The Countries of Southeast Asia and the Chinese Initiative Belt and Road: a Model of Interaction

DOI: 10.20542/0131-2227-2021-65-10-91-102
N. Rogozhina (,
Primakov National Research Institute of World Economy and International Relations, Russian Academy of Sciences (IMEMO), 23, Profsoyuznaya Str., Moscow, 117997, Russian Federation

Received 23.03.2021.

Acknowledgements. The article was prepared within the project “Post-crisis world order: challenges and technologies, competition and cooperation” supported by the grant from Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation program for research projects in priority areas of scientific and technological development (agreement 075-15-2020-783).

Abstract. The choice of the countries of Southeast Asia as an example for analyzing the nature of interaction between developing countries and China within the framework of the Belt and Road Initiative is not accidental. The very logic of China’s stated goals of gaining dominant positions in the world economy and politics makes it inevitable that the countries of Southeast Asia located in geographic proximity to it are included in its long-term economic and political plans. The question, however, is to what extent do they meet the interests of the Southeast Asian countries themselves? The solution to this question is the main subject of research in the article. There are objective prerequisites for mutually beneficial cooperation. The Belt and Road projects are viewed by China as a tool for economic expansion into the region with the prospect of taking a leading position there, using the interest of Southeast Asian countries in the inflow of foreign investment to create modern infrastructure, the lack of which narrows their opportunities for further economic growth, maintaining competitiveness and developing integration ties within ASEAN Community. Expert assessments made by international organizations confirm the positive impact of OBOR projects on the economic development of Southeast Asian countries and although today it is too early to draw any conclusions, since the initiative is only at the initial stage of its implementation in the region, nevertheless the case studies presented in the article indicate a mismatch in the positions of the parties on a number of issues related to the financing of projects, their lack of transparency. non-compliance with environmental and social requirements. The support of the initiative on the part of the Southeast Asian countries does not automatically mean their acceptance of the terms of the agreements proposed by China, which are far from always consistent with their national interests and give rise to fears in society about its expansionist intentions. Therefore, in many Southeast Asian countries, participation in OBOR projects is turning into a subject of political discourse, which reflects the presence of disagreements in society and confrontation of interests regarding the advisability of rapprochement with China, given the associated economic and political risks. The countries of Southeast Asia can be conditionally divided into two groups according to their relation to the Belt and Road initiative. The first group includes Indonesia, Malaysia, Singapore, the Philippines, Thailand, Vietnam and Myanmar, whose position can be described as national pragmatism. While supporting the Chinese initiative in general, they nevertheless assess the possible risks of their participation in projects and seek to reduce them. The second group is represented by Laos and Cambodia, whose leadership unconditionally supports the Chinese initiative, guided by the interests of their own survival, which largely depends on Chinese assistance. Therefore, the prospect of falling into a debt trap and increasing economic dependence on the PRC and even the threat of losing sovereignty does not deter them from participating in highly controversial projects from a commercial point of view. Based on the analysis made, the author comes to the conclusion that, given the existing alignment of political forces in Southeast Asia, China can count on promoting its initiative in the region, which, however, does not automatically lead to an increase in its political influence and to the creation of a China-centric model of regional order.

Keywords: China, South East Asia, Belt and Road Initiative, anti-Chinese sentiments


1. Huang Yasheng. Can the Belt and Road become a trap for China? The Nikkei Asian Review, 23.05.2019. Aavailable at: (accessed 15.03.2021).

2. ASEAN Statistical Yearbook 2020. Jakarta: ASEAN Secretariat, December 2020. 252 p.

3. Claire Knox. How Southeast Asia can leverage China’s New Silk Road. Globe, 05.07.2017. Aavailable at: (accessed 15.03.2021).

4. Cahyo Pamungkas, Saiful Hakam. Between fear and hope: BRI in Southeast Asia. Chinese Journal of International Review, 2020, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 129-149. DOI: 10.1142/S2630531320500031

5. Ben O. de Vera. China emerges as PH’s most important source of investments. Philippine Daily Inquirer, 09.12.2020. Available at: (accessed 15.03.2021).

