“Islamic Factor” and Socio-Political Debate on Immigration in Modern France

97
DOI: 10.20542/0131-2227-2021-65-11-97-105
N. Lapina, lapina@inion.ru
Institute of Scientific Information on Social Sciences, Russian Academy of Sciences (INION RAN), 51/21, Nakhimovskii Prosp., Moscow, 117997, Russian Federation.

Received 01.04.2021.

Abstract. The article considers the place of Muslims in the socio-political life of modern France. The heterogeneity of the Muslim community, different trends within it, the attitude of French Muslims to religion and its place in life are shown. It is noted that in recent years, French Muslims, especially young ones, have become more religious and more often observe the norms of the Koran. There is a growing number of Muslims who believe that the French secular state must adapt to Islamic norms of life. Against this background, especially in connection with the terrorist attacks that have not stopped since 2015, French society is growing distrust of Muslims. Most of the French perceive Islam as a “threat to the Republic”. These sentiments are reflected in the socio-political discussion around issues related to immigration and the “Islamic factor”, which involves well-known French intellectuals, writers and scientists. In the discussion, the supporters of “happy globalization”, who believe that France will be saved by open borders (including President E. Macron and his followers), are opposed by “declinists”, who are afraid of “dissolving” France in the global world. Some advocate the recognition of communitarist movements, some defend the principles of French and/or Muslim identity, others defend multiculturalism, and yet others defend the Republican principles of “one nation” and the secular school. Recently, the discussion has included topics such as racism/anti-racism, the colonial past and anti-colonialism. The country approves a “cancel culture”, which came from the United States and is new to France. An intolerant “cancel culture” contributes to radicalization of the discussion. Another new phenomenon is “anti-white racism” in the French university environment, evident in the fact that meetings are held in universities, attending which is prohibited for “whites”. The peculiarity of the socio-political discussion today is that the number of its participants has increased dramatically. With the expansion of the circle of interested parties and the emergence of new platforms for discussion (social networks, messengers), it has acquired a new quality, and its tone is becoming more aggressive and irreconcilable.

Keywords: muslim community, Islam, France, “islamogoshism”, terrorism, public discussion, “cancel culture”


REFERENCES

1. Lapina N.Yu. Society of Lost Illusions. Current Problems of Europe, 2021, no. 3, ðð. 85-112. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.31249/ape/2021.03.04

2. Kepel G. Les banlieux de l’Islam. Naissance d’une religion en France. Paris, Ed. du Seuil, 1987. 424 p.

3. Kudriyashova I.V. Muslim Political Identity: Unity and Diversity. Identity: the Individual, Society, and Politics. An Encyclopedia. Semenenko I.S., ed. Moscow, Izdatelstvo “Ves Mir”, 2017, pp. 228-241. (In Russ.)

4. Koller F. Gilles Kepel: “Le 13 novembre? Le resultat d’une faillite des elites politiques francaises”. Le Temps, 26.11.2015. Available at: https://www.letemps.ch/monde/gilles-kepel-13-novembre-resultat-dune-faillite-elites-politiques-francaises (accessed 26.11.2015).

5. Fregosi F. Formes de mobilisation collective des musulmans en France et en Europe. Revue internationale de politique comparee, 2009, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 41-61. Available at: https://www.cairn.info/revue-internationale-de-politique-comparee-2009-1-page-41.htm (accessed 24.06.2009).

6. Kepel G. “Eviter une guerre entre l’Arabie et l’Iran”. Available at: https://www.herodote.net/Gilles_Kepel_Eviter_une_guerre_entre_l_Arabie_et_l_Iran_-article-1693.php (accessed 26.11.2017).

7. Les musulmans en France, 30 ans apres l’affaire des foulards de Creil. Le Point, 23.09.2019. Available at: https://www.ifop.com/publication/les-musulmans-en-france-30-ans-apres-laffaire-des-foulards-de-creil/ (accessed 30.09.2019).

8. Tableaux de l’economie francaise. Paris, INSEE, 2019. Available at: https://www.insee.fr/fr/statistiques/3676614?sommaire=3696937 (accessed 29.12.2020).

9. Petreault Ñl. Pour 57% des jeunes musulmans, la charia plus importante que la Republique. Le Point, 05.11.2020. Available at: https://www.lepoint.fr/politique/pour-57-des-jeunes-musulmans-la-charia-plus-importante-que-la-republique-05-11-2020-2399511_20.php (accessed 17.11.2020).

10. Dolgov B.V. Moslem Renaissance in France: Results and prospects. Current Problems of Europe, 2015, no. 4, ðð. 112-140. (In Russ.)

11. En qu(o)i les Francais ont-ils confiance aujourd’hui? Le Barometre de la confiance politique. Paris, Sciences Po/CEVIPOF, 2020. Vague 11. Available at: https://www.sciencespo.fr/cevipof/sites/sciencespo.fr.cevipof/files/OpinionWay%20pour%20le%20CEVIPOF-Baromètre%20de%20la%20confiance%20en%20politique%20-%20vague11%20-%20Comparaison-1.pdf (accessed 25.04.2020).

