Print

Turkey and Syrian Conflict

96
Rubric: Greater Middle East
DOI: 10.20542/0131-2227-2022-66-3-44-51
A. Gasanova, aytanh23@gmail.com
Primakov National Research Institute of World Economy and International Relations, Russian Academy of Sciences (IMEMO), 23, Profsoyuznaya Str., Moscow, 117997, Russian Federation. 
PDF (RUS)

Received 30.06.2021.

Abstract. The article analyses Turkey’s policy towards the Syrian crisis. The author presents an overview of doctrinal principles of the Turkish foreign policy as a basis for its objectives and motivation. The “zero problems with neighbours” concept that had been integral to Ankara’s Middle Eastern policies in general was proven irrelevant amid the Arab Spring. In fact, Ankara strived to use the Arab revolutions to its own advantage by promoting Turkey’s modernization pattern and gaining clout in the whole region. This course seems to have shaped the informal doctrine of “neo- Ottomanism”, which glorifies the Ottoman imperial power and expansionism towards the nations that comprised the former empire. In addition, one of the main factors in Ankara’s policy in Syria is its aspiration to prevent a Kurdish autonomy there. Kurds were the major target of Ankara’s three illegal military operations (“Euphrates Shield”, “Olive Branch” and “Peace Spring”) on the Syrian soil, with the aim of pushing them away from the Turkish boundaries. Turkey’s aggressive policy towards the Syrian Kurds appears to be the clearest manifestation of “neo-Ottomanism”. Apart from that, the article considers Turkey’s balancing act between the US and Russia as part of its foreign policy in Syria. Following the “Euphrates Shield”, there was a rapprochement between Turkey and Russia when the former joined the Astana negotiations. Cooperation with Russia has become a consistent trend in Erdogan’s foreign policy in Syria, especially in Idlib. It has proven beneficial to Ankara with regard to achieving its policy goals in the Syrian Arab Republic.

Keywords: Turkey, Syria, Russia, “zero problems with neighbours”, “neo-Ottomanism”, Kurds, “Euphrates Shield”, “Olive Branch”, “Peace Spring”, Idlib


