Reality, Ontology and Substitution in the Organization Theory by Alexandr Bogdanov

47
DOI: 10.20542/0131-2227-2022-66-8-101-110
M. Strezhneva, m.strezhneva@imemo.ru
Primakov National Research Institute of World Economy and International Relations, Russian Academy of Sciences (IMEMO), 23, Profsoyuznaya Str., Moscow, 117997, Russian Federation.

Received 28.03.2022. Revised 26.04.2022. Accepted 27.05.2022.

Abstract. Alexander Bogdanov’s tektology and empiriomonism are treated in this article as an applicable basis for the recovery of structural realism in the study of international politics. Kenneth Waltz, the author of the existent structural realist theory, favored a systemic approach to international relations and acknowledged the problem of “organized complexity”, as produced by the activities of free-willed individuals, facing social sciences in particular. Yet, unlike Bogdanov, he seems not to have fully appreciated the reverberations that the advent of quantum physics caused for ideas on human cognition. Previously unambiguous distinction between mental and physical manifestations became blurred. It led to the emergence of a general “quantum” methodological school of structural realism, of which Bogdanov is recognized in this article as an early representative. Tektology is a system science, meant by the author to explore organizational features and principles of organization, inherent to any system complexes (biological, political or psychic). At the same time, as pointed out in this research, Bogdanov paid particular attention to the observer problem in societal studies. Bogdanov (as well as Niklass Luhmann later on), but unlike Kenneth Waltz (or Alexander Wendt), would deem neutral observation of international relations (IR) beyond attainment. It is revealed in particular that the long-term appeal of the Waltz’s theory has in fact been sustained by the form of system analysis it involved, based on deductive inference. It carried a promise to allow the IR to generate logically coherent theories about the ways that the international system is organized in. In empiriomonism, a method of “universal substitution” is promoted instead, allowing for new gains in knowledge about the unknown outer (material) reality. A theory of international politics of the latter kind could provide a framework for elaboration of new reasonable hypotheses concerning the international sphere.

Keywords: structural realism, Alexander Bogdanov, Kenneth Waltz, tektology, epistemology, system theory, materialist monism, constructivism, methodological individualism, universal substitution


REFERENCES

1. Bogdanov A. Tektology. The General Science of Organization. 6th edition. Moscow, URSS, 2019. 680 p. (In Russ.)

2. Bogdanov A. Empiriomonism. Articles on Philosophy. Moscow, Respublika, 2003. 400 p. (In Russ.)

3. Loktionov M. Alexander Bogdanov. Unknown Marxism. Moscow, GAUGN-Press, 2018. 288 p. (In Russ.)

4. Lenin V. Materialism and Empiriocriticism. Critical Updates on a Reactionary Mindset. Lenin V.I. Omnibus edition. Vol. 18. Moscow, Izdatel’stvo politicheskoi literatury, 1968, pp. 7-384. (In Russ.)

5. Worrall J. Structural Realism: The Best of Both Worlds? Dialectica, 1989, vol. 43, no. 1–2, pp. 99-124.

6. Rovelli C. Helgoland: Making Sense of the Quantum Revolution. New York, Riverhead Books, 2021. 256 p.

7. Waltz K. Theory of International Politics. Reading (MA), Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, 1979. 249 p.

8. Waltz K. Evaluating Theories. American Political Science Review, 1997, vol. 91, iss. 4, pp. 913-917.

9. Ladyman J. What is Structural Realism? Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Science, 1998, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 409-424.

10. Brading K., Crull E. Epistemic Structural Realism and Poincare’s Philosophy of Science. The Journal of the International Society for the History of the Philosophy of Science, 2017, vol. 7, pp. 108-129. Available at: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/epdf/10.1086/691138 (accessed 21.03.2022).

11. Bogdanov A. Relativity Principle from Organizational Point of View. Relativity Theory and Its Intellectual Understanding. Moscow, URSS, 2020, pp. 101-122. (In Russ.)

12. Strezhneva M. Systems Approach in International Research: on the Applicability of the Theoretical Heritage of Alexander Bogdanov. Polis. Political Studies, 2020, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 112-123. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2020.04.08

13. Strezhneva M. On the Norms and Habits of the European Union as a Meta-Organization. Croatian International Relations Review, 2020, vol. XXVI, no. 87, pp. 6-31. DOI: 10.37173/cirr.26.87.1 Available at: https://hrcak.srce.hr/file/360740 (accessed 25.04.2022).

