Pandemic Testing of the Sustainability of Emerging Trends in Higher Education

72
DOI: 10.20542/0131-2227-2021-65-2-125-133
E. Antyukhova (e.antyukhova@gmail.com),
Moscow State Institute of International Relations (MGIMO University), 76, Prosp. Vernadskogo, Moscow, 119454, Russian Federation;
P. Kasatkin (pkas@mail.ru),
Moscow State Institute of International Relations (MGIMO University), 76, Prosp. Vernadskogo, Moscow, 119454, Russian Federation

Acknowledgements. The reported study was funded by RFBR according to the research project ¹ 20-04-60109.



Abstract

The article is devoted to objectifying the consequences of the emergency transition to distance education in universities and the global decline in academic mobility during the 2020 pandemic through the prism of active implementation of the methodology of success and excellence in education. The author highlighted the current trends in education by the beginning of the second decade of the 21st century: increasing inequality in the education system; the predominance of the idea and methodology of success and excellence; a stable division into global and regional; the replacement of the model of internalization of values with the model of knowledge generation; refusal of targeted state subsidies in favor of self-financing; precarization of the middle teaching class; demonstration of the superiority of digital solutions in the translation of knowledge; creation of outsourcing chains of interaction in the educational sphere (research centers – universities, universities – commercial publishing houses, schools – career guidance centers, universities – online plaftorms, etc.). The article analyzes the aspects of changes in the modern model of higher education, taking into account the desire to position universities in the world educational rankings. The basis for a discussion of the choice of development priorities has been formed, taking into account the growing dissatisfaction of teachers with the need to match the model of success and excellence in their educational and scientific activities. It was found that pre-pandemic trends in education were multidirectional, and their impact on education systems and learning models (global or regional) was more stimulating for development, rather than mandatory for survival. The crisis has divided the manifestations of the new into two components: necessary renewal and sufficient improvement to ensure stability. It is noted that education is characterized by a fairly conservative approach to the organization of the educational process, so the extreme transition to distance learning during the pandemic actually replaced the evolutionary period of transformation of education, which would have lasted for more than one decade. Academic mobility, which has become widespread in the world, but which was forced to temporarily stop its activity during the pandemic, in the new conditions can continue to contribute to improving the ranking of universities, but can also carry threats of precarization to their working teachers and become a source of social tension, which should be taken into account when developing university development programs in the context of universal digitalization. Conclusions are drawn about trends have been tested by the pandemic reality, which will determine the vector of future development of higher education.


Keywords

education, methods of success and excellence, educational ratings, precarization, internalization of values, digitalization, online learning, mobility


