FRG and Biden's Transatlantic Strategy: Unsolved Problems and New Challenges

51
DOI: 10.20542/0131-2227-2021-65-9-56-68
A. Kokeev (alkokeev@gmail.com), 
Primakov National Research Institute of World Economy and International Relations, Russian Academy of Sciences (IMEMO), 23, Profsoyuznaya Str., Moscow, 117997, Russian Federation

Received 21.06.2021.

Abstract. This article addresses the most significant changes in German-American relations since the election of J. Biden; unveils the main factors influencing Berlin’s transatlantic policy in relations with Russia and China; analyzes approaches to the climate agenda and problems associated with the fulfillment of Germany’s allied obligations in NATO; reveals new trends in Germany’s approach to the issue of strategic autonomy of the EU; investigates the discrepancies on security issues between the main German parties ahead of the parliamentary elections in September 2021. The first steps of the Biden administration to normalize the transatlantic ties undermined by Trump (the return of the United States to participation in international negotiations and organizations) were seen in Berlin as evidence of significant changes in Washington’s positions on international problems of vital importance to Germany. At the same time, Berlin has no illusion that with the arrival of Biden, transatlantic relations will once again be the same as they were before Trump’s presidency. The most important stumbling block in the beginning process of resetting the transatlantic relations was the set of problems associated with the completion of the Nord Stream 2 gas pipeline construction. It is clear that Biden is just as harshly rejecting this project as his predecessor did, and will continue to obstruct its commissioning. After the elections to the Bundestag in September 2021, the internal political situation in Germany may change significantly. In any case, the Nord Stream 2 issue will remain a subject of disputes and serious disagreements between Germany, the USA, the EU and Russia for a long time. In Germany it is assumed that in the coming decades, the transatlantic agenda will be largely determined by the growing influence and policy of China, and the relationship between the United States and the EU with China will affect not only the economic interests of the FRG, but also the sphere of its security. The climate agenda today remains one of the few areas where it is possible not only to revive the transatlantic interaction, but also to intensify cooperation between the United States, the EU, China and Russia with an eye to interaction in solving other problems, not necessarily related to the climate agenda. The most important U.S. demand for Germany remains an increase in its material and financial contribution to NATO. Berlin’s readiness to meet these requirements has increased significantly. However, the thesis that the Europeans are faced with a choice – a course towards strategic autonomy or restoration of close ties with Washington and reliance on the United States and NATO – seems simplified. Representatives of all German parties are unanimous in the opinion that the renewal of the transatlantic partnership, which has begun under Biden, will be accompanied by a reduction in American commitments in Europe. Therefore, the EU will have to invest more in its own security and (in the longer term) strategic autonomy. 

Keywords: Germany, USA, EU, China, Russia, transatlantic relations, climate agenda, security policy, strategic autonomy, Bundeswehr, defense spending