REFERENCES

  1. Davutoğlu A. Turkey’s Zero-Problems Foreign Policy. Foreign Policy, 20.05.2010. Available at: http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2010/05/20/turkeys_zero_problems_foreign_policy (accessed 25.05.2021).
  2. Davutoglu A. Strategic Depth, Turkey’s International Position. Istanbul, Globe Publications, 2001. 600 p. (In Turk.) Available at: https://www.kureyayinlari.com/Kitap/10/stratejik_derinlik (accessed 29.02.2021).
  3. Barkey J.H. Turkish Foreign Policy and the Middle East. CERI Strategy Papers, no. 10, 06.06.2011. 13 p. Available at: https://www.sciencespo.fr/ceri/sites/sciencespo.fr.ceri/files/n10_06062011.pdf (accessed 30.05.2021).
  4. Speech entitled “Vision 2023: Turkey’s Foreign Policy Objectives” delivered by H.E. Ahmet Davutoğlu, Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Turkey at the Turkey Investor Conference: The road to 2023 organized by Goldman Sachs (London, 22.11.2011). Rep. of Turkey Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Available at: https://www.mfa.gov.tr/speech-entitled-_vision-2023_-turkey_s-foreign-policy-objectives__-delivered-by-h_e_-ahmet-davutoglu_-minister-of-foreign-af.en.mfa (accessed 28.04.2021).
  5. Subbotin I. Turkey aspires a special position in a new world order. Nezavisimaya gazeta, 24.03.2021. (In Russ.) Available at: https://www.ng.ru/world/2021-03-24/6_8110_turkey.html (accessed 25.05.2021).
  6. “World is bigger than five”: Turkey’s Erdogan slams “handful of WW2 victors” ruling the globe during whirlwind tour of Africa. RT, 18.10.2021. Available at: https://www.rt.com/news/537811-erdogan-unfair-handful-countries-world-order/ (accessed 19.10.2021).
  7. Avatkov V. Neo-Ottomanism. Turkey’s basic ideologeme and geostrategy. Svobodnaya misl’, 2014, no. 3, pp. 71-78. (In Russ.)
  8. Svistunova I.A. Turkish foreign policy in the Middle East in the XXI century: regional strategy. Problemy natsional’noi strategii, 2012, no. 4 (13), pp. 39-55. (In Russ.)
  9. Malysheva D. Turkey’s modern political development. Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya, 2014, no. 9, pp. 84-91. (In Russ.) Available at: https://doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227-2014-9-84-91  
  10. Ivanova I.I. Evolution of the Turkish Republic’s foreign policy in the Middle East in XX–XXI centuries. Shtanov A.V., ed. (MGIMO University). Moscow, Publisher Vorob’ev A.V., 2019. 380 p. (In Russ.)
  11. Taspınar Ö. Turkey’s strategic vision and Syria. The Washington Quarterly, 2012, vol. 35, iss. 3, pp. 127-140. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/0163660X.2012.706519  
  12. Akyol M. The problem with Turkey’s “zero problems” plan. The New York Times, 29.06.2016. Available at: https://www.nytimes.com/roomfordebate/2011/11/15/why-turkey-turned-away-from-syria/the-problem-with-turkeys-zero-problems-plan (accessed 06.03.2021).
  13. Suleimanov A.V. Relations between Turkey and Syria: yesterday and today. Asia and Africa Today, 2015, no. 12 (701), pp. 32-38. (In Russ.)
  14. Erdogan announced the number of the Syrian refugees in Turkey. IA REGNUM, 25.10.2020. (In Russ.) Available at: https://regnum.ru/news/polit/3098487.html (accessed 27.01.2021).
  15. EU leaders asked the European Commission to elaborate new refugee financial assistance to Turkey. TASS, 25.06.2021. (In Russ.) Available at: https://tass.ru/mezhdunarodnaya-panorama/11748151 (accessed 27.06.2021).
  16. Ahmet S.Yayla, Colin P.Clarke. What’s Turkey trying to achieve in Syria? The National Interest, 01.04.2018. Available at: https://nationalinterest.org/feature/whats-turkey-trying-achieve-syria-25162 (accessed 01.03.2021).
  17. Rudnickii A.Y., Avatkov V.A., Sbitneva A.I. The conflict between Turkey and Syria: history and reality. Konfliktologiya/nota bene, 2020, no. 2, pp. 26-33. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.7256/2454-0617.2020.2.33629
  18. Arutyunyan A.E. Cooperation between Turkey and Syria in the late 20th – early 21st century. Sovremennaya Turtsiya: problemy i resheniya. Ul’chenko N.Y., Urazova E. I., eds. Moscow, Institut Blizhnego Vostoka, 2006, pp. 152-165. (In Russ.)
  19. Hinnebusch R. Back to enmity: Turkey-Syria relations since the Syrian Uprising. Orient, Journal of German Orient Institute, 2015, vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 14-22. Available at: https://research-repository.st-andrews.ac.uk/handle/10023/6068 (accessed 09.05.2021).
  20. Vertyaev K.V., Zhigalina O.I., ed., Ivanov S.M. Political developments in the Kurdish regions of the West Asian states (Iraq, Turkey, Syria, Iran). Moscow, Institute of Oriental Studies of RAS, 2013. 142 p. (In Russ.)
  21. Turkey ended “Euphrates Shield” operation in Syria. BBC, 29.03.2017. (In Russ.) Available at: https://www.bbc.com/russian/news-39439678 (accessed 15.04.2021).
  22. Younes A. Analysis: What does the Adana deal mean for Turkey and Syria? Al Jazeera, 23.10.2019. Available at: https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2019/10/23/analysis-what-does-the-adana-deal-mean-for-turkey-and-syria (accessed 10.03.2021).
  23. Svistunova I.A. Turkey and the Syrian crisis: challenges and opportunities for Ankara’s foreign policy. Problemy natsional’noi strategii, 2018, no. 1 (46), pp. 74-97. (In Russ.)
  24. Sudagezer E. What do Russia-Turkey relations look like at a new stage? Sputnik, 25.06.2018. (In Turk.) Available at: https://tr.sputniknews.com/20180625/yeni-donem-turkiye-rusya-iliski-1034014881.html (accessed 02.03.2021).
  25. D’Alema F. The Evolution of Turkey’s Syria Policy. IAI Working Papers 17, 28.10.2017. 18 p. Available at: https://www.iai.it/sites/default/files/iaiwp1728.pdf (accessed 07.05.2021).
  26. Sochi memorandum: Russia and Turkey established a status quo in Syria. EADaily, 23.10.2019. (In Russ.) Available at: https://eadaily.com/ru/news/2019/10/23/sochinskiy-memorandum-rossiya-i-turciya-ustanovili-status-kvo-v-sirii (accessed 14.02.2021).
  27. Belen’kaya M. Idlib felt Turkish. Kommersant, 07.06.2021. (In Russ.)
  28. Dolgov B.V. The Syrian conflict in 2016. West–East–Russia 2016. Khoros V.G., Malysheva D.B., eds. Moscow, IMEMO, 2017, pp. 111-114. (In Russ.) DOI:10.20542/978-5-9535-0500-0
  29. Turkey looks for diplomatic solution to avoid “massacre” in Syria’s Idlib. The Telegraph, 05.09.2018. Available at: https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2018/09/05/turkey-looks-diplomatic-solution-avoid-massacre-syrias-idlib/ (accessed 15.01.2021).
  30. Memorandum on stabilization of the situation in the Idlib de-escalation area. Voltaire Network, 17.09.2018. Available at: https://www.voltairenet.org/article203066.html (accessed 01.05.2021).
  31. Russia and Turkey agreed a ceasefire in Idlib. Vedomosti, 05.03.2020 (In Russ.) Available at: https://www.vedomosti.ru/politics/articles/2020/03/05/824619-rossiya-turtsiya (accessed 06.04.2021).
  32. Route of first Russian-Turkish patrol along key de-escalation line shortened to prevent terrorist provocation involving civilians. RT, 15.03.2020. Available at: https://www.rt.com/news/483167-joint-russian-turkish-patrol-in-syria-shortened/ (accessed 10.06.2021).
  33. Turkey, Russia, Qatar push for political resolution in war-torn Syria. Doha news, 11.03.2021. Available at: https://www.dohanews.co/turkey-russia-qatar-push-for-political-resolution-in-war-torn-syria/ (accessed 13.03.2021).

