Goals of Regional Integration: a Modern Understanding

352
DOI: 10.20542/0131-2227-2021-65-10-5-14
O. Butorina (butorina@ieras.ru),
Institute of Europe, Russian Academy of Sciences, 11-3, Mokhovaya Str., Moscow, 125009 Russian Federation

Received 27.05.2021.

Abstract. To date, an extensive scholarly literature on regional integration has paid little attention to the question of its goals. However, it is fundamental for deeper understanding the nature of the phenomena and for the decision-making process at the national, regional and international levels. The objective of this article is to reveal declared and de facto pursued goals of regional integration, and to arrange them into a coherent system. To accomplish this task this paper first provides an overview of official goals stated in the founding agreements of various regional groups, formed by developed and developing countries in Europe, Asia and Americas. Then the question of goals is explored through the lenses of the key theories of regional economic integration and their practical application. Later a similar exercise is carried out in the context of political integration theories. Finally, based on the comprehensive analysis of official declarations, major theories of regional integration and practical developments in various regions and policy fields this paper categorizes main goals of regional integration into four groups compiled along two axes: internal and external, positive and negative. They form a matrix, which endows researchers with new optics. Further exploration of different types of integration goals, especially negatively oriented ones, has a potential to expand the research program of integration studies. They may also shed light on the debate over why regional blocks of developing countries stall at the level of free trade zones or why the creation of the European monetary union did not help the EU to move to the true political union.

Keywords: regional integration, integration theory, EAEU, MERCOSUR, ASEAN, USMCA, RCEP, European Union


REFERENCES

1. Treaty on the Eurasian Economic Union, 2014. (In Russ.)

2. Supreme Eurasian Economic Council. On Strategic Directions for the Development of Eurasian Economic Integration until 2025. Decision no. 12, December 11, 2020. (In Russ.)]

3. The ASEAN Charter. Jakarta, ASEAN Secretariat, November 2020.

4. Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement, 2020. Available at: https://rcepsec.org/legal-text/ (accessed 13.05.2021).

5. Tratado para la constitucion de un Mercado Comun entre la Republica Argentina, la Republica Federativa del Brasil, la Republica del Paraguay y la Republica Oriental del Uruguay, 1991.

6. Consolidated Text of the Treaty of the Southern African Development Community, 2014. Available at: https://www.sadc.int/files/5314/4559/5701/Consolidated_Text_of_the_SADC_Treaty_-_scanned_21_October_2015.pdf (accessed 13.05.2021).

7. Consolidated Version of the Treaty on European Union. Official Journal of the European Union, vol. 53, 30.03.2010, C83/15.

8. Agreement between the United States of America, the United Mexican States, and Canada. Preamble. Available at: https://ustr.gov/trade-agreements/free-trade-agreements/united-states-mexico-canada-agreement/agreement-between (accessed 13.05.2021).

9. Schiff M., Winters A. L. Regional Integration and Development. Washington, World Bank, 2003. 321 p.

10. Golovnin M., Zakharov A., Ushkalova D. Economic Integration: Lessons for the Post-Soviet Space. Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya, 2016, vol. 60, no. 4, pp. 61-69. (In Russ.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227-2016-60-4-61-69

11. Verdun A., Tobias A., eds. Mapping European Integration. Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan, 2013. 277 p.

12. Mendes M.A.J. The Contribution of the European Community to Economic Growth. An Assessment of the First 25 Years. Journal of Common Market Studies, vol. 24, no. 4, June 1986, pp. 261-277.

13. Tinbergen J. International Economic Integration. Amsterdam, Elsevier, 1954. 191 p.

14. Shishkov Yu. Integration and Disintegration: Concept Correction. Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya, 1993, no. 10, pp. 50-68. (In Russ.)

15. Viner J. The Customs Union Issue. New York, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, 1950. 221 p.

16. Ushkalova D.I., Golovnin M.Yu. Theoretical approaches to the study of international economic integration. Moscow, Institut ekonomiki RAN, 2011. 44 p. (In Russ.)

17. Corden W.M. Economies of Scale and Customs Union Theory. Journal of Political Economy, 1972, vol. 80, no. 3, pp. 465-475.

18. Pelkmans J. Economic Theories of Integration Revised. Journal of Common Market Studies, 1980, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 333-354. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.1980.tb00851.x

19. Commission of the European Communities. Europe 1992. The Overall Challenge. Brussels, April 13, 1988, no. 524 final. Available at: http://aei.pitt.edu/3813/1/3813.pdf (accessed 13.05.2021).

