Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/otsenka-sotsialnogo-blagopoluchiya-rossiyskih-regionov-urovnya-i-dinamiki-mezhregionalnyh-razlichiy-na-osnove-funktsiy/viewer (accessed 20.04.2026).
3. Pyzhev A.I., Pyzheva Yu.I. Assessment of the regional socio-ecological and economic well-being of the Krasnoyarsk Territory: a new approach. Regional Economics: Theory and Practice, 2015, no. 34, pp. 30-40. (In Russ.) Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/otsenka-regionalnogo-sotsio-ekologo-ekonomicheskogo-blagopoluchiya-krasnoyarskogo-kraya-novyy-podhod (accessed 20.04.2026).
4. Egorova M.S., Anorina E.S. Problems of measuring human social and economic well-being. Young Scientist, 2015, no. 6 (86), pp. 394-396. (In Russ.) Available at: https://moluch.ru/archive/86/16391 (accessed 20.04.2026).
5. Amartya Sen et al. The Standard of Living. Cambridge University Press, 1987, xiv + 125 p.
6. Sen A. On ethics and economics. Oxford, New York, Basil Blackwell, 1987. 131 p.
7. Griffin K., Knight J., eds. Human Development in the 1980s and Beyond. Journal of Development Planning, 1989, no. 19 (Special number), ðp. 9-40.
8. Afanasyev M.N., Afanasyeva O.V., Krasnoslobodtsev V.P. Social Well-Being as a Criterion for Development of Nations (On the Issue of Assessment Methodology). World Economy and International Relations, 2024, vol. 68, no. 10, pp. 125-136. (In Russ.) Available at: https://doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227-2024-68-10-125-136
9. Karl R. Popper. The Open Society and Its Enemies. Vol. I, II. London, Routledge, 1966. 920 p.
10. Lyotard J.-F. The Postmodern Condition. Manchester University Press, 1979. 135 p. Available at: https://monoskop.org/images/e/e0/Lyotard_Jean-Francois_The_Postmodern_Condition_A_Report_on_Knowledge.pdf (accessed 20.04.2026).
11. Mahbub ul Haq. Reflections on Human Development. Oxford University press, New York, Oxford, 1995. 276 p. Available at: https://books.google.ru/books?id=cXU8DwAAQBAJ&printsec=frontcover&hl=ru#v=onepage&q&f=false (accessed 20.04.2026).
12. Inglehart R. Modernization and Postmodernization. Cultural, Economic and Political Change in 43 Societies. Princeton, Princeton Univ. Press, 1997. 453 p.
13. Putnam R.D. Bowling Alone: America’s Declining Social Capital. Journal of Democracy, 1995, no. 1, pp. 65-78. Available at: https://www.journalofdemocracy.org/articles/bowling-alone-americas-declining-social-capital/ (accessed 20.04.2026).
14. Todd E. La Défaite de l’Occident. Paris, Gallimard, 2024. 297 p. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/2325548X.2024.2389782
15. Shcherbakova E. Households of the EU-27, 2009–2022. Demoscope Weekly, 2023, no. 1009-1010. (In Russ.) Available at: https://www.demoscope.ru/weekly/2023/01009/barom03.php (accessed 07.04.2025).
16. Medkov V.M. The expected future or romantic dreams? Demographics.ru. (In Russ.) Available at: https://archive.ph/20120709150634/http:/demographia.ru/articles_N/index.html?idR=22&idArt=75 (accessed 22.05.2026).
17. Medkov V.M. Demographic forecasts of the United Nations for the world and Russia. Bulletin of the Moscow University. Series 18. Sociology and Political Science, 2008, no. 1, pp. 135-151. (In Russ.) Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/demograficheskie-prognozy-oon-dlya-mira-i-rossii/viewer (accessed 07.04.2025).
18. Ojovan M.I., Loshchinin M.B. Heuristic Paradoxes of S.P. Kapitza Theoretical Demography. European Researcher, 2015, vol. 92, no. 3, pp. 237-248. (In Russ.) Available at: http://www.erjournal.ru/journals_n/1427563722.pdf (accessed 15.03.2024).
19. Coleman D. Immigration and ethnic change in low-fertility countries: a third demographic transition. Population and Development Review, 2006, no. 32 (3), pp. 401-446.
20. Danilov-Danilyan V.I., Piskulova N.A., eds. Sustainable development: new challenges. Moscow, Aspect Press, 2015. 336 p. (In Russ.) Available at: https://esg-library.mgimo.ru/publications/ustoychivoe-razvitie-novye-vyzovy/?utm_source=google.com&utm_medium=organic&utm_campaign=google.com&utm_referrer=google.com (accessed 07.04.2025).
