Separatism in Modern Europe: Spatial Effects of Political Changes

72
DOI: 10.20542/0131-2227-2024-68-3-59-68
EDN: WKZMWC
Institute of Scientific Information on Social Sciences, Russian Academy of Sciences, 51/21, Nakhimovskii Prosp., Moscow, 117418, Russian Federation.

Received 24.07.2023. Revised 22.11.2023. Accepted 07.12.2023.

Abstract. According to Ryan Griffiths, we’re in the “Age of Secession”. The characteristics of spatial effects typical of European separatism are consistently examined in this paper. The effects of diffusion, proximity, fragmentation, and scale are given special consideration. The space is not homogeneous; separatism erupts with the most vulnerable territories, takes different forms, and has different pace. Since the diffusion effect undoubtedly contributes to the fragmentation of the political space, it takes on distinct forms depending on the historical period. It would be incorrect to claim that separatist movements arise in response to geographic distance only. Social proximity determines spatial influence. Instead, the degree to which separatist actors interact with one another is determined by their territorial proximity. With scale of political activity changing, the correspondent extent, to which political actors influence them, varies as well. As a result, regionalist parties that are not well-known at the federal level play a significant role in local politics. Due to the fragmentation effect, the number of these parties is increasing at the regional level, yet not nationwide. Given the scale effect, regional actors in the EU can interact with supranational structures themselves and gain more power without having to go through national ones. There are more parties with a territorial profile as a result of spatial effects in politics. Political leaders and parties at the national level are compelled to consider their stances, incorporate the regional agenda into their plans, and frequently pursue partnerships with them.

Keywords: spatial effects, diffusion of innovations, separatism, regional parties, regionalism, Europe


REFERENCES

1. Griffiths R. Age of secession. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2016. 284 p.

2. Sambanis N., Germann M., Schädel A. SDM: a new data set on self-determination movements with an application to the reputational theory of conflict. J. Conflict Resolut, 2017, vol. 62, no. 3, pp. 658-686. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002717735364 

3. Roth H. Let’s split! A complete guide to separatist movements and aspirant nations, from Abkhazia to Zanzibar. Sacramento, Litwin Books, 2015. 636 p.

4. Wood J. Secession: a comparative analytical framework. Canadian Journal of Political Science, 1981, vol. 14, iss. 1, pp. 107-134. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/S000842390003537X 

5. Panov P.V. Ethnic and regional parties in the countries: special features and trajectories of development. Bulletin of Perm University. Political Science, 2020, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 20-34. (In Russ.) Available at: https://doi.org/10.17072/2218-1067-2020-3-20-34 

6. Popov F.A. Spatial Aspects of Failure and Collapse of a Sovereign State. World Eñonomy and International Relations, 2014, no. 7, pp. 78-86. (In Russ.) Available at: https://doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227-2014-7-78-86 

7. Semenenko I.S. New patterns of national identity in “Old” Europe. Polis: Political Studies, 2018, no. 5, pp. 70-87. (In Russ.) Available at: https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2018.05.07 

8. Bauböck R. A multilevel theory of democratic secession. Ethnopolitics, 2019, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 227-246. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/17449057.2019.1585088 

9. Chernega V.N. “Threats to democracy” in France. Current Problems of Europe, 2023, no. 1, pp. 146-169. (In Russ.) Available at: https://upe-journal.ru/article.php?id=1773 (accessed 05.10.2023).

10. Strmiska M. Conceptualization and typology of European regional parties: a note on methodology. Central European Journal of International and Security Studies, 2003, vol. 5, pp. 2-5. Available at: https://journals.muni.cz/cepsr/article/view/3940 (accessed 05.10.2023).

11. Otjes S. Pushed by national politics or pulled by localism? Voting for independent local parties in the Netherlands. Local Government Studies, 2018, vol. 44, iss. 3, pp. 305-328. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2018.1427072 

12. Lundåsen S, Erlingsson G. The local party voter: A localist anti-establishment voter? Electoral Studies, 2023, vol. 82, pp. 1-15. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2023.102592 

13. Elias A., Basile L., Franco-Guillén N., Szöcsik E. The Framing Territorial Demands (FraTerr) dataset: A novel approach to conceptualizing and measuring regionalist actors’ territorial strategies. Regional & Federal Studies, 2023, vol. 33, iss. 3, pp. 355-370. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/13597566.2021.1964481 

14. Kolosov V.A. Territorial and Political Organization of Society. Dr. Dis. (Geogr.). Moscow, 1992. 526 p. (In Russ.)

15. Sulimov K.A. The dynamics of ethnic regional autonomies’ subjectness and the balance in interethnic relations. Political science, 2017, no. 4, pp. 206-225. (In Russ.) Available at: https://www.politnauka.ru/jour/article/view/574 (accessed 05.10.2023).