6. Oehler-Sincai M. I. Narratives and Actions Regarding the Belt and Road Initiative in ASEAN Countries. Global Economic Observer, 2019, vol. 7, no 2, pp. 48-55.

7. China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) and Southeast Asia. Special Report. October 2018, CIMB ASEAN Research Institute and LSE IDEAS, Kuala Lumpur. 46 p.

8. Hiebert M. China’s Belt and Road: from Malaysia to Philippines, Asean projects face roadblocks. The South China Morning Post, September, 2020. Available at: (accessed 15.03.2021).

9. Vineles. P. Making the belt and road work for Southeast Asia. East Asia Forum, 13.07.2019. Available at: (accessed 15.03.2021).

10. Nyi Nyi Kyaw. Sinophobia in Myanmar and the Belt and Road Initiative. The Perspective, no. 9, 13.02.2020. ISEAS. 9 .

11. Obe M. and Kishimoto M. Why China is determined to connect Southeast Asia by rail. The Nikkei Asian Review, 09.01.2019. Available at: (accessed 15.03.2021).

12. Reid Cr. The China-Laos railway: a way out of poverty or a white elephant in waiting? The South China Morning Post, 26.09.2020. Available at: (accessed 15.03.2021).

13. Dorsey J. M. China’s Belt and Road funding terms spark criticism. Lobe Log, 21.03.2018. Available at: (accessed 15.03.2021).

14. Freeman N. Can Laos profit from China rail link despite being US$1.5 billion in debt? The South China Morning Post, 10.12.2019. Available at: (accessed 15.03.2021).

15. Ward O. Chinese-owned banana plantations expand in Laos despite lingering environmental and health concerns. ASEAN Today, 16.10.2019. Available at: (accessed 15.03.2021).

16. Jing Jing Luo, Kheang Un. Cambodia: hard landing for China’s soft power? The Perspective, no. 111, 06.10.2020. ISEAS. 7 p.

17. Prasso S. Chinese influx stirs resentment in once-sleepy Cambodian resort. Bloomberg, 21.06.2018. Available at: (accessed 16.03.2021).

18. Fullerton J. Welcome to ‘Tourism Vacation Town’: China to build $1.2 bn holiday hotspot in Cambodia. The Guardian, 07.09.2018. Available at: (accessed 25.01.2021).

19. Heijmans P. Chinese money is driving one of Asia’s Fastest property booms. Bloomberg, 11.09.2018. Available at: (accessed 15.03.2021).

20. Ellis-Petersen H. No Cambodia left: how Chinese money is changing Sihanoukville. The Guardian, 31.07.2018. Available at: (accessed 15.03.2021).

21. Lintner B. Myanmar a perfect fit on China’s Belt and Road. The Asia Times, 27.01.2020. Available at: (accessed 15.03.2021).

22. Lintner B. China’s Belt and Road detours downstream in Myanma. Asia Times, 22.02.2020. Available at: (accessed 15.03.2021).

23. Mohan M.J. Myanmar’s role in China’s Maritime Silk Road Initiative. Journal of Contemporary China, 2018, vol. 27, no. 111, pp. 362-378. DOI: 10.1080/10670564.2018.1410969

24. Zhou L. China has factories secured against vandalism Myanmar but how can it protect itself from anti-China sentiment? The South China Morning Post, 19.02.2021. Available at: (accessed 15.03.2021).

25. Green D. Thailand pushes China’s Belt and Road despite differing visions. Nikkey Asia, 02.05.2019. Available at: (accessed 15.03.2021).

26. Le Hong Hiep. The Belt and Road Initiative in Vietnam: challenges and prospects. The Perspective, no. 18, 29.03.2018. ISEAS. 7 p.

27. Van Huy D. A Vietnamese Perspective on China s Belt and Road Initiative in Vietnam. Contemporary Chinese Political Economy and Strategic Relations. An International Journal, 2020, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 145-185.

28. Tang See Kit. Belt and Road Initiative can play important role to strengthen regional, multilateral cooperation: PM Lee. CNA, 26.04.2019. Available at: (accessed 15.03.2021).

