Non-Western Theories of Development in the Global Capitalism Era

319
DOI: 10.20542/0131-2227-2021-65-4-113-122
Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University), 6, Miklukho-Maklaya Str., Moscow, 117198, Russian Federation;
Moscow State Institute of International Relations (MGIMO-University), The Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation, 76, Vernadskogo Prosp., Moscow, 119454, Russian Federation;
St. Petersburg State University, 1/3, Smolnyi Str., St. Petersburg, 191060, Russian Federation

Received 31.08.2020.

Acknowledgements. The article has been prepared at RUDN University and supported by a grant of the Russian Foundation for Basic Research (RFBR). Project no. 19-111-50655 (Expansion) “Non-Western Theories of Development in the Age of Global Capitalism”. The author also expresses his sincere gratitude to P. Bond (University of the Western Cape, South Africa), T.M. Gavristova (YarSU), E.N. Grachikov (RUDN University), Li Yan (CASS, China) and V. G. Shubin (Institute for African Studies, RAS) for their valuable comments.


Abstract. This article is devoted to the evolution of non-Western theories of development in the epoch of global capitalism, i. e. after 1990. It describes in detail what is meant by this concept – models of socio-economic development, alternative to the Western neoliberal paradigm and associated with the modernization of non-Western countries, primarily in the “Global South”. Periodization of these approaches is given in connection with the process of decolonization (early 1960s), the end of the bipolar world, and the strengthening of China (since 2010s). Two main directions of such theories – neo-Marxian tradition, as well as post-colonial and anti-colonial studies – are shown. The author concludes that the “non-Westernness” of post-colonial studies is conditional, while anti-colonial and neo-Marxian studies are very much intertwined. The article shows the role of such organizations as CODESRIA and Third World Network in shaping the intellectual development agenda of the Global South. It traces the evolution of neo-Marxist approaches to development of the poorest countries, which originated in Latin American structuralism, American neo-Marxism, the works of J. Galtung and W. Rodney. By the early 1980s, the world-systemic approach was already dominant, its representatives were relatively capable to explain the collapse of the socialist system, and also made attempts to describe the growing influence of China. Nevertheless, the theory of the transnational capitalist class that emerged in the 1990s and 2000s was more successful from this point of view. The article investigates the phenomenon of an emerging confrontation between China and the United States in the ideological field – for the influence on leftist intellectuals around the world, and shows the main resources of both sides in this conflict. Special attention is paid to Postdevelopmentalism that developed in the 1990–2000s in line with postmodernist approaches; both strengths and weaknesses of this concept are presented. In conclusion, the author summarizes that neo-Marxist approaches play a key role as the major alternative to neoliberal capitalist development in the countries of the “Global South” while national modernization theories are lacking in the non-Western countries.

Keywords: development, modernization, Global South, non-Western theories, postcolonial studies, neo-Marxism, dependency theories, world-system theories, transnational capitalism, social movements, post-development


REFERENCES 

1. Yablochkov L.D., Kremen’ K.S., eds. Ideinye techeniya v Tropicheskoi Afrike [Ideological Currents in Tropical Africa]. Moscow, Nauka, 1969. 227 p.

2. Critique of Neocolonialism Ideology and Politics. Moscow, Nauka, 1984. 256 p. (In Russ.)

3. Industrialization Problems in Developing Countries. Moscow, Mysl’, 1971. 408 p. (In Russ.)

4. Maidanik K.L., ed. Obshchestvennaya mysl’ razvivayushchikhsya stran [Social Concepts of Developing Countries]. Moscow, Nauka, 1988. 344 p.

5. Khoros V.G., ed. Sovremennye problemy razvitiya. Materialy teoreticheskogo seminara v IMEMO RAN [Modern problems of development. Materials of the theoretical seminar at IMEMO RAN]. Moscow, IMEMO, 2010. 284 p.

6. Khoros V.G., ed. Sovremennye problemy razvitiya. Materialy teoreticheskogo seminara v IMEMO RAN [Modern problems of development. Materials of the theoretical seminar at IMEMO RAS]. Iss. 2. Vol. 1. Moscow, IMEMO, 2016. 412 p.

7. Voskresenskii A.D., ed. Vostok i politika: Politicheskie sistemy, politicheskie kul’tury, politicheskie protsessy [East and Politics: Political Systems, Political Cultures, Political Processes]. Moscow, Aspect Press, 2015. 624 p.

8. Zakharov A.N., Bulatov A.S., eds. Yug: put’ k ekonomicheskoi nezavisimosti [South: the Way to Economic Independence]. Moscow, MGIMO-Universitet, 2019. 324 p.

9. Semenov Yu.I. Politarnyi (“aziatskii”) sposob proizvodstva. Sushchnost’ i mesto v istorii chelovechestva i Rossii. Filosofsko-istoricheskie ocherki [Politarian (“Asian”) Method of Production. The Essence and Place in Human and Russian history. Philosophical and Historical Essays]. Moscow, Lenand, 2019. 376 p.

