137Received 10.01.2025. Revised 20.06.2025. Accepted 29.09.2025.
Acknowledgements. Many thanks to Farmov Rakhmonov and Sarbinaz Azhiniyozova for their assistance in preparing of this article.
Abstract. This study explores the growing geopolitical importance of water resources in Central Asia, with particular focus on their role in maintaining regional stability amid climate change, interstate relations, and external influences. The urgency of the issue stems from the need to move away from traditional approaches toward adaptive strategies aligned with current geopolitical dynamics. The research highlights key environmental challenges worsened by water issues, including the desiccation of the Aral Sea, declining surface and groundwater quality, loss of wetlands, and rising soil salinity. Additionally, developments like the construction of the Qosh-Tepa canal in Afghanistan introduce new geopolitical risks. Through historical and contemporary analysis, the study traces the evolution of the “Central Asia” concept, covering five core nations – Uzbekistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and Turkmenistan – while also recognizing Afghanistan’s growing geopolitical role. The Amu Darya and Syr Darya rivers, which provide most of the region’s freshwater, are analyzed along with the legal, political, and infrastructural challenges of managing transboundary waters. The paper reviews regional and global initiatives, including the 1992 Nukus Agreement, UN water conventions, and crisis group reports. Drawing from global cases such as the India-Bangladesh Ganges treaty, it proposes cooperative models for Central Asia. A geostrategic model is presented, integrating water strategy, transport corridor development, and geopolitical balancing. It outlines practical steps such as improving legal frameworks, investing in small reservoirs and water-saving technologies, and establishing regional centers for drought resilience and coordination. In conclusion, the study emphasizes that sustainable water governance and strategic foresight are vital for long-term peace, development, and ecological stability in Central Asia. These findings aim to guide policymakers and scholars in forming cooperative strategies for a region increasingly shaped by water geopolitics.
Keywords: Central Asia, water resources, Qosh-Tepa canal, geostrategic model
REFERENCES
1. Humboldt A. de. Asie Centrale. Vol. 3. Paris, Gide, 1843. 640 p. Available at: https://archive.org/details/asiecentralerec00humbgoog/page/n522/mode/2up?ref=ol&view=theater (accessed 29.09.2025).
2. Asanova S.A. Minerals of the Turkestan territory in the service of the empire: ideas and practice of the end of the XIX century. MCU Journal of Historical Studies, 2023, no. 3 (51), pp. 38-48. (In Russ.) Available at: https://doi.org/10.25688/20-76-9105.2023.51.3.03
3. Ergashev I. The threat will not belong to “us” or “others”. (In Uzbek) Available at: https://strategy.uz/index.php?news=1202&lang=uz (accessed 29.09.2025).
4. Khushmatova M. Water-related issues in the Central Asian republics and their significance in interrelations. Scientific Progress, 2021, vol. 2, iss. 3, pp. 361-366. (In Uzbek) Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/markaziy-osiyo-respublikalarida-suv-bilan-bog-liq-muammolar-va-uning-o-zaro-munosabatlaridagi-ahamiyati/viewer (accessed 29.09.2025).
5. Bucknall J. et al. Irrigation in Central Asia. Social, Economic and Environmental Considerations. World Bank, 2003. 50 p. (In Russ.) Available at: https://cawater-info.net/bk/improvement-irrigated-agriculture/files/irrigation_in_central_asia.pdf (accessed 29.09.2025).
6. Jamison Th. Alfred Thayer Mahan: “The Influence of Sea Power Upon History” as Strategy, Grand Strategy, and Polemic. Classics of Strategy and Diplomacy, 09.02.2022. Available at: https://classicsofstrategy.com/2022/02/09/alfred-thayer-mahan-the-influence-of-sea-power-upon-history-as-strategy-grand-strategy-and-polemic/ (accessed 29.09.2025).
7. Zhiltsov S.S. The policy of the Central Asian countries in the field of the use of water resources of transboundary rivers. International scientific and practical conference dedicated to summarizing the results of the decade declared by the United Nations “Water for life” (Almaty, Kazakhstan, September 22–24, 2016). Book 2, ðð. 288-296. (In Russ.) Available at: http://www.cawater-info.net/bk/water_law/pdf/jiltsov.pdf (accessed 29.09.2025).
8. Ergasheva M. Water problems in Central Asian geopolitics. Oriental Renaissance: Innovative, educational, natural and social sciences, May 2023, no. 3 (5). (In Uzbek) Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/markaziy-osiyo-geosiyosatida-suv-muammolari/viewer (accessed 29.09.2025).
SOURCES
1. Agreement on sharing of the Ganges waters at Farakka and on augmenting its flows (with schedule). Signed at Dacca on 05.11.1977, ðp. 1-5. Available at: https://treaties.un.org/doc/Publication/UNTS/Volume%201066/volume-1066-I-16210-English.pdf (accessed 29.09.2025).
2. UN Report: Water Crisis Threatens Global Security. (In Russ.) Available at: https://news.un.org/ru/story/2024/03/1450821 (accessed 29.09.2025).
3. OECD Environmental Outlook to 2050. The Consequences of Inaction. OECD, 2012. 353 p. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264122246-en
4. U.S. Intelligence Report Warns of Global Water Tensions. The New York Times, 22.03.2012. Available at: https://www.nytimes.com/2012/03/23/world/us-intelligence-report-warns-of-global-water-tensions.html (accessed 29.09.2025).
5. Conflict and cooperation over water – The role of the EU in ensuring the realisation of human rights. European Parliament, 2015. 50 p. Available at: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2015/549056/EXPO_STU(2015)549056_EN.pdf (accessed 29.09.2025).
No comments