REFERENCES

  1. Arbatova N., Kokeev A., eds. Strategic autonomy of the EU and prospects for cooperation with Russia. Moscow, Ves’ mir, 2020. 368 p. (In Russ.)
  2. Kitzman J. Deutsche sehen in USA größere Bedrohung als in China oder Russland. Der Spiegel, 05.05.2021. Available at: https://www.spiegel.de/politik/deutschland/deutsche-sehen-in-usa-groessere-bedrohung-als-in-china-oder-russland-a-d616341d-b1b7-4d87-949d-c2a2959a205b (accessed 03.06.2021).
  3. Amerikaner und Deutsche starten mit unterschiedlichen Meinungen über die transatlantische Allianz in das Jahr 2021. Pew Research Center, 23.11.2020. Available at: https://www.pewresearch.org/global/2020/11/23/amerikaner-und-deutsche-starten-mit-unterschiedlichen-meinungen-uber-die-transatlantische-allianz-in-das-jahr-2021/ (accessed 06.03.2021).
  4. Rede von Bundeskanzlerin Angela Merkel anlässlich des virtuellen Forums der Münchner Sicherheitskonferenz am 19. Februar 2021 (Videokonferenz). Available at: https://www.bundesregierung.de/breg-de/suche/rede-von-bundeskanzlerin-angela-merkel-anlaesslich-des-virtuellen-forums-der-muenchner-sicherheitskonferenz-am-19-februar-2021-videokonferenz--1860126  (accessed 13.04.2021).
  5. Maas H. Es ist Zeit für einen transatlantischen Neuanfang. Die Welt, 25.10.2020. Available at: https://www.welt.de/debatte/kommentare/article218520574/US-Wahlkampf-Es-ist-Zeit-fuer-einen-transatlantischen-Neuanfang.html (accessed 06.05.2021).
  6. Gabriel: Nord Stream 2 geht USA nichts an. Die Welt, 18.02.2021. Available at: https://www.welt.de/regionales/mecklenburg-vorpommern/article226591245/Gabriel-Nord-Stream‑2-geht-USA-nichts-an.html (accessed 12.03.2021).
  7. Westphal K. Nord Stream 2 – Deutschlands Dilemma. Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik, 20.04.2021. Available at: https://www.swp-berlin.org/publikation/nord-stream-2-deutschlands-dilemma/ (accessed 02.06.2021).
  8. Glucroft W. USA und Deutschland: 500 weitere Soldaten. Deutsche Welle, 13.04.2021. Available at: https://www.dw.com/de/usa-und-deutschland-500-weitere-soldaten/a-57178428 (accessed 27.04.2021).
  9. Wesel B. Meinung: Europas Partnerschaft mit den USA hat ihren Preis. Deutsche Welle, 24.03.2021. Available at: https://www.dw.com/de/meinung-europas-partnerschaft-mit-den-usa-hat-ihren-preis/a-56976778 (accessed 06.04.2021).
  10. Die Volksrepublik China ist erneut Deutschlands wichtigster Handelspartner. Statistisches Bundesamt. Available at: https://www.destatis.de/DE/Themen/Wirtschaft/Aussenhandel/handelspartner-jahr.html (accessed 02.06.2021).
  11. Hein M. Deutschland und China: Beziehung unter Stress. Deutsche Welle, 28.04.2021. Available at: https://www.dw.com/de/deutschland-und-china-beziehung-unter-stress/a-57354038 (accessed 30.04.2021).
  12. Schrader C. Mehrheit der Deutschen für konsequenten Klimaschutz – trotz Corona. Süddeutsche Zeitung, 10.05.2020. Available at: https://www.sueddeutsche.de/wissen/corona-klimaschutz-umfrage-1.4902185 (accessed 17.05.2021).
  13. Nikiforov O. The pros and cons of Joe Biden’s climate summit. Nezavisimaya gazeta, 17.05.2021. (In Russ.) Available at: https://www.ng.ru/ng_energiya/2021-05-17/9_8149_summit.html (accessed 21.05.2021).
  14. Deutschland und Europa sind weiter auf Klimaschutzkurs. Die Bundesregierung, 22.04.2021. Available at: https://www.bundesregierung.de/breg-de/suche/merkel-leaders-summit-on-climate-1895578 (accessed 30.04.2021).
  15. Carstens P. Nicht bereit zur kollektiven Verteidigung. Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, 28.01.2020. Available at: https://www.faz.net/aktuell/politik/inland/wehrbeauftragter-bartels-kritisiert-den-zustand-der-bundeswehr-16604787.html (accessed 08.03.2021).
  16. Wiegold T. Pläne für die “Bundeswehr der Zukunft”: Weniger Stäbe, mehr Einsatzbereitschaft – Neufassung (m. Pressekonferenz). 18.05.2021. Available at: https://augengeradeaus.net/2021/05/plaene-fuer-die-bundeswehr-der-zukunft-weniger-staebe-mehr-einsatzbereitschaft-neufassung-m-pressekonferenz/ (accessed 22.05.2021).
  17. Misik L. “Eternal problem”: Germany does not have enough money for a new tank and fighter. Gazeta.ru, 11.05.2021. (In Russ.) Available at: https://www.gazeta.ru/army/2021/05/11/13588844.shtml#:~:text=%D0%9B%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B8%D1%8F%20%D0%9C%D0%B8%D1%81%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%BA-,11.05.2021,-%2C%2018%3A206 (accessed 24.05.2021).
  18. Auch Deutschland gibt mehr aus Globale Militärausgaben steigen erneut an. 26.04.2021. Available at: https://www.n-tv.de/politik/Globale-Militaerausgaben-steigen-erneut-an-article22513732.html#:~:text=Deutschland%20steigerte%20seine%20Milit%C3%A4rausgaben%20um,Jahr%202020%20dem%20Jahresbericht%20zufolge (accessed 30.04.2021).
  19. Mützenich fordert Abkehr vom Zwei-Prozent-Ziel der Nato. Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, 28.04.2021. Available at: https://www.faz.net/aktuell/politik/inland/ruestungsausgaben-muetzenich-fordert-abkehr-von-zwei-prozent-ziel-der-nato-17316429.html (accessed 30.04.2021).
  20. Kramp-Karrenbauer A. Europe still needs America. Politico, 02.11.2020. Available at: https://www.politico.eu/article/europe-still-needs-america/ (accessed 22.05.2021).
  21. Thuman M. Die EU muss ihre Position zu den USA neu vermessen. Zeit Online, 26.11.2020. Available at: https://www.zeit.de/politik/ausland/2020-11/strategische-autonomie-europa-verteidigung-emmanuel-macron-annegret-kramp-karrenbauer?utm_referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com%2F (accessed 06.04.2021).
  22. Hanke T. Wie erfolgreich ist die Idee der europäischen Souveränität? Eine Zwischenbilanz. Handelsblatt, 02.04.2021. Available at: https://www.handelsblatt.com/politik/international/essay-wie-erfolgreich-ist-die-idee-der-europaeischen-souveraenitaet-eine-zwischenbilanz/27062976.html?ticket=ST-14350308-4z7Er0cL9U4XME9Pxiv9-ap5 (accessed 16.04.2021).
  23. Transatlantisches Verhältnis: Eine neue Härte. Available at: https://taz.de/Transatlantisches-Verhaeltnis/!5743191/ (accessed 16.04.2021).

