86Received 11.08.2022. Revised 10.09.2022. Accepted 22.11.2022.
Abstract. The liberal model of globalization, proceeding from the “naturalness” of the unipolar world, essentially personifies the “modern barbarism”: sustainable development of the Western civilization is a priori meant to be at the expense of other countries. Today, its functioning is running into the resistance from local civilizations, whose economic and political weight has increased significantly in the 21st century, allowing the non-Western countries to become important actors in international relations claiming to realize their national interests and own type of sustainable development. Alliances are emerging among these countries, based on an alternative type of globalization, which implies both mutually beneficial cooperation and national development outside anyone’s external dictate. In fact, a global-local reality is being formed in the context of the multipolar world formation. The reaction of the West is to maintain its dominance by all means, holding back the creation of new international poles. These processes demand “rediscovery” of the established “universalist” approaches to sustainable development of human civilization: the problem of its alternative type has an independent scientific and practical significance for Russia as well as for the countries of non-Western civilization. In this regard, the study on the mutual influence of global and local factors that produce complex risks to sustainable development is being updated. Their complex nature is manifested in the fact that under the influence of hybridization of socio-techno-natural realities and inter-civilizational confrontation, they simultaneously cover a number of life spheres, overlapping each other, thereby acquiring an interference character. The author sees the answer to the challenges of these risks in the actualization of long-term functioning factors of a humanistic nature, which should be included in Russia’s strategy of a global-local sustainable development.
Keywords: sustainable development, Russian civilization, interference risks, nonlinearity, globo-loñalization, “rigidity turn”, long-term functioning factors, humanism
REFERENCES
1. Kuvaldin V.Â. Globalization and Nation-State: Yesterday, Today, Tomorrow. World Eñonomy and International Relations, 2021, vol. 65, no. 1, pp. 5-13. (In Russ.) Available at: https://doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227-2021-65-1-5-13
2. Popper K.R. The Open Society and Its Enemies. Princeton, Princeton University Press, 2020. 808 p.
3. Bauman Z. Liquid Times. Living in an Age of Uncertainty. Cambridge, Polity Press, 2006. 128 ð.
4. Robertson R., ed. European Glocalization in Global Context. London, Palgrave Macmillan, 2014. 238 ð.
5. Roudemetof V. Glocalization. A Critical Introduction. London, New York, Routledge, 2016. 188 p.
6. Parhomenko T.A. Russian Civilization: Between East and West. Moscow, Institut naslediya, 2021. 152 p. (In Russ.)
7. Malashenko A.V., Nisnevich Yu.A., Ryabov A.V. Modern Barbarism: Causes and Consequences. Politiya, 2018, vol. 89, no. 2, pp. 6-22. (In Russ.)
8. Zarubina N.N., Kravchenko S.A. The “New Barbarism” in a Civilizational Perspective: Impact on Human Capital. Polis. Political Stidies, 2022, no. 1, pp. 31-44. (In Russ.) Available at: https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2022.01.04
9. Urry J. Climate Change and Society. Cambridge, Polity Press, 2011. 200 ð.
10. Beck U. Cosmopolitan Vision. Cambridge, Polity Press, 2006. 216 ð.
11. Holton R.J. Global Inequalities. New York, Palgrave, 2014. 204 ð.
12. Giddens A. The Politics of Climate Change. Cambridge, Polity Press, 2010. 264 ð.
13. Beck U. World at Risk. Cambridge, Polity Press, 2010. 269 ð.
14. Urry J. Global Complexity. Cambridge, Polity Press, 2003. 184 ð.
15. Beck U. The Metamorphosis of the World. Cambridge, Polity Press, 2016. 223 ð.
16. Kravchenko S.A. The Demand of the “Rigidity Turn” for the Sustainable Development: Contours of the Concept. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya, 2021, no. 10, pp. 12-22. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.31857/S013216250015998-0
17. Perrow Ch. Normal Accidents: Living with High Risk Technologies. New Brunswick, Rutgers University Press, 1999. 464 ð.
18. Perrow Ch. The Next Catastrophe: Reducing Our Vulnerabilities to Natural, Industrial, and Terrorist Disasters. Princeton University Press, 2011. 432 ð.
