Print

International Political Economy of Preferential Trade Agreements

40
Rubric: Economy, Economic Theory
DOI: 10.20542/0131-2227-2022-66-5-32-40
E. Smirnov, smirnov_en@mail.ru 
State University of Management, 99, Ryazansky Prosp., Moscow, 109542, Russian Federation.
S. Lukyanov, s.lukyanov@mail.ru 
State University of Management, 99, Ryazansky Prosp., Moscow, 109542, Russian Federation;
Moscow State Institute of International Relations, 76, Prosp. Vernadskogo, Moscow, 119454, Russian Federation.
PDF (RUS)

Received 19.11.2021.

Abstract. The change in the concept of globalization of the world economy has led to serious structural changes in the global governance of international trade, as well as in the theory and practice of organizing preferential trade agreements (PTAs) between countries. At all stages of economic globalization, the main motive for the creation of the PTS was the expansion of access to foreign markets. The period of slowbalization of the world economy after the global crisis of 2008–2009 led to a further increase in trade protectionism. The role of traditional determinants in the creation of PTAs is decreasing, while the lobbying activity of exporters – transnational companies – is becoming more significant, which leads to an increase in the unevenness of benefits received by participants in international exchange. The focus of the international political economy of the PTA is shifting from traditional tariff and non-tariff trade barriers to the study of the conditions for cross-border investment, rules for the protection of intellectual property, environmental issues, and production standards. The multidimensionality of trade policy at the present stage dictates the need to revise the preferences prevailing in international trade. Trade policy covers not only cross-border exchange, but also international production. Modern PTAs are an alternative design to the WTO multilateral trade regulation, which will simplify traditional international exchange procedures. In addition, in the PTAs, some aspects of competition rules that are poorly spelled out in the WTO may be especially significant, since the risks of collusion of firms in this case may already cover several jurisdictions. An important role in understanding the political and economic nature of PTAs is played by their “distributional” consequences, when the gains of different countries from participation in the PTAs becomes uneven, which is a serious challenge for real economic integration between countries. To develop new approaches to organizing PTAs requires a clear understanding of the new nature and scale of economic globalization. Therefore, in the coming years, we will face the transformation of the designs of the already created PTAs, taking into account the new challenges that have emerged in international trade.

Keywords: economic globalization, preferential liberalization, preferential trade agreements, global value chains


