217Received 17.12.2022. Revised 17.01.2023. Accepted 20.01.2023.
Acknowledgements. The research was supported by the Russian Science Foundation (grant no. 19-18-00142Ï).
Abstract. The article addresses the political and economic risks and prospects for the Russian policy of turning to the East, in the context of the new geopolitical situation that has taken shape by the autumn of 2022. The object of the study is the region of East Asia, where Russia possesses significant interests in the spheres of economy, politics and security. Among the risks for the Russian policy of turning to the East the authors mention the lack of experience of Russia’s involvement in the regionalization processes of East Asia, as well as the cautious attitude of certain Asian countries towards Russia as an external player in the region, associated with Russia’s image as a non-Asian country and the West-centric thinking of the Russian political elite. Another risk is an increasingly noticeable tilt in Russia’s Asian policy towards China, both in the economic and political-diplomatic spheres, which is most evident in the increasing dependence of Russian energy export on the Chinese gas markets. Such tilt endangers Russia’s status of a neutral power enjoying a special authority in the region as a country with considerable mediation potential not involved in any of the regional conflicts. Among the recommendations for Russia, the authors mention the necessity for the projects of “coupling” the Greater Eurasia with the infrastructure development in the Asia-Pacific countries, which should be devoid of an ideological commitment and should be based solely on pragmatic considerations. Besides, Russia needs to step up its diplomacy in the multilateral economic and political organizations of the region – the SCO, BRICS, RCEP, the East Asian Summit, as well as think over long-term plans for the development of relations with major Asian partners on bilateral tracks. Finally, it would be desirable to develop the “second track” dialogue with partner countries, both in bilateral and multilateral formats, which would provide a platform for a frank exchange of views against the background of insufficient level of the political contacts. In any case, it is necessary to pursue a meaningful and well-coordinated strategy in the East, based on an accurate understanding of national interests and the effective use of available resources.
Keywords: Russia, turn to East, East Asia, Western sanctions, Ukraine, special military operation, energy sector, tilt towards China, Greater Eurasia, regional integration, bilateral tracks
REFERENCES
1. Ostevik M., Kuhrt N. The Russian Far East and Russian Security. Blakkisrud H., Wilson Rowe E., eds. Russia’s Turn to the East: Domestic Policymaking and Regional Cooperation (Global Reordering). Basingstoke, Springer Nature, 2018, pp. 75-94.
2. Yilmaz S. (Yao Shifan) S., Changming L. Remaking Eurasia: the Belt and Road Initiative and China-Russia Strategic Partnership. Asia Europe Journal, 2020, vol. 18, pp. 259-280. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10308-019-00547-1
3. Mankoff J. Russia’s Asia Pivot: Confrontation or Cooperation? Asia Policy, 2015, vol. 19, pp. 65-87. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1353/asp.2015.0009
4. Lukonin S. Redefining Russia’s Pivot and China’s Peripheral Diplomacy. Saalman L., ed. China–Russia Relations and Regional Dynamics. From Pivots to Peripheral Diplomacy. Solna, SIPRI, 2017, pp. 3-10.
5. Lukyanov F. Why the West Has Failed to Get the Rest of the World on Board to Support Its Confrontation with Russia. Russia in Global Affairs, 11.07.2022. Available at: https://eng.globalaffairs.ru/articles/why-the-west-failed (accessed 11.12.2022).
6. Likhachyova A., Makarov I. National Identity and the Future of Russia. Valdai Discussion Club, 22.04.2014. (In Russ.) Available at: https://ru.valdaiclub.com/a/reports/natsionalnaya-identichnost/?sphrase_id=555085 (accessed 11.12.2022).
7. Baykov A.À. Models of Integration Expansion in Foreign Europe and East Asia. Moscow University Bulletin of World Politics, 2011, no. 4, pp. 57-74. (In Russ.)
8. Efimova L., Khokhlova N. Conceptualisation of “Asian Values” in Malaysia and Singapore. World Eñonomy and International Relations, 2020, vol. 64, no. 1, pp. 91-98. (In Russ.) Available at: https://doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227-2020-64-1-91-98
9. Bordachev Ò. Russia’s Turn to the East: Between Choice and Necessity. Valdai Discussion Club, 01.09.2022. (In Russ.) Available at: https://ru.valdaiclub.com/a/highlights/povorot-rossii-na-vostok/ (accessed 11.12.2022).
10. Dyomina Ya., Mazitova Ì. Russian Far East Development: Challenges under Deepening Integration in Asia Pacific. Regionalistica, 2018, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 41-54. (In Russ.) Available at: https://doi.org/10.14530/reg.2018.4.41
11. Larin V.L. Pacific Russia in the “Greater Eurasia” at the Beginning of XXI Century: Challenges and Responds. Historical and Social-Educational Idea, 2018, vol. 10, no. 3/1, pp. 65-81. (In Russ.) Available at: https://doi.org/10.17748/2075-9908-2018-10-3/1-65-81
12. Song Jiaxue. Current State of Foreign Direct Investment from China to Russia. Spring Days of Science: Collection of Reports of the International Conference of Students and Young Scientists (Yekaterinburg, April 22–24, 2021). Yekaterinburg, UrFU, 2021, pp. 1079-1087. (In Russ.) Available at: https://elar.urfu.ru/handle/10995/99725 (accessed 11.12.2022).