16. Cabestan J.-P., Pavković A. Secessionism and separatism in Europe and Asia: to have a state of one’s own. London, Routledge, 2017. 280 p.

17. Sulimov K.A. Regionalism as a driver of European regions’ activity in their relations with national authorities. Polis. Political Studies, 2022, no. 6, pp. 38-54. (In Russ.) Available at: https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2022.06.04

18. Jensen M., Koop C., Tatham M. Coping with power dispersion? Autonomy, coordination and control in multilevel systems. Journal of European Public Policy, 2014, vol. 21, iss. 9, pp. 1237-1254. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2014.922861 

19. Shair-Rosenfield S., Schakel A., Niedzwiecki S., Marks G., Hooghe L., Osterkatz S., Language difference and regional authority. Regional & Federal Studies, 2021, vol. 31, iss. 1, pp. 73-97. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/13597566.2020.1831476 

20. Tkacik M. Characteristics of Forms of Autonomy. Brill, The International Journal on Minority and Group Rights, 2008, vol. 15, no. 2–3, pp. 369-401. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1163/157181108X332668 

21. Fagerholm A. Ethnic and Regionalist Parties in Western Europe: A Party Family? Studies in Ethnicity and Nationalism, 2016, vol. 16, iss. 2, pp. 304-339. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/sena.12191 

22. Åberg M., Ahlberger C. Local candidate lists: historical artefacts or a novel phenomenon? A research note. Party politics, 2015, vol. 21, iss. 5, pp. 813-820. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068813499870 

23. Alonso S., Cabeza L., Gómez B. Parties’ electoral strategies in a two-dimensional political space: Evidence from Spain and Great Britain. Party Politics, 2015, vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 851-865. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068815597576

24. Duerr G. Secessionism and the European Union: The Future of Flanders, Scotland, and Catalonia. Lanham, Lexington Books, 2015. 226 p.

25. Jolly S. The Europhile Fringe? Regionalist Party Support for European Integration. European Union Politics, 2007, vol. 8, iss.1, pp. 109-130. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/1465116507073290 

26. Laible J. Separatism and sovereignty in the new Europe: party politics and the meaning of statehood in a supranational context. Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan, 2008. 272 p.

27. Piris J.-C. Political and legal aspects of recent regional secessionist trends in some EU member states. Closa C., ed. Secession from a member state and withdrawal from the European Union: troubled membership. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2017, pp. 69-87.

28. Kenealy D. How do you solve a problem like Scotland? A proposal regarding “internal enlargement”. Journal of European Integration, 2014, vol. 36, no. 6, pp. 585-600. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2014.902942 

29. Jolly K. The European Union and the Rise of Regionalist Parties. Ann Arbor, University of Michigan Press, 2015. 252 p.

30. Anderson P., Soeren K. Minority nationalism and the European Union. The cases of Scotland and Catalonia. L’Europe en formation, 2016, vol. 379, no.1, pp. 40-57. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3917/eufor.379.0040 

31. Elias A. Whatever happened to the Europe of the regions? Revisiting the regional dimension of European politics. Regional & Federal Studies, 2008, vol. 18, iss. 5, pp. 483-492. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/13597560802351655 

32. Massetti E. Explaining Regionalist Party Positioning in a Multi-dimensional Ideological Space: A Framework for Analysis. Regional & Federal Studies, 2009, vol. 19, iss. 4–5, pp. 501-531. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/13597560903310246 

33. Cunningham K., Sawyer K. Is self-determination contagious? A spatial analysis of the spread of self-determination claims. International Organization, 2017, vol. 71, iss. 3, pp. 585-604. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818317000200 

34. Conversi D. Domino effect or internal developments? The influences of international events and political ideologies on Catalan and Basque nationalism. West European Politics, 1993, vol. 16, iss. 3, pp. 245-270. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/01402389308424973 

35. Forsberg E. Do Ethnic Dominoes Fall? Evaluating Domino Effects of Granting Territorial Concessions to Separatist Groups. International Studies Quarterly, 2013, vol. 57, iss. 2, pp. 329-340. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/isqu.12006 

36. De Gruyter K. There Is Life for the EU After Brexit. Carnegie Europe, 23.03.2018. Available at: https://carnegieeurope.eu/2018/03/23/there-is-life-for-eu-after-brexit-pub-75876 (accessed 15.09.2022).

