Externalization of Corporate Science in Big Pharma

49
DOI: 10.20542/0131-2227-2025-69-10-79-88
EDN: LVEDSM
A. Bereznoy, ORCID 0000-0001-8624-2526, abereznoy@hse.ru
National Research University Higher School of Economics, 11, Myasnitskaya Str., Moscow, 101000, Russian Federation.
A. Abotk, ORCID 0000-0003-2915-7004, aabotk@hse.ru
National Research University Higher School of Economics, 11, Myasnitskaya Str., Moscow, 101000, Russian Federation.

Received 03.04.2025. Revised 10.06.2025. Accepted 30.07.2025.

Acknowledgements. The article was prepared within the framework of the Basic Research Program of the HSE University.


Abstract. Externalization of corporate R&D became the new important trend characteristic of the innovation development of Big Pharma firms in the last decade. Having accumulated about a half of the R&D investment of the global pharmaceutical industry, these giants had relied for a long time largely on their own research capabilities. However, in the end of the XX century the situation began to change. The decline of their traditional blockbuster business model, which was increasingly losing the ability to generate sufficient revenues to finance the fast-growing drug discovery and development costs of Big Pharma firms, led to the so-called productivity crisis of pharmaceutical R&D and became the major driver of externalization of their corporate science reflecting difficult transition to open innovation. The urgent need to adopt specialty pharma business model forced Big Pharma firms to master the completely new competencies and technologies, which was possible only through intensive R&D cooperation with external partners, in particular with biotech companies. Developing this cooperation at scale, the pharmaceutical giants quickly learned that the partnership mechanisms should be very flexible, allowing external participants to maintain considerable autonomy and to preserve unique creative culture and knowledge management organization. As a result, similar indirect mechanisms of R&D interaction were introduced into in the relationships with other innovative partners, thus contributing to the emergence of R&D ecosystems around each of the Big Pharma firms representing the networks of long-term partnerships with various R&D players coordinated mainly through informal instruments. Digital transformation of the pharmaceutical industry, and especially the active use of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies in pharma research, became the new important driver of corporate science externalization. The lack of digital competencies (particularly in AI area) has already pushed Big Pharma companies into various R&D partnerships with specialized tech firms. Simultaneously, the rise of digital platforms as the new format of research cooperation enhanced the toolbox of existing R&D ecosystems with crowdsourcing and virtual drug design platforms.

Keywords: externalization of research and development, Big Pharma companies, open innovation, research and development ecosystem


REFERENCES

1. Buntz B. Top Pharma Companies Ranked by 2023 R&D Spend. Drug Discovery and Development, 30.04.2024. Available at: https://www.drugdiscoverytrends.com/top-pharma-companies-2023-rd-spend (accessed 20.03.2025).

2. Chandra A., Drum J., Daly M., Misberger H., Spare S., Neumann U., Martin S., Kirson N. Comprehensive Measurement of Biopharmaceutical R&D Investment. Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, 2024, vol. 23, pp. 652-653. Available at: http://doi.org/10.1038/d41573-024-00131-2

3. Yeung A.W.K., Atanasov A.G., Sheridan H., Klager E., Eibensteiner F., Volkl-Kernsock S., Kletecka-Pulker M., Willschke H., Schaden E. Open Innovation in Medical and Pharmaceutical Research: A Literature Landscape Analysis. Frontiers in Pharmacology, 2021, vol. 11, art. 587526. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2020.587526

4. Chesbrough H.W. Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology. Boston, Harvard Business Press, 2003. 227 p.

5. Teece D. Business Models, Business Strategy and Innovation. Long Range Planning, 2010, vol. 43, iss. 2-3, pp. 172-194. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2009.07.003

6. Foss N.J., Saebi T. Fifteen Years of Research on Business Model Innovation: How Far Have We Come, and Where Should We Go? Journal of Management, 2017, vol. 43, iss. 1, pp. 200-227. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316675927

7. Li J.J. Blockbuster Drugs: The Rise and Fall of the Pharmaceutical Industry. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2014. 223 p.

8. Coghlan A. Blockbuster challenge. New Scientist, 12.06.2004. Available at: https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg18224515-800-blockbuster-challenge/ (accessed 20.03.2025).

9. Bingham A. Whither Pharma? The Demise of Pharma’s Blockbuster Business Model. Drug Discovery World (DDW), 06.08.2006. Available at: https://www.ddw-online.com/whither-pharma-the-demise-of-pharmas-blockbusterbusiness-model-723-200608/ (accessed 24.03.2025).