13. Kapoor N. Russia’s Pivot to Asia – A 10-Year Policy Review. Valdai Discussion Club, 21.03.2022. Available at: https://valdaiclub.com/a/highlights/russia-s-pivot-to-asia-a-decadal-policy-review/ (accessed 11.12.2022).
14. Charap S., Drennan J., Noël P. Russia and China: A New Model of Great-Power Relations. Survival, 2017, vol. 59, no. 1, pp. 25-42. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/00396338.2017.1282670
15. Yang Cheng. Redefining Russia’s Pivot and China’s Peripheral Diplomacy. Saalman L., ed. China–Russia Relations and Regional Dynamics. From Pivots to Peripheral Diplomacy. Solna, SIPRI, 2017, pp. 7-13.
16. Blank S. The Un-Holy Russo-Chinese Alliance. Defense & Security Analysis, 2020, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 249-274. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/14751798.2020.1790805
17. Mosyakov D.V. Russia’s Policy on the Conflict in the South China Sea. Southeast Asia: Actual Problems of Development, 2018, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 24-34. (In Russ.) Available at: https://sea.ivran.ru/en-articles?artid=11039 (accessed 11.12.2022).
18. Gore L. Forging a Sino-Russo Alliance: Analysis with a Hybrid Theoretical Framework. China: An International Journal, 2017, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 140-162. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1353/chn.2017.0008
19. Wishnick E. In Search of the ‘Other’ in Asia: Russia-China Relations Revisited. The Pacific Review, 2017, vol. 30, iss. 1, pp. 114-132. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/09512748.2016.1201129
20. Togt T. van der, Montesano F., Kozak I. From Competition to Compatibility Striking a Eurasian Balance in EU-Russia Relations. Clingendael Report, 2015, October. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/284609616_From_Competition_to_CompatibiliCo_Striking_a_Eurasian_balance_in_EU-Russia_relations (accessed 10.11.2022).
21. Lewis D. Strategic Culture and Russia’s “Pivot to the East”: Russia, China, and “Greater Eurasia”. The George C. Marshall European Center for Security Studies, July 2019, no. 034. Available at: https://www.marshallcenter.org/en/publications/security-insights/strategic-culture-and-russias-pivot-east-russia-china-and-greater-eurasia-0 (accessed 11.12.2022).
22. Pantin V.I. The Ideological Foundations of Eurasian Economic Integration. Vestnik RUDN. International Relations, 2022, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 17-29. (In Russ.) Available at: https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-0660-2022-22-1-17-29
SOURCES
1. The Concept of the Foreign Policy of the Russian Federation (approved by the President of the Russian Federation V.V. Putin on November 30, 2016). (In Russ.) Available at: https://www.mid.ru/ru/foreign_policy/official_documents/1538901 (accessed 11.11.2022).
2. The EC Reported that the EU Gas Storage Facilities Are Filled to Almost 90%. TASS, 05.10.2022. (In Russ.) Available at: https://tass.ru/ekonomika/15958181 (accessed 10.12.2022).
3. Minxin Pei. Is ‘Asia for Asians’ Just a Slogan? Taipei Times, 06.12.2014. Available at: https://www.taipeitimes.com/News/editorials/archives/2014/12/06/2003606061 (accessed 11.11.2022).
4. Going East: Russia’s Asia-Pacific Strategy. Russia in Global Affairs, 25.12.2010. Available at: https://eng.globalaffairs.ru/articles/going-east-russias-asia-pacific-strategy/ (accessed 10.12.2022).
5. Russia and China: Partnership or Competition? Ulitsa Moskovskaya. (In Russ.) Available at: https://www.ym-penza.ru/analitika/novejshaya-istoriya/item/7436-rossiya-i-kitaj-partnerstvo-ili-sopernichestvo (accessed 10.12.2022).
6. In 2021, the Import of Natural Gas from Russia to China Amounted to about $3 Billion. RBC, 14.09.2022. (In Russ.) Available at: https://marketing.rbc.ru/articles/13694/ (accessed 10.12.2022).
7. India Is Going to Abandon the Purchases of Russian Oil. Lenta.ru, 23.09.2022. (In Russ.) Available at: https://lenta.ru/news/2022/09/23/neftindia/ (accessed 10.12.2022).
8. Putin Revived the Greater Eurasia Project as Opposed to Western Countries. Ura.ru, 26.05.2022. Available at: https://ura.news/articles/1036284661 (accessed 10.12.2022).
9. Putin Proposed to Create a Eurasian Expert Center and Trading Houses. TASS, 28.05.2022. Available at: https://tass.ru/ekonomika/14737383 (accessed 10.12.2022).
No comments