REFERENCES

  1. Huang R., Tlili A., Chang T. et al. Disrupted Ñlasses, Undisrupted Learning During COVID‑19 Outbreak in China: Application of Open Educational Practices and Resources. Smart Learning Environments, 2020, vol. 7, article no. 19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-020-00125-8 Available at: https://slejournal.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s40561-020-00125-8 (accessed 09.07.2020).
  2. Xiao Y., Fan Z. 10 Technology Trends to Watch in the COVID19 Pandemic. The World Economic Forum COVID Action Platform. Available at: https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2020/04/10-technology-trends-coronavirus-covid19-pandemic-robotics-telehealth/ (accessed 09.07.2020).
  3. Ghosh I. Chart: Which Universities Have the Richest Graduates? Available at: https://www.visualcapitalist.com/chart-which-universities-have-the-richest-graduates/ (accessed 09.07.2020).
  4. Lu M. The Impact of International Students on the U.S. Economy. Available at: https://www.visualcapitalist.com/international-students-impact-u-s-economy/ (accessed 09.07.2020).
  5. Coco G., Lagravinese R., Resce G. Beyond the Weights: a Multicriteria Approach to Evaluate Inequality in Education. The Journal of Economic Inequality, 2020, no. 18, pp. 469-489. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10888-020-09449-4 Available at: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10888-020-09449-4 (accessed 09.07.2020).
  6. COVID19 and Human Development: Assessing the Crisis, Envisioning the Recovery. United Nations Development Programme – Human Development Reports. Available at: http://hdr.undp.org/en/hdp-covid (accessed 09.07.2020).
  7. Hogan A., Thompson G. Commercialization in Education. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Education. December, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190264093.013.180 Available at: http://education.oxfordre.com/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780190264093.001.0001/acrefore-9780190264093-e-180?print=pdf (accessed 09.07.2020).
  8. Selingo J. The Third Education Revolution. March 22, 2018. Available at: https://www.theatlantic.com/education/archive/2018/03/the-third-education-revolution/556091/ (accessed 09.07.2020).
  9. Anikina E.A., Ivankina L.I., Silifonova E.V. Problemy i perspektivy dostupnosti vysshego obrazovaniya v usloviyah sovremennyh preobrazovanii v Rossii [Problems and Prospects of Accessibility of Higher Education in the Conditions of Modern Transformations in Russia]. Tomsk, STT Publishing, 2016. 162 p.
  10. Osipova N.G. Rol’ klassicheskogo universiteta v vosproizvodstve elity obshchestva [The Role of Classical University in the Reproduction of Society’s Elite]. Bulletin of the Moscow University. Series 18. Sociology and Political Science, 2017, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 9-31.
  11. Itskovich G. Model’ troinoi spirali [Model of the Triple Helix]. Innovacii, 2011, no. 4 (150), pp. 5-10.
  12. Lytras M.D., Daniela L., Visvizi A. Enhancing Knowledge Discovery and Innovation in the Digital Era. Hershey, IGI Global, 2018. 363 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-4191-2
  13. Stending G. Prekariat: novyi opasnyi klass [Precariat: a New Dangerous Class]. Moscow, Ad Marginem Press, 2014. 400 p.
  14. Busygina I.M. Prekariat: novyi vyzov dlya sovremennykh obshchestv i ego kontseptualizatsiya (Razmyshleniya nad knigoi G. Stendinga) [Precariat: a New Challenge for Modern Societies and its Conceptualization (Reflections on the Book by G. Standing)]. Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost’, 2016, no. 3, pp. 34-47.
  15. Márquez-Ramos L., Mourelle E. Selecting a Suitable Approach to Analyze the Future of Higher Education. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2016, vol. 228, pp. 86-91. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.07.013
  16. Lynch K. Control by Numbers: New Managerialism and Ranking in Higher Education. Critical Studies in Education, 2015, vol. 56, no. 2, pp. 190-207.
  17. Kasatkin P.I., Koval’chuk Yu.A., Stepnov I.M. Rol’ sovremennykh universitetov v formirovanii tsifrovoi povyshatel’noi volny dlinnykh tsiklov Kondrat’eva [The Modern Universities Role in the Formation of the Digital Wave of Kondratiev’s Long Cycles]. Voprosy Ekonomiki, 2019, no. 12, pp. 123-140. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2019-12-123-140
  18. Ivancheva M. Prekarizatsiya, tsifrovizatsiya i autsorsing. Tendentsii razvitiya truda v sovremennoi akademii i prizyv k profsoyuzam [Precarization, Digitalization and Outsourcing. Trends in the Development of Labor in the Modern Academy and the Call to Trade Unions]. 20.04.2020. Available at: https://doxajournal.ru/uni/precarity_ivancheva (accessed 09.07.2020).
  19. Ivancheva M. Precarización y digitalización en el trabajo academic o por qué deberían los sindicatos llamar a la huelga. Libre Pensamiento, 2020, no. 101, pp. 19-27. Available at: https://www.academia.edu/42082178/Precarizaci%C3%B3n_y_digitalizaci%C3%B3n_en_el_trabajo_acad%C3%A9mico_o_por_qu%C3%A9_deber%C3%ADan_los_sindicatos_llamar_a_la_huelga (accessed 09.07.2020).
  20. Swartz R., Ivancheva Ì., Czerniewicz L., Morris N.P. Between a Rock and a Hard Place: Dilemmas Regarding the Purpose of Public Universities in South Africa. Higher Education, 2019, vol. 77, no. 4, pp. 567-583. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-018-0291-9 Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/325795294_Between_a_rock_and_a_hard_place_Dilemmas_regarding_the_purpose_of_public_universities_in_South_Africa (accessed 09.07.2020).

Registered in System SCIENCE INDEX

For citation:
Antyukhova E., Kasatkin P. Pandemic Testing of the Sustainability of Emerging Trends in Higher Education. World Eñonomy and International Relations, 2021, vol. 65, No 2, pp. 125-133. https://doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227-2021-65-2-125-133



Comments (0)

No comments

Add comment







Indexed

 

 

 

 

Current Issue
2022, vol. 66, No. 6
Topical Themes of the Issue:
  •  China on the Eve of the 20th CPC Congress 
  •  2020 Elections: “Stress Test” for American Federalism 
  •  The Chancellor O. Scholz’s Policy in the Context of Global Transformation 
  •  The EU China Policy in the Making: The Role of Central and Eastern Europe 
  •  Pan-European Political Space: From Idea to Reality
View This Issue (2022, vol. 66, No. 6)
Submit an Article
NEW SECTION

In response to the challenges of our time the Editorial board continues to open new thematic rubrics:

“World Energy Sector after Pandemic”. We plan to publish articles presenting in-depth analysis of influence of Pandemic on the global energy sector and forecasts of further developments in its various branches.