Peculiarities of the Party System of Slovakia in the Context of Parliamentary Electrical Cycles of 20162020

DOI: 10.20542/0131-2227-2021-65-3-81-91
Yu. Ostapets (, 
Uzhhorod National University, University Str., 14, Uzhhorod, 88000, Ukraine;
Uzhhorod National University, University Str., 14, Uzhhorod, 88000, Ukraine

Abstract. The article considers the structural changes in the party system of the Slovak Republic, taking place in 2016– 2020 due to the strengthening of parties of anti-systemic populist orientation. The author researches the causes and factors of evolution of the party landscape in the EU countries towards institutionalisation of antisystem policy. The development of the Slovak party system reflects the key trends in the political development of the EU countries with the weakening position of the systemic party establishment and the strengthening role of populist parties. The complexity of the phenomenon of antisystemicism in modern conditions is emphasized, since mainstream parties, seeking electoral support, use the rhetoric of populist parties, and populist parties, haveing obtained parliamentary mandates, weaken their radicalism and start working in the mainstream format. As a result of the 2016 parliamentary elections, the breakdown of the “structural nucleus” of Slovakia’s party system took place, which for two decades had been the basis of its stability and predictability of development. The weakening influence of “traditional” (Christian-Democratic, Conservative, Social-Democratic) parties freed up electoral environment for “new” populist, anti-systemic, right-wing extremist forces. Electoral statistics demonstrates that the influence of mainstream parties weakens at the regional and local levels of Slovak politics. The results of the 2020 parliamentary elections demonstrate that the party system of Slovakia in the continuum between mainstream and populism comes even closer to the populist format. The electoral triumph of populists and their convergence with programmatic parties within the parliamentary-governmental coalition raises new challenges for Slovakia’s political system. Among the main reasons for the rise of populism in Slovakia are the following: disappointment of citizens with the activities of the ruling elites; mediation and personalisation of policy; denationalisation of politics and increasing importance of global governance structures at European and world levels; increasing populism in Slovakian election campaigns; low level of institutionalisation of political parties and the party system as a whole. Attention is drawn to the destructive tendencies in the development of the modern party system of Slovakia. The collapse of the “structural core” of the Slovak party system and the further pluralisation of parliamentary representation of parties do not contribute to the stability and predictability of parliamentary-governmental activity. Increased electoral influence and parliamentary representation of political subjects of populist, anti-systemic and right-wing extremist orientation cause political risks for the stable democratic development of the Slovak Republic. 

Keywords: Slovakia, parliamentary elections, party “Direction – Social Democracy”, party “Ordinary People and Independent Personalities”, mainstream, right-wing populism, euro-skepticism, anti-systemic parties, institutionalisation of the party system


