"A Disunited Kingdom": the Muslim Diaspora of Great Britain in Scientific Discussion

95
DOI: 10.20542/0131-2227-2021-65-8-120-130
M. Sigachev (maxsig@mail.ru),
Primakov National Research Institute of World Economy and International Relations, Russian Academy of Sciences (IMEMO), 23, Profsoyuznaya Str., Moscow, 117997, Russian Federation;
S. Arteev (artsp7@yandex.ru),
Primakov National Research Institute of World Economy and International Relations, Russian Academy of Sciences (IMEMO), 23, Profsoyuznaya Str., Moscow, 117997, Russian Federation

Received 15.02.2021.

Abstract. The present world is characterized by the growth of conflicts. Dividing lines and fractures are increasingly appearing in societies. Migration reinforces such phenomena. The West is no longer an area of stability and prosperity. Moreover, in the last two decades, the problem of integrating the descendants of migrants into society has become clear. In this regard, the scientific discussions of cultural identity acquire a high practical significance. The paper presents an analysis of the scientific discourse on the Muslim issue in the UK. The choice of the case is due to the fact that the UK is a typical Western state, where there is a steady trend to strengthen the cleavage of society. At the same time, it is noted that migration has become one of the key processes in the history of the United Kingdom. The authors apply the concepts of a divided society and responsible development. It is noted that in practice multiculturalism is changing to interculturalism as a more adequate concept of solving existing problems. According to the authors, the ethno-religious discourse on the issue of the Muslim diaspora in the UK consists of four areas: migration, school and higher education, gender, and radicalization of young people. Discourses on the problems of migration policy and functioning of diasporas, Muslim education, gender equality, and radicalization of Islamic youth can be considered derived from a higher discourse – the discourse of identity, which is based on value-worldview aspects. In conclusion, it is noted that negative processes are taking place in British society, which are of strategic importance for responsible development. According to the authors, success in overcoming divisions in British society will depend on coordinated planned actions at all levels (international, national, regional, local). “Indigenous” residents and the Muslim diaspora need to build a model of partnership, which implies mutual responsibility. The analysis of scientific discourses presented in the article inspires moderate optimism, as it offers well-founded and concrete solutions to the existing problems of British society. Although British society is divided, British scientific discourse has a common platform where researchers of different backgrounds and faiths successfully engage in dialogue.

Keywords: sociocultural identity, Great Britain, United Kingdom, Islam, British Muslims, multiculturalism, interculturalism


