Trump’s Digital Strategy: U.S. Hegemony or Polycentric Architecture?

57
DOI: 10.20542/0131-2227-2025-69-10-24-33
EDN: ZCPQTG
E. Leonov, ORCID 0009-0008-5801-3070, e.leonov@inno.mgimo.ru
Moscow State Institute of International Relations, The Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation (MGIMO University), 76, Vernadskogo Prosp., Moscow, 119454, Russian Federation.
N. Tsvetkova, ORCID 0000-0002-0156-9069, n.tsvetkova@iskran.ru
Georgy Arbatov Institute for U.S. and Canada Studies, Russian Academy of Sciences (ISKRAN), 2/3, Khlebnyi Per., Moscow, 121069, Russian Federation.

Received 12.04.2025. Revised 24.07.2025. Accepted 31.07.2025.

Abstract. The second administration of Donald Trump marked a pivotal transformation in the U.S. digital diplomacy. This article examines how technologies – such as artificial intelligence, digital currencies, and even tech-diplomacy – were recast as instruments of strategic influence within a global power projection strategy. Recent executive orders, investment restrictions, and regulatory innovations introduced by the Trump administration illustrate a shift from multilateral digital governance to a model of digital hegemony anchored in national sovereignty and selective technological partnerships. The findings show that Trump’s digital strategy operates at two levels: a political doctrine emphasizing national technological dominance, and a practical framework involving the creation of new institutions and partnerships, including the Strategic Bitcoin Reserve and alliances with specific countries. These measures institutionalize the U.S. control over digital financial flows and redefine cryptocurrencies as strategic assets of the federal government. The administration has effectively weaponized digital infrastructure to pursue economic protectionism, geopolitical containment of China, and a model of alliance-building based on “trusted” partners. The policy excludes the PRC from key technological ecosystems through investment screening, export controls, and restrictions on cross-border financial transactions involving the digital yuan. The TikTok case illustrates the evolution of digital containment into expropriative management, where foreign platforms face pressure either to divest or comply with American regulations. Furthermore, the Bureau of Cyberspace and Digital Policy plays a central role in enforcing digital sanctions and coordinating cross-border cyber deterrence campaigns. Trump’s approach undermines the idea of a polycentric digital order and promotes a closed, American-led digital bloc instead. Technology is no longer framed as a common good but as a sovereign resource with geopolitical utility. This shift transforms digital diplomacy from a mediating mechanism into an instrument of strategic control. The article concludes that the United States under Trump has begun constructing a new digital architecture that replaces global inclusivity with a normative framework rooted in unilateralism.

Keywords: technological diplomacy, digital hegemony, artificial intelligence, bitcoin, digital sovereignty, Trump, USA, China, Russia, digital alliance


REFERENCES

1. Danilin I.V. The U.S. – China Technological War Through the Prism of Technonationalism. Paths to Peace and Security, 2021, no. 1 (60), pp. 29-43. (In Russ.) Available at: https://doi.org/10.20542/2307-1494-2021-1-29-43

2. Tsvetkova N.A. The Phenomenon of Digital Diplomacy in International Relations and the Methodology of Research. RSUH Bulletin. Series: Political Science. History. International Relations, 2020, no. 2, pp. 37-47. (In Russ.) Available at: https://doi.org/10.28995/2073-6339-2020-2-37-47 

3. Zinovyeva E.A., Shitkov S.V. Digital Sovereignty in the Practice of International Relations. Mezhdunarodnaya zhizn (International Affairs), 2023, no. 11, pp. 28-43. (In Russ.) Available at: https://interaffairs.ru/jauthor/material/2798 (accessed 30.03.2025).

4. Suchkov M.A., Bolgova I.V., eds. The Digital Turn in International Relations: How New Technologies Are Changing World Politics and the Study of It. Moscow, MGIMO University, 2023. 232 p. (In Russ.)

5. Slaughter A.-M. The Chessboard and the Web: Strategies of Connection in a Networked World. New Haven, Yale University Press, 2017. 336 p.

6. Mueller M. Networks and States: The Global Politics of Internet Governance. Cambridge, MIT Press, 2010. 320 p.

7. Hofmann J., Katzenbach C., Gollatz K. Between coordination and regulation: Finding the governance in Internet governance. New Media & Society, 2017, vol. 19, no. 9, pp. 1406-1423. Available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2836068 (accessed 31.07.2025).

8. Aaronson S.A. Why Trade Agreements are not Setting Information Free: The Lost History and Reinvigorated Debate over Cross-Border Data Flows, Human Rights, and National Security. World Trade Review, 2016, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 671-696.

9. Klimburg A. The Darkening Web: The War for Cyberspace. New York, Penguin Press, 2017. 432 p.

10. Lebedeva M.M., Zinovieva E.S., eds. New Technologies in World Politics. Moscow, MGIMO University, 2021. 259 p. (In Russ.)

