Transformation of the Armenian-Azerbaijani Conflict: Historical Experience and Current Developments

41
DOI: 10.20542/0131-2227-2022-66-12-120-130
S. Markedonov, smarkpost@gmail.com
Institute for International Studies at GIMO University, 76, Prosp. Vernadskogo, Moscow, 119454, Russian Federation.

Received 15.08.2022. Revised 29.08.2022. Accepted 03.10.2022.

Acknowledgments. The reported study is funded by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation grant (Agreement No. 075-15-2022-327).


Abstract. The military-political reconfiguration of the post-Soviet space that is comparable in its scale and possible consequences to the process of the collapse of the former USSR is taking place now. This development makes topical the study of the roots of the Eurasian conflict and the trajectories of its development. The author of the article has chosen the Armenian-Azerbaijani conflict as an analytical pattern in order to reconceptualize some explanation models and redefine key definitions concerning it. The study represents a greater panoramic view on the spectrum of the Armenian-Azerbaijani disputes. Following E. Azar theoretical ideas, he identifies the Armenian-Azerbaijani conflict as a protracted social one covering both ethnic, intercommunal, interstate, national and external dimensions. He also pays attention to the major concepts of the K. Deutsch communication theory. The author traces the spread of nationalism strategies in the South Caucasus in parallel with modernization, urbanization and growth of literacy. He connects the strengthening of these strategies with the first experience of Armenian and Azerbaijani nation-states in 1918–1920 and subsequent “Sovetization” of both republics. Particularly underlying the Soviet techniques that address the nationalism, the author concludes that the specific political experience in the USSR promoted ethno-territorial nationalism. Thus, by the eve of the Soviet Union’s demise both republics were ready to launch new editions of their nation-states. Traditionally, scholars, while addressing the confrontation, oppose the Karabakh Armenian fight for national liberation and Armenian occupation of some Azerbaijani areas. The author examines the particularities of the two aforementioned formats of the conflict after the dissolution of the USSR and offers an explanation framework to the new realities of the current state of this conflict after the “second Karabakh war” of 2020.

Keywords: Azerbaijan, Armenia, Nagorno-Karabakh, South Caucasus, conflict, nation, nationalism, state-building, communication, protracted social conflict


REFERENCES

1. Matveeva . Donbas: The Post-Soviet Conflict that Changed Europe. European Politics and Society, 2022, vol. 23, no. 3, p. 410-441. DOI: 10.1080/23745118.2022.2074398

2. Suny R. G. The Revenge of the Past. Nationalism, Revolution, and the Collapse of the Soviet Union. Redwood City. Stanford University Press, 1993. 200 p.

3. De Waal T. Black Garden: Armenia and Azerbaijan through Peace and War. New York, New York University Press, 2013. 406 p.

4. Broers L. Armenia and Azerbaijan: Anatomy of a Rivalry. Edinburgh, Edinburgh University Press, 2019. 352 p.

5. Hoch T. The Roots of Ethno-Political Mobilization in Nagorno-Karabakh. Soviet and Post-Soviet Review, 2020, vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 1-27. DOI: 10.30965/18763324-20201370

6. Cornell S., ed. The International Politics of the Armenian-Azerbaijani Conflict: The Original “Frozen Conflict” and European Security. New York, Palgrave Macmillan, 2017. 237 p.

7. Krylov A.B. Karabakh: Unfinished war. Journal of International Analytics, 2018, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 94-100. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.46272/2587-8476-2018-0-1-94-100

8. Kurylev K.P., ed. The 30th anniversary of the Nagorno-Karabakh Conflict: The Collection of Scholarly Articles. Moscow, RUDN, 2019. 172 p. (In Russ.)

9. Pukhov R.N., ed. The Storm in the Caucasus. Moscow, Center for Analysis of Strategies and Technologies, 2021. 128 p. (In Russ.)

10. Reynolds M. Confidence and Catastrophe: Armenia and the Second Nagorno-Karabakh War. Texas National Security Review, 11.01.2021. Available at: https://warontherocks.com/2021/01/confidence-and-catastrophe-armenia-and-the-second-nagorno-karabakh-war/ (accessed 20.07.2022).