10. Collier R. Bye, Bye Blockbusters, Hello Niche Busters. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 2011, vol. 183, no. 11, pp. E697-E698. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.109-3874

11. Cockburn I.M. Is Pharmaceutical Industry in a Productivity Crisis? Jaffe A.B., Lerner J., Stern S., eds. Innovation Policy and Economy. Cambridge, MIT Press, 2006, vol. 7, pp. 1-32. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1086/ipe.7.25056188

12. Laermann-Nguen U., Backfisch M. Innovation Crisis in the Pharmaceutical Industry? A Survey. SN Business & Economics, 2021, vol. 1, no. 12, art. 164. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43546-021-00163-5

13. DiMasi J.A., Hansen R.W., Grabowski H.G., Lasagna L. Cost of Innovation in the Pharmaceutical Industry. Journal of Health Economics, 1991, vol. 10, iss. 2, pp. 107-142. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-6296(91)90001-4

14. DiMasi J.A., Hansen R.W., Grabowski H.G. The Price of Innovation: New Estimates of Drug Development Costs. Journal of Health Economics, 2003, vol. 22, iss. 2, pp. 151-185. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0167-6296(02)00126-1

15. Gilbert J., Henske P., Singh A. Rebuilding Big Pharma’s Business Model. In Vivo: The Business & Medicine Report, 2003, vol. 21, no. 10, pp. 1-10. Available at: http://plg-group.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/Rebuilding-big-pharmas-business-model-Jim-Gilbert-Windhove.pdf (accessed 24.03.2025).

16. DeRuiter J., Holton P.L. Drug Patent Expirations and the “Patent Cliff”. U.S. Pharmacist, 2012, vol. 37 (6), pp. 12-20. Available at: https://www.uspharmacist.com/article/drug-patent-expirations-and-the-patent-cliff (accessed 24.03.2025).

17. Gibney M. The ‘Innovation Gap’ Haunts Big Pharma, and the Race Is on for the Next Blockbusters. PharmaVoice, 28.04.2022. Available at: https://www.pharmavoice.com/news/innovation-gap-pharma-blockbuster-drugbiotech/622804/ (accessed 25.03.2025).

18. Schuhmacher A., Hinder M., Dodel A., Gassmann O., Hartl D. Investigating the Origins of Recent Pharmaceutical Innovation. Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, 2023, vol. 22, pp. 781-782. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41573-023-00102-z 

19. Van de Vyver B., Berghauser Pont L., Parekh R., Smietana K., Robke L. External Innovation: Biopharma Dealmaking to Boost R&D Productivity. McKinsey Quarterly, 09.01.2025. Available at: https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/life-sciences/our-insights/external-innovation-biopharma-dealmaking-to-boost-r-and-d-productivity (accessed 15.03.2025).

20. Iazzolino G., Bozzo R. Partnership Models for R&D in the Pharmaceutical Industry. Canci J.K., Mekler P., Mu G., eds. Quantitative Models in Life Science Business. Springer, Cham., 2023, pp. 29-48. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-11814-2_3

21. Gautam A., Pan Xiaogang. The Changing Model of Big Pharma: Impact of Key Trends. Drug Discovery Today, 2016, vol. 21, iss. 3, pp. 379-384. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drudis.2015.10.002

22. Bowman M.L., Sousa J.J.S., Pina M.E.T. Regulatory Issues for Orphan Medicines: A Review. Health Policy and Technology, 2020, vol. 9, iss. 1, pp. 115-121. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hlpt.2019.11.008

23. Niu S., Happe L.E., Abuloha S., Svensson M. Concentration of Spending and Share of Specialty Drug Spending in Medicare Part D over a 10-Year Period. Journal of Managed Care & Specialty Pharmacy, 2024, vol. 30, no. 12, pp. 1355-1363. Available at: https://doi.org/10.18553/jmcp.2024.30.12.1355

24. Niazi S.K., Mariam Z. Computer-aided Drug Design and Drug Discovery: A Prospective Analysis. Pharmaceuticals, 2024, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 1-22. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/ph17010022

25. Kint S., Dolfsma W., Robinson D. Strategic Partnerships for AI-driven Drug Discovery: The Role of Relational Dynamics. Drug Discovery Today, 2024, vol. 29, iss. 12, art. 104242. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drudis.2024.104242

26. Schuhmacher A., Gassman O., Bieniok D., Hinder M., Hartl D. Open Innovation: A Paradigm Shift in Pharma R&D? Drug Discovery Today, 2022, vol. 27, iss. 9, pp. 2395-2405. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drudis.2022.05.018


SOURCES

1. The Pharmaceutical Industry and Global Health: Facts and Figures 2022. Geneva, The International Federation of Pharmaceutical Manufacturers & Associations, 20.09.2022. Available at: https://www.ifpma.org/publications/facts-and-figures-2022-the-pharmaceutical-industry-and-global-health/ (accessed 24.01.2025).

