Print

The Missile Defense Systems and Concepts of Limited Nuclear War

44
Rubric: Security Problems in Contemporary World
DOI: 10.20542/0131-2227-2022-66-8-16-24
Primakov National Research Institute of World Economy and International Relations, Russian Academy of Sciences (IMEMO), 23, Profsoyuznaya Str., Moscow, 117997, Russian Federation.
PDF (RUS)

Received 08.05.2022. Revised 15.05.2022. Accepted 30.05.2022.

Acknowledgements. The article was prepared within the project “Post-Crisis World Order: Challenges and Technologies, Competition and Cooperation” supported by the grant from Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation program for research projects in priority areas of scientific and technological development (Agreement ¹ 075-15-2020-783).


Abstract. In the case of an intercepting massive nuclear missile attack, the technical capabilities of modern missile defense systems remain poor, nevertheless, the options for using the latest missile defense systems go beyond the “classic nuclear scenario”. First and foremost, missile defense systems have been used in conventional armed conflicts. This practice has already demonstrated their combat effectiveness which has become an impetus for the ongoing technical modernization of their main elements. In recent years, the conflict scenarios have been worked out in the United States and Russia where the limited use of low-yield nuclear weapons is allowed. The limited nuclear strike can be launched at the initial stages of a traditional conflict to consolidate the acquired military benefits and disrupt the enemy’s counteroffensive. Obviously, the limited use of nuclear weapons is fraught with an aggravation of the risk of a rapid and uncontrolled nuclear escalation. Unexpectedly, in this context, missile defense becomes a severe deterrent. Missile defense systems deployed at critical military facilities can remove the incentives for the limited nuclear strike as well as give considerable strategic and political advantages. Under these circumstances, missile defense systems become key players in the military balance. To reduce the risks of the limited use of nuclear weapons the author proposes “a roadmap” based on revitalization of the main arms control regimes and use of the capabilities of modern missile defense systems. It is hypothesized that “thin” missile defense removes the incentive to launch the first limited nuclear strike, thus enhancing strategic stability.

Keywords: limited use of nuclear weapons, de-escalation, ballistic missile defense, tactical (non-strategic) nuclear weapons, theater missile defense (TMD), high-precision conventional weapons, strategic stability, nuclear deterrence


REFERENCES 

1. Schlesinger J.R. Defense Department Annual Report. Washington, D.C. Air Force Magazine, 04.03.1974. Available at: https://www.airforcemag.com/PDF/MagazineArchive/Documents/2006/February%202006/0206keeperfull.pdf (accessed 05.05.2022).

2. McNamara Robert S. The Essence of Security: Reflections in Office. New York, Harper & Row, 1968. 176 p.

3. Bogdanov K. The signal component in strategies of limited nuclear employment. World Eñonomy and International Relations, 2022, vol. 66, no. 5, pp. 5-13. (In Russ.) Available at: https://doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227-2022-66-5-5-13

4. O’Rourke R. Navy Aegis Ballistic Missile Defense (BMD) Program: Background and Issues for Congress. Congressional Research Service, 31.03.2020. Available at: https://www.everycrsreport.com/files/20200331_RL33745_6bcc028eee1724f0e9df327bc348a387dcbb4474.pdf (accessed 05.05.2022).

5. Sivkov K. Global impact: slowly and sadly. Voenno-promyshlennyi kur’er, 23.04.2018. (In Russ.) Available at: https://vpk-news.ru/articles/42351 (accessed 05.05.2022).

6. Arbatov A. Problems and Dilemmas of the Next Start Treaty. World Eñonomy and International Relations, 2021, vol. 65, no. 6, pp. 5-20. (In Russ.) Available at: https://doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227-2021-65-6-5-20

7. Oznobishchev S.K., Bogdanov K.V. High-Precision weapons in Europe. Arms control in the new military-political and technological conditions. Arbatov A.G., ed. Moscow, IMEMO, 2020, pp. 36-47. (In Russ.)

8. Klimov V. The European Missile Defense Factor in Russia–USA/NATO Relations. World Eñonomy and International Relations, 2021, vol. 65, no. 10, pp. 103-111. (In Russ.) Available at: https://doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227-2021-65-10-103-111

SOURCES 

1. Nuclear Posture Review. Office of the Secretary of Defense. February 2018, Washington, DC. Available at: https://media.defense.gov/2018/Feb/02/2001872886/-1/-1/1/2018-NUCLEAR-POSTURE-REVIEW-FINAL-REPORT.PDF (accessed 05.05.2022).

2. The United States has a second submarine with missiles equipped with new nuclear warheads. Interfax, 11.10.2021. (In Russ.) Available at: https://www.interfax.ru/world/796488 (accessed 05.05.2022).

3. The Military doctrine of the Russian Federation. Electronic fund of legal and normative-technical documents. 21.04.2000. (In Russ.) Available at: https://docs.cntd.ru/document/901759209 (accessed 05.05.2022).