29. Lim J. PM Lee proposes ways to reap more long-term benefits from China’s Belt and Road initiative. Today, 27.04.2019. Available at: (accessed 15.03.2021).

30. Tang See Kit. Belt and Road can go beyond physical infrastructure, take transparent approach in next phase: PM Lee. CAN, 27.04.2019. Available at: (accessed 15.03.2021).

31. Venzon C. Duterte struggles to sell his China pivot at home. The Nikkei Asian Review, 09.10.2019. Available at: (accessed 15.03.2021).

32. China’s ambitious bid for Southeast Asia hegemony. Available at: (accessed 15.03.2021).

33. Venzon C. China Group’s $10bn Philippines Airport bid sows alarm. The Nikkei Asian Review, 20.12.2019. Available at: (accessed 15.03.2021).

34. Heydarian R. Duterte should not rush Chinese infrastructure investments. The Nikkei Asian Review, 10.02.2020. Available at: (accessed 15.03.2021).

35. Indonesia may be next Asian country to spurn China. The Star, 01.04.2019. Available at: (accessed 15.03.2021).

36. Lai Hongyi. Indonesia: The Belt and Road Initiative and relations with China. 04.10.2019. Available at: (accessed 15.03.2021).

37. “Indonesia to propose Projects Worth US$91 Billion”. The Straits Times, 20.03.2019. Available at: (accessed 15.03.2021).

38. Rakhma M.Z., Nugroho A.S. What’s driving Indonesian paranoia over Chinese workers? The South Morning China Post, 02.06.2019. Available at: (accessed 15.03.2021).

39. Mourdoukoutas P. “Indonesia warns about bad side of Chinese investments – and isn’t alone”. Forbes, 13.12.2019. Available at: (accessed 15.03.2021).

40. Coca N. Comfortably Reelected, Indonesia’s Jokowi Opens the Door to China’s Belt and Road. The World Political review, 20.06.2019. Available at: (accessed 15.03.2021).

41. Kok Wey A.L. Foreign policy concerns swayed Malaysia’s voters. East Asia Forum, 28.07.2018. Available at: (accessed 15.03.2021).

42. The perils of China’s “debt-trap diplomacy”. The Economist, 06.09.2018. Available at: (accessed 15.03.2021).

43. Wen P. Mahathir says China will sympathize with Malaysia’s problems. Reuters, 20.08.2018. Available at: (accessed 15.03.2021).

44. Dr Mahathir backs Belt and Road, proposes bigger, faster train links. Head Topics. Malaysia, 26.04.2019. Available at: (accessed 15.03.2021).

Registered in System SCIENCE INDEX

For citation:
Rogozhina N. The Countries of Southeast Asia and the Chinese Initiative Belt and Road: a Model of Interaction. World Eonomy and International Relations, 2021, vol. 65, no. 10, pp. 91-102.

Comments (0)

No comments

Add comment






Dear authors! Please note that in the VAK List of peer-reviewed scientific journals, in which the main scientific results of dissertations for the degree of candidate and doctor of sciences should be published for the “MEMO Journal” the following specialties are recorded:
economic sciences:
5.2.5. World Economy.
5.2.1. Economic Theory
5.2.3. Regional and Branch Economics
political sciences:
5.5.4. International Relations
5.5.1. History and Theory of Politics
5.5.2. Political Institutions, Processes, Technologies


Current Issue
2024, vol. 68, No. 5
Topical Themes of the Issue:
  • Are There Any Ways to Break Through the Korean Nuclear Impasse?
  • Contemporary U.S. Taiwan Policy: Balancing on the Edge
  • The Gulf Monarchies’ Vision of the Global Order Transformations and the Russian Place in It
  • At Post-Soviet Space
Submit an Article
The Editorial Board invites authors to write analytical articles on the following topics:
  • changes in the processes of globalization in modern conditions
  • formation of the new world order
  • shifts in civilization at the stage of transition to a digital society

The editors are also interested in publishing synthesis articles / scientific reviews revealing the main trends in the development of certain regions of the world - Latin America, Africa, South Asia, etc.