14. Varela F., Maturana H., Uribe R. Autopoiesis: The Organisation of Living Systems, Its Characterization and a Model. Biosystems, 1974, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 187-196.

15. Luhmann N. The Autopoiesis of Social Systems. Geyer F., Van der Zouwen J., eds. Sociocybernetic Paradoxes. London, Sage, 1986, pp. 172-192.

16. Magalhaes R., Sanchez R. Autopoiesis Theory and Organization: an Overview. Magalhaes R., Sanchez R., eds. Autopoiesis in Organization Theory and Practice. Bingley (UK), Emerald, 2009, pp. 3-28.

17. Şenalp O. The ‘Emergence’ of the New World View Was with Tektology, Not Systemology; with Alexander Bogdanov, not Ludwig Von Bertalanffy! Social Network Unionism. 02.04.2019. Available at: https://snuproject.wordpress.com/2019/04/02/alexander-bogdanov-not-ludwig-von-bertalanffy-is-the-founder-of-the-new-world-outlook-and-it-is-not-systemology-it-is-tektology/ (accessed 21.03.2022).

18. Bogdanov A. The Philosophy of Living Experience: Materialism, Empiriocriticism, Dialectical Materialism, Empirio-Monism, Science of the Future. Popular Outlines. Moscow, URSS, 2019. 272 p. (In Russ.)

19. Rutkevich A. Ideas of 1914. Moscow, Publishing House of the Higher School of Economics, 2012. 52 p. (In Russ.) Available at: https://wp.hse.ru/data/2012/11/19/1248711892/WP6_2012_03.pdf (accessed 21.03.2022).

20. Plenge J. Um die allgemeine Organisationslehre. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, 1927, Bd. 25, pp. 18-29. Available at: https://bogdanovlibrary.files.wordpress.com/2019/02/10.23074040412247.pdf (accessed 22.03.2022).

21. Moiseev N. Bogdanov’s Tektology and Contemporary Scientific Thought. Paper for Presentation at a Congress on Tektology. London, October 1994. (In Russ.) Available at: http://www.rudocs.exdat.com/docs/index-158169.html?page=7 (accessed 22.03.2022).

22. Kosilova E. Digital and Analog in Medicine and Psychology. Philosophy of Science and Technology, 2017, no. 3, pp. 122-132. (In Russ.)

23. Nikonova A. On the Ingression Principle in the System World of A. A. Bogdanov, or no Man Is a Prophet in His Own Country. Hronoeconomics, 2019, no. 7 (20), pp. 32-40. (In Russ.) Available at: http://hronoeconomics.ru/07_2019.pdf (accessed 22.03.2022).

24. Chimarov S. The Forming Tektological Mechanism, or on the Question of Methodological Bases of A.A. Bogdanov’s Doctrine. Administrative Consulting, 2014, no. 1 (61), pp. 92-97. (In Russ.) Available at: https://spb.ranepa.ru/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/uk_1_2014.pdf (accessed 22.03.2022).

25. Rozhkov V. Organizational Mechanisms of Tectology in Soil Science. Dokuchaev Soil Bulletin, 2013, iss. 71 (80), pp. 80-102. (In Russ.) Available at: https://doi.org/10.19047/0136-1694-2013-71-80-102

26. Albert M., Hilkermeier L., eds. Observing International Relations: Niklas Luhmann and World Politics. London, Routledge, 2004. 272 p.

27. Bogdanov A. Key Elements of a Historical View over Nature. St. Petersburg, “Izdatel”, 1899. 251 p. (In Russ.)

28. Soboleva M. Fight for Genuine Marxism. Bogdanov’s Interpretation of Monism by Spinoza. Veche. Journal of Russian Philosophy and Culture, 2012, iss. 24, pp. 137-147. (In Russ.)

29. Jackson P. The Conduct of Inquiry in International Relations. Philosophy of Science and Its Implications for the Study of World Politics, 2nd edition. New York, Routledge, 2016. 288 p.

30. Rowley D. Alexander Bogdanov’s Holistic World Picture: a Materialist Mirror Image of Idealism. Studies in East European Thought, 2021, vol. 73, no. 1, pp. 1-18. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11212-020-09395-x

31. Wendt A. Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2010. 422 p.

32. Aragona M. Causal Understanding: Max Weber and the Interpretation of Human Actions. Dialogues in Philosophy, Mental and Neuro Sciences, 2018, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 36-48. Available at: http://www.crossingdialogues.com/Ms-E18-01.htm (accessed 22.03.2022).