20. Henrekson M., Torstensson J., Torstensson R. Growth Effects of European Integration. European Economic Review, 1997, vol. 41, no. 8, pp. 1537-1557. DOI: 10.1016/S0014-2921(97)00063-9

21. Pelkmans J. The Economics of Single Market Regulation. Verdun A., Tovias A., eds. Mapping European Economic Integration. Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan, 2013, pp. 79-104. DOI: 10.1057/9781137317360

22. Pelkmans J. The Single Market Remains the Decisive Power of the EU. CEPS Policy Priorities for 2019–2024, October 18, 2019.

23. Jones E. The Economic Mythology of European Integration. Journal of Common Market Studies, 2010, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 89-109. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-5965.2009.02043.x

24. Briceno R.J. Las teorias de la integracion regional: mas alla del eurocentrismo. Bogota, Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia: Centro de Pensamiento Global, 2018. 224 p. DOI: 10.16925/9789587601015

25. Gavin B., De Lombaerde P. Economic Theories of Regional Integration. Farrell M., Hottne B., Van Langenhove L., eds. Global Politics of Regionalism. Theory and Practice. London, Pluto Press, 2005, pp. 69-83.

26. Mundell R.. A Theory of Optimum Currency Areas. The American Economic Review, 1961, vol. 51, no. 4, pp. 657-665.

27. Butorina O.V. An Economic History of the Euro. Moscow, Ves’ mir, 2020. 576 p. (In Russ.)

28. Butorina O.V. Euro as an instrument of integration: 20 years’ experience. Sovremennaya Evropa, 2019, no. 1, pp. 14-26. (In Russ.) DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15211/soveurope120191426

29. Commission of the European Communities. One Market, One Money. An Evaluation of Potential Benefits and Costs of Forming an Economic and Monetary Union, European Economy, 1990, no. 44. 341 p.

30. European Commission. One Currency for Europe. The Green Paper on the Practical Arrangements for the Introduction of the Single Currency, May 31, 1995. COM, no. 333 final. 8 p.

31. Manners I., Whitman R. Another Theory Is Possible: Dissident Voices in Theorising Europe. Journal of Common Market Studies, 2016, special iss., pp. 3-18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12332

32. Schmitter Ph.C. Neo-Neofunctionalism. Wiener A., Diez T., eds. European Integration Theory. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2004, pp. 45-74.

33. Nozdrev S. Financial Integration of Asian Countries: Regional Aspect. Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya, 2019, vol. 63, no. 12, pp. 23-31. (In Russ.) Available at: https://doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227-2019-63-12-23-31

34. Potemkina O. Multilevel governance of the EU migration policy. Sovremennaya Evropa, 2020, no. 2 (95), pp. 100-110. (In Russ.) DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15211/soveurope22020100110

35. European Commission. Efficiency, Stability and Equity. A Strategy for the Evolution of the Economic System of the European Community. Report of a study group appointed by the Commission of the European Communities, and presented by T. Padoa-Schioppa, April 1987. 71 p.

36. Genschel Ph., Jachtenfuchs M. From Market Integration to Core State Powers: the Eurozone Crisis, the Refugee Crisis and Integration Theory. Journal of Common Market Studies, 2017, vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 178-196. DOI: 10.1111/jcms.12654

37. Borko Yu.A. From the European idea – to United Europe. Moscow, Delovaya literatura, 2003. 464 p. (In Russ.)

38. Rosamond B. Theories of European Integration Palgrave. New York, St. Martin’s Press, 2000. 245 p.

39. Baranovsky V.G. Political integration in Western Europe. Some questions of theory and practice. Moscow, Nauka, 1983. 264 p. (In Russ.)

40. Konig J. The EU Index of Integration Effort. De Lombaerde Ph., Saucedo A., Edgar J., eds. Indicator-Based Monitoring of Regional Economic Integration. Fourth World Report on Regional Integration. Berlin, Springer, 2017, pp. 73-94.

41. Benetrix A., Walti S. Indicators of Regional Financial Integration. De Lombaerde Ph., Flores R.G., Iaparde P.L., Schulz M., eds. The Regional Integration Manual. Quantitative and Qualitative Methods. London, New York, Routledge, 2011, pp. 124-146.