37. Walter B. Building Reputation: Why Governments Fight Some Separatists but Not Others. American Journal of Political Science, 2006, vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 313-330. Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/3694275 (accessed 05.10.2023).

38. Isobchuk M.V. The reasons for regionalist parties fragmentation in Western Europe. Bulletin of Perm University. Political Science, 2021, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 35-44. (In Russ.) Available at: https://press.psu.ru/index.php/polit/article/view/4497 (accessed 05.10.2023).

39. Stewart B., McGauvran R. What Do We Know about Ethnic Outbidding? We Need to Take Ideology Seriously. Nationalism and Ethnic Politics, 2020, vol. 26. iss. 4, pp. 405-420. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/13537113.2020.1809897 

40. Isobchuk M.V. Fragmentation of regionalism such a factor of its dynamics. Bulletin of Perm University. Political Science, 2020, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 35-45. (In Russ.) Available at: https://doi.org/10.17072/2218-1067-2020-3-35-45 

41. Massetti E., Schakel A. From class to region: How regionalist parties link (and subsume) left-right into centre-periphery politics. Party Politics, 2015, vol. 21, iss. 6, pp. 866-886. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068815597577 

42. Buhaug H., Gleditsch K. Contagion or Confusion? Why Conflicts Cluster in Space. International Studies Quarterly, 2008, vol. 52, iss. 2, pp. 215-233. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2478.2008.00499.x 

43. Hegre H. Toward a Democratic Civil Peace? Democracy, Political Change, and Civil War, 1816–1992. American Political Science Review, 2001, vol. 95, iss. 1, pp. 33-48. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055401000119 

44. Zamyatina N., Pilyasov A. Concept of proximity: Foreign experience and prospects of application in Russia. Regional Research of Russia, 2017, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 197-207. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1134/S2079970517030108 


SOURCES

1. NBER working papers. Is secessionism mostly about income or identity? A global analysis of 3,003 subnational regions. Available at: https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w30428/w30428.pdf (accessed 14.05.2023).


For citation:
Turov N. Separatism in Modern Europe: Spatial Effects of Political Changes. World Eñonomy and International Relations, 2024, vol. 68, no. 3, pp. 59-68. https://doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227-2024-68-3-59-68 EDN: WKZMWC



Comments (0)

No comments

Add comment







Indexed

 

 

 

 

Dear authors! Please note that in the VAK List of peer-reviewed scientific journals, in which the main scientific results of dissertations for the degree of candidate and doctor of sciences should be published for the “MEMO Journal” the following specialties are recorded:
economic sciences:
5.2.5. World Economy.
5.2.1. Economic Theory
5.2.3. Regional and Branch Economics
political sciences:
5.5.4. International Relations
5.5.1. History and Theory of Politics
5.5.2. Political Institutions, Processes, Technologies

 

Current Issue
2025, vol. 69, No. 2
Topical Themes of the Issue:
  • Battle of Titans: Structural Shifts in MNCs Global Production
  • Features of Collective Securitization in the European Union
  • Terrorist Networks of the “Global Jihad” in the 2020s
  • At Post-Soviet Space
Announcement

Dear authors of the journal!

Please note that the author's copies of the issues in which your texts are published are kept in the editorial office for no more than one year. After this period expires, the editorial office has the right to dispose of unclaimed copies at its own discretion.

 

Submit an Article
INVITATION FOR PUBLICATION
The Editorial Board invites authors to write analytical articles on the following topics:
  • changes in the processes of globalization in modern conditions
  • formation of the new world order
  • shifts in civilization at the stage of transition to a digital society

The editors are also interested in publishing synthesis articles / scientific reviews revealing the main trends in the development of certain regions of the world - Latin America, Africa, South Asia, etc.