Contradictions and Conflicts in the Multilateral Trading System

40
DOI: 10.20542/0131-2227-2023-67-9-5-14
EDN: SBRVDY
V. Zagashvili, zagashvili@imemo.ru
Primakov National Research Institute of World Economy and International Relations, Russian Academy of Sciences (IMEMO), 23, Profsoyuznaya Str., Moscow, 117997, Russian Federation.

Received 29.05.2023. Revised 14.06.2023. Accepted 04.07.2023.

Acknowledgments. The article was prepared within the project “Post-crisis world order: challenges and technologies, competition and cooperation” supported by the grant from Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation program for research projects in priority areas of scientific and technological development (Agreement 075-15-2020-783).


Abstract. Although the Doha Round is prominent for its Development Agenda that pays special attention to the needs of developing countries, it is the contradictions between this group of countries and the developed ones that brought the multilateral negotiations to the deadlock. The stagnation of the Doha Round made protectionism an easy choice for too many. Protectionist response to external shocks becomes especially damaging to the multilateral trading system when WTO basic rules are ignored, which is just the case of the US trade policy. A really hard issue was posed in front of the WTO by Washington with the suspension of the work of the Appellate Body and subsequent paralysis of the Dispute Settlement, one of the pillars of the multilateral trading system. The significance of this case goes beyond the multilateral trading system because the experience of the WTO in this field is extremely important for the emerging system of global governance. Since the creation of the WTO the world economy has undergone great changes and major challenges arose that are still to be attended by the multilateral trading system. Moreover, some existing WTO provisions are to be clarified in order to eliminate uncertainty and double interpretation that allow countries to resort to discriminatory practices with impunity. The resumption of the full operation of the multilateral trading system is hardly possible without a review of the decision-making procedure based now on the consensus and single undertaking rules. Changing the decision-making process is a fundamental problem in the multilateral trading system. Plurilateral agreements do not eliminate it but allow the countries concerned to meet challenges that are most important to them. The resolution the 12th ministerial conference is critically important: it sets to summarize proposals for reforming the WTO and prepare a draft decision on their basis by the next conference which is scheduled for February 2024. Taking into account that the divergence of national economic interests will persist indefinitely long, it can be assumed that the process of reforming the WTO will encounter considerable difficulties and will also take long period of time. Overcoming the stagnation of the multilateral trading system will remove an important obstacle that prevents the globalization from entering its next, integration stage, distinctive for the formation of the global governance system. The WTO is not the only, although very important, element of this system, the further development of which will require a close interaction between the main international organizations.

Keywords: multilateral trading system, World Trade Organization, special and differential treatment, WTO dispute settlement system, plurilateral agreements


REFERENCES

1. Bordoff J. America’s Landmark Climate Law. Finance & Development, December 2022, pp. 35-37. Available at: https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/fandd/issues/2022/12/america-landmark-climate-law-bordoff (accessed 25.05.2023).

2. McBride J., Siripurapu A. What’s Next for the WTO? New York, Council on Foreign Relations, 10.06.2022. Available at: https://www.cfr.org/backgrounder/whats-next-wto (accessed 25.05.2023).

3. Adlung R., Mamdouh H. Plurilateral Trade Agreements: An Escape Route for the WTO? WTO Working Paper ERSD‑2017-03, January 2017. 23 p. Available at: https://www.wto.org/english/res_e/reser_e/ersd201703_e.htm (accessed 25.05.2023).

4. Low P. WTO Decision-Making for the Future. Staff Working Paper ERSD‑2011-05, May 2011. 14 p. Available at: https://www.wto.org/english/res_e/reser_e/ersd201105_e.htm (accessed 25.05.2023).

5. Winslett G. Critical Mass Agreements: The Proven Template for Trade Liberalization in the WTO. World Trade Review, 2018, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 405-426. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1474745617000295 

6. Baldwin R., Evenett S. Revitalising Multilateral Trade Cooperation: Why? Why Now? And How? Baldwin R., Evenett S., eds. Revitalising Multilateralism: Pragmatic Ideas for the New WTO Director-General. London, CEPR Press, 2020, pp. 9-53. Available at: https://ecipe.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Revitalisng_Multilateralism_Final_Version.pdf (accessed 25.05.2023).

7. Akman M.S., Armstrong S., Dadush U., Gonzalez A., Kimura F., Nakagawa J., Rashish P., Tamura A., Primo Braga C.A. World Trading System under Stress: Scenarios for the Future. Global Policy, 2020, no. 11, pp. 360-366. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12776 

8. Hoekman B., Mavroidis P.C. WTO Reform: Back to the Past to Build for the Future. Global Policy, 2021, vol. 12, iss. S3, pp. 5-12. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12924 

9. Schöfer T., Weinhardt C. Developing-Country Status at the WTO: The Divergent Strategies of Brazil, India and China. International Affairs, November 2022, vol. 98, no. 6, pp. 1937-1957. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iiac227 

10. García-Herrero A. The Elephant in the Room of WTO Reform: China. CESifo Forum, March 2021, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 22-29. Available at: https://www.cesifo.org/en/publications/2021/article-journal/elephant-room-wto-reform-china (accessed 25.05.2023).

