49Received 25.03.2022. Revised 17.09.2022. Accepted 03.10.2022.
Acknowledgements. The article has been supported by a grant of the Institute for International Studies, MGIMO University. Project no. 2022-02-01.
Abstract. The Eastern Partnership as one the European Union’s external activities is rarely analyzed through the prism of financing. At the same time, the analysis of instruments, volumes, dynamics and structure of financing allows not only to assess the efficiency of the funds spent in partner countries, but also to identify the real place of the Eastern Partnership in the structure of the EU foreign policy priorities. The aim of the study is to define the true role of partnership in the foreign policy of the Union. Analyzing the main directions and instruments of financing has resulted in a number of conclusions. Firstly, in terms of funding, the Eastern Partnership is inferior in importance not only to other countries and regions, which receive financial aid within the framework of the EU official development assistance, but also to the Southern Neighborhood. Secondly, the evolution of instruments has led to a further decrease in this role and the actual dissolution of financing the Eastern Partnership in the system of the EU official development assistance. Hence, we can conclude that the political component prevails over the economic one in case of the Eastern Partnership. Thirdly, the recipient countries within the framework of the program are clearly divided into two groups, based on the intensity of funding, and a larger amount of funds correlates not so much with the fulfillment of economic conditions, but with political loyalty and a demonstration of a pro-European foreign policy vector. Fourthly, even in the main beneficiary countries, the effectiveness of financing is very limited, since it does not lead to implementation of the stated goals. All this allows us to draw the key conclusion that the EU, within the framework of the Eastern Partnership, continues to build global regimes, the neighborhood being one of them. That is why the financing is aimed rather at stabilizing this neighborhood than at its active development.
Keywords: European Union, Eastern Partnership, European Neighborhood Policy, financing, Ukraine, Georgia, Moldova, Poland
REFERENCES
1. Eppler A., Anders L.H., Tuntschew T. Europe’s Political, Social, and Economic (Dis-) integration: Revisiting the Elephant in Times of Crises. Vienna, Institute for Advanced Studies, 2016. 28 p.
2. Risse T. Identity Matters: Exploring the Ambivalence of EU Foreign Policy. Global Policy, 2012, no. 3, sup. 1, pp. 87-95. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12019
3. Crombois J.F. Conflicting Narratives? Geopolitical and Normative Power Narratives in the EU Eastern Partnership. Politeja, 2017, vol. 14, no. 4 (49), pp. 109-125. Available at: https://doi.org/10.12797/Politeja.14.2017.49.07
4. Bolgova I.V. “Eastern Partnership” after the Ukrainian Crisis: the Value of Stability or Stable Values? Contemporary Europe, 2019, no. 7 (93), pp. 115-123. (In Russ.) Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.15211/soveurope72019115123
5. Kharlamova G. The European Union and the Eastern Partnership: Convergence of Economies. 22nd International Economic Conference – IECS2015 “Economic Prospects in the Context of Growing Global and Regional Interdependencies”. Sibiu, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu. Procedia Economics and Finance, 2015, vol. 27, pp. 29-41. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(15)00968-5
6. Arutyunyan O.V., Sergunin A.A. Armenia–EU Relations in the Scope of “Eastern Partnership” of the EU. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Series 6. Philosophy. Culturology. Political science. Law. International relations, 2012, no. 2, pp. 115-120. (In Russ.)
7. Nemenskii O.B. Belarus’ Participation in the EU Eastern Partnership Programme amid the Polish Eastern Policy. Slavic almanac, 2017, no. 3–4, pp. 155-177. (In Russ.)
8. Levchenkov A.S. Ukraine and the Eastern Partnership Programme (2014–2019). RSUH/RGGU Bulletin. “Eurasian studies. History. Political science. International relations” Series, 2020, no. 1, pp. 66-79. (In Russ.)
9. Sidenko V.R. Paths and Dead Ends of the EU Eastern Partnership Policy: Perspective from Ukraine. Mir Peremen, 2011, no. 2, pp. 156-171. (In Russ.)
10. Shishelina L.N. The Eastern Partnership Programme on the Eve of Decennary. Scientific and Analytical Herald of the Institute of Europe RAS, 2018, no. 6, pp. 26-35. (In Russ.) Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.15211/vestnikieran620182635
11. Latoszek E., Kłos A. Partnerstwo wschodnie jako nowa forma współpracy Unii Europejskiej z krajami trzecimi. Studia z Polityki Publicznej, 2016, no. 4 (12), pp. 177-194.
Latoszek E., Kłos A. The Eastern Partnership as a New Form of the European Union’s Cooperation with the Third Countries. Public Policy Studies, 2016, no. 4 (12), pp. 177-194. (In Pol.) Available at: https://doi.org/10.33119/KSzPP.2016.4.8
12. Walski K. The European Union’s Eastern Neighborhood: The Eastern Partnership as a Strategy of EU Engagement and Security. Penn McNair Research Journal, 2010, vol. 2, iss. 1, art. 5. Available at: https://repository.upenn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1009&context=mcnair_scholars (accessed 01.10.2022).
