Germany and the EU: Motive Power or Hegemonic Risk?

DOI: 10.20542/0131-2227-2022-66-7-24-32
University of Pisa, Via Filippo Serafini, 3, Pisa, 56126, Italy;
Moscow State Institute of International Relations, The Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation (MGIMO University), 76, Vernadskogo Prosp., Moscow, 119454, Russian Federation.

Received 18.10.2021. Revised 04.03.2022. Accepted 29.04.2022.

Abstract. The German position has played a central role in the European integration process from the earliest stages – both in the sense of strengthening and deepening integration and, especially after the adoption of the single currency, in that of imposing a particularly rigid economic and financial paradigm, while being accused by some member states of pursuing a hegemonic design that could even lead to a serious crisis in the Union. A heated debate has developed on this interpretation, not lacking in political polemics, which calls for a more in-depth assessment of the determinants of Bonn’s and then Berlin’s European policy, of the relationship between the choices considering integration and general lines of the German foreign policy as they develop. In addition, the theme of Reunification and, in parallel, of national identity, that have decisively conditioned the life of post‑1945 Germany, is crucial. In particular, it is interesting to note how Bonn made Western anchorage, both in the transatlantic and EU spheres, some of the cornerstones of its system, while at the same time, skilfully exploiting these choices to regain a place on the international scene. With reunification of 1990, Germany regained full sovereignty and tenaciously worked to assert its role as the continent’s Zentralmacht (central power) – a role that has been characteristic of the Germanic world since the Holy Roman Empire. This determination, albeit in different tones and colours, has seen substantial continuity between the CDU/CSU, the Social Democrats and Greens, and then with the “Gro.e Koalitionen” led by Angela Merkel. “Extraordinary responsibility”, “pivot”, “engine”, “vanguard”, “centre of gravity” are the different definitions that chancellors and foreign ministers have used in the last 30 years to define Berlin’s role within the European Union. Different expressions, but always intended to emphasise a special position and declined in such a way as to be useful to Germany’s “Vitalinteressen”, whether it was a question of the enlargement of the Union, its legal structure, the principle of subsidiarity or the creation of monetary union. It resulted, though not without contradictions, in a shift from the idea of “europaisches Deutschland” (European Germany) to that of “europaisches Deutschland in einem deutschen Europa” (European Germany in a German Europe). This contribution is devoted to the historical and political dynamics of this development.

Keywords: Germany, German Foreign Policy, European Integration, Reunification, German Question


1. Smale A., Mazzetti M., Sanger D.E. Germany Demands Top U.S. Intelligence Officer Be Expelled. New York Times, 10.07.2014. Available at: (accessed 06.03.2022).

2. Baumann R. Deutschland als Europas Zentralmacht. Handbuch zur deutschen Au.enpolitik. Schmidt S., Hellmann G., Wolf R., eds. Wiesbaden, VS Verlag fur Sozialwissenschaften, 2007, pp. 62-72.

3. Schwarz H.-P. Die Zentralmacht Europas. Deutschlands Ruckkehr auf die Weltbuhne. Berlin, Siedler, 1994. 320 p.

4. Zoellick R. Abschied von der Selbstbeschrankung. Internationale Politik, 1998, no. 12, pp. 21-26.

5. Haftendorn H. Deutsche Au.enpolitik zwischen Selbstbeschrankung und Selbstbehauptung: 1945–2000. Stuttgart–Munchen, Deutsche Verlags-Anstalt, 2001. 528 p.

6. Jopp M., Schneider H., Schmalz U., eds. Germany’s European policy: perceptions in key partner countries. Bonn, Europa Union Verlag, 2002. 280 p.

7. Genscher H.-D. Wir wollen ein europaisches Deutschland. Munchen, Goldmann, 1992. 286 p.

8. Roos U. Deutsche Au.enpolitik Eine Rekonstruktion der grundlegenden Handlungsregeln. Wiesbaden, VS Verlag fur Sozialwissenschaften, 2010. 370 p.

9. Liulevicius V.G. The German Myth of the East: 1800 to the Present. Oxford–New York. Oxford University Press, 2009. 312 p.

10. Markovits A.S., Reich S., eds. Das deutsche Dilemma. Die Berliner Republik zwischen Macht und Machtverzicht. Berlin, Fest Verlag, 1998. 366 p.

11. Katzenstein P.F. Germany and Mitteleuropa: an Introduction. Mitteleuropa. Between Europe and Germany. Katzensteined P.F., ed. Providence-Oxford, Berghan Books, 1997, pp. 1-39.

12. Meister S. Die Sackgasse der deutschen Ostpolitik. Wie die Bundesregierung ihre eigene Russland- und Ukrainepolitik torpediert. Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Auswartige Politik, 14.02.2019. Available at: (accessed 06.03.2022).

13. Russo F. Altro che salvataggio. Gli aiuti alla Grecia sono finiti quasi tutti alle banche. AGI, 23.06.2018. Available at: (accessed 06.03.2022).

14. Streeck W. Scenario for a Wonderful Tomorrow. London Review of Books, 2016, no. 38 (7), pp. 7-10. Available at: (accessed 06.03.2022).

15. Wagstyl S. Merkel throws support behind EC president Tusk. Financial Times, 09.03.2017. Available at: (accessed 06.03.2022).

16. Janning J., Moller A. Leading from the centre: Germany’s role in Europe. European Council on Foreign Relations, 13.07.2016. Available at: (accessed 06.03.2022).

17. Taylor P. Angela Merkel, still the queen of Europe. Politico, 21.12.2017. Available at: (accessed 06.03.2022).

18. Ivanovitch M. Brexit is a revolt against a German-run European super-state. CNBC, 04.02.2019. Available at: (accessed 06.03.2022).


1. Die Europabeauftragte der Ressorts: Prioritaten im Programm der deutschen EU-Prasidentschaft. Available at: (accessed 06.03.2022).

2. Niederschrift der Sitzung des Europaischen Parlaments vom 12. Januar 1999. Available at: (accessed 06.03.2021).

3. Grundgesetz fur die Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Available at: (accessed 06.03.2022).

4. Exporte aus aus europaischen Landern in die zehn wichtigsten Ziellander im Jahr 2020. Available at: (accessed 06.03.2022).

Registered in System SCIENCE INDEX

For citation:
Giannotti A. Germany and the EU: Motive Power or Hegemonic Risk?. World Eonomy and International Relations, 2022, vol. 66, no. 7, pp. 24-32.

Comments (0)

No comments

Add comment






Dear authors! Please note that in the VAK List of peer-reviewed scientific journals, in which the main scientific results of dissertations for the degree of candidate and doctor of sciences should be published for the “MEMO Journal” the following specialties are recorded:
economic sciences:
5.2.5. World Economy.
5.2.1. Economic Theory
5.2.3. Regional and Branch Economics
political sciences:
5.5.4. International Relations
5.5.1. History and Theory of Politics
5.5.2. Political Institutions, Processes, Technologies


Current Issue
2024, vol. 68, No. 6
Topical Themes of the Issue:
  • The “Pivot to Asia”: AUKUS in the Perception of American Politicum
  • The Collapse of the European Collective Security System
  • Public Investment and Sustainability of World Economy
  • Sub-Saharan Africa: Trends, Proportions and Factors of Development
Submit an Article
The Editorial Board invites authors to write analytical articles on the following topics:
  • changes in the processes of globalization in modern conditions
  • formation of the new world order
  • shifts in civilization at the stage of transition to a digital society

The editors are also interested in publishing synthesis articles / scientific reviews revealing the main trends in the development of certain regions of the world - Latin America, Africa, South Asia, etc.