U.S. Missile Defense: from National Territory Protection to NATO Defense

46
DOI: 10.20542/0131-2227-2023-67-12-5-15
EDN: SMNVXF
Primakov National Research Institute of World Economy and International Relations, Russian Academy of Sciences (IMEMO), 23, Profsoyuznaya Str., Moscow, 117997, Russian Federation.
S. Oznobishchev, serko96@gmail.com
Primakov National Research Institute of World Economy and International Relations, Russian Academy of Sciences (IMEMO), 23, Profsoyuznaya Str., Moscow, 117997, Russian Federation.

Received 01.07.2023. Revised 25.07.2023. Accepted 04.10.2023.

Acknowledgements. The article was prepared within the project “Post-Crisis World Order: Challenges and Technologies, Competition and Cooperation” supported by the grant from Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation program for research projects in priority areas of scientific and technological development (Agreement No. 075-15-2020-783).


Abstract. The 1972 ABM Treaty between the USSR and the USA allowed for the deployment of a limited strategic missile defense system, but established a strict ban on the deployment of anti-missile systems outside their national territory. The agreement was the first turn in the U.S. policy in this area, determining the direction and content of missile defense development programs for many years to come. Once every ten years, the United States revised its policy, for instance, R. Reagan’s intention in 1983 to build a large-scale space-based missile defense system was seen as an attempt to move away from the concept of mutual nuclear deterrence, enshrined in the ABM Treaty. However, only after its withdrawal from the ABM Treaty in 2002, the United States set a course for the deployment of a missile defense system in Europe, as stated, to protect the region from nuclear missile threats from “rogue states”. At the present stage, the growing degradation of relations between Russia and Western countries, especially against the backdrop of hostilities in Ukraine, has led NATO states to put forward new approaches to the integration of missile defense and air defense systems, providing for the functional interface of information management systems and strike components for the successful interception of different classes of targets. The experience of providing Ukraine with integrated defense and its functioning on the basis of modern Western air defense systems will allow the U.S. / NATO to evaluate the effectiveness of the chosen approach and apply the knowledge gained to improve Europe’s “anti-missile umbrella”. The article proposes the author’s periodization of American policy in the field of missile defense, as well as considers each of the identified stages with special emphasis on the last one, which is directly related to the current political situation.

Keywords: ballistic missile defense (BMD), theater missile defense (TBMD), U.S. military policy, nuclear deterrence, strategic stability, Russian-American relations, Russia–NATO relations


REFERENCES

1. Dobrynin A.F. In Confidence. Ambassador in Washington under six US Presidents (1962–1986). Moscow, Author, 1996. 687 p. (In Russ.)

2. Abrahamson ., Cooper F. What Did We Get for Our $30-Billion Investment in SDI/BMD? National Institute for Public Policy, September 1993. Available at: https://highfrontier.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/What-for-30B_.pdf (accessed 10.07.2023).

3. DeGrasse R., Daggett S. An Economic Analysis of the President’s Strategic Defense Initiative: Costs and Cost Exchange Ratios. Current News, 03.01.1985, Special Edition, no. 1243, pp. 35-46.

4. Arbatov A.G. 20 days later. Pravda, 20.11.1986. (In Russ.)

5. Brown N.C. The Strategic Defense Initiative and European Security. A Conference Report. Santa Monica, RAND Corporation, January 1986. 44 p.

6. Garanich G., Karazy S. Kyiv says it shoots down volley of Russian hypersonic missiles. Reuters, 17.05.2023. Available at: https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/air-defence-systems-repelling-attacks-ukraine-early-tuesday-officials-2023-05-16/ (accessed 10.07.2023).

7. Rybkin A. Kirby J.: Patriot air defense system will not help Ukraine against Russian cruise missiles. Rossiyskaya Gazeta, 09.03.2023. (In Russ.) Available at: https://rg.ru/2023/03/09/dzhon-kirbi-sistema-pvo-patriot-ne-pomozhet-ukraine-protiv-rossijskih-krylatyh-raket.html (accessed 10.07.2023).

8. Arbatov A.G. Global stability in the nuclear world. Vestnik RAN, 2021, no. 6, pp. 560-570. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.31857/S0869587321050030

9. Klimov V.. The missile defense systems and concepts of limited nuclear war. World Economy and International Relations, 2022, vol. 66, no. 8, pp. 16-24. (In Russ.) Available at: https://doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227-2022-66-8-16-24  

10. Chernenko E. Hands are accustomed to air defense, but how to defend and from whom. Kommersant, 20.06.2023. (In Russ.) Available at: https://www.kommersant.ru/doc/6054705 (accessed 10.07.2023).

11. Irish J., Rose M. France makes headway in alternatives to German-led air defence plan. Reuters, 19.06.2023. Available at: https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/france-pushes-alternatives-german-led-air-defence-plan-2023-06-19/ (accessed 10.07.2023).

12. Gotkowska J., Maślanka Ł. France against Germany’s European Sky Shield Initiative. Defence Industry Europe, 22.06.2023. Available at: https://defence-industry.eu/france-against-germanys-european-sky-shield-initiative/ (accessed 10.07.2023).

13. Arbatov G.A. SYSTEM Man. Observations and reflections of an eyewitness of its disintegration. Moscow, Vagrius, 2002. 481 p. (In Russ.)


SOURCES

1. Treaty between the United States of America and the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics on the limitation of the anti-ballistic missile systems. 26.05.1972. (In Russ.) Available at: https://www.un.org/ru/documents/decl_conv/conventions/pdf/abm.pdf (accessed 15.07.2023).

