Regulatory Autonomy of Great Britain: Problems and Perspectives

57
DOI: 10.20542/0131-2227-2021-65-7-71-79
A. Bolshakov (alvbolshakov@gmail.com), 
Independent Researcher

Received 05.11.2020.

Abstract. Sovereignty does not imply regulatory autonomy. After Brexit, the UK should align its regulatory policy with European norms, if it is interested in close partnership with the EU. Compromises must be made by both sides in order to ensure stability of the partnership. The EU will have to acknowledge the UK’s right to diverge from European rules. Britain will have to partly accept the jurisdiction of the European Court of Justice. The structure of dispute settlement mechanism which will be created under the partnership agreement should be a product of a compromise. The present study shows that optimal structure of dispute settlement mechanism must include two different procedures: one for political issues and the other for commercial issues. The central role for the European Court of Justice must be envisaged as a part of politically oriented procedure. There must be no role for the European Court of Justice or any Union to set the pace of political communication. The latter reflects the interest of Great Britain to simplify economic relations, which means that, firstly, disputes are resolved by independent arbiters; secondly, the EU acknowledges the UK’s right to diverge from European regulations; and thirdly, the UK accepts the EU’s right to impose countervailing duties to compensate for adverse effects of divergence on competition. This article also examines the main problems of future British regulatory policy, especially in the field of state aid. Boris Johnson’s government has decided not to form a full-fledged regulatory regime in the area of state aid. Its stance is politically appropriate since Conservative party manifesto for the 2019 general election promised to support local industries without limitations. But that decision created a great deal of economic risk. Firstly, the absence of a domestic subsidy control regulator can cause chaos within regulation system because workable norms and rules can only be sustained by a tight enforcement mechanism. Secondly, the EU can cite lack of subsidy control as an obstacle for British business to have unrestricted access to the European market. 

Keywords: Great Britain, European Union, government regulation, autonomy, sovereignty, subsidies