  1. Spasskii E. Transformatsiya politicheskikh partii i ikh tipologicheskaya kontseptualizatsiya: opyt zapadnoi partologii [Transformation of Political Parties and Their Typological Conceptualization: Experience of Western Parties’ Studies]. Politiya, 2008, no. 2, pp. 103-111. DOI: 10.30570/2078-5089-2008-49-2-103-113
  2. Lipset S., Rokkan S. Struktury razmezhevanii, partiinye sistemy i predpochteniya izbiratelei. Predvaritel’nye zamechaniya [Structures of Delimitations, Party Systems and Preferences of Voters. Preliminary Remarks]. Politicheskaya nauka: Sotsial’no-politicheskie razmezhevaniya i konsolidatsiya partiinykh sistem, 2004, no. 4, pp. 204-235.
  3. Smorgunov L. Setevye politicheskie partii [Network Political Parties]. Polis. Political Studies, 2014, no. 4, pp. 21-37. DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2014.04.03
  4. Inglkhart R. Postmodern: menyayushchiesya tsennosti i izmenyayushchiesya obshchestva [Postmodemity: Changing Values and Changing Societies]. Polis. Political Studies, 1997, no. 4, pp. 6-32.
  5. Mart’yanov D. Sravnitel’nyi analiz postmaterialisticheskikh partii (na primere “zelenykh” i piratov) [Comparative Analysis of Post-Materialist Parties (on the Example of “Green” and Pirates)]. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Politologiya, 2013, no. 2, pp. 20-32.
  6. Vainshtein G. Transformatsiya zapadnoevropeiskogo politicheskogo landshafta i institutsionalizatsiya antisistemnoi politiki [Transformation of the West European Political Landscape and the Institutionalisation of Anti-Systemic Politics]. Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya, 2018, vol. 62, no. 5, pp. 17-28. DOI: 10.20542/0131-2227-2018-62-5-17-28
  7. Solov’ev E. Evolyutsiya partiinykh sistem: novaya tochka bifurkatsii? [Evolution of Party Systems: a New Point for Bifurcation?] Kontury global’nykh transformatsii, 2018, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 185-198. DOI: 10.23932/2542- 0240-2018-11-3-185-198
  8. Oskolkov P. Pravyi populizm v Evropeiskom Soyuze [Right-Wing Populism in the European Union]. Moscow, Institut Evropy RAS, 2019. 164 p.
  9. Meseznikov G. A Quarter of a Century of Populism in Slovakia: in Government and in Opposition. Dennik N, 12.05.2016. (In Slov.) Available at: (accessed 15.03.2020).
  10. Margetts H. Cyber Parties. Handbook of Party Politics. London, Sage, 2006, pp. 528-536.
  11. Vainshtein G. Elektoral’nyi faktor v evolyutsii partiinogo landshafta Evropy [Electoral Factor in the Evolution of the Party Landscape of Europe]. Moscow, Institut Evropy RAS, 2016. 114 p.
  12. Vorotnyuk M. Privivka populizmom: kakie posledstviya budet imet’ smena vlasti v Slovakii [Vaccination by Populism: Consequences of Changing the Power in Slovakia]. 04.03.2020. Available at: (accessed 15.03.2020).
  13. Ostapets Iu., Haydanka Ye., Klyuchkovych A., Maradik N. Evolution of Party Systems in “Visegrad Four” Countries: Experience for Ukraine. Uzhgorod, ZIPPO, 2014. 256 p. (In Ukr.)
  14. Malová D. Transformation Experiences in Slovakia: Governing Uncertainty. Berlin, FES, 2017. 14 . Available at: (accessed 15.03.2020).
  15. Meseznikov G. The 2016 Elections in Slovakia: a Shock to Democracy (22 March 2020). (In Slov.) Available at: (accessed 15.03.2020).
  16. The Election to the National Council of SR2016. Final Results. Available at: (accessed 15.03.2020).
  17. Election 2020 to the National Council of the Slovak Republic. Final Results. Available at: (accessed 15.03.2020).
  18. The Election of the Parliament of the Slovak Republic 2010. Voting Results. Available at: (accessed 15.03.2020).
  19. The Election of the Parliament of the Slovak Republic 2012. Voting Results. Available at: (accessed 15.03.2020).
  20. Klyuchkovych A. Transition to Democracy in Slovakia: Dynamics and Contradictions of Socio-Political Transformations. Uzhhorod, UTDOR-SHARK, 2019. 416 p. (In Ukr.)
  21. Dudinska ., Cirner M. Development of the Party-Political Scene in Slovakia from 1989 to 2016 (In Slov.) [Political Parties and Elections: Ukrainian and World Practices (In Ukr.)]. Lvv, Prostr-M, 2017, pp. 308-326.
  22. Peter Pellegrini about Igor Matovic. Denník N, 01.03.2020. (In Slov.) Available at: (accessed 15.03.2020).
  23. The Elections to the Bodies of Self-Governing Regions 2017. Final Results. Available at: (accessed 15.03.2020).
  24. The Elections to the Bodies of Communal Self-Government 2018. Final Results. Available at: (accessed 15.03.2020).
  25. Gyarfasova O. Slovak Elections 2020: Confirmation of “Stable Instability” (6 March 2020) (In Slov.) Available at: (accessed 15.03.2020).
  26. Press release. Agentura FOCUS. 05.10.2018. Available at: (accessed 15.03.2020).

Registered in System SCIENCE INDEX

For citation:
Ostapets Y., Klyuchkovych A. Peculiarities of the Party System of Slovakia in the Context of Parliamentary Electrical Cycles of 20162020. World Eonomy and International Relations, 2021, vol. 65, no. 3, pp. 81-91.

Comments (0)

No comments

Add comment






Dear authors! Please note that in the VAK List of peer-reviewed scientific journals, in which the main scientific results of dissertations for the degree of candidate and doctor of sciences should be published for the “MEMO Journal” the following specialties are recorded:
economic sciences:
5.2.5. World Economy.
5.2.1. Economic Theory
5.2.3. Regional and Branch Economics
political sciences:
5.5.4. International Relations
5.5.1. History and Theory of Politics
5.5.2. Political Institutions, Processes, Technologies


Current Issue
2024, vol. 68, No. 2

Topical Themes of the Issue:

  • Fiscal Policy of Advanced Economies: Playing by the Rules?  
  • Iranian Development Model: State and Society Concept, Crises and Problems
  • Afghan-Pakistan Relations: Problems and Challenges in XXI Century
  • Climate Issues under Changing Geopolitical Conditions
Submit an Article
The Editorial Board invites authors to write analytical articles on the following topics:
  • changes in the processes of globalization in modern conditions
  • formation of the new world order
  • shifts in civilization at the stage of transition to a digital society

The editors are also interested in publishing synthesis articles / scientific reviews revealing the main trends in the development of certain regions of the world - Latin America, Africa, South Asia, etc.