OECD Countries: Labour Market Policy During COVID-19 Pandemic

83
DOI: 10.20542/0131-2227-2022-66-1-110-118
N. Vishnevskaya, vishnev@hse.ru
National Research University Higher School of Economics, 20, Myasnitskaya Str., Moscow, 101000, Russian Federation.

Received 23.09.2021.

Acknowledgements. The article was prepared within the framework of the Basic Research Program at the National Research University Higher School of Economics (HSE).


Abstract. In 2020 – the first half of 2021, the OECD economies faced a serious crisis, which was manifested by an increase in unemployment, a reduction in the number of jobs, and a decrease in household income. However, the nature of the last crisis and, accordingly, the ways out of it differed significantly from the previous recessions. During the COVID 19 pandemic, the global economy faced a massive supply shock caused by the forced shutdowns and the introduction of a self-isolation regime. The key task of state policy was to preserve the human capital of companies in order to facilitate the fastest possible recovery when anti-epidemic restrictions have been lifted. The OECD governments launch strong agenda to maintain their labor markets. The State Employment Service and the unemployment insurance system have significantly adjusted their methods of interaction with unemployed and companies. This included measures to simplify the procedure for obtaining unemployment benefits, which led to a significant increase in the number of beneficiaries. The deadlines for payment of benefits have been extended, the amount of the benefits has been increased and, in a number of countries, some groups of workers who had previously remained outside the system were included in the insurance system. Teleworking has become an important means of overcoming the spread of infection. The proportion of teleworkers in OECD countries ranged in the midst of the crisis from 30 to 60%. Governments are actively involved in supporting distance employment, starting with its legislative permission and ending with financial support for companies that are switching to this form of work. During the pandemic, job retention programs have become one of the main labor market support tools. The characteristic features of job retention programs were the wide coverage of workers, the simplification of the procedure for obtaining the state aid, the inclusion of workers with a non-standard form of contract. The governments have sought to encourage companies to use the reduced work period for professional retraining. Once the pandemic is over, OECD countries will have to return to the backlog of structural labor market problems.

Keywords: labor market, pandemic, state policies, distant work, OECD countries


REFERENCES

  1. OECD Employment Outlook 2020. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1787/1686c758-en (accessed 23.09.2021).
  2. What Have Countries Done to Support Young People in the COVID-19 Crisis? OECD Policy Responses to Coronavirus (COVID-19). OECD, 2021. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1787/ac9f056c-en (accessed 23.09.2021).
  3. Bell D., Blanchflower D. Young People and the Great Recession. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 2011, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 241-267.
  4. Basso G. The New Hazardous Jobs and Worker Reallocation. OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers, 2020, no. 247. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1787/400cf397-en (accessed 23.09.2021).
  5. Scaling up Policies that Connect People with Jobs in the Recovery from COVID‑19. OECD, April 29, 2021. Available at: https://www.oecd.org/coronavirus/policy-responses/scaling-up-policies-that-connect-people-with-jobs-in-the-recovery-from-covid-19-a91d2087/ (accessed 23.09.2021).
  6. OECD Employment Outlook 2021. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1787/5a700c4b-en (accessed 23.09.2021).
  7. Card D., Kluve J. What Works? A Meta-Analysis of Recent Active Labor Market Program Evaluations. Journal of the European Economic Association, 2018, vol. 16, iss. 3, pp. 894-931. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/jeea/jvx028 (accessed 23.09.2021).
  8. Cahuc P., Carcillo S. Is Short-Time Work a Good Method to Keep Unemployment Down? Nordic Economic Policy Review, 2011, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 133-165.
  9. Supporting Jobs and Companies: A Bridge to the Recovery Phase. OECD Policies Responses to Coronavirus OECD, 2021, March 10, pp. 1-13.
  10. Foucault M., Galasso V. Working during COVID‑19: Cross-Country Evidence from Real-Time Survey Data. OECD Social, Employment and Migration WP, 2020, no. 246, pp. 1-40.
  11. Kröll C., Nüesch S. The Effects of Flexible Work Practices on Employee Attitudes: Evidence from a Large-Scale Panel Study in Germany. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 2019, vol. 30/9, pp. 1505-1525.
  12. Bloom N. et al. Does Working from Home Work? Evidence from a Chinese Experiment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2014, vol. 130/1, pp. 165-218.
  13. Angelici M., Profeta P. Smart-Working: Work Flexibility without Constraints. Dondena Centre Bocconi University WP, 2020, no. 137, pp. 1-37.
  14. Mas A., Pallais A. Alternative Work Arrangements. Cambridge, National Bureau of Economic Research, 2020, p. 1-40.
  15. Dingel J., Neiman B. How Many Jobs Can Be Done at Home? COVID Economics, 2020, April 7, pp. 16-24.
  16. Espinoza R., Reznikova L. Who Can Log in? The Importance of Skills for the Feasibility of Teleworking Arrangements across OECD Countries. OECD Social, Employment and Migration WPs, 2020, no. 242, p. 1-45.
  17. Gottlieb C., Grobovšek J., Poschke M. Working from Home across Countries. COVID Economics, 2020, April 22, pp. 71-91.
  18. Ganong P., Noel P. US Unemployment Insurance Replacement Rates during the Pandemic. Available at: https://bfi.uchicago.edu/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/BFI_WP_202062.pdf (accessed 23.09.2021).
  19. OECD Employment Outlook 2018. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1787/empl_outlook-2018-8-en (accessed 23.09.2021)

Registered in System SCIENCE INDEX

For citation:
Vishnevskaya N. OECD Countries: Labour Market Policy During COVID-19 Pandemic. World Eonomy and International Relations, 2022, vol. 66, No 1, pp. 110-118. https://doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227-2022-66-1-110-118



Comments (0)

No comments

Add comment







Indexed

 

 

 

 

Current Issue
2022, vol. 66, No. 11
Topical Themes of the Issue:
  • Developing Countries in the New Equation of the Post-Crisis World Order 
  • U.S. Public Diplomacy as a Tool for “Political Warfare” 
  • Central Europe: Possible Scenarios
  • The Collapse of the Global Consumption Model: in Search of Sustainability
  • Future Wars in Light of the Past Experience
Submit an Article
NEW SECTION

In response to the challenges of our time the Editorial board continues to open new thematic rubrics:

“World Energy Sector after Pandemic”. We plan to publish articles presenting in-depth analysis of influence of Pandemic on the global energy sector and forecasts of further developments in its various branches.