REFERNCES

  1. Kessler M., Subramanian A. The Hyperglobalization of Trade and Its Future. PIIE Working Paper Series, 2013, no. 13-16. 66 p.
  2. Kandil N., Battaia O., Hammami R. Globalisation vs. Slowbalisation: ÀLiterature Review of Analytical Models for Sourcing Decisions in Supply Chain Management. Annual Reviews in Control, 2020, vol. 49, pp. 277-287. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arcontrol.2020.04.004 (accessed 16.09.2021).
  3. Taglioni D., Winkler D. Making Global Value Chains Work for Development. Washington, The World Bank, 2016. 262 p.
  4. Yamamura E., Tsutsui Y. Trade Policy Preference, Childhood Sporting Experience, and Informal School Curriculum: An Examination of Views of the TPP from the Viewpoint of Behavioral Economics. Review of International Economics, 2019, vol. 27, pp. 61-90. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/roie.12356 (accessed 12.10.2021).
  5. Maur J.-C., Chauffour J.-P., eds. Preferential Trade Agreement Policies for Development: A Handbook. The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development. Washington, The World Bank, 2011. 511 p.
  6. Smirnov E.N. Digital transformation of the world economy: trade, production, markets. Moscow, Mir nauki, 2019. 95 p. (In Russ.)
  7. Kucik J. The Domestic Politics of Institutional Design: Producer Preferences over Trade Agreement Rules. Economics and Politics, 2012, vol. 24 (2), pp. 95-118. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0343.2012.00399.x (accessed 15.09.2021).
  8. Blanchard E., Matschke X. US Multinationals and Preferential Market Access. Review of Economics and Statistics, 2015, vol. 97 (4), pp. 839-854.
  9. Baccini L., Pinto P., Weymouth S. The Distributional Consequences of Preferential Trade Liberalization: Firm-level Evidence. International Organization, 2017, vol. 71 (2), pp. 373-395. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/S002081831700011X (accessed 22.10.2021).
  10. Baccini L. The Economics and Politics of Preferential Trade Agreements. Annual Review of Political Science, 2019, vol. 22, pp. 75-92. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-050317-070708 (accessed 24.10.2021).
  11. Caliendo L., Parro F. Estimates of the Trade and Welfare Effects of NAFTA. Review of Economic Studies, 2015, vol. 82 (1), pp. 1-44.
  12. Manger M. PTA Design, Tariffs and Intra-Industry Trade. Trade Cooperation: The Purpose, Design and Effects of Preferential Trade Agreements. Dur A., Elsig M., eds. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2015, pp. 195-217.
  13. Baccini L., Dur A., Elsig M. Intra-industry Trade, Global Value Chains, and Preferential Tariff Liberalization. International Studies Quarterly, 2018, vol. 62 (2), pp. 329-340.
  14. Hoekman B., Mattoo A., Sapir A. The Political Economy of Services Trade Liberalization: A Case for International Regulatory Cooperation? Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 2007, vol. 23, iss. 3, pp. 367-391. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/grm024 (accessed 28.10.2021).
  15. Anderer C., Dür A., Lechner L. Trade Policy in a “GVC World”: Multinational Corporations and Trade Liberalization. Business and Politic, 2020, vol. 22 (4), pp. 639-666. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/bap.2020.4 (accessed 01.11.2021).
  16. Lee J.W., Pyun J.H. Does Trade Integration Contribute to Peace? ADB Working Paper on Regional Integration, January 2009, no. 24. 35 p.
  17. Martin P., Mayer T., Thoenig M. The Geography of Conflicts and Free Trade Agreements. CEPR Discussion Paper, 2010, no. 7740, Centre for Economic and Policy Research (CEPR), London. 34 p.
  18. Rodrik D. What Do Trade Agreements Really Do? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 2018, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 73-90. DOI: 10.1257/jep.32.2.73
  19. Ronnback K. Interest-group Lobbying for Free Trade: An Empirical Case Study of International Trade Policy Formation. Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, 2015, vol. 4 (2), pp. 281-293. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/09638199.2014.884154 (accessed 16.10.2021).
  20. Leibovici F., Santacreu A. M. International Trade of Essential Goods during a Pandemic. Covid Economics Vetted and Real- Time Papers, 22 May 2020, iss. 21, pp. 59-99.
  21. Hoekman B., Shingal A., Eknath V., Ereshchenko V. COVID‑19, Public Procurement Regimes, and Trade Policy. Policy Research Working Paper, January 2021, no. 9511. 20 p.
  22. Mattoo A., Rocha N., Ruta M., eds. Handbook of Deep Trade Agreements. Washington, International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank, 2020. 615 p.
  23. Baena-Rojas J.J., Herrero-Olarte S. From Preferential Trade Arrangements to Free Trade Agreements: One of the Downturns of Cooperation in International Relations? Social Sciences, 2020, vol. 9 (8), pp. 1-139. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci9080139 (accessed 16.10.2021).
  24. Dashkov A.A., Chernikova E.S. Researching the impact of digital platforms on the business model of an organization. E-management. 2019, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 48-57. (In Russ.)
  25. Titievskaia J., Kononenko V., Navarra C., Stamegna C., Zumer K. Slowing Down or Changing Track? Understanding the Dynamics of Slowbalisation. European Parliamentary Research Service Paper, PE659.383, December 2020. 24 p.

Registered in System SCIENCE INDEX

For citation:
Smirnov E., Lukyanov S. International Political Economy of Preferential Trade Agreements. World Eñonomy and International Relations, 2022, vol. 66, no. 5, pp. 32-40. https://doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227-2022-66-5-32-40

Contents World Eñonomy and International Relations. 2022, vol. 66, no. 5

Comments (0)

Show

No comments

Add comment







Indexed

 

 

 

 

Dear authors! Please note that in the VAK List of peer-reviewed scientific journals, in which the main scientific results of dissertations for the degree of candidate and doctor of sciences should be published for the “MEMO Journal” the following specialties are recorded:
economic sciences:
5.2.5. World Economy.
5.2.1. Economic Theory
5.2.3. Regional and Branch Economics
political sciences:
5.5.4. International Relations
5.5.1. History and Theory of Politics
5.5.2. Political Institutions, Processes, Technologies

 

Current Issue
2023, vol. 67, No. 9
Topical Themes of the Issue:
  • Contradictions and Conflicts in the Multilateral Trading System 
  • Global Climate Agenda: Big Gamble 
  • South Asia in Regional and World Politics 
  • Social Policy and Public Administration Ecosystems
Submit an Article
Submit an Article
INVITATION FOR PUBLICATION
The Editorial Board invites authors to write analytical articles on the following topics:
  • changes in the processes of globalization in modern conditions
  • formation of the new world order
  • shifts in civilization at the stage of transition to a digital society

The editors are also interested in publishing synthesis articles / scientific reviews revealing the main trends in the development of certain regions of the world - Latin America, Africa, South Asia, etc.

Scientific and Practical Seminar of IMEMO, RIAC
and the MEMO Journal