Contemporary Biosafety Challenges and Perspectives of International Cooperation

28
DOI: 10.20542/0131-2227-2022-66-4-94-100
S. Zavriev, szavriev@ibch.ru 
Primakov National Research Institute of World Economy and International Relations, Russian Academy of Sciences (IMEMO), 23, Profsoyuznaya Str., Moscow, 117997, Russian Federation.

Received 25.01.2022.

Acknowledgements. The article was prepared within the project “Post-Crisis World Order: Challenges and Technologies, Competition and Cooperation” supported by the grant from Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation program for research projects in priority areas of scientific and technological development (Agreement 075-15-2020-783).


Abstract. Biological safety is one of the most important components of the overall security system of both individual states and the entire world community. Today it has become quite obvious that the problems of biosafety are more urgent than ever and require the maximum attention of the world community. Against the background of the emergence and spread of diseases caused, as a rule, by dangerous and especially dangerous microorganisms, a number of problems arise in the world not only in the field of health care, but also of a political, social and economic nature. A striking example of this is the COVID 19 coronavirus pandemic that has continued since the end of 2019. The issues related to biosafety in the agricultural sector and ecology are considered. It is obvious that constant monitoring and analysis of a wide range of biosafety problems, early development of measures to minimize the threats of exposure to already known dangerous pathogens not only on human health, but also on the environment, agricultural and food sectors are necessary. The issues related to the development of new research directions that can lead to the creation of biological systems with specified properties and functions that have no analogues in nature are discussed. In research aimed at the development of new biological technologies, to one degree or another related to the production of biological warfare, the primary and mandatory requirement is to ensure the safety of all personnel involved in these works and the availability of well-trained qualified scientists, as well as certified laboratory facilities in which these works are carried out. It is important to constantly pursue the purposeful development of multilateral international cooperation in the field of biosafety, and make creative decisions to ensure it on the territory of the Russian Federation. The importance of Russia’s active international participation in solving existing and potential biological threats within the framework of the Biological and Toxin Weapons Convention (BTWC) and the Collective Security Treaty Organization (CSTO) is noted.

Keywords: biological security, biological weapons, international cooperation, the impact of economics and politics


