
Received 26.07.2023. Revised 10.10.2023. Accepted 02.11.2023.
Abstract. In the world (but not yet in Russia specifically) there is already an extensive and rapidly growing amount of literature on the role and place of emotions both in international relations (IR) and in the foreign policy of states. This gives grounds to talk about the “emotional turn” within the framework of IR as a research discipline. But it is also well known that emotions are studied not only by IR, but in psychology, in various areas of neuroscience and in sociology as well. This article deals with some ontological and epistemological issues, arising from the results of multidirectional efforts of many academics to conceptualize the international political role of emotions on the basis of the leading international relations theories. The immediate goal is the exploration in the chosen subject area of the methodological problem of the integration of social science knowledge with achievements from the field of natural sciences. It is proposed to pay particularly close attention in this sense to the paradigm of affective neuroscience. The phenomenon of emotion, in principle, does not fit well with categories, which until now the IR has been focused on. Methodological imperatives of objective research push for the exclusion of subjective emotional experience from the scope of consideration. Constructivists, in their turn, treat emotion as a cognitive belief rather than as a bodily state. But in the article, the emotion is represented as a phenomenon which is both mental and physical. This is a monist view, going back to Spinoza. The research leads to the conclusion that, although social constructivism has good potential for studying the emotions in IR, when intentionally ignoring the biological nature of emotions, social constructivists can weaken their own position in comparison with those academic opponents, who are committed to instrumental rationalism in their approach. Constructivists thus limit with no good reason their own agenda when studying emotions and hinder the development of a transdisciplinary approach to the study of emotions in IR in particular.
Keywords: emotion, affect, realism, constructivism, behavioural analysis, affective neuroscience, monism
REFERENCES
1. Skonieczny A. Emotions and Political Narratives: Populism, Trump and Trade. Politics and Governance, 2018, vol. 6, iss. 4, pp. 62-72. DOI: 10.17645/pag.v6i4.1574
2. Hall T.H., Ross A.A.G. Rethinking Affective Experience and Popular Emotion: World War I and the Construction of Group Emotion in International Relations. Political Psychology, 2019, vol. 40, no. 6, pp. 1357-1372. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12608
3. Sirin C.V., Villalobos J.D., Geva N. Political Information and Emotions in Ethnic Conflict Interventions. International Journal of Conflict Management, 2011, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 35-59. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1108/10444061111103616
4. Gellwitzki C.N.L., Houde A.M. Feeling the Heat: Emotions, Politicization, and the European Union. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 2022, vol. 60, iss. 5, pp. 1470-1487. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.13328
5. Ojala Ì. Emotional Awareness: On the Importance of Including Emotional Aspects in Education for Sustainable Development (ESD). Journal of Education for Sustainable Development, 2013, vol. 7, iss. 2, pp. 167-182. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0973408214526488
6. Mercer J. Feeling like a state: social emotion and identity. International Theory, 2014, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 515-535. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1752971914000244
7. Mercer J. Rationality and Psychology in International Politics. International Organization, 2005, vol. 59, iss. 1, pp. 77-106. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818305050058
8. Harris S. The Moral Landscape: How Science Can Determine Human Values. New York, Free Press, 2010. 320 p.
9. Kotsur G. Emotions and International Relations. International Trends, 2021, vol. 19, no. 3 (66), pp. 43-67. (In Russ.) Available at: https://doi.org/10.17994/IT.2021.19.3.66.2
10. Lebedeva M.M., Zinovieva E.S. Methods of neuroscience in studying world politics. Polis. Political Studies, 2023, no. 5, pp. 141-152. (In Russ.) Available at: https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2023.05.09
11. Coan J. Emergent Ghosts of the Emotion Machine. Emotion Review, 2010, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 274-285. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1754073910361978
12. Ross A.A.G. Representation and Mediation in World Politics. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 2019, vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 263-273. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829818808386
13. Solomon R. The Passions. Indianapolis/Cambridge, Mass., Hackett, 1993. 324 p.
14. Panksepp J. Affective neuroscience: The foundations of human and animal emotions. New York, Oxford University Press, 1998. 480 p.
15. Ratcliffe M. William James on emotion and intentionality. International Journal of Philosophical Studies, 2005, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 179-202. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/09672550500080405
16. Damasio A.R. William James and the modern neurobiology of emotion. Evans D., Cruse P., eds. Emotion, Evolution, and Rationality. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2004, pp. 3-14. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198528975.003.0001
17. Robinson B., Kutner M. Spinoza and the Affective Turn: A Return to the Philosophical Origins of Affect. Qualitative Inquiry, 2019, vol. 25, iss. 2, pp. 111-117. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800418786312
18. Brennan T. The transmission of affect. Ithaca, NY, Cornell University Press, 2004. 227 p.
19. Volodina A.V. Theory of Affect in Deleuze: Aesthetic Issues. Culture and Art, 2019, no. 12, pp. 35-45. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.7256/2454-0625.2019.12.31729
20. Massumi B. Parables for the virtual: Movement, affect, sensation. Durham, NC, Duke University Press, 2002. 338 p.
21. Damasio A.R. Descartes’ Error: Emotion Reason, and the Human Brain. New York, Avon Books, 1994. 336 p.
22. Waltz K.N. Man, the State, and War. The Theoretical Analysis. New York, Columbia University Press, 2001. 263 p.
23. Cooley J.W. The Geometries of Situation and Emotion and the Calculus of Change in Negotiation and Mediation. ValpoScholar, 1994, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 1-120. Available at: http://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/144549648.pdf (accessed 13.07.2023).
