Imperatives of Sustainable Development in the Shadow and in the Light of the Pandemic

69
DOI: 10.20542/0131-2227-2021-65-3-11-22
V. Davydov (davydov@ilaran.ru), 
Institute of Latin American Studies, Russian Academy of Sciences, 21/16, B. Ordynka Str., Moscow, 115035, Russian Federation; 
The Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia, 6, Miklukho-Maklaya Str., Moscow, 117198, Russian Federation

Abstract. The COVID-19 pandemic temporarily overshadowed all the previous concerns of the world community, and among them even existential challenges. The attitude towards sustainable development issues has moved into the “deferred demand” zone. The pandemic pushed the offensive and exacerbated the effect of another crisis in the global economy. At the same time, it is symptomatic that during the pandemic a significant improvement in the environmental situation was felt as a result of the reduction in greenhouse gas emissions and the release of other harmful production wastes. At the same time, the pandemic has accentuated the biomedical safety imperative and will inevitably make a corresponding adjustment to the list of top priorities for moving towards sustainable development goals. After the pause of the pandemic, the imperative of transition to a sustainable development regime will begin to act with significant intensification, bearing in mind the need to compensate for the loss of time and pace. Ensuring biomedical safety will be a special priority. The lessons of the pandemic convincingly confirm the understanding that real success in moving towards sustainable development goals in accordance with the 2030 Agenda cannot be imagined without the normalization of international relations and the establishment of broad cooperation in a global format. At the same time, the author proceeds from the integral perception of the concept of sustainable development. Summing up the pre-pandemic stage of the formation of the concept of sustainable development, its essence can be expressed as follows. Development will be sustainable if it is economically balanced, socially inclusive and balanced, environmentally responsible, biologically safe, institutionally oriented to the interests of the majority and respect for the rights of the minority. If at the same time it is assumed and guaranteed that the use of weapons of mass destruction will be excluded if the urge for military solutions to international conflicts fades. And, of course, on such a platform, debt to the future is unacceptable, as it was said. This, of course, is the ideal, and practice is determined and will be determined by a greater or lesser approximation to it.

Keywords: COVID-19 pandemic, sustainable development, global warming, bridging inequalities, biomedical security, global regulation, global green New Deal