4. The Relevant Development Objectives of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation. Krasnaya zvezda, 11.10.2003. (In Russ.) Available at: http://old.redstar.ru/2003/10/11_10/3_01.html (accessed 26.11.2021).

5. “On Approval of the Fundamentals of State Policy of the Russian Federation in the Field of Naval Activities for the Period up to 2030”. Presidential Decree no. 327, 20.07.2017. (In Russ.) Available at: http://kremlin.ru/acts/bank/42117 (accessed 05.05.2022).

6. “On the Fundamentals of the State Policy of the Russian Federation in the Field of Nuclear Deterrence”. Presidential Decree no. 355, 02.06.2020. (In Russ.) Available at: http://www.kremlin.ru/acts/bank/45562 (accessed 05.05.2022).

7. Ambassador Antonov called the words about the development of the doctrine of “escalation for de-escalation” by the Russian Federation erroneous. TASS, 09.04.2019. (In Russ.) Available at: https://tass.ru/politika/6309802 (accessed 05.05.2022).

8. The Foreign Ministry rejected the concept of “limited nuclear war”. RBK, 11.02.2021. (In Russ.) Available at: https://www.rbc.ru/politics/11/02/2021/6024f1389a7947b140e61acf (accessed 05.05.20220).

9. Defense Industry Bulletin, January 1967, vol. 3, no. 1. Available at: https://archive.org/details/defenseindustryv019235mbp/page/n1/mode/2up?view=theater (accessed 05.05.2022).

10. Missile Defense Review. U.S. Department of Defense. Washington DC, 2019. Available at: https://media.defense.gov/2019/Jan/17/2002080666/-1/-1/1/2019-MISSILE-DEFENSE-REVIEW.PDF (accessed 25.03.2021).

11. SIPRI Yearbook 2021: Armaments, Disarmament and International Security. Stockholm, Oxford University Press, 2021. 724 p.

12. The source spoke about the new tests of the S‑500 in the Arctic. TASS, 29.12.2021. (In Russ.) Available at: https://ria.ru/20211229/s-500-1766015268.html (accessed 05.05.2022).

13. Source: the new S‑550 air defense system successfully passed state tests and took up combat duty. TASS, 29.12.2021. (In Russ.) Available at: https://tass.ru/armiya-i-opk/13321835 (accessed 05.05.2022).

14. The agreement between the Russian Federation, the Republic of Kazakhstan, the Kyrgyz Republic, the Republic of Tajikistan and People’s Republic of China on mutual reducing armed forces around border. April 1997. Ministry of Defence of the Russian Federation. (In Russ.) Available at: https://doc.mil.ru/documents/quick_search/more.htm?id=10947127@egNPA (accessed 05.05.2022).

15. U.S. – Russian Arms Control at a Glance. Arms Control Association. Arms control Association, April 2020. Available at: https://www.armscontrol.org/factsheets/USRussiaNuclearAgreements (accessed 05.05.2022).

16. The agreement on confidence building measures concerning systems of fight against the ballistic missiles which are not strategic ballistic missiles. Electronic fund of legal and normative-technical documents. New York, 26.09.1997. (In Russ.) Available at: https://docs.cntd.ru/document/901725944 (accessed 05.05.2022).

17. The first agreed statement relating to the Treaty between the USSR and the USA on the limitation of the ABM systems. New York, 26.09.1997. (In Russ.) Available at: https://www.armscontrol.ru/start/rus/docs/ny-1abm.htm (accessed 05.05.2022).

18. The second agreed statement relating to the Treaty between the USSR and the USA on the limitation of the ABM systems. New York, 26.09.1997. (In Russ.) Available at: https://www.armscontrol.ru/start/rus/docs/ny-2abm.htm (accessed 27.05.2022).


Registered in System SCIENCE INDEX

For citation:
Klimov V. The Missile Defense Systems and Concepts of Limited Nuclear War. World Eñonomy and International Relations, 2022, vol. 66, No 8, pp. 16-24. https://doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227-2022-66-8-16-24

Contents World Eñonomy and International Relations. 2022, vol. 66, No 8

Comments (0)

Show

No comments

Add comment







Indexed

 

 

 

 

Current Issue
2023, vol. 67, No. 3
Topical Themes of the Issue:
  • Tax Instruments to Stimulate Innovations in EU Countries 
  • Russia and Western Balkans: Realized and Missed Opportunities in Trade
  • Spanish Society: Stable Instability 
  • ASEAN and the Myanmar Dilemma 
  • Greater Middle East
Submit an Article
Submit an Article
INVITATION FOR PUBLICATION
The Editorial Board invites authors to write analytical articles on the following topics:
  • changes in the processes of globalization in modern conditions
  • formation of the new world order
  • shifts in civilization at the stage of transition to a digital society

The editors are also interested in publishing synthesis articles / scientific reviews revealing the main trends in the development of certain regions of the world - Latin America, Africa, South Asia, etc.

Scientific and Practical Seminar of IMEMO, RIAC
and the MEMO Journal