Registered in System SCIENCE INDEX

For citation:
Gasanova A. Turkey and Syrian Conflict. World Eñonomy and International Relations, 2022, vol. 66, no. 3, pp. 44-51. https://doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227-2022-66-3-44-51

Contents World Eñonomy and International Relations. 2022, vol. 66, no. 3

Comments (0)

Show

No comments

Add comment







Indexed

 

 

 

 

Dear authors! Please note that in the VAK List of peer-reviewed scientific journals, in which the main scientific results of dissertations for the degree of candidate and doctor of sciences should be published for the “MEMO Journal” the following specialties are recorded:
economic sciences:
5.2.5. World Economy.
5.2.1. Economic Theory
5.2.3. Regional and Branch Economics
political sciences:
5.5.4. International Relations
5.5.1. History and Theory of Politics
5.5.2. Political Institutions, Processes, Technologies

 

Current Issue
2025, vol. 69, No. 2
Topical Themes of the Issue:
  • Battle of Titans: Structural Shifts in MNCs Global Production
  • Features of Collective Securitization in the European Union
  • Terrorist Networks of the “Global Jihad” in the 2020s
  • At Post-Soviet Space
Announcement

Dear authors of the journal!

Please note that the author's copies of the issues in which your texts are published are kept in the editorial office for no more than one year. After this period expires, the editorial office has the right to dispose of unclaimed copies at its own discretion.

 

Submit an Article
Submit an Article
INVITATION FOR PUBLICATION
The Editorial Board invites authors to write analytical articles on the following topics:
  • changes in the processes of globalization in modern conditions
  • formation of the new world order
  • shifts in civilization at the stage of transition to a digital society

The editors are also interested in publishing synthesis articles / scientific reviews revealing the main trends in the development of certain regions of the world - Latin America, Africa, South Asia, etc.

Scientific and Practical Seminar of IMEMO, RIAC
and the MEMO Journal