11. Ibragimov R.F. Azerbaijan: From Small to Regional Power? Journal of International Analytics, 2021, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 170- 181. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.46272/2587-8476-2021-12-3-170-181

12. Iskandaryan A. The Second Karabakh War or the First Post-Post-Soviet War. Working Paper. Vienna: Institute for Security Policy, 2020. Available at: https://c-i.am/wp-content/uploads/ISP-Working-Paper-Alexander-ISKANDARYAN-The-Second-Karabakh-War-or-the-First-Post-Post-Soviet-War.pdf (accessed 16.09.2022).

13. Baberowski J. The Civilizing Mission and Nationalism in Transcaucasia. New Imperial History of the Post-Soviet Space. Gerasimov I., Glebov S., Kaplunovskyi A., Mogilner M., Semenov A., eds. Kazan, Center for Nationalism and Empire Studies, 2004, pp. 307-352. (In Russ.)

14. Gamaghelyan P., Rumyantsev S. The Road to the Second Karabakh War: The Role of Ethno-Centric Narratives in the Nagorno-Karabakh Conflict. Caucasus Survey, 2021, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 320-336. DOI: 10.1080/23761199.2021.1932068

15. Geukjian O. Negotiating Armenian-Azerbaijani Peace: Opportunities, Obstacles, Prospects. Farnham, Surrey: Ashgate, 2014. 300 p.

16. Ziyadov T. Nagorno-Karabakh Negotiations: Though the Prism of a Multi-Issue Bargaining Model. International Negotiation, 2010, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 107-131.

17. Sarkisyan O.L., Dunamalyan N.A. The Dynamics of the Civil Identity Transformation in Current Armenia. Polis. Political Studies, 2020, no. 2, pp. 53-72. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2020.02.05

18. Ergun A. Citizenship, National Identity, and Nation-Building in Azerbaijan: Between the Legacy of the Past and the Spirit of Independence. Nationalities Papers, 2022, vol. 50, no. 4, pp. 813-830. DOI: 10.1017/nps.2020.81

19. Suny R.G., ed. Transcaucasia, Nationalism, and Social Change: Essays in the History of Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Georgia. University of Michigan Press, 1996. 543 p.

20. Swietochowski T. Russian Azerbaijan, 1905–1920: The Shaping of National Identity in a Muslim Community. Cambridge & New York, Cambridge University Press, 1985. 247 p.

21. Braudel F. History and Social Sciences. Historical Duration. Philosophy and Methodology of History. Kon I.S., ed. Moscow, Progress, 1977, pp. 115-143. (In Russ.)

22. Azar E. The Management of Protracted Social Conflict: Theory and Cases. London, Dartmouth Publishing Company, 1990. 157 p.

23. Deutsch K. Nationalism and Social Communication: An Inquiry into the Foundations of Nationality. 2nd d. Cambridge, Massachusetts, MIT Press, 1966. 345 p.

24. Shnirelman V.A. Memory Wars. Myths, Identity and Politics in Transcaucasia. Moscow, Akademkniga, 2003. 592 p. (In Russ.)

25. Tsutsyiev A.A. Atlas of the Caucasus Ethnopolitical History (1774–2004). Moscow, Evropa, 2006. 128 p. (In Russ.)

26. Markedonov S.M. The Caucasus in Search of “Its Own Land”. Central Asia and the Caucasus, 2004, no. 2 (32), pp. 60-66. (In Russ.)

27. Baberowsky J. The Enemy is Everywhere. Stalinism in the Caucasus. Moscow, ROSSPEN, 2010. 855 p. (In Russ.)

28. Gellner E. Nations and Nationalism. Ithaca, Cornell University Press, 1983. 150 p.

29. Rumyantsev S. The Soviet National Policies in Transcaucasia: Constructing National Borders, Histories and Cultures. Neprijosnovennyi zapas, 2011, no. 4 (78), pp. 28-36. (In Russ.)