2. 2002 Drug Industry Profits: Hefty Pharmaceutical Company Margins Dwarf Other Industries. Washington, Public Citizen’s Congress Watch, June 2003. 13 p. Available at: https://www.citizen.org/wp-content/uploads/pharma_report.pdf (accessed 20.12.2024).

3. FDA New-Medication Approval Times Dropped Significantly in Recent Years. U.S. Pharmacist, 22.01.2020. Available at: https://www.uspharmacist.com/article/fda-newmedication-approval-times-dropped-significantly-in-recent-years (accessed 24.03.2025).

4. Blockbuster Product Patent Expiry. Journal of Generic Medicines, 2004, vol. 1, iss. 3, pp. 273-280. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jgm.4940032

5. From Vision to Decision: Pharma 2020. New York, PWC, 2012. 53 p. Available at: https://www.pwc.com/jp/ja/japan-knowledge/archive/assets/pdf/pharma-2020-vision-to-decision.pdf (accessed 25.03.2025).

6. Externalizing Pharma Innovation Is the Winning Strategy – Now More Than Ever. New York, EY, 2019. Available at: https://www.ey.com/en_gl/industries/life-sciences (accessed 21.12.2024).

7. Insights into the 2023 U.S. Pharmaceutical Market. IQVIA, 25.07.2023. Available at: https://www.iqvia.com/locations/united-states/blogs/2023/07/insights-into-the-2023-us-pharmaceutical-market (accessed 21.12.2024).

8. AI in Pharmaceuticals Promises Innovation, Speed, and Savings. SP Global, 01.10.2024. Available at: https://www.spglobal.com/ratings/en/research/articles/241001-ai-in-pharmaceuticals-promises-innovation-speed-and-savings-13254002 (accessed 20.12.2024). 


For citation:
Bereznoi A., Abotk A. Externalization of Corporate Science in Big Pharma. World Eñonomy and International Relations, 2025, vol. 69, no. 10, pp. 79-88. https://doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227-2025-69-10-79-88 EDN: LVEDSM



Comments (0)

No comments

Add comment







Indexed

 

 

 

 

Dear authors! Please note that in the VAK List of peer-reviewed scientific journals, in which the main scientific results of dissertations for the degree of candidate and doctor of sciences should be published for the “MEMO Journal” the following specialties are recorded:
economic sciences:
5.2.5. World Economy.
5.2.1. Economic Theory
5.2.3. Regional and Branch Economics
political sciences:
5.5.4. International Relations
5.5.1. History and Theory of Politics
5.5.2. Political Institutions, Processes, Technologies

 

Current Issue
2026, vol. 70, No. 1
Topical Themes of the Issue:
  • Global Dominance of Dollar: Theory and Prospects
  • Japan’s Economic Policy: A Paradigm Shift?
  • The Chinese Model of Cognitive Security: “The Right to Interpret” as a Resource of Power
  • Features of South Korea’s Current Development Stage: Growing Pains or Systemic Crisis?
Announcement

Dear authors of the journal!

Please note that the author's copies of the issues in which your texts are published are kept in the editorial office for no more than one year. After this period expires, the editorial office has the right to dispose of unclaimed copies at its own discretion.

Dear authors of the journal!

We would like to inform you that the materials proposed for publication in our journal must be submitted only through the form located on the journal website in the “Submit an article” section.

 

Submit an Article
INVITATION FOR PUBLICATION
The Editorial Board invites authors to write analytical articles on the following topics:
  • changes in the processes of globalization in modern conditions
  • formation of the new world order
  • shifts in civilization at the stage of transition to a digital society

The editors are also interested in publishing synthesis articles / scientific reviews revealing the main trends in the development of certain regions of the world - Latin America, Africa, South Asia, etc.