REFERENCES

  1. Porter C. Adapting to a Changing Climate. How Collaboration Addresses Unique Challenges in Climate Change and Environmental Reporting. Center for Cooperative Media, Monclair State University, July 2020. 24 p. Available at: https://collaborativejournalism.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/8/2020/07/climate-change-caroline-porter-july-16-2020.pdf (accessed 08.09.2020).
  2. Observatorio COVID‑19 en América Latina y el Caribe en tiempos de pandemia. EPAL, 25 de Junio de 2020. Available at: https://www.cepal.org/es/noticias/observatorio-covid-19-la-cepal-un-instrumento-apoyo-america-latina-caribe-tiempos-pandemia (accessed 08.09.2020).
  3. The World in 2020. London, The Economist, 2019. 142 .
  4. CEPAL, Balance preliminar de la economía de América Latina y el Caribe. Santiago de Chile, 2020. Diciembre de 2020, p. 11, 12, 23.
  5. Atkinson E.B. Neravenstvo. Kak s nim byt’? [Inequality. What Can Be Done?] Moscow, Delo, 2018. 536 .
  6. Tale of Two Crisis: Billionaires Gain as Workers Feel Pandemic Pain. Americans for Tax Fairness. Americans for Tax Fairness, Institute for Policy Studies, May 21, 2020. 3 p. Available at: https://americansfortaxfairness.org/wp-content/uploads/2020-5-21-Billionaires-Press-Release-at-Two-month-Covid-Pandemic-FINAL.pdf (accessed 08.09.2020).
  7. Voluntary National Review of the Implementation of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Russian Federation. Moscow, 2020. 240 p. (In Russ.) Available at: https://ac.gov.ru/uploads/2-Publications/analitika/DNO.pdf (accessed 08.09.2020).
  8. Goodbuy globalization: The dangerous lure of self-sufficiency. The Economist, May 16, 2020. Available at: https://www.economist.com/weeklyedition/2020-05-16 (accessed 08.09.2020).
  9. Davydov V.M. Determinatsiya razvitiya Latino-Karibskoi Ameriki. Sopryazhenie global’noi i regional’noi problematiki [Determination of Development of Latin America and Caribbean Area. Conjunction of Global and Regional Agenda]. Moscow, ILA RAN, 2016. 72 p.
  10. Gromyko A.A. (Dez)integracionnye processy: krizis “global’nogo mira” [(Des)integration Trends: Crisys of “Global World”]. Obozrevatel’, 2020, no. 7, pp. 24-38. Available at: https://www.instituteofeurope.ru/images/stories/structura/gromyko/2020/gromyko2020-5.pdf (accessed 08.09.2020).
  11. Amorim C. Los pergaminos del nuevo mundo. Nueva Sociedad – Opinión, julio 2020. Available at: https://www.nuso.org/articulo/postales-de-un-mundo-que-cambia/ (accessed 22.10.2020).
  12. Our Common Future. World Commission on Environment and Development. Moscow, Progress, 1989. 376 p. (In Russ.)
  13. Davydov V.M. Ustoichivoe razvitie kak obshchii znamenatel’ [Sustainable Development as Common Denominator]. Mezhdunarodnaya zhizn’, 2019, no. 10, pp. 32-45.
  14. Paris Agreement. United Nations. FCCC/cp/2015/L.9/Rev.1. Framework Convention on Climate Change. Conference of the Parties. Application. Twenty-first session (In Russ.) Available at: https://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2015/cop21/rus/l09r01r.pdf (accessed 14.09.2020).
  15. Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. UN General Assembly Resolution of September 25, 2015 (A/RES/70/1) (In Russ.) Available at: https://undocs.org/ru/A/RES/70/1 (accessed 14.09.2020).
  16. Horizons 2030. Equality at the Centre of Sustainable Development. Thirty Sixth Session of ECLAC. Mexico City, 23–27 of May, 2016. 172 p. Available at: https://repositorio.cepal.org/bitstream/handle/11362/40160/4/S1600652_en.pdf (accessed 14.09.2020).
  17. Bulatov A.S., ed. Perspektivy ekonomicheskoi globalizacii [Perspectives of Economic Globalization]. Moscow, MGIMO, 2019. 666 .
  18. Fridman V.S. Global’nyi ekologicheskii krizis [Global Ecological Crisis]. Moscow, URSS-Lenand, 2017. 442 .
  19. Roginko S.A. V tsentre mirovoi diskussii: problemy klimaticheskoi povestki [In the Spotlight at the World Debate: Climate Agenda Issues]. Sovremennaya Evropa, 2019, no. 6, p. 127-138.
  20. Sakharov A.G. Izmenenie klimaticheskoi politiki SShA i povestka dnya Arkticheskogo soveta [Shift in the US Climate Policy and Arctic Council Agenda]. Vestnik mezhdunarodnyh organizatsii, 2018, no. 1, pp. 66-79.
  21. Davydov V.M. Perspektivy ustoichivogo razvitiya v novom global’nom i regional’nom kontekste [Perspective of Sustainable Development in the New Global and Regional Context]. Moscow, ILA RAN, 2020. 72 p.
  22. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs. Sustainable Development Outlook 2020. Achieving SDCs in the Wake of COVID19: Scenarios for Policymakers. 13 July 2020. Available at: https://www.un.org/development/desa/dpad/publication/sustainable-development-outlook-2020-achieving-sdgs-in-the-wake-of-covid-19-scenarios-for-policymakers/ (accessed 80.09.2020).
  23. UNCTAD. Trade and Development Report 2019. Financing a Global Green New Deal. UN, 2019. 174 p. Available at: https://unctad.org/webflyer/trade-and-development-report-2019 (accessed 08.09.2020).
  24. Cardoso F.H. Crise e reinvenção da política no Brasil. São Paulo. Companía de letras, 2019. 240 p. [Crisis and reinvention of politics in Brazil. São Paulo. Companía de letras, 2019. 240 p. (In Portuguese)]

Registered in System SCIENCE INDEX

For citation:
Imperatives of Sustainable Development in the Shadow and in the Light of the Pandemic. World Eonomy and International Relations, 2021, vol. 65, no. 3, pp. 11-22. https://doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227-2021-65-3-11-22



Comments (0)

No comments

Add comment







Indexed

 

 

 

 

Dear authors! Please note that in the VAK List of peer-reviewed scientific journals, in which the main scientific results of dissertations for the degree of candidate and doctor of sciences should be published for the “MEMO Journal” the following specialties are recorded:
economic sciences:
5.2.5. World Economy.
5.2.1. Economic Theory
5.2.3. Regional and Branch Economics
political sciences:
5.5.4. International Relations
5.5.1. History and Theory of Politics
5.5.2. Political Institutions, Processes, Technologies

 

Current Issue
2024, vol. 68, No. 4
Topical Themes of the Issue:
  • Financial Contagion Propagation in Europe under the Impact of Global Shocks
  • Regional Powers on the African Continent: Trends and Prospects
  • Investment Activity of the PRC in the Kyrgyz Republic
  • “Land Grabbing” Concept: Global and National Aspects
Submit an Article
INVITATION FOR PUBLICATION
The Editorial Board invites authors to write analytical articles on the following topics:
  • changes in the processes of globalization in modern conditions
  • formation of the new world order
  • shifts in civilization at the stage of transition to a digital society

The editors are also interested in publishing synthesis articles / scientific reviews revealing the main trends in the development of certain regions of the world - Latin America, Africa, South Asia, etc.