101Received 08.08.2022. Revised 01.10.2022. Accepted 07.12.2022.
Abstract. By the time Donald Trump came to the White House, the American political elites and expert community had developed a consensual perception that China’s strategy was aimed at challenging the U.S. dominance and threatening its national interests. The United States Strategic Approach to the People’s Republic of China, adopted by the Trump Republican Administration but reflecting a bipartisan position, marked the most dramatic shift in policy towards China since Richard Nixon. The main change was the recognition of the competitive nature of the U.S. – China relations, which resulted in the development and subsequent implementation of a competitive approach to relations with the PRC. This approach is largely based on the experience and theoretical concepts developed during confrontation with the Soviet Union but there are significant differences primarily due to the limitations imposed by interdependence of the American and Chinese economies, which did not exist between the U.S. and the USSR. The first part of the article reveals the concept and principles of the competitive approach, a commitment to which has been reiterated by the Biden administration. It is stated that such approach aims at forcing the PRC to change its strategy that threatens American interests. This goal is achieved by applying a complex pressure on the military and strategic, socioeconomic and politico-ideological strands through implementation of four types of competitive strategies identified by the U.S. expert community: strategies of denial, “cost-imposing” strategies, attacking the enemy’s strategy, and attacking the adversary’s political system. Their implementation is illustrated predominantly in the cases of the American–Soviet confrontation. Using the active “burden-shifting” strategy as an example, the second (practical) part of the study offers the most recent evidence of the “cost-imposing” strategy based on the principle of exploiting an enemy’s vulnerabilities in the most efficient way. It demonstrates how Washington’s approach to Afghanistan was transformed within such a strategy. The reasons for the formation, development process and the main ideas of the strategy are described in detail. It is acknowledged that the close-out of the U.S. – led security mission in Afghanistan was largely driven by the intention to shift the responsibility for the security in the region to the PRC. It is stated that there are no guaranteed tools for the Chinese leadership to counter the U.S. competitive approach, and the PRC is not enough prepared for a full-scale contest with the United States. The study concludes that it would be better for Beijing to delay transition to open competition in the bilateral relations.
Keywords: United States of America, competitive approach, U.S. – China relations, foreign policy, “cost-imposing” strategy, active “burden-shifting” strategy, Afghanistan, People’s Republic of China, Belt and Road Initiative
REFERENCES
1. Voitolovskii F.G. US Strategy in a Changing World Order: Challenges for Russia. Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 2021, vol. 91, no. 7, pp. 616-626. (In Russ.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.31857/S0869587321070148
2. Kashin V.B. On the Potential Impact of the U. S. Third Offset Strategy on the Development of Strategic Nuclear Forces of China. Far Eastern Affairs, 2017, no. 3, pp. 109-118. (In Russ.) Available at: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=29333929 (accessed 01.07.2022).
3. Pankova L.V. Strategic Stability and the U. S. Third Offset Strategy. Moscow University Bulletin of World Politics, 2015, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 115-141. (In Russ.) Available at: https://www.fmp.msu.ru/attachments/article/358/PANKOVA_2015_3.pdf (accessed 01.07.2022).
4. Mikheev V., Lukonin S. Âeijing’s Pain Points. World Economy and International Relations, 2020, vol. 64, no. 5, pp. 5-15. (In Russ.) Available at: https://doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227-2020-64-5-5-15
5. Lomanov A.V. Chinese Discussions about Relations with the U.S. and the Trade War. World Economy and International Relations, 2019, vol. 63, no. 10, pp. 17-29. (In Russ.) Available at: https://doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227-2019-63-10-17-29
6. Mahnken T.G. Thinking about Competitive Strategies. Competitive Strategies for the 21st Century: Theory, History, and Practice. Mahnken T.G., ed. Stanford, CA, Stanford University Press, 2012, pp. 3-11. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1515/9780804783187-004
7. Marshall A.W. Long-Term Competition with the Soviets: A Framework for Strategic Analysis. Santa Monica, CA, RAND Corporation, 1972. 71 p. Available at: https://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/reports/2014/R862.pdf (accessed 01.07.2022).