24. Larson D.W. Trust and Missed Opportunities in International Relations. Political Psychology, 1997, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 701-734. DOI: 10.1111/0162-895x.00075
25. Hill Ch. The Changing Politics of Foreign Policy. Houndmills, Basingstoke and New York, Palgrave, 2003. 376 p.
26. Mercer J. Emotion and Strategy in the Korean War. International Organization, 2013, vol. 67, iss. 2, pp. 221-252. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818313000015
27. Crawford N.C. Institutionalizing passion in world politics: fear and empathy. International Theory, 2014, vol. 6, iss. 3, pp. 535-557. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1752971914000256
28. Linklater A. Anger and World Politics: How Collective Emotions Shift over Time. International Theory, 2014, vol. 6, iss. 3, pp. 574-578. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1752971914000293
29. Widmaier W.W. Emotions Before Paradigms: Elite Anxiety and Populist Resentment from the Asian to Subprime Crises. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 2010, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 127-144. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829810372693
30. Head N. A Politics of Empathy: Encounters with Empathy in Israel and Palestine. Review of International Studies, 2016, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 95-113. Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/26618548
31. Hall T. Emotional Diplomacy: Official Emotion on the International Stage. Ithaca, New York, Cornell University Press, 2015. 264 p.
32. Tonra B. Emotion norms: Ireland, Brexit, backstops and protocols. Global Affairs, 2021, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 157-171. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/23340460.2021.1931399
33. Richard Ph. Over AUKUS deal, France took its time to process the affront [online]. Le Monde, 14.03.2023. Available at: https://www.lemonde.fr/en/international/article/2023/03/14/over-aukus-deal-france-took-its-time-to-process-the-affront_6019338_4.html (accessed 14.07.2023).
34. Panksepp J., Biven L. The Archaeology of Mind: Neuroevolutionary Origins of Human Emotions. New York, NY, W.W. Norton & Company, 2012. 699 p.
35. Bell D. In Biology We Trust: Biopolitical Science and the Elusive Self. Jacobi D., Freyberg-Inan A., eds. Human Beings in International Relations. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2015, pp. 113-131. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781316337042.006
36. Holmes M. Face-to-Face Diplomacy: Social Neuroscience and International Relation. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2018. 303 p.
37. Verweij M., Senior T.J., Domínguez D.J.F., Turner R. Emotion, rationality and decision-making: How to link affective and social neuroscience with social theory. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 2015, vol. 9, art. 332, pp. 1-13. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2015.00332
38. Stein J.G. The Micro-Foundations of International Relations Theory: Psychology and Behavioral Economics. International Organization, 2017, vol. 71, Supplement S1, pp. S249-S263. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818316000436
39. Kapeliushnikov R.I. Behavioral economics and new paternalism: Working paper WP3/2013/03. Moscow, Publishing House of the Higher School of Economics, 2013. 76 p. (In Russ.) Available at: https://wp.hse.ru/data/2013/05/14/1299917275/WP3_2013_03f.pdf (accessed 24.07.2023).
40. Roediger III H.L., Gallo D.A., Geraci L. Processing approaches to cognition: The impetus from the levels-of processing framework. Memory, 2002, vol. 10, no. 5/6, pp. 319-332. DOI: 10.1080/09658210224000144
41. Risse T., Wiener A. ‘Something rotten’ and the social construction of social constructivism: a comment on comments. Journal of European Public Policy, 1999, vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 775-782. DOI: 10.1080/135017699343379
42. Koschut S. The power of (emotion) words: on the importance of emotions for social constructivist discourse analysis in IR. Journal of International Relations and Developments, 2018, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 495-522. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41268-017-0086-0
43. Fearon J.D., Wendt A. Rationalism v. Constructivism: A Skeptical View. Carlsnaes W., Risse T., Simmons B.A., eds. Handbook of International Relations. 1st ed. London, SAGE Publications, 2002, pp. 52-72.
44. Laffey M., Weldes J. Beyond Belief: ideas and symbolic technologies in the study of international relations. European Journal of International Relations, 1997, vol. 3, pp. 193-237. DOI: 10.1177/1354066197003002003
45. Hutchison E., Bleiker, R. Theorising Emotions in World Politics. International Theory, 2014, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 491-514. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1752971914000232
46. Holmes M. Believing This and Alieving That: Theorizing Affect and Intuitions in International Politics. International Studies Quarterly, 2015, vol. 59, no. 4, pp. 706-720. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/isqu.12201
47. Aranguren M. Reconstructing the social constructionist view of emotions: from language to culture, including nonhuman culture. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 2017, vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 244-260. Available at: https://hal.science/hal-01633965/document (accessed 25.07.2023).
No comments