The Trajectory of Development of Social Partnership

57
DOI: 10.20542/0131-2227-2021-65-2-117-124
A. Fedchenko (faa1711@yandex.ru),
Voronezh State University, 40, Holzunova Str., Voronezh, 394068, Russian Federation;
E. Dashkova (dashkova 82@mail.ru),
Voronezh State University, 40, Holzunova Str., Voronezh, 394068, Russian Federation;
N. Dorokhova (nv_dorohova@mail.ru),
Voronezh State University of Engineering Technologies, 19, Prospect Revolyutsii, 394000, Voronezh, Russian Federation

Abstract. Profound changes in the social and labor sphere are followed by both emergence of the new opportunities associated with the development of flexible forms of employment, expansion of opportunities for employment, humanization and digitization of work, and the emergence of new threats: the occurrence of such phenomena as employment preñarization, growth of the informal components in the labor relations, distribution of practice of bringing the labor relations to the civil legal area, and so on. As a result, controversies between the main participants of the social and labor relations grow. An effective and worldwide recognized mechanism of resolving them is the social partnership which has the deep historical roots going back to outstanding thinkers of antiquity. During later historical periods the ideas of social partnership gained development in the works of domestic and foreign scientists, public and statesmen. In the Russian Federation social partnership has the specific trajectory of development which has developed under the influence of both historical and modern factors. The carried-out analysis allowed to reveal the following problems of formation and development of the social partnership system in the Russian Federation: sociocultural features, weakness of the trade-union movement, development of non-standard forms of employment, differentiation of the income of the population, low interest of the government. The designated problems which are slowing down the process of transition of the social and labor relations to partner type are manifested both on federal, and on regional levels. To research the extent of development of collective contract regulation and identification of the problems which take place in the system of social partnership at the local level sociological survey of workers of a number of the Russian organizations was performed. As a result, it was found that collective contract regulation of the social and labor relations in the Russian Federation at the local level demands improvement. The main problems of system of social partnership at the local level are: weak knowledge of trade-union members concerning the activity of those organizations, especially at the sectoral, regional, and territorial levels; unwillingness to resolve the issues of social and labor regulation at the organizational level without governmental support and lack of the developed practice of conducting collective negotiations; passivity and weak motivation of trade-union members in protection of their labor rights; weak feasibility of practical implementation of the collective agreement provisions. The results of the theoretical and empirical researches allow to predict the trajectory of further development of social partnership consisting in strengthening of the social component due to the extension of the database concerning the problems of the social partners.

Keywords: Labor, social and labor relations, social partnership, tripartism, trade unions, Voronezh oblast


REFERENCES

  1. Kosack W. Berliner Hefte zur ägyptischen Literatur 2 Teil, Basel, Christoph Brunner, 2015. 415 p.
  2. Beiner R.S. Civil Religion: A Dialogue in the History of Political Philosophy. Cambridge University Press, 2010. 383 p.
  3. Confucius. New Philosophical Encyclopedia. In Four Volumes. Moscow, Mysl’, 2010 (In Russ.) Available at: http://enc.biblioclub.ru/Termin/174677_Konfuciy (accessed 27.03.2020).
  4. Aristotle. New Philosophical Encyclopedia. In Four Volumes. Moscow, Mysl’, 2010 (In Russ.) Available at: http://enc.biblioclub.ru/Termin/173338_Aristotel (accessed 27.03.2020).
  5. Cicero. New Philosophical Encyclopedia. In Four Volumes. Moscow, Mysl’, 2010 (In Russ.) Available at: http://enc.biblioclub.ru/Termin/176842_Ciceron (accessed 27.03.2020).
  6. Mill J.S. Sistema logiki sillogisticheskoi i induktivnoi [System of Logic, Ratiocinative and Inductive]. Moscow, LENAND, 2011. 832 p.
  7. Marx K., Engels F. Manifest Kommunisticheskoi partii [Communist manifesto]. Sochineniya [Essays]. T. 4. Moscow, Izdatel’stvo politicheskoi literatury, 1955, pp. 419-459.
  8. Rousseau J.-J. Traktaty [Treatises]. Moscow, Nauka, 1969. 704 p.
  9. Antip’ev A.G. Sotsial’noe partnerstvo v sovremennoi Rossii: sostoyanie i problemy [Social Partnership in Modern Russia: Status and Problems]. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta, 2010, iss. 1 (7). pp. 57-63.
  10. Baranov Yu.V. Problemy profsoyuznogo dvizheniya v Rossii [Problems of the trade Union movement in Russia]. Omskii nauchnyi vestnik, 2012, no. 2 (106), pp. 71-73.
  11. Official website of the Federal state statistics service (In Russ.) Available at: http://www.gks.ru (accessed 10.09.2019).
  12. Manuilova A. Nestandartnaya zanyatost’ beret svoe [Precarious work takes its toll]. Kommersant, 17.10.2017.
  13. Dashkova E.S., Zvyagintseva V.E. Problema razvitiya sotsial’nogo partnerstva na lokal’nom urovne [The Problem of Developing Social Partnership at the Local Level]. Sovremennye problemy ekonomiki i menedzhmenta. Vypusk, posvyashchennyi 100-letiyu MOT, 100-letiyu VGU. Materialy mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii [Modern problems of economics and management. Issue dedicated to the 100th anniversary of the ILO, the 100th anniversary of the VSU. Materials of the international scientific and practical conference]. Voronezh, VGTU, 2017, pp. 103-106.

Registered in System SCIENCE INDEX

For citation:
Fedchenko A., Dashkova E., Dorokhova N. The Trajectory of Development of Social Partnership. World Eñonomy and International Relations, 2021, vol. 65, no. 2, pp. 117-124. https://doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227-2021-65-2-117-124



Comments (0)

No comments

Add comment







Indexed

 

 

 

 

Dear authors! Please note that in the VAK List of peer-reviewed scientific journals, in which the main scientific results of dissertations for the degree of candidate and doctor of sciences should be published for the “MEMO Journal” the following specialties are recorded:
economic sciences:
5.2.5. World Economy.
5.2.1. Economic Theory
5.2.3. Regional and Branch Economics
political sciences:
5.5.4. International Relations
5.5.1. History and Theory of Politics
5.5.2. Political Institutions, Processes, Technologies

 

Current Issue
2025, vol. 69, No. 2
Topical Themes of the Issue:
  • Battle of Titans: Structural Shifts in MNCs Global Production
  • Features of Collective Securitization in the European Union
  • Terrorist Networks of the “Global Jihad” in the 2020s
  • At Post-Soviet Space
Announcement

Dear authors of the journal!

Please note that the author's copies of the issues in which your texts are published are kept in the editorial office for no more than one year. After this period expires, the editorial office has the right to dispose of unclaimed copies at its own discretion.

 

Submit an Article
INVITATION FOR PUBLICATION
The Editorial Board invites authors to write analytical articles on the following topics:
  • changes in the processes of globalization in modern conditions
  • formation of the new world order
  • shifts in civilization at the stage of transition to a digital society

The editors are also interested in publishing synthesis articles / scientific reviews revealing the main trends in the development of certain regions of the world - Latin America, Africa, South Asia, etc.