8. Arbatov A. Strategic Stability and Chinese Gambit. World Economy and International Relations, 2022, vol. 66, no. 3, pp. 5-22. (In Russ.) Available at: https://doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227-2022-66-3-5-22
9. Mahnken T.G. Cost-Imposing Strategies: A Brief Primer. Washington, DC, Center for a New American Security, 2014. 18 p. Available at: https://s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/files.cnas.org/documents/CNAS_Maritime4_Mahnken.pdf?mtime=20160906081628&focal=none (accessed 01.07.2022).
10. Dobbins J.F., Cohen R.S., Chandler N., eds. Extending Russia: Competing from Advantageous Ground. Santa Monica, CA, RAND Corporation, 2019. 354 p. Available at: https://doi.org/10.7249/RR3063
11. Lee B.A. Strategic Interaction: Theory and History for Practitioners. Competitive Strategies for the 21st Century: Theory, History, and Practice. Mahnken T.G., ed. Stanford, CA, Stanford University Press, 2012, pp. 28-46. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1515/9780804783187-006
12. Friedberg A. Strategic Competition with China. U. S. House Committee on Armed Services. One Hundred Fifteen Congress Second Session February 15, 2018. Washington, DC, U. S. Government Publishing Office, 2018, pp. 65-89. Available at: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CHRG-115hhrg28995/pdf/CHRG-115hhrg28995.pdf (accessed 01.07.2022).
13. Kennedy S. Prepared Testimony before the U.S. – China Economic and Security Review Commission. Hearing on Foreign Investment Climate in China: Present Challenges and Potential for Reform January 28, 2015. CSIS, 2015. 7 p. Available at: https://www.uscc.gov/sites/default/files/Scott%20Kennedy_Testimony.pdf (accessed 01.07.2022).
14. Blumenthal D. Testimony before the US-China Economic and Security Review Commission: Objectives and Future Direction for Rebalance Security Policies March 31, 2016. 9 p. Available at: https://www.uscc.gov/sites/default/files/Dan%20Blumenthal%20Testimony_033116.pdf (accessed 01.07.2022).
15. Wethington O., Manning R. Shaping the Asia-Pacific Future. Washington, DC, Atlantic Council, 2015. 40 p. Available at: https://www.files.ethz.ch/isn/192129/Shaping_AP_Future_Digital.pdf (accessed 01.07.2022).
16. Dreyer J.T. The Limits to China’s Growth. Orbis, 2004, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 233-246. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orbis.2004.01.004
17. Saich T. Testimony before the U.S. – China Economic and Security Review Commission. Year in Review. 09.09.2020. 14 p. Available at: https://www.uscc.gov/sites/default/files/2020-09/Saich_Testimony.pdf (accessed 01.07.2022).
18. Rolland N. China’s “Belt and Road Initiative”: Underwhelming or Game-Changer? The Washington Quarterly, 2017, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 127-142. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/0163660X.2017.1302743
19. Hillman J. China’s Belt and Road Initiative: Five Years Later Statement Before the U.S. – China Economic and Security Review Commission January 25, 2018. CSIS, 2018. 12 p. Available at: https://www.uscc.gov/sites/default/files/Hillman_USCC%20Testimony_25Jan2018_FINAL.pdf (accessed 01.07.2022).
20. Kliman D. Testimony before the U.S. – China Economic and Security Review Commission “The Geostrategic and Military Drivers and Implications”. 25.01.2018. Center for a New American Security, 2018. 8 p. Available at: https://www.uscc.gov/sites/default/files/Kliman_USCC%20Testimony_20180119.pdf (accessed 01.07.2022).
21. Ratner E. Geostrategic and Military Drivers and Implications of the Belt and Road. Council on Foreign Relations, 2018. 8 p. Available at: https://www.uscc.gov/sites/default/files/Ratner_USCC%20Testimony%20CORRECTED.pdf (accessed 01.07.2022).
22. Ratner E. Rising to the China Challenge. Council on Foreign Relations, 2018. 8 p. Available at: https://www.congress.gov/115/meeting/house/106848/witnesses/HHRG-115-AS00-Wstate-RatnerE-20180215.pdf (accessed 01.07.2022).