REFERENCES

  1. Kudryashova I.V. How to Accomplish Stability in Divided Societies. Political Science, 2016, no. 1, pp. 15-33. (In Russ.)
  2. Rokkan S., Lipset M. Party Systems and Voter Alignments. New York, Free Press, 1967. 570 p.
  3. Lipset M., Rokkan S. Division Structures, Party Systems, and Voter Preferences. Parties and Elections: A Textbook. Part 1. Moscow, INION, 2004, pp. 49-80. (In Russ.)
  4. Lijphart A. Democracy in Plural Societies. New Haven, Yale University Press, 1977. 258 p.
  5. Ponamareva A.M. Session of the Section “Divided Societies in a Divided World: Values, Identities, Images of the Future”. (V International Scientific and Expert Forum “Primakov Readings”: Return to Confrontation: Are There Any Alternatives? “, June 10–11, 2019) (report). Social and Humanities Sciences. Russian and Foreign Literature. Series 11: Sociology, 2019, no. 4, pp. 135-139. (In Russ.)
  6. Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future. 04.08.1987. (In Russ.) Available at: https://www.un.org/ru/ga/pdf/brundtland.pdf (accessed 08.01.2021).
  7. Semenenko I.S. Horizons of Responsible Development: From Discourse to Governance. Polis. Political Studies, 2019, no. 3, pp. 7-26. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2019.03.02
  8. Whyte I. Migration and Society in Britain, 1500–1830. London, St. Martin’s Press, 2000. X, 198 p.
  9. Morgan K., ed. The Oxford History of Britain. Moscow, Ves’ Mir, 2007. 680 p. (In Russ.)
  10. Luu L. Immigrants and the Industries of London, 1500–1700. Burlington, VT, Ashgate, cop. 2005. xiii, 366 p.
  11. Fedorov S.E. British Identity/Identities in the Early Modern Period. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. History, 2013, iss. 3, pp. 75-81. (In Russ.)
  12. Braun G. What It Means to Be British. Russia in Global Affairs, 2006, no. 5. (In Russ.) Available at: https://globalaffairs.ru/articles/chto-znachit-byt-britanczem/ (accessed 10.10.2020).
  13. Borodai S. Islam in Great Britain. Islam v sovremennom mire, 2014, no. 1, pp. 69-74. (In Russ.)
  14. Research Report on Population Estimates by Ethnic Group and Religion. Office for National Statistics. Available at: https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/populationandmigration/populationestimates/articles/researchreportonpopulationestimatesbyethnicgroupandreligion/2019-12-04#population-estimates-by-ethnic-group (accessed 09.10.2020).
  15. Orlov A.A. The Problem of Secession at the Present Stage (On the Example of Scotland and Catalonia). Obozrevatel’ – Observer, 2015, no. 1, pp. 67-80. (In Russ.)
  16. Paul D.E. The “Civic” Road to Secession: Political Ideology as an Ethnic Boundary Marker in Contemporary Scotland. Nationalism and Ethnic Politics, 2020, no. 2, pp. 167-182. DOI: 10.1080/13537113.2020.1753327
  17. King Ch. The Scottish game. Edinburgh’s Desire for Independence and the Future of Separatism. Russia in Global Affairs, 2012, no. 6, pp. 56-66. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2019.104073
  18. Scotland Plans to Hold a New Independence Referendum. Rossiiskaya Gazeta, 03.09.2020. (In Russ.) Available at: https://rg.ru/2020/09/03/shotlandiia-planiruet-provesti-novyj-referendum-o-nezavisimosti.html (accessed 22.09.2020).
  19. Kharitonova E.M. Weariness and Disillusion: Political Situation in Britain through the prism of Public Opinion. Contemporary Europe, 2020, no. 1, pp. 123-134. (In Russ.) DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15211/soveurope12020123134
  20. Nechaeva A.A. The National Party of Wales and the Transformation of Welshness: The Mechanism of Maintaining National Identity in the 20th Century. Tomsk State University Journal, 2020, no. 455, pp. 109-116. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.17223/15617793/455/16
  21. Gehring K., Schneider S.A. Regional Resources and Democratic Secessionism. Journal of Public Economics, 2020, vol. 181. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2019.104073
  22. A Bout of Decentralization Force: The Prospect of a Break-up of the United Kingdom Looks Increasingly Real. Kommersant.Ogonek, 09.11.2020. (In Russ.) Available at: https://www.kommersant.ru/doc/4557919 (accessed 29.01.2021).
  23. UK Population. Mid-year Estimate (2019). Office for National Statistics. Available at: https://www.ons.gov.uk/ (accessed 08.10.2020).
  24. Religion in England and Wales 2011. Office for National Statistics. Available at: https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/culturalidentity/religion/articles/religioninenglandandwales2011/2012-12-11 (accessed 30.12.2020).
  25. A Review of Survey Research on Muslims in Britain. IPSOS MORI. (2018). Available at: https://www.ipsos.com/sites/default/files/ct/publication/documents/2018-03/a-review-of-survey-research-on-muslims-in-great-britain-ipsos-mori_0.pdf (accessed 30.12.2020).
  26. Table 1. Religion in Great Britain. 02.08.2018. Office for National Statistics. Available at: https://www.ons.gov.uk/aboutus/transparencyandgovernance/freedomofinformationfoi/muslimpopulationintheuk// (accessed 28.01.2021).
  27. Iqbal J. The Diverse Origins of Britain’s Muslims. BBC, 18.01.2016. Available at: https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-33715473 (accessed 28.01.2021).
  28. Strabac Z., Aalberg T., Valenta M. Attitudes towards Muslim Immigrants: Evidence from Survey Experiments across Four Countries. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 100-118. DOI: 10.1080/1369183X.2013.831542
  29. Jørgen N. Muslims in Britain: Searching for an identity? New Community, 1987, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 384-394. DOI: 10.1080/1369183X.1987.9975994
  30. Barder Ch. Islam in Britain, Part I: The Situation. Ariel Center for Policy Research. Available at: http://www.acpr.org.il/madorim/0902-UK-barderE2.pdf (accessed 28.01.2021).
  31. Andreescu V. Attitudes toward Immigrants and Immigration Policy in United Kingdom. Journal of Identity and Migration Studies, 2011, no. 2, pp. 61-85.
  32. Moghiss H., Ghorashi H., eds. Muslim Diaspora in the West. Negotiating Gender, Home and Belonging. London, New York, Routledge, 2016. 223 p.
  33. Contextualising Islam in Britain II. University of Cambridge in Association with The Universities of Exeter and Westminster. January 2012. Available at: https://web.archive.org/web/20140323044028/http://www.cis.cam.ac.uk/assets/media/cib2-complete-report.pdf. (accessed 19.05.2021).
  34. Joppke Ch. Immigration and the Nation-State. The United States, Germany and Great Britain. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1999. 364 p.
  35. Imène A. Muslims in France and Great Britain: Issues of Securitization, Identities and Loyalties Post 9/11. Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs, 2014, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 123-133. DOI: 10.1080/13602004.2014.911583
  36. Maxwell R. Ethnic Minority Migrants in Britain and France: Integration Trade-offs. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2012. 262 p.
  37. Morris M. Building a post-Brexit Immigration System for the Economic Recovery. November 2020. IPPR. Available at: https://www.ippr.org/research/publications/post-brexit-migration (accessed 09.01.2021).
  38. New Migration System Risks Covid Economic Recovery Due to Curbs on Carers and Key Workers, Warns IPPR. November 2020. IPPR. Available at: https://www.ippr.org/news-and-media/press-releases/new-migration-system-risks-covid-economic-recovery-due-to-curbs-on-carers-and-key-workers-warns-ippr (accessed 09.01.2021).
  39. Timol R. Ethno-religious Socialisation, National Culture and the Social Construction of British Muslim Identity. Contemporary Islam, vol. 14, iss. 3, pp. 331-360. DOI: 10.1007/s11562-020-00454-y
  40. Reddie R. Black Muslims in Britain. Oxford, Lion Hudson, 2009. 272 p.
  41. Carr H. “I Think You Have Ignored the Relevant Provisions of the 1944 Education Act”: Muslims, the State and Education in England. Contemporary British History, 2021, vol. 35, pp. 52-71. DOI: 10.1080/13619462.2020.1799351
  42. Lahmar F. Islamic Education: An Islamic “Wisdom-Based Cultural Environment” in a Western Context. Religions, 2020, vol. 11, iss. 8, pp. 1-15. DOI: 10.3390/rel11080409
  43. Stott P. Rising Islamism in British Schools Threatens Free Speech. 31.03.2021. Available at: https://spectator.org/batley-school-muhammad-blasphemy-codes-islamism/ (accessed 02.04.2021).
  44. Breen D. Critical Race Theory, Policy Rhetoric and Outcomes: The Case of Muslim Schools in Britain. Race Ethnicity and Education, 2018, vol. 21, iss. 1, pp. 30-44. DOI: 10.1080/13613324.2016.1248828
  45. Sidat H. Between Tradition and Transition: An Islamic Seminary, or Dar al-Uloom in Modern Britain. Religions, 2018, vol. 9, iss. 10. DOI: 10.3390/rel9100314
  46. Cheruvallil-Contractor S. Women in Britain’s First Muslim Mosques: Hidden from History, but not without Influence. Religions, 2020, vol. 11, iss. 2. DOI: 10.3390/rel11020062
  47. Gill A.K., Harvey H. Examining the Impact of Gender on Young People’s Views of Forced Marriage in Britain. Feminist Criminology, 2017, vol. 12, iss. 1, pp. 72-100. DOI: 10.1177/1557085116644774
  48. Bi S. More than “Multiple Jeopardy”: Navigating the Legal System as a British-Muslim-woman-litigant-in-person. Journal of Muslims in Europe, 2019, vol. 8, iss. 3, pp. 247-264. DOI: 10.1163/22117954-12341403
  49. Liberatore G. Guidance as “Women’s Work”: A New Generation of Female Islamic Authorities in Britain. Religions, 2019, vol. 10, iss. 11. DOI: 10.3390/rel10110601
  50. Shah S. “I Am a Muslim First …” Challenges of Muslimness and the UK State Schools. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 2018, pp. 1-16. DOI: 10.1080/15700763.2017.1398335
  51. Ivshina O. Who are young Muslims in Britain aggressors or victims? BBC, 04.07.2017. (In Russ.) Available at: https://www.bbc.com/russian/features-40195094 (accessed 12.02.2021).
  52. Siddiqui A. Muslims in Britain: Past and Present. Available at: https://muslimpopulation.com/library/History/Muslims%20In%20Britain.pdf (accessed 10.01.2021).
  53. Parekh B. Does Islam Threaten Democracy? Project-Syndicate, 11.07.2003. Available at: http://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/parekh1/Russian (accessed 10.01.2021).

