104Received 11.12.2020.
Abstract. The article is dedicated to the 100th anniversary of the Academician N. N. Inozemtsev. The article provides an overview of the unpublished collective monograph “Foundations of the Theory of International Relations” – the fundamental work of a group of the IMEMO researchers, devised in the 1970s in the USSR. The process of creating a monograph is considered in the context of domestic and foreign policy conjuncture of that historical period, as well as the history of IMEMO. Among factors that slowed down the publication of this work were ideological transformations in the USSR, the divergence of political elite groups’ interests. The main provisions of the monograph, based on a systematic approach and works by representatives of Marxism and Marxism-Leninism, are given. Particular attention is paid to comparison with the American and Western European international relations theory concepts of that period. Self-sufficiency of the monograph as a full-fledged theoretical concept within the framework of the Marxist-Leninist theory of international relations is substantiated. The authors of the article prove the relevance of the monograph both as a historical source and as a milestone for modern scientific Marxist thought. Owing to the collapse of the world socialist system, the Marxist paradigm received an opportunity to reach its own realism, separated from ideology and based on the central idea of Marxism – the position of development as an objective quality of the socio-historical process. The publication of the collective monograph “Fundamentals of the Theory of International Relations” is planned for the end of 2021.
Keywords: IMEMO, theory of international relations, N.N. Inozemtsev, E.M. Primakov, V.I. Gantman, foreign policy of the USSR, USSR, Cold War, Marxism, Marxism-Leninism
REFERENCES
1. Mir v protsesse peremen: vyzovy i vozmozhnosti dlya Rossii [The world in the process of changes: challenges and opportunities for Russia]. Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya, 2011, no. 9, pp. 3-30.
2. Cherkasov P. P. IMEMO. Ocherk istorii [IMEMO. History sketch]. Moscow, Izdatel’stvo “Ves’ Mir”, 2016. 872 p.
3. Inozemtsev N.N., ed. Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya posle vtoroi mirovoi voiny. V 3 t. [International relations after the Second World War. In three volumes]. Moscow, Gospolitizdat, 1963. 759 p.
4. Primakov E.M., Gantman V.I., Lyubchenko V.I. Metodika situatsionnogo analiza mezhdunarodnykh otnoshenii [Methodology for situational analysis of international relations]. Moscow, IMEMO, 1974. 13 ð.
5. Inozemtsev N.N., ed. Prognoz osnovnykh tendentsii i napravlenii ekonomicheskogo razvitiya kapitalizma do 1990 goda. V 4 tt. [Forecast of the main tendencies and directions of economic development of capitalism until 1990. In four volumes]. Moscow, IMEMO, 1972. 223 ð.
6. Pozdnyakov E.A. Sistemnyi podkhod i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya [Systems approach and international relations]. Moscow, Nauka, 1976. 157 p.
7. Gantman V.I., ed. Sistema, struktura i protsess razvitiya sovremennykh mezhdunarodnykh otnoshenii [System, structure and development process of modern international relations]. Moscow, Nauka, 1984. 422 p.
8. Gantman V.I., ed. Sovremennye burzhuaznye teorii mezhdunarodnykh otnoshenii [Modern bourgeois theories of international relations]. Moscow, Nauka, 1976. 486 p.
9. Kosolapov N. Issledovaniya mezhdunarodnykh otnoshenii: logika idei, interesov, politiki [Studies of international relations: the logic of ideas, interests, politics]. Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya, 2006, no. 4, pp. 93-99.
10. Problemy teorii mezhdunarodnykh otnoshenii [Problems of the theory of international relations]. Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya, 1969, no. 9, pp. 88-106.
11. Problemy teorii mezhdunarodnykh otnoshenii [Problems of the theory of international relations]. Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya, 1969, no. 11, pp. 78-99.
12. Maksimova M. Vsemirnoe khozyaistvo, nauchnotekhnicheskaya revolyutsiya i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya [World economy, scientific and technological revolution and international relations]. Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya, 1979, no. 4, pp. 12-24.
13. Maksimova M. Vsemirnoe khozyaistvo, nauchnotekhnicheskaya revolyutsiya i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya [World economy, scientific and technological revolution and international relations]. Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya, 1979, no. 5, pp. 21-33.
14. Kosolapov N. Obshchestvennaya priroda mezhdunarodnykh otnoshenii [The public nature of international relations]. Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya, 1979, no. 7, pp. 61-80.
15. Bykov O. Sovetskii Soyuz v bor’be za predotvrashchenie yadernoi voiny [Soviet Union in the fight to prevent nuclear war]. Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya, 1979, no. 9, pp. 27-39.
16. Inozemtsev N.N. XXVI s”ezd KPSS i razvitie nauki o mezhdunarodnykh otnosheniyakh [XXVI Congress of the CPSU and the development of the science of international relations]. Pravda, 22.09.1981, pp. 4-5.
17. Kosolapov N. Teoreticheskie issledovaniya mezhdunarodnykh otnoshenii [Theoretical studies of international relations]. Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya, 1998, no. 1, pp. 81-93.
18. Kosolapov N. Teoreticheskie issledovaniya mezhdunarodnykh otnoshenii [Theoretical studies of international relations]. Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya, 1998, no. 2, pp. 67-79.
19. Ot sistemnoi istorii k rossiiskoi teorii mezhdunarodnykh otnoshenii. Interv’yu s professorom Alekseem Demosfenovichem Bogaturovym [From systemic history to the Russian theory of international relations. Interview with Professor Alexei Demosthenovich Bogaturov]. Vestnik RUDN. Seriya: mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya, 2020, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 574-584.
Registered in System SCIENCE INDEX
No comments