REFERENCES

  1. Black J. “Says Who?” Liquid Authority and Interpretive Control in Transnational Regulatory Regimes. International Theory, 2017, vol. 9 (2), pp. 286-310. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1752971916000294 (accessed 04.11.2020).
  2. Büthe T., Mattli W. The New Global Rulers: The Privatization of Regulation in the World Economy. Princeton, Princeton University Press, 2013. 320 p.
  3. Golberg E. Regulatory Cooperation – a Reality Check. HARVARD Kennedy School, April 2019. Available at: https://www.hks.harvard.edu/sites/default/files/centers/mrcbg/img/115_final.pdf (accessed 04.11.2020).
  4. Armstrong K. Regulatory Autonomy after EU Membership – Alignment, Divergence and the Discipline of Law. European Law Review, 2020, no. 45 (2), pp. 207-221. Available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3593482 (accessed 04.11.2020).
  5. Kuznetsov A.V. Brekzit: istoricheskii rakurs [Brexit: a historical perspective]. Ekonomicheskie aspekty Brekzita [Brexit economic aspects]. Moscow, Institut Evropy RAN, 2017, pp. 51-71.
  6. Khesin E. Velikobritaniya: izmenenie ekonomicheskogo landshafta [UK: economic landscape change]. Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya, 2018, vol. 62, no. 11, pp. 5-14. Available at: https://doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227-2018-62-11-5-14
  7. Babynina L.O. Deevropeizatsiya ili demontazh: kak budut stroit’sya otnosheniya ES i Velikobritanii [De-Europeanization or Dismantling: Prospects of the EU-UK Relations]. Contemporary Europe, 2020, no. 3, pp. 5-15. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15211/soveurope320200515
  8. Kaveshnikov N.Yu. Nekotorye posledstviya Brexit dlya razvitiya Evropeiskogo soyuza [Some Implications of Brexit for EU Development]. MGIMO Review of International Relations, 2016, no. 6 (51), pp. 24-30.
  9. Ananieva E.V. Brexit: prichiny, politicheskii fon, posledstviya [Brexit: Reasons, Political Background, Consequences]. Outlines of global transformations: politics, economics, law, 2017, no. 10 (6), pp. 98-119. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23932/2542-0240-2017-10-6-98-119
  10. Godovanyuk K.A. “Global’naya Britaniya” v preddverii brekzita [“Global Britain” in the run-up to Brexit]. oscow, Institut Evropy RAN, 2020. 160 p. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15211/report62020_373 Available at: https://www.instituteofeurope.ru/images/uploads/doklad/373.pdf (accessed 04.11.2020).
  11. Okhoshin O.V. Problema severoirlandskoi granitsy: “yashchik Pandory” dlya Velikobritanii i ES [The problem of Northern Ireland border: Pandora’s box for Great Britain and the EU]. Pathways to Peace and Security, 2019, no. 1 (56), pp. 34-46. Available at: https://doi.org/10.20542/2307-1494-2019-1-34-46
  12. Kharitonova E.M. “Myagkaya sila” Velikobritanii [The soft power of the United Kingdom]. Moscow, IMEMO, 2018. 139 p. Available at: https://www.imemo.ru/files/File/ru/publ/2018/2018_23.pdf (accessed 04.11.2020). DOI:10.20542/978-5-9535-0542-0
  13. Kondratyeva N.B. Evropeiskii soyuz: stanovlenie edinogo rynka [European Union: Formation of a Single Market]. Institut Evropy RAN, Moscow, 2017. 142 p. Available at: http://www.instituteofeurope.ru/images/uploads/doklad/346.pdf (accessed 04.11.2020).
  14. Directives for the Negotiation of a New Partnership with the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland. Council of the European Union. 25.02.2020. Available at: https://www.consilium.europa.eu/media/42736/st05870-ad01re03-en20.pdf (accessed 04.11.2020).
  15. The Future Relationship with the EU: The UK’s Approach to Negotiations. HM Government, February 2020. Available at: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/868874/The_Future_Relationship_with_the_EU.pdf (accessed 04.11.2020).
  16. Prime Minister Boris Johnson’s speech in Greenwich. Prime Minister’s Office. 03.02.2020. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/pm-speech-in-greenwich-3-february-2020 (accessed 04.11.2020).
  17. Prime Minister’s letter to President Donald Tusk. Prime Minister’s Office, 19.08.2019. Available at: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/826166/20190819_PM_letter_to_His_Excellency_Mr_Donald_Tusk.pdf (accessed 04.11.2020).
  18. UK/EU relations: Boris Johnson’s written statement. UK Parliament. 03.02.2020. Available at: https://www.parliament.uk/business/publications/written-questions-answers-statements/written-statement/Commons/2020-02-03/HCWS86/ (accessed 04.11.2020).
  19. Bryant R. Brexit: Make Hard Choices but don’t Confuse Sovereignty with Autonomy. Brookings, 21.12.2018. Available at: https://www.brookings.edu/blog/up-front/2018/12/21/brexit-make-hard-choices-but-dont-confuse-sovereignty-with-autonomy/ (accessed 04.11.2020).
  20. Agreement on the Withdrawal of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland from the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community. 24.01.2020 (signed). Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?qid=1580206007232&uri=CELEX%3A12019W/TXT%2802%29 (accessed 04.11.2020).
  21. Draft text of the Agreement on the New Partnership with the United Kingdom. European Commission. 18.03.2020. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/info/files/200318-draft-agreement-gen.pdf (accessed 04.11.2020).