42. Howarth D., Quaglia L. One Money, Two Markets? EMU at Twenty and European Financial Market Integration. Journal of European Integration, 2020, vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 433-448. DOI: 10.1080/07036337.2020.1730346

43. Hooghe L., Marks G. A Postfunctionalist Theory of European Integration: From Permissive Consensus to Constraining Dissensus. British Journal of Political Science, 2009, vol. 39, iss. 1, pp. 1-23. DOI: 10.1017/S0007123408000409

44. Hooghe L., Marks G. Grand Theories of European Integration in the Twenty-first Century. Journal of European Public Policy, 2019, no. 8, pp. 1113-1133. DOI: 10.1080/13501763.2019.1569711

45. Semenenko I.S. Memory politics in the European Union: in search for common landmarks. Izvestiya AltGU. Istoricheskie nauki i arkheologiya, 2020, no. 6 (116), pp. 62-67. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.14258/izvasu(2020)6-10

46. Semenenko I. History on the frontline of identity politics. Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya, 2018, vol. 62, no. 11, pp. 65-76. (In Russ.) Available at: https://doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227-2018-62-11-65-76

47. Krapohl S. Integration Theory and the New Regionalism. Krapohl S., ed. Regional Integration in the Global South. External Influence on Economic Cooperation in ASEAN, MERCOSUR and SADC. Amsterdam, Palgrave Macmillan, 2017, pp. 1-29.

48. Komkova E. USMCA instead of NAFTA. Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya, 2019, vol. 63, no. 4, pp. 50-58. (In Russ.) Available at: https://doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227-2019-63-4-50-58

49. Press conference of President Delors proceeding the European Council in Brussels (11–12 February 1988). 10 February 1988. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/bio_88_45 (accessed 13.05.2021).

50. Arbatova N. Will European Union Become a Global Power Center? (Trends, opportunities, risks). Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya, 2020, vol. 64, no. 6, pp. 51-65. (In Russ.) Available at: https://doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227-2020-64-6-51-65

51. Afontsev S.A. Eurasian Economic Union: Integration Development Scenarios. Byudzhet, 2019, no. 1, pp. 80-83. (In Russ.)

52. Abramova I.O. Africa in the Modern Model of the World Order: A Powerful Player or an Outsider? Kontury global’nykh transformatsii: politika, ekonomika, pravo, 2018, vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 6-21. (In Russ.) Available at: https://doi.org/10.23932/2542-0240-2018-11-5-6-21

53. Baikov A.A. Comparative Integration: experience and patterns of integration in the United Europe and Asia Pacific. Moscow, Aspekt Press, 2012. 256 p. (In Russ.)

54. Ackoff R.L. The Art of Problem Solving. New York, John Wiley & Sons, 1978. 214 p.

55. Vinocurov E., Libman A. Eurasian Integration: Challenges of Transcontinental Regionalism. Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan, 2012. 267 p.

56. Gromyko Al.A. (Dez)integration processes: the crisis of the “global world”. Obozrevatel’, 2020, no. 7, pp. 24-38. (In Russ.)


Registered in System SCIENCE INDEX

For citation:
Butorina O. Goals of Regional Integration: a Modern Understanding. World Eonomy and International Relations, 2021, vol. 65, no. 10, pp. 5-14. https://doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227-2021-65-10-5-14



Comments (0)

No comments

Add comment







Indexed

 

 

 

 

Dear authors! Please note that in the VAK List of peer-reviewed scientific journals, in which the main scientific results of dissertations for the degree of candidate and doctor of sciences should be published for the “MEMO Journal” the following specialties are recorded:
economic sciences:
5.2.5. World Economy.
5.2.1. Economic Theory
5.2.3. Regional and Branch Economics
political sciences:
5.5.4. International Relations
5.5.1. History and Theory of Politics
5.5.2. Political Institutions, Processes, Technologies

 

Current Issue
2024, vol. 68, No. 5
Topical Themes of the Issue:
  • Are There Any Ways to Break Through the Korean Nuclear Impasse?
  • Contemporary U.S. Taiwan Policy: Balancing on the Edge
  • The Gulf Monarchies’ Vision of the Global Order Transformations and the Russian Place in It
  • At Post-Soviet Space
Submit an Article
INVITATION FOR PUBLICATION
The Editorial Board invites authors to write analytical articles on the following topics:
  • changes in the processes of globalization in modern conditions
  • formation of the new world order
  • shifts in civilization at the stage of transition to a digital society

The editors are also interested in publishing synthesis articles / scientific reviews revealing the main trends in the development of certain regions of the world - Latin America, Africa, South Asia, etc.