10. Melyantsev V.A., Matyunina L.Kh. Ocherki makroekonomicheskogo i finansovogo razvitiya stran Vostoka i Zapada (1980–2010-e gody) [Essays on Macroeconomic and Financial Development of the Countries of East and West (1980s‑2010s)]. Moscow, Klyuch-S, 2019. 192 p.

11. Wallerstein I. The Modern World-System IV: Centrist Liberalism Triumphant, 1789–1914. Berkley, University of California Press, 2011. 396 p.

12. Reinert E.S. How Rich Countries Got Rich… and Why Poor Countries Stay Poor. London, Constable, 2008. 398 p.

13. Gills B. Interview with Boris Kagarlitsky. Third World Quarterly, 2016, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 744-748. DOI:10.1080/01436597.2015.1128818

14. Leech M. What is Development Studies? The British Academy, February 20, 2020. Available at: https://www.thebritishacademy.ac.uk/blog/what-is-development-studies/?gclid=EAIaIQobChMIqJT_m-nB6QIVC08YCh14KwmkEAAYASAAEgKpyPD_BwE (accessed 10.08.2020).

15. Fanon F. The Wretched of the Earth. New York, Grove Weidenfeld, 1963. 250 p.

16. Campbell H.G. African International Relations, Genocidal Histories and the Emancipatory Project. Part 1. Vestnik RUDN. International Relations, 2020, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 115-130. DOI: 10.22363/2313-0660-2020-20-1-115-130

17. Buzgalin A.V., Voeikov M.I., eds. Marks posle Marksa: Postsovetskaya shkola kriticheskogo marksizma [Marx after Marx: Post-Soviet School of Critical Marxism]. Moscow, Lenand, 2019. 568 p.

18. Eifari A.K. Razvivayushchiesya strany i “Kapital” K. Marksa [Developing Countries and the “Capital” by K. Marx]. Moscow, RUDN, 2019. 303 p.

19. Peet R., Hartwick E., eds. Theories of Development: Contentions, Arguments, Alternatives. New York, The Guilford Press, 2009. 324 p.

20. Gavristova T.M. Afrika: “postkolonial’naya biblioteka” [Afrika: “Post-Colonial Library”]. Asia and Africa Today, 2020, no. 3, pp. 80-85. DOI: 10.31857/S032150750008720-4

21. Easterly W. The Elusive Quest for Growth: Economists’ Adventures and Misadventures in the Tropics. Cambridge, MIT Press, 2001. 400 p.

22. Degterev D. Politicheskaya ehkonomiya mezhdunarodnoi pomoshchi [Political Economy of Foreign Aid]. Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya, 2014, no. 4, pp. 26-35.

23. Moyo D. Dead Aid: Why Aid Is Not Working and How There Is a Better Way for Africa. New York, Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2009. 208 p.

24. Ndikumana L., Boyce J. K. Africa’s Odious Debts: How Foreign Loans and Capital Flight Bled a Continent (African Arguments). London, Zed Books, 2011. 152 p.

25. Prashad V. Poorer Nations: A Possible History of the Global South. London, Verso Books, 2012. 304 p.

26. Grachikov E.N. Stanovlenie kitaiskoi shkoly mezhdunarodnykh otnoshenii: analiticheskie podkhody i metody issledovanii [Formation of the Chinese School of International Relations: Analytical Approaches and Research Methods]. Vestnik RUDN. International Relations, 2019, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 187-200. DOI: 10.22363/2313-0660-2019-19-2-187-200

27. Declaration on the Establishment of a New International Economic order. Resolution 3201 (S-VI) of UN GA, May 1, 1974 (In Russ.) Available at: https://undocs.org/A/RES/3201(S-VI) (accessed 10.08.2020).

28. CODERSRIA Tribute – Samir Amin (1931–2018): A Titan has Gone Home to Rest. CODESRIA, 2018. Available at: https://codesria.org/spip.php?article2870&lang=en (accessed 10.08.2020).

29. Khor M. The “Singapore Issues” in the WTO: Evolution and Implications for Developing Countries. Penang, Third World Network, 2007. 65 p.

30. Rodney W. How Europe Underdeveloped Africa. London, Bogle-L’Ouverture Publications, 1972. 316 p.

31. Galtung J. A Structural Theory of Imperialism. Journal of Peace Research, 1971, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 81-117. DOI:10.1177/002234337100800201

32. Sears D., ed. Dependency Theory: A Critical Reassessment. London, Pinter, 1981. 211 p.

33. Kvangraven I.H., Styve M.D., Kufakurinani U., Frutuoso S., eds. Dialogues on Development. Volume 1: Dependency. New York, Institute for New Economic Thinking, 2017. 112 p.