30. Slezkine Y. USSR as a Communal Apartment. Slavic Review, 1994, vol. 53, no. 2, pp. 414-452.

31. Markedonov S.M. The Post-Soviet De-Facto States: Trajectories of Their Struggle for Sovereignty. World Economy and International Relations, 2021, vol. 65, no. 12, pp. 79-89. (In Russ.) Available at: https://doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227-2021-65-12-79-89  

32. Markedonov S.M. Republic of Artsah: 20 Years without Recognition. Politcom, 02.09.2011. (In Russ.) Available at: http://politcom.ru/12483.html (accessed 28.09.2022).

SOURCES

1. Official Statement by the President of the Republic of Azerbaijan, the Prime Minister of the Republic of Armenia and the President of the Russian Federation. The Kremlin, 10.11.2020. (In Russ.) Available at: http://www.kremlin.ru/events/president/news/64384 (accessed 03.08.2022).

2. Tokaev called Donetsk and Luhansk People’s Republics quasi-states. RIA, 17.06.2022. (In Russ.) Available at: https://ria.ru/20220617/Donbass-1796281249.html (accessed 12.08.2022).

3. Levon Ter-Petrosyan: “War or peace? Time to get more serious”. NewsArmRu, 20.01.2022. (In Russ.) Available at: https://newsarmru.com/news/levon_ter_petrosjan_vojna_ili_mir_pora_stat_sereznee/2022-01-20-4148 (accessed 20.06.2022).

4. Madrid Principles. Kavkaz uzel, 07.04.2016. (In Russ.) Available at: https://www.kavkaz-uzel.eu/articles/160309 (accessed 23.07.2022).

5. Official Statement by the President of the Republic of Azerbaijan, the Prime Minister of the Republic of Armenia and the President of the Russian Federation. The Kremlin, 11.01.2021. (In Russ.) Available at: http://kremlin.ru/supplement/5606 (accessed 14.07.2022).

6. The Prime Minister of the Republic of Armenia, the President of the Russian Federation and the President of the Republic of Azerbaijan adopted a joint statement. Prime Minister of the Republic of Armenia, 26.11.2021. (In Russ.) Available at: https://www.primeminister.am/ru/press-release/item/2021/11/26/Nikol-Pashinyan-Sochi/ (accessed 02.08.2022).

7. Serzh Sargsyan: I was ready to be branded as traitor, but to solve the problem to avoid that fate. News, 24.06.2021. (In Russ.) Available at: https://news.am/rus/news/650782.html (accessed 14.07.2022).


Registered in System SCIENCE INDEX

For citation:
Markedonov S. Transformation of the Armenian-Azerbaijani Conflict: Historical Experience and Current Developments. World Eonomy and International Relations, 2022, vol. 66, No 12, pp. 120-130. https://doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227-2022-66-12-120-130



Comments (0)

No comments

Add comment







Indexed

 

 

 

 

Dear authors! Please note that in the VAK List of peer-reviewed scientific journals, in which the main scientific results of dissertations for the degree of candidate and doctor of sciences should be published for the “MEMO Journal” the following specialties are recorded:
economic sciences:
5.2.5. World Economy.
5.2.1. Economic Theory
5.2.3. Regional and Branch Economics
political sciences:
5.5.4. International Relations
5.5.1. History and Theory of Politics
5.5.2. Political Institutions, Processes, Technologies

 

Current Issue
2023, vol. 67, No. 6
Topical Themes of the Issue:
  • Far Eastern Regions of RF in Modern Russian-Chinese Cooperation  
  • Caribbean Segment of China’s Belt and Road Initiative in the Context of Sino-US Relations
  • “Hard Power” of Afghan Radical Islamists in Asia
  • Grounding Ontology of the “International” in Terms of Radical Constructivism
Submit an Article
INVITATION FOR PUBLICATION
The Editorial Board invites authors to write analytical articles on the following topics:
  • changes in the processes of globalization in modern conditions
  • formation of the new world order
  • shifts in civilization at the stage of transition to a digital society

The editors are also interested in publishing synthesis articles / scientific reviews revealing the main trends in the development of certain regions of the world - Latin America, Africa, South Asia, etc.