The Evolution of U.S. “Strategic Ambiguity” Policy Towards Taiwan

187
DOI: 10.20542/0131-2227-2024-68-6-61-71
EDN: SJBBXX
Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation, 49/2, Leningradskii Prosp., Moscow, 125167, Russian Federation.
 

Received 11.12.2023. Revised 04.02.2024. Accepted 20.03.2024.

Abstract. The article is dedicated to the analysis of “strategic ambiguity” concept – a tool of U.S. foreign policy aimed at dual deterrence of both mainland China and breakaway Taiwan. Washington stayed deliberately ambiguous in its commitments to defend Taiwan thus leaving Beijing uncertain whether the U.S. will intervene in case of escalation in the Strait, and at the same time not encouraging Taiwanese authorities to declare full independence and sovereignty which would provoke military escalation with mainland China, dragging the U.S. into full-scale conflict with the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA). The article analyzes the roots of this approach during D. Eisenhower’s years in office, its evolution en course and after the Cold War, and its erosion under D. Trump and J. Biden. The article shows that the U. S. President Eisenhower wished to maintain status-quo in Taiwan Strait, fearing that he would either have to turn a blind eye on the communist takeover of Taiwan, or be dragged into conflict with the close ally of Moscow, which would eventually lead to the war with the USSR. Eisenhower and his administration remained ambiguous in their communications with the PRC (mainland China) and Taiwan, not encouraging the island to declare full independence and at the same time not giving Beijing a carte blanche for military intervention. This approach dubbed in political science and international relations theory as “strategic ambiguity” proved to be useful, and was reinforced during Washington–Beijing rapprochement in 1970s. Under Trump administration, the U.S. started to consider dropping the “strategic ambiguity” policy towards clearer deterrence commitments. This trend manifested via emotional statements made by Donald Trump himself, mostly on social media, as well as through a change of tone in key foreign policy documents and new decisions that signaled a serious revision of the American approach to military cooperation between the United States and Taiwan. This trend continued and exacerbated under Biden administration due to number of bills signed, including the Taiwan Enhanced Resilience Act (TERA) which de-facto dubbed the contested island as Washington’s “Major Non-NATO Ally” and enabled to boost military supplies. The erosion of the “strategic ambiguity” policy also manifested through various high-profile contacts, including the House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s visit on the island.

Keywords: USA, PRC, China, Taiwan, US foreign policy, Taiwan issue, strategic ambiguity


REFERENCES

1. Hanania R. Public Choice Theory and the Illusion of Grand Strategy: How Generals, Weapons Manufacturers, and Foreign Governments Shape American Foreign Policy. London, Routledge, 2021. 230 p. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003223467 

2. Eisenhower D.D. Mandate for Change, 1953–1956: The White House Years. New York, Doubleday & Company, 1963. 650 p.

3. Chang G.H., Di H. The Absence of War in the U.S. – China Confrontation over Quemoy and Matsu in 1954–1955: Contingency, Luck, Deterrence? The American Historical Review, 1993, vol. 98, iss. 5, pp. 1500-1524. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1086/ahr/98.5.1500 

4. Divine R.A. Eisenhower and the Cold War. New York, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1981. 192 p.

5. Tsvetkov I.A. The Problem of US International Obligations After Withdrawal from Afghanistan: Is America Ready to Defend Taiwan? Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. International Relations, 2021, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 393-408. (In Russ.) Available at: https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu06.2021.402 

6. Knowlton B. Bush Warns Taiwan to Keep Status Quo: China Welcomes U. S. Stance. The New York Times, 10.12.2003. Available at: https://www.nytimes.com/2003/12/10/news/bush-warns-taiwan-to-keep-status-quo-china-welcomes-us-stance.html (accessed 03.02.2024).

7. Copper J.F. Understanding President Trump’s Taiwan Policy. American Journal of Chinese Studies, 2017, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 5-8. Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/44759209 (accessed 03.02.2024).

8. Grzegorzewski F. Strategic Ambiguity in US-Taiwan Relations During the Donald Trump Administration. Polish Political Science Yearbook, 2022, vol. 51, pp. 59-74. Available at: https://doi.org/10.15804/ppsy202210 

9. Chang-Liao N., Fang C. The Case for Maintaining Strategic Ambiguity in the Taiwan Strait. The Washington Quarterly, 2021, vol. 44, iss. 2, pp. 45-60. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/0163660X.2021.1932088 

10. Chung L. United States ‘Plays Taiwan Card’ with Tsai Ing-wen’s Trip to NASA’s Mission Control Center. Politico, 20.08.2018. Available at: https://www.politico.com/story/2018/08/20/tsai-ing-wen-taiwan-president-nasa-visit-788931 (accessed 01.02.2024).