34. Tausch A. Globalisation and Development: The Relevance of Classical “Dependency” Theory for the World Today. International Social Science Journal, 2010, vol. 61, no. 202, pp. 467-488. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2451.2011.01786.x

35. Amin S. Capitalism in the Age of Globalization. London, Zed Press, 2014. 192 p.

36. Arrighi G. Adam Smith in Bejing: Lineages of the Twenty-First Century. New York, Verso, 2007. 418 p.

37. Frank A. ReOrient: Global Economy in the Asian Age. Berkeley, University of California Press, 1998. 416 p.

38. Rakhmanov A.B. Kontseptsiya transnatsional’nogo kapitalisticheskogo klassa v zapadnoi sotsial’noi mysli kontsa XX i nachala XXI veka (podkhody L. Sklyar, W. Robinson i J. Harris [The Conception of the Transnational Capitalist Class in the Social in the Late 20th and the Early 21st Centuries (Perpespectives of L. Sklyar, W. Robinson and J. Harris)]. Moscow State University Bulletin. Series 18. Sociology and Political Science, 2015, no. 2, pp. 98-114.

39. Massad J. How the US Empire Stole the Left’s Ideas. Middle East Eye, January 17, 2020. Available at: https://www.middleeasteye.net/opinion/us-and-new-imperial-order (accessed 10.08.2020).

40. Taylor I. Sixty Years Later: Africa’s Stalled Decolonization. Vestnik RUDN. International Relations, 2020, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 39-53. DOI: 10.22363/2313-0660-2020-20-1-39-53

41. Bond P. The BRICS’ Centrifugal Geopolitical Economy. Vestnik RUDN. International Relations, 2018, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 535-549. DOI: 10.22363/2313-0660-2018-18-3-535-549

42. Norton B., Blumenthal M. DSA/Jacobin/Haymarket–sponsored “Socialism” Conference Features US Gov-Funded Regime-Change Activists. The Gray Zone, July 6, 2019. Available at: https://thegrayzone.com/2019/07/06/dsa-jacobin-iso-socialism-conference-us-funded-regime-change/ (accessed 10.08.2020).

43. Zhikui Z. Introduction to Socialism with Chinese Characteristics. Linden, Prunus Press, Bejing, Bejing Publishing Group, 2016. 284 p.

44. Voskresenskii A.D., ed. Model’ razvitiya sovremennogo Kitaya: otsenki, diskussii, prognozy [The Development Model of Modern China: Estimates, Discussions, Forecasts]. Moscow, Strategicheskie izyskaniya, 2019. 736 p.

45. Vinogradov A.V., Degterev D.A., Spirina D.V., Trusova A.A. “Pekinskii konsensus” v mezhdunarodnom i vnutrikitaiskom politicheskom diskurse [Beijing Consensus” in the International and Domestic Chinese Political Discourse]. Far Eastern Affairs, 2018, no. 3, pp. 17-28.

46. Degterev D.A. Multipolar World Order: Old Myths and New Realities. Vestnik RUDN. International Relations, 2019, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 404-419. DOI: 10.22363/2313-0660-2019-19-3-404-419

47. Gereffi G. Global value chains in a post-Washington Consensus world. Review of International Political Economy, 2014, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 9-37. DOI: 10.1080/09692290.2012.756414

48. Klein E., Morreo C.E., eds. Postdevelopment in Practice. Alternatives, Economies, Ontologies. London, Routledge, 2019. 350 p.

49. Rahnema M., Bawtree V., eds. The Postdevelopment Reader. London, Zed Books, 1997. 464 p.

50. Wiarda H.J., ed. Non-Western Theories of Development. Regional Norms versus Global Trends. Fort Worth, Harcourt Brace College Publishers, 1999. 180 p.

51. Escobar A. Encountering Development: the Making and Unmaking of the Third World. Princeton, Princeton University Press, 1995. 312 p.

52. Chevalier J.M., Buckles D. Participatory Action Research: Theory and Methods for Engaged Inquiry. London, Routledge, 2013. 496 p. DOI: 10.4324/9780203107386

53. QS World University Ranking by Subject, 2019. Development Studies. Available at: https://www.topuniversities.com/university-rankings/university-subject-rankings/2019/development-studies (accessed 10.08.2020).


Registered in System SCIENCE INDEX

For citation:
Degterev D. Non-Western Theories of Development in the Global Capitalism Era . World Eonomy and International Relations, 2021, vol. 65, No 4, pp. 113-122. https://doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227-2021-65-4-113-122



Comments (0)

No comments

Add comment







Indexed

 

 

 

 

Current Issue
2023, vol. 67, No. 1
Topical Themes of the Issue:
  • Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism of the European Union: a New Tool of Global Governance
  • Russia in American Climate Strategies
  • Latin America and NATO: Correlation Formats in the XX – the First Quarter of the XXI Century
  • Russia’s Chance to Renew Global Modernity
Submit an Article
INVITATION FOR PUBLICATION
The Editorial Board invites authors to write analytical articles on the following topics:
  • changes in the processes of globalization in modern conditions
  • formation of the new world order
  • shifts in civilization at the stage of transition to a digital society

The editors are also interested in publishing synthesis articles / scientific reviews revealing the main trends in the development of certain regions of the world - Latin America, Africa, South Asia, etc.