28Received 12.09.2022. Revised 01.10.2022. Accepted 30.11.2022.
Abstract. The article is devoted to the problem of the relationship between monarchy and democracy, the question of whether the monarchical form of government is able to adapt to modern realities and how compatible it is with democracy. This problem is not well understood, and no new political theory has been developed on it since Walter Bagehot published his classic work “The English Constitution” about the British system of government in 1867. The phenomenon of the “northern kingdoms” is investigated, which lies in the fact that the kingdoms of Denmark, the Netherlands, Norway and Sweden have earned advanced positions in socio-economic development and evolution of democratic institutions and are at the top of the modern states’ development ratings. A possible explanation for this phenomenon is that the leading positions of the northern monarchies in the evolvement of the political, and as a result, the socio-economic sphere are largely due to the high level of unity of the nation, in which the form of government of these states, the democratic constitutional monarchy, plays a decisive role. To confirm this research hypothesis, the work of Phillip Manow “In the Kings’ Shadow” is used. This work suggests a possible explanation of this phenomenon providing historical and political analysis of the transition of the nation’s political representation from the King to the parliament when moving from absolute monarchy to democracy. In constitutional monarchies, the monarch preserves in symbolical and representational form the concept of national cohesion and the nation’s common will removing it from the competitive field of politics, therefore, monoethnic northern kingdoms have a high level of solidarity and national unity “in the shadow of the king”. This significantly affects coherence and efficiency of the system of public authority and public institutions. Moreover, in constitutional monarchies, the Crown symbolizes and represents historical continuity, cultural and ethnic traditions and norms of behavior; representatives of monarchial dynasties can serve as more adequate role models than elected politicians.
Keywords: “northern kingdoms”, constitutional monarchy, parliament, historical and political analysis, representation of national unity
REFERENCES
1. Fedorova-Kuznetsova I.V. The monarchical system of power in the modern world and its features. Obshhestvo: politika, ekonomika, pravo, 2019, no. 9 (74), pp. 35-38. (In Russ.) Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/monarhicheskaya-sistema-vlasti-v-sovremennom-mire-i-ee-osobennosti/viewer (accessed 30.11.2022).
2. Hazell R., Morris B., eds. The Role of Monarchy in Modern Democracy: European Monarchies Compared (Hart Studies in Comparative Public Law). Oxford, Publisher, Hart Publishing, 2020. 328 p.
3. Deryabin Yu.S., Antyushina N.M., eds. The Northern Europe. New Development Region. Moscow, Izdatelstvo “Ves Mir”, 2008. 512 p. (In Russ.)
4. Manov F. In the King’s shadow. The political anatomy of democratic representation. Moscow, Izdatelstvo Instituta Gaydara, 2014. 176 p. (In Russ.)
5. Kantorovich E.H. Two King’s bodies. Study on medieval political theology. Moscow, Izdatelstvo Instituta Gaydara, 2013. 744 p. (In Russ.)
6. Dahl R. On Democracy. Moscow, Aspekt Press, 2000. 208 p. (In Russ.)
7. Nisnevich Yu.A., ed. World Development Indexes: Handbook. Moscow, Izdatelskii dom Visshei shkoly ekonomiki, 2014. 247 p. (In Russ.)
8. Veenendaal W.P. A Big Prince in a Tiny Realm: Smallness, Monarchy, and Political Legitimacy in the Principality of Liechtenstein. Swiss Political Science Review, 2015, vol. 21 (2), pp. 333-349. DOI: 10.1111/spsr.12138
9. Wolden-Ræthinge A. Queen in Denmark: Margarethe II talks about her life. Copenhagen, Gyldendal, 1990. 171 p.
10. Nisnevich Yu.A., Hahunova A.K. Methodology of Comparative Analysis and Classification of Public Administration Systems. Polis. Political Studies, 2015, no. 4, pp. 75-96. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2015.04.08
SOURCES
1. Opinion poll in the UK: the majority is for the preservation of the monarchy. REGNUM, 09.09.2015. (In Russ.) Available at: https://regnum.ru/news/society/1965903.html (accessed 06.04.2022).
2. 55% of Spaniards want a referendum on the fate of the monarchy. Euro_royals, 08.10.2020. (In Russ.) Available at: https://euro-royals.livejournal.com/775658.html (accessed 06.04.2022).
3. The King of Sweden has excluded five grandchildren from the members of the Royal House. Argumenty i fakty, 07.10.2019. (In Russ.) Available at: https://aif.ru/politics/world/korol_shvecii_isklyuchil_pyateryh_vnukov_iz_chlenov_korolevskogo_doma?utm_source=yxnews&utm_medium=desktop (accessed 06.04.2022).
4. The-English-Constitution. Bagehot Walter. Britannica. Available at: https://www.britannica.com/topic/The-English-Constitution (accessed 06.04.2022).
5. Harris Peter Backwards Britain: Why It’s Time to Abolish the Monarchy. The National Interest, 12.03.2020. Available at: https://nationalinterest.org/feature/backwards-britain-why-it%E2%80%99s-time-abolish-monarchy-132407 (accessed 06.04.2022).
6. MacShane Denis. Kate et William sont-ils marxistes? Le Monde, 02.05.2011. Available at: https://www.lemonde.fr/idees/article/2011/04/28/kate-et-william-sont-ils-marxistes_1514045_3232.html (accessed 06.04.2022).
7. Le Portail des statisiques Grand-Duché de Luxembourg. Available at: http://www.statistiques.public.lu/stat/TableViewer/tableView.aspx?ReportId=12859&IF_Language=fra&MainTheme=2 (accessed 06.04.2018).
8. The seven principles of public life. The Committee on Standards in Public Life. 1994. Available at: http://www.public-standards.gov.uk (accessed 06.04.2022).
9. Is Europe’s monarchy anachronistic? Euronews, 19.12.2012. Available at: https://www.euronews.com/my-europe/2012/12/19/is-europe-s-monarchy-anachronistic (accessed 06.04.2022).
No comments