11. Strokan’ S. Taiwanese Tag of War: Washington and Beijing Ñompete for Spheres of Influence in Insular China. Kommersant′, 20.09.2020. (In Russ.) Available at: https://www.kommersant.ru/doc/4500433 (accessed 03.02.2024).

12. Tiezzi S. US Secretary of State Pompeo Lifts Restrictions on Exchanges with Taiwan. The Diplomat, 11.01.2021. Available at: https://thediplomat.com/2021/01/us-secretary-of-state-pompeo-lifts-restrictions-on-exchanges-with-taiwan/ (accessed 02.02.2024).

13. Samozhnev A. State Department confirms US-Taiwan Talks. Rossiiskaya gazeta, 11.02.2021. (In Russ.) Available at: https://rg.ru/2021/02/11/gosdep-podtverdil-peregovory-administracii-ssha-s-tajvanem.html (accessed 04.02.2024).

14. Albert E. US Ambassador Makes First Visit to Taiwan in More Than 40 Years. The Diplomat, 01.04.2021. Available at: https://thediplomat.com/2021/04/us-ambassador-makes-first-visit-to-taiwan-in-more-than-40-years/ (accessed 04.11.2023).

15. Overholt W.H. Taiwan: Peril without Exit? Global Asia, 2023, vol. 18, no. 2. Available at: https://globalasia.org/v18no2/feature/taiwan-peril-without-exit_william-h-overholt (accessed 04.02.2024).

16. Adragna A. McCarthy, Taiwan’s Leader Meet in California Despite Threats from China. Politico, 04.05.2023. Available at: https://www.politico.com/news/2023/04/05/mccarthy-taiwan-leader-historic-meeting-00090639 (accessed 04.02.2024).

17. Drezner D.W. Biden Cannot Escape Strategic Ambiguity on Taiwan. The Washington Post, 24.05.2022. Available at: https://www.washingtonpost.com/outlook/2022/05/24/joe-biden-cannot-escape-strategic-ambiguity-taiwan/ (accessed 04.11.2023).

18. Restuccia A., Thomas K., Chin J. Biden Says U. S. Would Intervene Military if China Invaded Taiwan. The Wall Street Journal, 23.05.2022. Available at: https://www.wsj.com/articles/biden-says-u-s-would-intervene-militarily-if-china-invaded-taiwan-11653286228 (accessed 02.11.2023).

19. Atwood K. US Approves First-Ever Military Aid to Taiwan Through Program Typically Used for Sovereign Nations. CNN Politics, 31.08.2023. Available at: https://edition.cnn.com/2023/08/30/politics/us-taiwan-foreign-military-financing-program/index.html (accessed 03.02.2024).

20. Honrada G. Pacific Shift: US to Build a ‘Missile Wall’ Against China. Asia Times, 21.11.2023. Available at: https://asiatimes.com/2023/11/pacific-shift-us-to-build-a-missile-wall-against-china/ (accessed 01.02.2024).

21. Huang C., Starr K.J. Most People in Taiwan See Themselves as Primarily Taiwanese; Few Say They’re Primarily Chinese. Pew Research Center, 16.01.2024. Available at: https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2024/01/16/most-people-in-taiwan-see-themselves-as-primarily-taiwanese-few-say-theyre-primarily-chinese/ (accessed 05.02.2024).

22. Johnston A.I, Tsai Chia-hung T., Yin G. When Might US Political Support Be Unwelcome in Taiwan? The Brookings Institution, 05.04.2023. Available at: https://www.brookings.edu/articles/when-might-us-political-support-be-unwelcome-in-taiwan/ (accessed 04.02.2024).

23. Golovachev V. “Cooperating with China, in Love with Taiwan”. Interview. Russia in Global Affairs, 23.01.2024. (In Russ.) Available at: https://globalaffairs.ru/articles/sotrudnichat-s-kitaem/ (accessed 05.02.2024).


SOURCES

1. Mutual Defense Treaty between the United States and the Republic of China; December 2, 1954. Lillian Goldman Law Library. Available at: https://avalon.law.yale.edu/20th_century/chin001.asp (accessed 29.10.2023).

2. Taiwan Relations Act. American Institute in Taiwan. Available at: https://www.ait.org.tw/taiwan-relations-act-public-law-96-8-22-u-s-c-3301-et-seq/ (accessed 02.11.2023).