33. Timofeev I. Interpretive Sociology of Foreign Policy: “Agent” Model of State Behavior in the International Arena. Vestnik RUDN. International Relations, 2017, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 265-278. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.22363/231306602017172265278

34. Bogdanov A. Philosophy of an Advanced Naturalist Scientist. Contours of Collectivist Philosophy. Collected volume 1. St. Petersburg, “Znanie”, 1909, pp. 35-142. (In Russ.) Available at: http://www.e-heritage.ru/Book/10071287 (accessed 23.03.2022).

35. Morganti M. On the Preferability of Epistemic Structural Realism. Synthese, 2004, vol. 142, no. 1, pp. 81-107.

36. Bogdanov A. A Land of Idols and Marxist Philosophy. Essays on the Philosophy of Marxism: Philosophical Collection. St. Petersburg, Zerno, 1908, pp. 215-242. (In Russ.) Available at: http://www.e-heritage.ru/Book/10071908 (accessed 23.03.2022).

37. Sadovskii V. Origins, Theoretical Background and Plight of A.A. Bogdanov’s Empiriomonism. Bogdanov A.A. Empiriomonism. Articles on Philosophy. Moscow, Respublika, 2003, pp. 340-365. (In Russ.)

38. Strezhneva M. Beyond Brexit: on the Occasion of Reinvention of Britain’s Global Role. World Economy and International Relations, 2021, vol. 65, no. 10, pp. 64-72. (In Russ.) Available at: https://doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227-2021-65-10-64-72

39. Poluyan N. Elements of Phenomenology in the Conception of “Cognitive Substitution” by A. A. Bogdanov. Izvestiya of the Volgograd State Pedagogical University, 2013, no. 8 (83), pp. 27-30. (In Russ.) Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/elementy-fenomenologii-v-kontseptsii-poznavatelnoy-podstanovki-a-a-bogdanova (accessed 23.03.2022).

40. Hudson L., Ozanne J. Alternative Ways of Seeking Knowledge in Consumer Research. Journal of Consumer Research, 1988, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 508-521. Available at: https://sharingiscaringsouls.files.wordpress.com/2018/04/17-06.pdf (accessed 23.03.2022).

41. Bogdanov A. The Philosophy of Living Experience. Popular Outlines, transl. by Rowley D. Leiden (Boston), Brill, 1913/2016. 266 p.

42. Friedrichs J., Kratochwil F. On Acting and Knowing: How Pragmatism Can Advance International Relations Research and Methodology. International Organization, 2009, vol. 63, no. 4, pp. 701-731.

43. Uemov A. Logical Basis of the Model Building Method. Moscow, Mysl’, 1971. 312 p. (In Russ.)

44. Popkov V. Science and Commitment of Alexandr Bogdanov. Philosophy and Culture, 2013, no. 4 (64), pp. 437-448. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.7256/1999-2793.2013.04.3


Registered in System SCIENCE INDEX

For citation:
Strezhneva M. Reality, Ontology and Substitution in the Organization Theory by Alexandr Bogdanov. World Eonomy and International Relations, 2022, vol. 66, no. 8, pp. 101-110. https://doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227-2022-66-8-101-110



Comments (0)

No comments

Add comment







Indexed

 

 

 

 

Dear authors! Please note that in the VAK List of peer-reviewed scientific journals, in which the main scientific results of dissertations for the degree of candidate and doctor of sciences should be published for the “MEMO Journal” the following specialties are recorded:
economic sciences:
5.2.5. World Economy.
5.2.1. Economic Theory
5.2.3. Regional and Branch Economics
political sciences:
5.5.4. International Relations
5.5.1. History and Theory of Politics
5.5.2. Political Institutions, Processes, Technologies

 

Current Issue
2023, vol. 67, No. 9
Topical Themes of the Issue:
  • Contradictions and Conflicts in the Multilateral Trading System 
  • Global Climate Agenda: Big Gamble 
  • South Asia in Regional and World Politics 
  • Social Policy and Public Administration Ecosystems
Submit an Article
INVITATION FOR PUBLICATION
The Editorial Board invites authors to write analytical articles on the following topics:
  • changes in the processes of globalization in modern conditions
  • formation of the new world order
  • shifts in civilization at the stage of transition to a digital society

The editors are also interested in publishing synthesis articles / scientific reviews revealing the main trends in the development of certain regions of the world - Latin America, Africa, South Asia, etc.