11. Tsvetkova N.A., Sytnik A.N. The U.S. – China Digital Confrontation: Economic and Political Dimensions. World Economy and International Relations, 2023, vol. 67, no. 11, pp. 15-23. (In Russ.) Available at: https://doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227-2023-67-11-15-23


SOURCES

1. Executive Order on Advancing American Artificial Intelligence. The White House, 23.01.2025. Available at: https://bidenwhitehouse.archives.gov/briefing-room/presidential-actions/2025/01/14/executive-order-on-advancing-united-states-leadership-in-artificial-intelligence-infrastructure/ (accessed 30.03.2025).

2. Executive Order on the Safe, Secure, and Trustworthy Development and Use of Artificial Intelligence. The White House, 30.10.2023. Available at: https://bidenwhitehouse.archives.gov/briefing-room/presidential-actions/2023/10/30/executive-order-on-the-safe-secure-and-trustworthy-development-and-use-of-artificial-intelligence/ (accessed 30.03.2025).

3. Executive Order on Strengthening American Leadership in Digital Financial Technologies. The White House, March 2025. Available at: https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/01/strengthening-american-leadership-in-digital-financial-technology/ (accessed 30.03.2025).

4. Establishment of the Strategic Bitcoin Reserve and United States Digital Asset Stockpile. The White House, March 2025. Available at: https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/03/establishment-of-the-strategic-bitcoin-reserve-and-united-states-digital-asset-stockpile/ (accessed 30.03.2025).

5. Crypto Innovation and Strategy. Crypto Achievements. The White House, 15.03.2025. Available at: https://www.whitehouse.gov/issues/tech-innovation/ (accessed 24.07.2025).

6. Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for U.S. Stablecoins Act (GENIUS Act). 119 Congress. S.1582, July 2025. Available at: https://www.congress.gov/119/bills/s1582/BILLS-119s1582enr.pdf (accessed 24.07.2025).

7. Executive Order 13694 of April 1, 2015: Blocking the Property of Certain Persons Engaging in Significant Malicious Cyber-Enabled Activities. Federal Register. Available at: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2025/03/26/2025-05096/notice-of-ofac-sanctions-action (accessed 30.03.2025).

8. America First Investment Policy. Presidential Memorandum. The White House, 21.02.2025. Available at: https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/02/america-first-investment-policy/ (accessed 30.03.2025).

9. Application of “Protecting Americans from Foreign Adversary Controlled Applications Act” to TikTok. The White House, January 20, 2025. Available at: https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/01/application-of-protecting-americans-from-foreign-adversary-controlled-applications-act-to-tiktok/ (accessed 30.03.2025).


For citation:
Leonov E., Tsvetkova N. Trump’s Digital Strategy: U.S. Hegemony or Polycentric Architecture?. World Eñonomy and International Relations, 2025, vol. 69, no. 10, pp. 24-33. https://doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227-2025-69-10-24-33 EDN: ZCPQTG



Comments (0)

No comments

Add comment







Indexed

 

 

 

 

Dear authors! Please note that in the VAK List of peer-reviewed scientific journals, in which the main scientific results of dissertations for the degree of candidate and doctor of sciences should be published for the “MEMO Journal” the following specialties are recorded:
economic sciences:
5.2.5. World Economy.
5.2.1. Economic Theory
5.2.3. Regional and Branch Economics
political sciences:
5.5.4. International Relations
5.5.1. History and Theory of Politics
5.5.2. Political Institutions, Processes, Technologies

 

Current Issue
2026, vol. 70, No. 1
Topical Themes of the Issue:
  • Global Dominance of Dollar: Theory and Prospects
  • Japan’s Economic Policy: A Paradigm Shift?
  • The Chinese Model of Cognitive Security: “The Right to Interpret” as a Resource of Power
  • Features of South Korea’s Current Development Stage: Growing Pains or Systemic Crisis?
Announcement

Dear authors of the journal!

Please note that the author's copies of the issues in which your texts are published are kept in the editorial office for no more than one year. After this period expires, the editorial office has the right to dispose of unclaimed copies at its own discretion.

Dear authors of the journal!

We would like to inform you that the materials proposed for publication in our journal must be submitted only through the form located on the journal website in the “Submit an article” section.

 

Submit an Article
INVITATION FOR PUBLICATION
The Editorial Board invites authors to write analytical articles on the following topics:
  • changes in the processes of globalization in modern conditions
  • formation of the new world order
  • shifts in civilization at the stage of transition to a digital society

The editors are also interested in publishing synthesis articles / scientific reviews revealing the main trends in the development of certain regions of the world - Latin America, Africa, South Asia, etc.