  22. Draft UK-EU Comprehensive Free Trade Agreement. HM Government. 27.02.2020. Available at: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/886010/DRAFT_UK-EU_Comprehensive_Free_Trade_Agreement.pdf (accessed 04.11.2020).
  23. Meetings of the EU–UK Joint and Specialised Committees under the Withdrawal Agreement. European Commission. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/info/european-union-and-united-kingdom-forging-new-partnership/eu-uk-withdrawal-agreement/meetings-eu-uk-joint-and-specialised-committees-under-withdrawal-agreement_en#meetingsofthejointcommittee (accessed 04.11.2020).
  24. Armstrong K. Can the EU and UK agree the Rules of a Future Relationship? LSE Brexit blog, 10.02.2020. Available at: https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/brexit/2020/02/10/long-read-its-the-autonomy-stupid-can-the-eu-and-uk-agree-the-rules-of-a-future-relationship/ (accessed 04.11.2020).
  25. González-García L. UK-EU Trade Negotiations: The Level Playing Field. UCL Europe Blog, 12.02.2020. Available at: https://ucleuropeblog.com/2020/02/12/uk-eu-trade-negotiations-the-level-playing-field/ (accessed 04.11.2020).
  26. Brunsden J., Foster P., Pickard J. UK must reveal state-aid plan to unblock Brexit talks, EU warns. Financial Times, 28.06.2020. Available at: https://www.ft.com/content/cc23c73e-88e2-4c60-b2bf-36b241b5a101 (accessed 04.11.2020).
  27. State aid: guidance. UK Department for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy, 10.07.2015. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/guidance/state-aid (accessed 04.11.2020).
  28. State aid Scoreboard 2019. European Commission, 2019. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/competition/state_aid/scoreboard/state_aid_scoreboard_2019.pdf (accessed 04.11.2020).
  29. UK–EU future relationship: level playing field. The Institute for Government, 17.02.2020. Available at: https://www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk/explainers/future-relationship-level-playing-field (accessed 04.11.2020).
  30. Usherwood S. The EU’s mandate for the Future Partnership. The UK in a Changing Europe, 26.02.2020. Available at: https://ukandeu.ac.uk/the-eus-mandate-for-the-future-partnership/ (accessed 04.11.2020).
  31. Peretz G., Artley A. State aid under the Northern Ireland Protocol. Tax Journal, 11.05.2020. Available at: https://www.taxjournal.com/articles/state-aid-under-the-northern-ireland-protocol (accessed 04.11.2020).
  32. Webber J. All Change? UK State Aid after Brexit. Politeia, 2020. Available at: https://www.politeia.co.uk/wp-content/Politeia%20Documents/2020/12.02%20James%20Webber%20All%20Change%3F%20State%20Aid/%27All%20Change%20UK%20State%20Aid%20after%20Brexit%20-%20What%20Law%20What%20Courts%27%2C%20James%20Webber.pdf (accessed 04.11.2020).
  33. European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018. Available at: https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2018/16/contents (accessed 04.11.2020).
  34. The State Aid (EU Exit) Regulations 2019 (draft). Available at: https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukdsi/2019/9780111178768 (accessed 04.11.2020).
  35. Letter to the House of Lords Internal Market Sub-Committee. Department for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy, 15.05.2020. Available at: https://committees.parliament.uk/publications/1381/documents/12714/default/ (accessed 04.11.2020).
  36. Foster P., Pickard J. Cummings Leads Push for light-touch UK state-aid regime after Brexit. Financial Times, 27.07.2020. Available at: https://www.ft.com/content/e29430c7-9dae-440e-8093-74f705ce62c3 (accessed 04.11.2020).
  37. Boris Johnson backs looser state aid rules after Brexit. Financial Times, 29.11.2019. Available at: https://www.ft.com/content/e46f977e-12b5-11ea-a7e6-62bf4f9e548a (accessed 04.11.2020).
  38. Conservative Plans to Replace the UK State aid regime. UKSALA, 18.12.2019. Available at: https://uksala.org/conservative-plans-to-replace-the-uk-state-aid-regime/ (accessed 04.11.2020).

Registered in System SCIENCE INDEX

For citation:
Bolshakov A. Regulatory Autonomy of Great Britain: Problems and Perspectives. World Eonomy and International Relations, 2021, vol. 65, No 7, pp. 71-79. https://doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227-2021-65-7-71-79



Comments (0)

No comments

Add comment







Indexed

 

 

 

 

Current Issue
2023, vol. 67, No. 1
Topical Themes of the Issue:
  • Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism of the European Union: a New Tool of Global Governance
  • Russia in American Climate Strategies
  • Latin America and NATO: Correlation Formats in the XX – the First Quarter of the XXI Century
  • Russia’s Chance to Renew Global Modernity
Submit an Article
INVITATION FOR PUBLICATION
The Editorial Board invites authors to write analytical articles on the following topics:
  • changes in the processes of globalization in modern conditions
  • formation of the new world order
  • shifts in civilization at the stage of transition to a digital society

The editors are also interested in publishing synthesis articles / scientific reviews revealing the main trends in the development of certain regions of the world - Latin America, Africa, South Asia, etc.