23. Ratner E. Blunting China’s Illiberal Order. Center for a New American Security, 2019. 12 p. Available at: https://nsarchive.gwu.edu/sites/default/files/documents/6826712/National-Security-Archive-165-Blunting-China-s.pdf (accessed 01.07.2022).
24. Fravel T. Securing Borders: China’s Doctrine and Force Structure for Frontier Defense. Journal of Strategic Studies, 2007, vol. 30, no. 4–5, pp. 705-737. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/01402390701431790
25. Clarke M. Beijing’s March West: Opportunities and Challenges for China’s Eurasian Pivot. Orbis, 2019, vol. 63, no. 2, pp. 187-208. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orbis.2019.02.007
26. Wuthnow J. Securing China’s Belt and Road Initiative: Dimensions and Implications. Testimony before the U.S. – China Economic and Security Review Commission Hearing on “China’s Belt and Road Initiative: Five Years Later”. 25.01.2018. Available at: https://www.uscc.gov/sites/default/files/Wuthnow_USCC%20Testimony_20180123.pdf (accessed 01.07.2022).
27. Heath T. China’s Pursuit of Overseas Security. Santa Monica, CA, RAND Corporation, 2018. 66 p. Available at: https://doi.org/10.7249/RR2271
28. Arduino A. China’s Private Army: Protecting the New Silk Road. Singapore, Palgrave Pivot, 2018. 188 p. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-7215-4
29. Ross R. The Geography of the Peace: East Asia in the Twenty-first Century. International Security, 1999, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 81-118. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1162/isec.23.4.81
30. Ross R. China’s Naval Nationalism: Sources, Prospects, and the U. S. Response. International Security, 2009, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 46-81. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1162/isec.2009.34.2.46
31. Montgomery E. Competitive Strategies against Continental Powers: The Geopolitics of Sino-Indian-American Relations. Journal of Strategic Studies, 2013, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 76-100. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/01402390.2012.736383
32. Rosen S.P. Competitive Strategies: Theoretical Foundations, Limits, and Extensions. Competitive Strategies for the 21st Century: Theory, History, and Practice. Mahnken T.G., ed. Stanford, CA, Stanford University Press, 2012, pp. 12-27. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1515/9780804783187-005
SOURCES
1. Yang Jiechi Meets with U. S. National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan. Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the People’s Republic of China, 14.06.2022. Available at: https://www.fmprc.gov.cn/mfa_eng/zxxx_662805/202206/t20220614_10702808.html (accessed 01.07.2022).
2. National Security Strategy of Engagement and Enlargement, 1995. Available at: https://history.defense.gov/Portals/70/Documents/nss/nss1995.pdf?ver=pzgo9pkDsWmIQqTYTC6O-Q%3d%3d (accessed 01.07.2022).
3. United States Strategic Approach to the People’s Republic of China. The White House. 2020. Available at: https://trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/U.S.-Strategic-Approach-to-The-Peoples-Republic-of-China-Report-5.24v1.pdf (accessed 01.07.2022).
4. Interim National Security Strategic Guidance, March, 2021. The White House. Available at: https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/NSC-1v2.pdf (accessed 01.07.2022).
5. Addressing the Threat from Securities Investments That Finance Communist Chinese Military Companies. Federal Register, 2020, vol. 85, no. 222, pp. 73185-73188. Available at: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2020-11-17/pdf/2020-25459.pdf (accessed 01.07.2022).
6. Hearing on China’s Belt and Road Initiative: Five Years Later, 25.01.2018. U.S. – China Economic and Security Review Commission. 193 p. Available at: https://www.uscc.gov/sites/default/files/transcripts/Hearing%20Transcript%20-%20January%2025,%202018_0.pdf (accessed 01.07.2022).
7. The 2018 Report to Congress. U.S. – China Economic and Security Review Commission. Washington, DC, U. S. Government Publishing Office. 539 p. Available at: https://www.uscc.gov/sites/default/files/2019-09/2018%20Annual%20Report%20to%20Congress.pdf (accessed 01.07.2022).
8. Ramzy A., Buckley C. “Absolutely No Mercy”: Leaked Files Expose How China Organized Mass Detention of Muslims. New York Times, 19.11.2019. Available at: https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2019/11/16/world/asia/china-xinjiang-documents.html (accessed 01.07.2022).
No comments