Registered in System SCIENCE INDEX

For citation:
Sigachev M., Arteev S. "A Disunited Kingdom": the Muslim Diaspora of Great Britain in Scientific Discussion. World Eñonomy and International Relations, 2021, vol. 65, no. 8, pp. 120-130. https://doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227-2021-65-8-120-130



Comments (0)

No comments

Add comment







Indexed

 

 

 

 

Dear authors! Please note that in the VAK List of peer-reviewed scientific journals, in which the main scientific results of dissertations for the degree of candidate and doctor of sciences should be published for the “MEMO Journal” the following specialties are recorded:
economic sciences:
5.2.5. World Economy.
5.2.1. Economic Theory
5.2.3. Regional and Branch Economics
political sciences:
5.5.4. International Relations
5.5.1. History and Theory of Politics
5.5.2. Political Institutions, Processes, Technologies

 

Current Issue
2024, vol. 68, No. 12
Topical Themes of the Issue:
  • Mechanisms of International Financial Relations in the Conditions of Globalization Crisis  
  • “New” Militarization of Europe?
  • Foreign Economic Policy of Germany: African Vector
  • Transformation of the Conflict Field in Abkhazia: Contemporary Politics and Historical Context
Announcement

Dear authors of the journal!

Please note that the author's copies of the issues in which your texts are published are kept in the editorial office for no more than one year. After this period expires, the editorial office has the right to dispose of unclaimed copies at its own discretion.

 

Submit an Article
INVITATION FOR PUBLICATION
The Editorial Board invites authors to write analytical articles on the following topics:
  • changes in the processes of globalization in modern conditions
  • formation of the new world order
  • shifts in civilization at the stage of transition to a digital society

The editors are also interested in publishing synthesis articles / scientific reviews revealing the main trends in the development of certain regions of the world - Latin America, Africa, South Asia, etc.