Registered in System SCIENCE INDEX

For citation:
Kokeev A. FRG and Biden's Transatlantic Strategy: Unsolved Problems and New Challenges. World Eonomy and International Relations, 2021, vol. 65, no. 9, pp. 56-68. https://doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227-2021-65-9-56-68



Comments (0)

No comments

Add comment







Indexed

 

 

 

 

Dear authors! Please note that in the VAK List of peer-reviewed scientific journals, in which the main scientific results of dissertations for the degree of candidate and doctor of sciences should be published for the “MEMO Journal” the following specialties are recorded:
economic sciences:
5.2.5. World Economy.
5.2.1. Economic Theory
5.2.3. Regional and Branch Economics
political sciences:
5.5.4. International Relations
5.5.1. History and Theory of Politics
5.5.2. Political Institutions, Processes, Technologies

 

Current Issue
2024, vol. 68, No. 2

Topical Themes of the Issue:

  • Fiscal Policy of Advanced Economies: Playing by the Rules?  
  • Iranian Development Model: State and Society Concept, Crises and Problems
  • Afghan-Pakistan Relations: Problems and Challenges in XXI Century
  • Climate Issues under Changing Geopolitical Conditions
Submit an Article
INVITATION FOR PUBLICATION
The Editorial Board invites authors to write analytical articles on the following topics:
  • changes in the processes of globalization in modern conditions
  • formation of the new world order
  • shifts in civilization at the stage of transition to a digital society

The editors are also interested in publishing synthesis articles / scientific reviews revealing the main trends in the development of certain regions of the world - Latin America, Africa, South Asia, etc.