12. En qu(o)i les Francais ont-ils confiance aujourd’hui? Le Barometre de la confiance politique. Paris, Sciences Po/CEVIPOF,

2021. Vague 12. Available at: https://www.sciencespo.fr/cevipof/sites/sciencespo.fr.cevipof/files/OpinionWay%20pour%20le%20CEVIPOF-Baromètre%20de%20la%20confiance%20en%20politique%20-%20vague12%20-%20Rapport%20international%20(1).pdf (accessed 15.04.2021).

13. Gordon A.V. The Chinese Communities of Paris: To Integrate While Preserving Their Identity. Current Problems of Europe, 2021, no. 3, ðð. 136-163. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.31249/ape/2021.03.06

14. Fourquet J. L’archipel francais. Naissance d’une nation multiple et divisee. Paris, Seuil, 2019. 383 p.

15. Bourmeau S. Scare Tactics: Michel Houellebecq Defends His Controversial New Book. The Paris Review, 02.01.2015. Available at: https://www.theparisreview.org/blog/2015/01/02/scare-tactics-michel-houellebecq-on-his-new-book/ (accessed 15.03.2015).

16. Squierrel M.W. Le seisme. Marine Le Pen presidente. Paris, Robert Laffont, 2016. 234 p.

17. Wieviorka M. Multiculturalisme: le debat est-il clos? 03.03.2015. Available at: https://wieviorka.hypotheses.org/351 (accessed 10.03.2015).

18. Lang J. La langue arabe, tresor de France. Paris, Le Cherche Midi, 2020. 334 ð.

19. Nazaret A. Jean-Christophe Cambadelis au JDD: “Pour 2022, je ne me sens pas hors-jeu”. Journal du dimanche, 14.11.2020. Available at: https://www.lejdd.fr/Politique/jean-christophe-cambadelis-au-jdd-pour-2022-je-ne-me-sens-pas-hors-jeu-4005590 (accessed 28.12.2020).

20. Carriat J., Darame M. “Il faut agir et il est deja tard”: la droite lance les grandes manoeuvres contre l’islamisme. Le Monde, 20.10.2020. Available at: https://www.lemonde.fr/politique/article/2020/10/20/il-faut-agir-et-il-est-deja-tard-la-droitelance-les-grandes-man-uvres-contre-l-islamisme_6056686_823448.html (accessed 02.01.2020).

21. Bourmaud D. Two Frances through the Prism of Social Movements. Current Problems of Europe, 2021, no. 3, ðð. 113-135. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.31249/ape/2021.03.05

22. Peyrefitte À. C’etait de Gaulle. Paris, Editions de Fallois/Fayard, 1994. Vol. 1. 435 ð.

23. Prokhorenko I.L. Diasporas and Diasporas “Worlds”. Identity: the Individual, Society, and Politics. An Encyclopedia. Semenenko I. S., ed. Moscow, Izdatelstvo ‘Ves Mir’, 2017, pp. 432-439. (In Russ.)

24. Deputy Director of IMEMO: the French Identity Is Not Interested for Refugees. Irina Semenenko Spoke about New Security Challenges in Europe. Interfaõ, 11.11.2020. (In Russ.) Available at: https://www.interfax.ru/world/736560 (accessed 11.12.2020).


Registered in System SCIENCE INDEX

For citation:
Lapina N. “Islamic Factor” and Socio-Political Debate on Immigration in Modern France. World Eñonomy and International Relations, 2021, vol. 65, no. 11, pp. 97-105. https://doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227-2021-65-11-97-105



Comments (0)

No comments

Add comment







Indexed

 

 

 

 

Dear authors! Please note that in the VAK List of peer-reviewed scientific journals, in which the main scientific results of dissertations for the degree of candidate and doctor of sciences should be published for the “MEMO Journal” the following specialties are recorded:
economic sciences:
5.2.5. World Economy.
5.2.1. Economic Theory
5.2.3. Regional and Branch Economics
political sciences:
5.5.4. International Relations
5.5.1. History and Theory of Politics
5.5.2. Political Institutions, Processes, Technologies

 

Current Issue
2025, vol. 69, No. 4
Topical Themes of the Issue:
  • Entrenchment of Neo-Protectionism in Global Economy of 21st Century 
  • Institutional Dynamics of Fiscal Integration in the European Union
  • Factors of Latin American Countries’ Interest in BRICS
  • “China: Bitter Dish with Complex Garnish”
Announcement

Dear authors of the journal!

Please note that the author's copies of the issues in which your texts are published are kept in the editorial office for no more than one year. After this period expires, the editorial office has the right to dispose of unclaimed copies at its own discretion.

 

Submit an Article
INVITATION FOR PUBLICATION
The Editorial Board invites authors to write analytical articles on the following topics:
  • changes in the processes of globalization in modern conditions
  • formation of the new world order
  • shifts in civilization at the stage of transition to a digital society

The editors are also interested in publishing synthesis articles / scientific reviews revealing the main trends in the development of certain regions of the world - Latin America, Africa, South Asia, etc.