21. Bobylev S.N., Solovyeva S.V., Kiryushin P.A. The Collapse of the Global Consumption Model: in Search of Sustainability. World Economy and International Relations, 2022, vol. 66, no. 11, pp. 92-100. (In Russ.) Available at: https://doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227-2022-66-11-92-100
22. Todd E. Where We Are Going: History through the Eyes of an Anthropologist. Moscow, Eksmo, 2021. 512 p. (In Russ.)
23. Hegel G.V.F. Philosophy of Law. Moscow, Mysl, 1990. 524 p. (In Russ.)
24. Rimashevskaya N.M. Problems of human potential development. Children and youth are the future of Russia. Population, 2007, no. 1 (35), pp. 5-9. (In Russ.) Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/problemy-razvitiya-chelovecheskogo-potentsiala (accessed 29.05.2024).
25. Ashmanov I.S. Mental epidemics and “brain” viruses in the era of information wars. Questions of Cultural Studies, 2019, no. 4, pp. 46-53. (In Russ.) Available at: https://bik.sfu-kras.ru/elib/view?id=PRSV-vocu/2019/4-664904763 (accessed 29.05.2024).
26. Afanasyeva O.V. Integrated communications, but a disintegrated society. Quo vadis? Notebooks on Conservatism, 2021, no. 3, pp. 135-145. (In Russ.)
27. Ryabov A.V. About contradictions and historical forks of the transition to a digital society. Polity, 2022, no. 4, pp. 23- 39. (In Russ.) Available at: https://doi.org/10.30570/2078-5089-2022-107-4-23-39
28. Bukharian V., Tirskikh T., Galieva G. Migration of the Russian population in 2023: personnel starvation. RA Expert, 26.12.2023. (In Russ.) Available at: https://en.raexpert.ru/researches/regions/migration_regions_2023/ (accessed 29.05.2024).
SOURCES
1. Rating of regions of the Russian Federation by income of the population. RIA Rating Agency. (In Russ.) Available at: https://ria.ru/20241021/dokhody-1978472225.html (accessed 07.04.2025).
2. Social Well-Being Index. TOP 35. Foundation for the Development of Civil Society, 01.04.2025. (In Russ.) Available at: http://civilfund.ru/mat/161 (accessed 07.04.2025).
3. Rating of regions by quality of life – 2024. RIA Rating Agency, 17.02.2025. (In Russ.) Available at: https://riarating.ru/infografika/20250217/630276667.html (accessed 07.04.2025).
4. New Economic Foundation. The Happy Planet Index. Available at: https://happyplanetindex.org/ (accessed 07.04.2025).
5. United Nations Development Program. Human Development Reports. Available at: https://hdr.undp.org/reports-and-publications (accessed 07.04.2025).
6. The Economist Intelligence Unit. The Quality of Life Index. Available at: https://webcitation.org/69MVHhwNd?url=http://www.economist.com/media/pdf/QUALITY_OF_LIFE.pdf (accessed 15.03.2024).
7. Social Progress Imperative. Social Progress Index. Available at: https://www.socialprogress.org/ (accessed 15.03.2024).
8. Official statistics on fertility, life expectancy, mortality from external causes, and poverty level. Federal State Statistics Service Rosstat. (In Russ.) Available at: https://fedstat.ru/ (accessed 07.04.2025).
9. Official results of the Russian Population Census 2020 about the composition of households. Federal State Statistics Service (Rosstat). (In Russ.) Available at: https://rosstat.gov.ru/vpn/2020/Tom8_Chislo_i_sostav_domohozyajstv (accessed 29.05.2024).
10. Official statistics on the level of education. Federal State Statistics Service (Rosstat). (In Russ.) Available at: https://rosstat.gov.ru/vpn/2020/Tom3_Obrazovanie (accessed 29.05.2024).
11. Poverty headcount ratio at $ 8.30 a day (2021 PPP) (% of population) – Russian Federation, Italy, Sweden, Austria, United States, Estonia, Portugal, Poland. World Bank, Poverty and Inequality Platform. Available at: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SI.POV.UMIC?end=2022&locations=RU-IT-SE-AT-US-EE-PT-PL&name_desc=false&start=2000&view=chart (accessed 07.04.2025).
12. The program of increasing the birth rate on Sakhalin. Demographic Platform. Russian Federation, 03.10.2022. (In Russ.) Available at: https://demografplatforma.ru/?p=1723 (accessed 29.05.2024).
13. Olovyannikova P. Between a desk and a hard place. Kommersant, 27.12.2024. (In Russ.)



No comments