19. Urry J. What is the Future? Cambridge, Polity Press, 2016. 226 ð.
20. Mokhov I.I. Features of Modern Climate Changes in the Arctic and their Consequences. Problemy Arktiki i Antarktiki, 2020, vol. 66, no. 4, pp. 446-462. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.30758/0555-2648-2020-66-4-446-462
21. Kravchenko S.A. Humanistically Oriented Modernization: The Need for Transformations Adequate to the Aspirations of Russians. Russia Undergoing Reforms. Yearbook. Moscow, Novyi khronograf, 2013, iss. 12, pp. 21-41. (In Russ.)
22. Schutz A. Returning Home. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya, 1995, no. 2, pp. 136-142. (In Russ.)
23. Toshchenko Zh.T. The Lifeworld of Russians: 25 years later (late 1980s – mid‑2010s). Moscow, TsSPiM, 2016. 367 ð. (In Russ.)
24. Lapin N.I. Complexity of the Formation of a New Russia. Anthroposociocultural Approach. Moscow, Ves’ mir, 2021. 364 p. (In Russ.)
25. Gorshkov M.M., Komissarov S.N., Karpukhin O.I. At the Turn of the Century: Sociodynamics of Russian Culture. Moscow, FNITS RAN, 2022. 703 p.
26. Gorshkov M.K., Tikhonova N.E., eds. Capitals and Regions in Modern Russia: Myths and Reality Fifteen Years Later. Moscow, Ves’ mir, 2018. 312 p. (In Russ.)
27. Tishkov V.A., ed. Russian Part of the Arctic: Indigenous Peoples and Industrial Development. Moscow, Saint Petersburg, Nestor-Istoriya, 2016. 277 p. (In Russ.)
28. Tikhonova N.E. The Social Structure of Russia: Theories and Reality. Moscow, New chronograph, IS RAN, 2014. 408 p. (In Russ.)
29. Simmel G. Bridge and Door. Sotsiologiya vlasti, 2013, no. 3, pp. 145-150. (In Russ.)
30. Luhmann N. Trust and Power. Cambridge, Polity, 2017. 216 p.
31. Baudrillard J. The Spirit of Terrorism. There Was no War in the Gulf. Verso, 2003. 105 p.
32. Chugrov S.V. Post-Truth: Transformation of Political Reality or Self-Destruction of Liberal Democracy? Polis. Political Studies, 2017, no. 2, pp. 42-59. (In Russ.) Available at: https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2017.02.04
33. Tartakovskaya I.N. Trust in the Face of a Pandemic: In Search of Common Ground. Sotsiologicheskii zhurnal, 2021, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 68-89. (In Russ.) Available at: https://doi.org/10.19181/socjour.2021.27.2.8087
34. Castells M. Another Economy is Possible: Culture and Economy in a Time of Crisis. Cambridge, Polity, 2017. 224 p.
35. Rozov N.S. Ruts and Passes: Macrosociological Foundation of the Strategy of Russia in the 21st Sentury. Moscow, ROSSPEN, 2011. 735 p. (In Russ.)
36. Rashkovskii E.Â. Religion, Politics and Civilizational Dynamics in the Modern World. World Eñonomy and International Relations, 2021, vol. 65, no. 4, pp. 123-131. (In Russ.) Available at: https://doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227-2021-65-4-123-131
37. Wallerstein I. Structural Crisis, or Why Capitalists Might Consider Capitalism Unprofitable? Is There a Future for Capitalism? Derlug’yan G., ed. Moscow, Izd-vo Instituta Gaidara, 2015, pp. 23-60. (In Russ.)
38. Kravchenko S. The Birth of “Normal Trauma”: The Effect of Non-Linear Development. Economics and Sociology, 2020, no. 2, pp. 150-159. DOI: 10.14254/2071-789X.2020/13-2/11
39. Kravchenko S.A. Development of the Subject of Sociology: from Monodisciplinarity to Inter- and Post-Disciplinarity. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya, 2020, no. 3, pp. 16-26. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.31857/S013216250008794-6
40. Kravchenko S.A. Sociology on the Move: The demand for Humanistic Digital Turn. RUDN Journal of Sociology, 2019, no. 3, pp. 397-405. DOI: 10.22363/2313-2272-2019-19-3-397-405
41. Kravchenko S.A. The Future: Based on the Materials of the Forum of the International Sociological Association. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya, 2016, no. 12, pp. 139-143. (In Russ.)
42. Rovinskaya T. Environmental Perspective on the COVID‑19 Pandemic: A New Chance for “Green” Economy. World Eñonomy and International Relations, 2021, vol. 65, no. 12, pp. 128-140. (In Russ.) Available at: https://doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227-2021-65-12-128-140
No comments