3. U.S. – PRC Joint Communique (1972). American Institute in Taiwan. Available at: https://www.ait.org.tw/u-s-prc-joint-communique-1972/ (accessed 02.11.2023).

4. Chinese Premier Urges U.S. Not to Aggravate Situation. CNN, 17.03.1996. Available at: http://edition.cnn.com/WORLD/9603/china_taiwan/17/ (accessed 05.11.2023).

5. Trump’s Phone Call with Taiwan President Risks China’s wrath. The Guardian, 03.12.2016. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/dec/03/trump-angers-beijing-with-provocative-phone-call-to-taiwan-president (accessed 04.11.2023).

6. National Security Strategy of the United States of America. The White House, 2017. 68 ð. Available at: https://trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/NSS-Final-12-18-2017-0905.pdf (accessed 01.02.2024).

7. Summary of the 2018 National Defense Strategy of The United States of America. Available at: https://dod.defense.gov/Portals/1/Documents/pubs/2018-National-Defense-Strategy-Summary.pdf (accessed 02.02.2024).

8. U.S. Strategic Framework for the Indo-Pacific. Available at: https://trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/IPS-Final-Declass.pdf (accessed 01.02.2024).

9. US Plans $7bn Arms Deal with Taiwan as China Ratchets Up Military Threat. Financial Times, 16.09.2020. Available at: https://www.ft.com/content/f4b2696b-a960-40f0-85db-1bf9fd6d0b7b (accessed 04.11.2023).

10. United States Secretary of Health and Human Services to First Ever Visit Taiwan. TASS, 05.08.2020. (In Russ.) Available at: https://tass.ru/mezhdunarodnaya-panorama/9123423 (accessed 02.02.2024).

11. Taiwan Invited to US Inauguration for First Time Since 1979. France 24, 21.01.2021. Available at: https://www.france24.com/en/live-news/20210121-taiwan-invited-to-us-inauguration-for-first-time-since-1979 (accessed 04.02.2024).

12. Xi Warns Biden Not to ‘Play with Fire’ Ahead of Potential Taiwan Trip by Nancy Pelosi. Financial Times, 28.07.2022. Available at: https://www.ft.com/content/c8fc6efa‑5429-4873-92c0-aae1134c7a14 (accessed 04.02.2024).

13. The US Taiwan Enhancement Resilience Act (TERA) Substantially Strengthens US-Taiwan Military Cooperation. Pamir Consulting LLC, January 2023. Available at: https://pamirllc.com/executive-briefs/taiwan-update-us-tera-strengthens-us-taiwan-military-cooperation-20-jan-23 (accessed 01.02.2024).

14. China’s Foreign Minister Warns US Not to Cross Its ‘Red Line’. Al Jazeera, 23.12.2022. Available at: https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2022/12/23/us-must-stop-unilateral-bullying-chinas-foreign-minister-says (accessed 04.02.2024).


For citation:
Lebedev S. The Evolution of U.S. “Strategic Ambiguity” Policy Towards Taiwan. World Eñonomy and International Relations, 2024, vol. 68, no. 6, pp. 61-71. https://doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227-2024-68-6-61-71 EDN: SJBBXX



Comments (0)

No comments

Add comment







Indexed

 

 

 

 

Dear authors! Please note that in the VAK List of peer-reviewed scientific journals, in which the main scientific results of dissertations for the degree of candidate and doctor of sciences should be published for the “MEMO Journal” the following specialties are recorded:
economic sciences:
5.2.5. World Economy.
5.2.1. Economic Theory
5.2.3. Regional and Branch Economics
political sciences:
5.5.4. International Relations
5.5.1. History and Theory of Politics
5.5.2. Political Institutions, Processes, Technologies

 

Current Issue
2025, vol. 69, No. 4
Topical Themes of the Issue:
  • Entrenchment of Neo-Protectionism in Global Economy of 21st Century 
  • Institutional Dynamics of Fiscal Integration in the European Union
  • Factors of Latin American Countries’ Interest in BRICS
  • “China: Bitter Dish with Complex Garnish”
Announcement

Dear authors of the journal!

Please note that the author's copies of the issues in which your texts are published are kept in the editorial office for no more than one year. After this period expires, the editorial office has the right to dispose of unclaimed copies at its own discretion.

 

Submit an Article
INVITATION FOR PUBLICATION
The Editorial Board invites authors to write analytical articles on the following topics:
  • changes in the processes of globalization in modern conditions
  • formation of the new world order
  • shifts in civilization at the stage of transition to a digital society

The editors are also interested in publishing synthesis articles / scientific reviews revealing the main trends in the development of certain regions of the world - Latin America, Africa, South Asia, etc.