13. Ponomareva E.G., Rudov G.A. Confrontational Partnership. Svobodnaya mysl, 2015, no. 3, pp. 93-106. (In Russ.)
14. Shishelina L.N. Some Results of Three Decades of Transformation in Central Europe. Contemporary Europe, 2019, no. 6, pp. 48-57. (In Russ.) Available at: http://www.sov-europe.ru/images/pdf/2019/6-2019/5.pdf
15. Gaman‐Golutvina O.V., Ponomareva E.G., Shishelina L.N. EU’s Eastern Partnership: Rival Development Scenarios. Polis. Political Studies, 2014, no. 5, pp. 20-40. (In Russ.)
16. Maslova E.A., Sorokova E.D. Russia – Italy: Conceptual Analysis of Bilateral Relations. Contemporary Europe, 2019, no. 1, pp. 48-59. (In Russ.) Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.15211/soveurope120194859
17. Sydoruk T., Tyshchenko D. A Review of the Eastern Partnership after Ten Years: The Need to Reconsider its Efficacy. Studia Politica. Romanian Political Science Review, 2018, no. 18 (2), pp. 213-239.
18. Shishelina L.N. The 30-th Anniversary of Visegrad Group: Achievements and Prospects. Contemporary Europe, 2021, no. 4, pp. 26-36. (In Russ.) Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.15211/soveurope420212636
19. Petrov K.E. The Eastern Partnership Initiative after the Vilnius Summit (November 28–29, 2013). IIS Yearbook, 2015, no. 1, pp. 63-70. (In Russ.) Available at: https://doi.org/10.46272/2587-8476-2015-0-1-63-70
20. Petrova I., Delcour L. From Principle to Practice? The Resilience – Local Ownership Nexus in the EU Eastern Partnership Policy. Contemporary Security Policy, 2020, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 336-360. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/13523260.2019.1678280
21. Prokhorenko I.L. The EU “Eastern Partnership” Project: Competition in the Post-Soviet Space. Russia and New States of Eurasia, 2017, no. 4 (37), pp. 48-60. (In Russ.)
22. Bulatov A.S., Zakharov A.N., eds. The South: The Way to Economic Independence. Moscow, MGIMO-University, 2019. 326 p. (In Russ.)
23. Sandu I., Dragan G. Financing the EU Neighbourhood – Key Facts and Figures for the Eastern Partnership. CES Working Papers, 2016, vol. 8, iss. 3, pp. 464-472.
24. Piskorska B. The Eastern Partnership after 10 Years: Success or Failure, Realism or Illusion? Yearbook of the Institute of East-Central Europe, 2019, no. 17, pp. 9-39. (In Pol.) Available at: https://doi.org/10.36874/RIESW.2019.2.1
SOURCES
1. Eastern Partnership: a Renewed Agenda for Recovery, Resilience and Reform Underpinned by an Economic and Investment Plan. European Commission. 02.07.2021. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_21_3367 (accessed 12.09.2022).
2. Operations Evaluation. Evaluation of the Eastern Partnership Technical Assistance Trust Fund (2010–2019). European Investment Bank. March 2021. Available at: https://www.eib.org/attachments/ev/ev_report_evaluation_eptatf_en.pdf (accessed 12.09.2022).
3. EBRD Says Time Ripe for More International Investment in Eastern Partnership Countries. European Bank for Reconstruction and Development. 22.11.2019. Available at: https://www.ebrd.com/news/2019/ebrd-says-time-ripe-for-more-international-investment-in-eastern-patnership-countries.html (accessed 12.09.2022).
4. Total Amount Allocated to Eastern Countries from the European Neighbourhood Instrument for the Period 2014–2020. European Parliament, Secretariat of the Committee on Foreign Affairs. 21.11.2014. Available at: https://www.europarl.europa. eu/meetdocs/2014_2019/documents/dmed/dv/4e_eni_easterncountries_/4e_eni_easterncountries_en.pdf (accessed 12.09.2022).
5. Budget Support: Trends and Results 2021. European Commission. September 2021. Available at: https://international-partnerships.ec.europa.eu/system/files/2021-09/budget_support_-_trends_and_results_2021.pdf (accessed 12.09.2022).
6. Ex-ante Evaluation Statement on EU Macro-Financial Assistance to Ukraine. Commission Staff Working Document. European Commission. Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52018SC0066 (accessed 12.09.2022).
7. EU to Offer Ukraine Bilateral Financial Assistance in 2021 to Support Key Reforms. Kiev Post, 12.10.2021. Available at: https://www.kyivpost.com/ukraine-politics/eu-to-offer-ukraine-bilateral-financial-assistance-in‑2021-to-support-key-reforms.html (accessed 12.09.2022).
8. EaP CSF Position Paper on NDICI. Eastern Partnership Civil Society Forum. September 2018. Available at: https://eap-csf. eu/wp-content/uploads/EaP-CSF-position-paper-on-NDICI_September‑2018.pdf (accessed 12.09.2022).
9. European Neighbourhood Instrument (ENI). European Commission. 2021. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/ default/files/about_the_european_commission/eu_budget/db_2021_programme_statement_european_neighbourhodd_ instrument_eni.pdf (accessed 12.09.2022).
Registered in System SCIENCE INDEX
No comments