11. Ahn D. Why Reform Is Needed: WTO ‘Public Body’ Jurisprudence. Global Policy, 2021, vol. 12, no. S3, pp. 61-70. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12929

12. Hoekman B., Wolfe R. WTO Reform as a Triangular Problem among China, the EU and the US. CESifo Forum, March 2021, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 12-16. Available at: https://www.cesifo.org/en/publications/2021/article-journal/wto-reform-triangular-problem-among-china-eu-and-us (accessed 25.05.2023).

13. Bown C.P. Mega-Regional Trade Agreements and the Future of the WTO. Global Policy, 2017, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 107-112. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12391 


SOURCES

1. UNCTAD. Statistics. Data Centre. Available at: https://unctadstat.unctad.org/wds/ReportFolders/reportFolders.aspx?sCS_ChosenLang=en (accessed 25.05.2023).

2. Report on the Appellate Body of the World Trade Organization. Washington, Office of the United States Trade Representative, February 2020. 174 p. Available at: https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/Report_on_the_Appellate_Body_of_the_World_Trade_Organization.pdf (accessed 25.05.2023).

3. Multi-Party Interim Appeal Arbitration Arrangement (MPIA). Available at: https://wtoplurilaterals.info/plural_initiative/the-mpia/ (accessed 25.05.2023).

4. Agreement on Trade in Civil Aircraft. Available at: https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/civair_e/civair_e.htm (accessed 25.05.2023).

5. Agreement on Government Procurement. Available at: https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/gproc_e/gp_gpa_e.htm (accessed 25.05.2023).

6. The Legal Status of ‘Joint Statement Initiatives’ and Their Negotiated Outcomes. WT/GC/W/819/Rev.1. WTO, 30.04.2021. Available at: https://docs.wto.org/dol2fe/Pages/SS/directdoc.aspx?filename=q:/WT/GC/W819R1.pdf&Open=True (accessed 25.05.2023).

7. World Trade Report 2011. The WTO and Preferential Trade Agreements: From Co-existence to Coherence. Geneve, WTO, 2012. 256 p. Available at: https://www.wto.org/english/res_e/publications_e/wtr11_e.htm (accessed 25.05.2023).

8. Information Technology Agreement – an Explanation. Available at: https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/inftec_e/itaintro_e.htm (accessed 25.05.2023).

9. Joint Initiatives. Available at: https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/jsi_e/jsi_e.htm (accessed 25.05.2023).

10. EU Concept Paper on WTO Reform. 04.10.2022. Available at: https://circabc.europa.eu/ui/group/7fc51410-46a1-4871-8979-20cce8df0896/library/42115f40-e2ba-4a49-9162-de92098f15bd/details (accessed 25.05.2023).

11. EU–U.S. Trade Talks – One Year on. Brussels, European Commission, 25.07.2019. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_19_4670 (accessed 25.05.2023).

12. WTO Reform – an Overview. Available at: https://www.wto.org/english/thewto_e/minist_e/mc12_e/briefing_notes_e/bfwtoreform_e.htm (accessed 25.05.2023).


For citation:
Zagashvili V. Contradictions and Conflicts in the Multilateral Trading System. World Eonomy and International Relations, 2023, vol. 67, no. 9, pp. 5-14. https://doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227-2023-67-9-5-14 EDN: SBRVDY



Comments (0)

No comments

Add comment







Indexed

 

 

 

 

Dear authors! Please note that in the VAK List of peer-reviewed scientific journals, in which the main scientific results of dissertations for the degree of candidate and doctor of sciences should be published for the “MEMO Journal” the following specialties are recorded:
economic sciences:
5.2.5. World Economy.
5.2.1. Economic Theory
5.2.3. Regional and Branch Economics
political sciences:
5.5.4. International Relations
5.5.1. History and Theory of Politics
5.5.2. Political Institutions, Processes, Technologies

 

Current Issue
2024, vol. 68, No. 5
Topical Themes of the Issue:
  • Are There Any Ways to Break Through the Korean Nuclear Impasse?
  • Contemporary U.S. Taiwan Policy: Balancing on the Edge
  • The Gulf Monarchies’ Vision of the Global Order Transformations and the Russian Place in It
  • At Post-Soviet Space
Submit an Article
INVITATION FOR PUBLICATION
The Editorial Board invites authors to write analytical articles on the following topics:
  • changes in the processes of globalization in modern conditions
  • formation of the new world order
  • shifts in civilization at the stage of transition to a digital society

The editors are also interested in publishing synthesis articles / scientific reviews revealing the main trends in the development of certain regions of the world - Latin America, Africa, South Asia, etc.