Security Modus Operandi of the Northern Europe

DOI: 10.20542/0131-2227-2021-65-1-82-89
K. Voronov (,
Primakov National Research Institute of World Economy and International Relations, Russian Academy of Sciences (IMEMO), 23, Profsoyuznaya Str., Moscow, 117997, Russian Federation

Abstract. The article analyses the complex influence of dangerous changes, which took place after 2014 in the international political environment in Europe, on the ongoing transformations, suggests essential revision of national policies of the five Nordic countries (Denmark, Norway, Iceland, Sweden and Finland) in the field of their security and defene. The degree of military and political tension in the North of Europe has increased significantly after 2014. The conflict is escalating due to additional deployment within the so-called reinforcement of the “eastern flank” of the Alliance with three allied battalions, and NATO weapons in the Baltic States and Poland. However, great strategic stability in the zone of direct contact between NATO and Russia is still possible to maintain. The international political situation in the subregion has also deteriorated markedly as a result of the U.S., NATO and EU sanctions policy against Russia, strengthening of transatlantic relations of the Nordic countries, and reinforcement of allied ties within the framework of the Western bloc policy as a whole. It noted signified not only a revision in favor of further strengthening of transatlantic ties in the policy of bloc allegiance of the Nordic countries – members of NATO (Denmark, Norway, Iceland), but also an obvious intensification of practical cooperation between formally non-aligned states (Sweden and Finland) with the Alliance structures. The Nordic Defene Cooperation (NORDEFCO) has also started to acquire a risky pro-Atlantic style, losing its previous autonomous subregional nature. Apparently, in the present complex situation, the Nordic Five is disposed to solve security and defence problems by: 1) having a greater many-sided cooperation with NATO; 2) giving a real, limited meaning to the European Union in the military-political sphere; 3) continuing to bear pressure upon Russia for the purpose of limiting Russian influence in the subregion, especially in the Baltic region. In the near future, the problem of NATO accession for Sweden and Finland may remain in the same precarious condition unless some dangerous force majeure circumstances occur in the Baltic region.

Keywords: Nordic countries, Denmark, Norway, Iceland, Sweden, Finland, Russia, the Baltic countries, NATO, EU, NORDEFCO


  1. Brommesson D. Non-allied states in a changing Europe: Sweden and its bilateral relationship with Finland in a new security context. Oslo, NUPI. Policy in Brief, 2016, no. 31, pp. 1-4. Available at: (accessed 14.10.2018).
  2. Petersson M. Swedish Security Policy after the Ukraine crisis. The Macdonald-Laurier Institute, Canada’s, Ottawa, March 26, 2018. Available at: (accessed 28.03.2018).
  3. Simonyi ., Cagan D., eds. Nordic Ways. Center for Transatlantic Relations, Washington, 2016. 340 p.
  4. Lindvall F., Winnerstig M. Väpnad solidaritet – USA: s militära närvaro i Europa fram till 2020. Stockholm, 2017, FOI-R‑4428. Available at: (accessed 01.03.2018).
  5. Traavik K. Samhandling for sikkerhet – En ny sikkerhetslov for en ny tid. Den norske Atlanterhavskomite, Oslo, 2017, no. 1. 20 s. Available at: (accessed 10.10.2019).
  6. Fägersten B., von Sydow G., eds. Perspectives on the Future of the EU. Stockholm, April 2019. 123 p. Available at: (accessed 20.11.2019).
  7. Kilin Yu.M. Neitral’nye gosudarstva na rasput’e: problema vstupleniya v NATO Finlyandii i Shvetsii [Neutral states at a crossroads: the problem of joining to NATO Finland and Sweden]. Contemporary Europe, 2017, no. 2 (74), pp. 65-76. DOI:
  8. Voronov K. Severnyi neitralizm v XXI veke: istoricheskii final ili novaya transformatsiya? [Nordic neutralism: Historical Finale or a Transformation?]. Contemporary Europe, 2018, no. 1 (80), pp. 80-89. DOI:
  9. Dalsjö R. Trapped in the Twilight Zone? Sweden between neutrality and NATO. Helsinki, FIIA Working Paper 94, April 2017. 33 p. Available at: (accessed 10.10.2017).
  10. Voronov K. Shvetsiya–NATO: konspirativnaya uniya pod leiblom neitraliteta [Sweden-NATO: conspiracy unite under the label of neutrality]. Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya, 2013, no. 5, pp. 110-120.
  11. Fisher K., Mouritzen H., eds. Danish Foreign Policy Yearbook. Copenhagen, DIIS, 2017. 192 p. Available at: (accessed 10.10.2018).
  12. Larsen J. A Small State Addressing Big Problems. Perspectives on recent Danish foreign and security strategy. DIIS Report, Kobenhavn, 2020. 44 p. Available at: (accessed 10.09.2020).
  13. Ringsmose J., Rynning S. NATO og Rusland mellem strategisk konfrontation og stabilitet. Danmarks myligheder for at fremme kontinental dialog. DIIS, Copenhagen, 2019. 48 s.
  14. Hermann R. Die Nato will den “Flugzeugträger Island” wieder mehr nutzen. Neue Zürcher Zeitung, 13.02.2018. Available at: (accessed 20.10.2019).
  15. Svendsen Ø., Weltzien Å. Norwegians adapting to a changing world. NUPI Report, nr. 9, 2020, Oslo. 24 p. Available at: (accessed 01.09.2020).
  16. Holmström M. Den dolda alliansen. Sveriges hemliga NATO-förbindelser. Atlantis, Stockholm, 2011. 659 s.
  17. Pyykönen J. Nordic Partners of NATO. How similar are Finland and Sweden within NATO co-operation? The Finnish Institute of International Affairs, Helsinki. 140 p. Available at: (accessed 11.10.2017).
  18. Olsson P. och Nordlund P. Effektiv materielförsörjning. Nordiska länders strategi, organisation och försvarsindustri. Stockholm, 2017, FOI-R‑4452. 40 s. Available at: (accessed 08.03.2018).
  19. Mouritzen H. Between Putin and Trump: from divergence to convergence of Nordic security policies. DIIS, Copenhagen, 2019, 30 p. Available at: (accessed 10.10.2019).

Registered in System SCIENCE INDEX

For citation:
Voronov K. Security Modus Operandi of the Northern Europe. World Eonomy and International Relations, 2021, vol. 65, no. 1, pp. 82-89.

Comments (0)

No comments

Add comment






Dear authors! Please note that in the VAK List of peer-reviewed scientific journals, in which the main scientific results of dissertations for the degree of candidate and doctor of sciences should be published for the “MEMO Journal” the following specialties are recorded:
economic sciences:
5.2.5. World Economy.
5.2.1. Economic Theory
5.2.3. Regional and Branch Economics
political sciences:
5.5.4. International Relations
5.5.1. History and Theory of Politics
5.5.2. Political Institutions, Processes, Technologies


Current Issue
2024, vol. 68, No. 4
Topical Themes of the Issue:
  • Financial Contagion Propagation in Europe under the Impact of Global Shocks
  • Regional Powers on the African Continent: Trends and Prospects
  • Investment Activity of the PRC in the Kyrgyz Republic
  • “Land Grabbing” Concept: Global and National Aspects
Submit an Article
The Editorial Board invites authors to write analytical articles on the following topics:
  • changes in the processes of globalization in modern conditions
  • formation of the new world order
  • shifts in civilization at the stage of transition to a digital society

The editors are also interested in publishing synthesis articles / scientific reviews revealing the main trends in the development of certain regions of the world - Latin America, Africa, South Asia, etc.