2. Protocol to the Treaty Between the United States of America and the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics on the Limitation of Anti-Ballistic Missile Systems. Electronic fund of legal and normative-technical documents, 1976. (In Russ.) Available at: https://docs.cntd.ru/document/902053546 (accessed 10.07.2023).

3. President Reagan’s Remarks on the Strategic Defense Initiative on March 23, 1983. YouTube, 26.06.2017. Available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QlH4kIEtmR4 (accessed 10.07.2023).

4. Joint Statement by President Vladimir V. Putin of the Russian Federation and President George W. Bush of the United States of America on the New Relationship between Russia and the United States of America. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation, 13.11.2001. (In Russ.) Available at: https://www.mid.ru/tv/?id=1677284&lang=ru (accessed 10.07.2023).

5. Ballistic Missile Defense Review Report, February 2010. Washington DC, 2010. Available at: https://dod.defense.gov/Portals/1/features/defenseReviews/BMDR/BMDR_as_of_26JAN10_0630_for_web.pdf (accessed 10.07.2023).

6. Statement in connection with the situation concerning the NATO countries’ missile defence system in Europe. Official website of President of Russia, 23.11.2011. (In Russ.) Available at: http://kremlin.ru/events/president/news/13637 (accessed 14.07.2023).

7. The General Staff named the main goal of creating a U.S. missile defense system. RIA Novosti, 11.10.2016. (In Russ.) Available at: https://ria.ru/20161011/1478944563.html (accessed 10.07.2023).

8. Plenary session of the Eastern Economic Forum. Official website of the President of Russia, 05.09.2019. (In Russ.) Available at: http://kremlin.ru/events/president/news/61451 (accessed 10.07.2023).

9. Secretary of Defense Lloyd J. Austin III and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff General Mark A. Milley Hold a Press Conference Following the Ukraine Defense Contact Group Meeting. US Department of Defense, 12.10.2022. Available at: https://www.defense.gov/News/Transcripts/Transcript/Article/3186611/secretary-of-defense-lloyd-j-austin-iii-and-chairman-of-the-joint-chiefs-of-sta/ (accessed 10.07.2023).

10. Patriot systems to be legitimate targets, if supplied to Kiev – Kremlin spokesman. TASS, 14.12.2022. (In Russ.) Available at: https://tass.ru/politika/16588933 (accessed 10.07.2023).

11. Kinzhal missile wipes out Patriot air defense system in Kiev – Russian Defense Ministry. TASS, 16.05.2023. (In Russ.) Available at: https://tass.ru/armiya-i-opk/17758187 (accessed 10.07.2023).

12. 14 NATO Allies and Finland agree to boost European air defence capabilities. NATO, 13.10.2022. Available at: https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/news_208103.htm (accessed 10.07.2023).

13. Vilnius Summit Communiqué. Issued by NATO Heads of State and Government participating in the meeting of the North Atlantic Council in Vilnius 11 July 2023. NATO, 11.07.2023. Available at: https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/official_texts_217320.htm?selectedLocale=en (accessed 13.07.2023).

14. 2022 National Defense Strategy. Washington, DC. U. S. Department of Defense, 2022. 80 p. Available at: https://media.defense.gov/2022/Oct/27/2003103845/-1/-1/1/2022-NATIONAL-DEFENSE-STRATEGY-NPR-MDR.PDF (accessed 17.07.2023).

15. Missile Defense. Annual Goals Unmet for Deliveries and Testing. United States Government Accountability Office, 18.05.2023. 44 p. Available at: https://www.gao.gov/assets/gao-23-106011.pdf (accessed 13.07.2023).

16. Remarks by President Biden and NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg. The White House, 29.06.2022. Available at: https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/press-briefings/2022/06/29/remarks-by-president-biden-and-nato-secretary-general-jens-stoltenberg-madrid-spain/ (accessed 13.07.2023).

17. Navy Aegis Ballistic Missile Defense (BMD) Program: Background and Issues for Congress. Congressional Research Service, 30.06.2021. Available at: https://fas.org/sgp/crs/weapons/RL33745.pdf (accessed 13.07.2023).


For citation:
Klimov V., Oznobishchev S. U.S. Missile Defense: from National Territory Protection to NATO Defense. World Eonomy and International Relations, 2023, vol. 67, no. 12, pp. 5-15. https://doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227-2023-67-12-5-15 EDN: SMNVXF



Comments (0)

No comments

Add comment







Indexed

 

 

 

 

Dear authors! Please note that in the VAK List of peer-reviewed scientific journals, in which the main scientific results of dissertations for the degree of candidate and doctor of sciences should be published for the “MEMO Journal” the following specialties are recorded:
economic sciences:
5.2.5. World Economy.
5.2.1. Economic Theory
5.2.3. Regional and Branch Economics
political sciences:
5.5.4. International Relations
5.5.1. History and Theory of Politics
5.5.2. Political Institutions, Processes, Technologies

 

Current Issue
2024, vol. 68, No. 7
Topical Themes of the Issue:
  • The Supporting Structure of Global Security
  • Institutional Features of the Fourth Energy Transition
  • The Evolution of Modern German Christian Democracy
  • The Monarchies of the Persian Gulf and Central Asia
Submit an Article
INVITATION FOR PUBLICATION
The Editorial Board invites authors to write analytical articles on the following topics:
  • changes in the processes of globalization in modern conditions
  • formation of the new world order
  • shifts in civilization at the stage of transition to a digital society

The editors are also interested in publishing synthesis articles / scientific reviews revealing the main trends in the development of certain regions of the world - Latin America, Africa, South Asia, etc.