REFERENCES

  1. Carbon dioxide levels continue to remain at record levels despite the COVID‑19-related isolation regime. Meteoinfo, 23.11.2020. (In Russ.) Available at: https://meteoinfo.ru/novosti/99-pogoda-v-mire/17636-uroven-soderzhaniya-dvuokisi-ugleroda-prodolzhaet-ostavatsya-na-rekordnom-urovne-nesmotrya-na-svyazannyj-s-covid-19-rezhim-izolyatsii (accessed 15.01.2022).
  2. Federal Law No. 296-FZ of July 2, 2021 “On Limiting Greenhouse Gas Emissions”. Garant.ru, 05.07.2021. (In Russ.) Available at: http://ivo.garant.ru/#/document/401420454/paragraph/1:0 (accessed 15.01.2022).
  3. Dauling S. Coronavirus: Spanish lessons for those who are fighting the spread of COVID‑19 today. BBC News, 07.03.2020. (In Russ.) Available at: https://www.bbc.com/russian/vert-fut-51723306 (accessed 15.01.2022).
  4. The COVID‑19 pandemic. What is known about the virus. RBC, 16.10.2020. (In Russ.) Available at: https://www.rbc.ru/society/23/01/2020/5e295e8f9a79476dcaaae2c8?from=center (accessed 15.01.2022).
  5. Pandemic as a challenge and new thinking in the XXI century. European Dialogue. Expert group. 20.07.2020. (In Russ.) Available at: http://www.eedialog.org/ru/2020/07/09/pandemija-kak-vyzov-i-novoe-myshlenie-v-xxi-veke/ (accessed 15.01.2022).
  6. COVID19 Dashboard by the center for Science and Engeneering (CSSE) AT Johns Hopkins University. Available at: https://gisanddata.maps.arcgis.com/apps/dashboards/bda7594740fd40299423467b48e9ecf6 (accessed 15.01.2022).
  7. Jaiswal1 J., LoSchiavo C., Perlmam D. Disinformation, Misinformation and Inequality‐Driven Mistrust in the Time of COVID‑19: Lessons Unlearned from AIDS Denialism. AIDS Behaviour, 2020, no. 24, pp. 2776-2780. DOI: 10.1007/s10461-020-02925-y Available at: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10461-020-02925-y (accessed 15.01.2022).
  8. Mian A., Khan S. Coronavirus: the spread of misinformation. BMC Medicine, 2020, no. 18, article no. 89. DOI: 10.1186/s12916-020-01556-3 Available at: https://bmcmedicine.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12916-020-01556-3 (accessed 15.01.2022).
  9. Iftimie I. A. The Implications of COVID‑19 for NATO’s Counter-Bioterrorism. COVID19: NATO in the Age of Pandemics. Tardy Th., ed. NATO Defense College, 2020, pp. 51-60. DOI: 10.2307/resrep25148.12 Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/resrep25148.12 (accessed 15.01.2022).
  10. Dehghani A., Masoumi G. Could SARS-CoV‑2 or COVID‑19 Be a Biological Weapon? Iran Journal of Public Health, 2020, vol. 49, suppl. 1, pp. 143-144. DOI: 10.18502/ijph.v49iS1.369 Available at: https://publish.kne-publishing.com/index.php/ijph/article/view/3691/2798 (accessed 15.01.2022).
  11. Brzozowski A. Has COVID‑19 increased the threat of bioterrorism in Europe? Euractiv, 03.06.2020. Available at: https://www.euractiv.com/section/defence-and-security/news/has-covid-19-increased-the-threat-of-bioterrorism-in-europe/ (accessed 15.01.2022).
  12. Finaud M. How does COVID19 relate to biological weapons? Geneva Centre for Security Policy. May 29, 2020. Available at: https://www.gcsp.ch/global-insights/how-does-covid-19-relate-biological-weapons (accessed 15.01.2022).
  13. Frinking E., et al. The Increasing Threat of Biological Weapons: Handle with Sufficient and Proportionate Care. The Hague, Hague Centre for Strategic Studies, 2016. 38 p. Available at: https://hcss.nl/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/Threat-and-Care-of-BWdef4eversie_0.pdf (accessed 15.01.2022).
  14. Zavriev S., Shemyakin I. Synthetic Biology in the Context of Current Biosecurity Challenges and Problems. Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya, 2019, vol. 63, no. 12, pp. 77-83. (In Russ.) Available at: https://doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227-2019-63-12-77-83 (accessed 15.01.2022).
  15. WHO has declared the coronavirus outbreak an international emergency. Interfax, 30.01.2020. (In Russ.) Available at: https://www.interfax.ru/world/693442 (accessed 15.01.2022).
  16. The Great Lockdown: Worst Economic Downturn Since the Great Depression. International Monetary Fund, March 23, 2020. Available at: https://www.imf.org/en/News/Articles/2020/03/23/pr2098-imf-managing-director-statement-following-a-g20-ministerial-call-on-the-coronavirus-emergency (accessed 10.09.2021).
  17. The Darker Bioweapons Future. Central Intelligence Agency. Available at: http://www.fas.org/irp/cia/product/bw1103.pdf (accessed 15.01.2022).
  18. Convention on the Prohibition of the Development, Production and Stockpiling of Bacteriological (Biological) and Toxin Weapons and on Their Destruction. Paris 13 January 1993. Available at: https://www.un.org/en/genocideprevention/documents/atrocity-crimes/Doc.42_Conv%20Chemical%20weapons.pdf (accessed 15.01.2022).
  19. Zavriev S., Malygina A. Analysis of the Current State of Affairs around the BTWC: Problems and their Possible Solutions. Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya, 2021, vol. 65, no. 10, pp. 112-121. (In Russ.) Available at: https://doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227-2021-65-10-112-121  
  20. Ivanov V. Biological weapons on the Russian border. Nezavisimoe voennoe obozrenie, 25.06.2020. (In Russ.) Available at: https://nvo.ng.ru/gpolit/2020-06-25/1_1097_armament.html (accessed 15.01.2022).
  21. Corley H., Higley L., Watkins J. Agricultural Bioterrorism Threat Requires Vigilance. Institute of Agriculture and Natural Resource, University of Nebraska, 12.11.2001. Available at: https://web.archive.org/web/20120218075510/http://ianrnews.unl.edu/static/0111121.shtml (accessed 15.01.2022).
  22. Zavriev S., Ignatov A. Potential Threats in the Sphere of Agricultural Security and Food Safety. Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya, 2020, vol. 64, no. 7, pp. 100-107. (In Russ.) Available at: https://doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227-2020-64-7-100-107  
  23. The SCO countries have agreed to hold regular consultations on biosafety. TASS, 28.11.2019. (In Russ.) Available at: https://tass.ru/politika/7181799?keepThis=true&TB_iframe=true&height=500&width=1100&caption=%D0%A2 (accessed 15.01.2022).
  24. Joint Statement of the Ministers of Foreign Affairs of the member States of the Collective Security Treaty Organization on strengthening the Convention on the Prohibition of Biological and Toxin Weapons. Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation. 19.05.2021. (In Russ.) Available at: https://www.mid.ru/ru/foreign_policy/news/-/asset_publisher/cKNonkJE02Bw/content/id/4737569 (accessed 15.01.2022).
  25. The CSTO Foreign Ministers called for joining efforts in the fight against COVID‑19. Reformation, 26.05.2020. (In Russ.) Available at: https://reform.by/glavy-mid-odkb-vystupili-za-obedinenija-usilij-v-borbe-s-covid-19 (accessed 15.01.2022).
  26. On consultations of Deputy Ministers of Foreign Affairs of the member States of the Collective Security Treaty Organization. Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation. 01.04.2021. (In Russ.) Available at: https://www.mid.ru/web/guest/integracionnye-struktury-prostranstva-sng/-/asset_publisher/rl7Fzr0mbE6x/content/id/4662377 (accessed 15.01.2022).

Registered in System SCIENCE INDEX

For citation:
Zavriev S. Contemporary Biosafety Challenges and Perspectives of International Cooperation. World Eonomy and International Relations, 2022, vol. 66, No 4, pp. 94-100. https://doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227-2022-66-4-94-100



Comments (0)

No comments

Add comment







Indexed

 

 

 

 

Current Issue
2022, vol. 66, No. 11
Topical Themes of the Issue:
  • Developing Countries in the New Equation of the Post-Crisis World Order 
  • U.S. Public Diplomacy as a Tool for “Political Warfare” 
  • Central Europe: Possible Scenarios
  • The Collapse of the Global Consumption Model: in Search of Sustainability
  • Future Wars in Light of the Past Experience
Submit an Article
NEW SECTION

In response to the challenges of our time the Editorial board continues to open new thematic rubrics:

“World Energy Sector after Pandemic”. We plan to publish articles presenting in-depth analysis of influence of Pandemic on the global energy sector and forecasts of further developments in its various branches.