Social Sciences and Global Turbulence: Rebooting the Mainstream

91
DOI: 10.20542/0131-2227-2021-65-1-100-113
V. Mart'yanov (martianov@instlaw.uran.ru),
Institute of Philosophy and Law, Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 16, S. Kovalevskoi Str., Ekaterinburg, 620137, Russian Federation;
L. Fishman (lfishman@yandex.ru),
Institute of Philosophy and Law, Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 16, S. Kovalevskoi Str., Ekaterinburg, 620137, Russian Federation

Acknowledgements. The article has been supported by a grant of the Russian Foundation for Basic Research (RFBR) and the Expert Institute of Social Research (“”). Project no. 20-011-31025 “Alternatives to Political Mainstream amidst the Crisis of the Global World Order”.


Abstract. After the collapse of the bipolar world, the neoliberal mainstream emerged in the global hierarchy of social sciences, built on three axiomatic pillars: Western domination, capitalism (free market) and liberalism (the value of individual autonomy). Nowadays, one can more and more often witness criticism and disintegration of the mainstream, which claimed the universality of descriptions and legitimation of modern societies that have reached the end of history in the form of open-access liberal market democracies. The purpose of the article is to find out how transformations of the prevailing political and economic orders, configurations of the subjects of geopolitical dominance and their legitimate metaphors determine the direction of changes in the social sciences mainstream. The hypothesis of the research is that the prevailing principles of stratification and distribution of public resources will be less and less valuable and institutionally related to capitalism, market and democracy, since an appeal to the latter does not lead to an increase in the available opportunities for the majority of the population in practice. The global change in social ontology, the structure of economic reproduction and legitimate foundations of the political order bring about a drop in the credibility and relevance of mainstream concepts focused on the axiomatics of market values and liberal rhetoric. Intellectual attempts to restore the relevance of the neoliberal mainstream through the construction of local utopias (flat world, creative class, knowledge economy, etc.), the introduction of complementary concepts of civil repair (J. Alexander), sociocultural trauma (P. Shtompka), unworthy government (bad governance), dependence on previous development (path dependence) or gauge (N. Rozov) do not save from growing conceptual stretch. Formation of a society without tangible economic growth and a declining need for mass labor leads to the inevitable transformation of the mainstream. Alternative and peripheral theories that describe the contours of a global future mainly in non-market, non-capitalist and, possibly, non-liberal categories are becoming more influential. These are concepts that fix new formats for the distribution of public resources, less and less connected with the market, democracy and hegemony of the West, but increasingly – with rental mechanisms, distributive political regulation and differentiated value of different social groups for the national state.

Keywords: social sciences, mainstream, metaphor, alternative, crisis of legitimation, center-periphery, rent, rental society, social ontology, social stratification


REFERENCES

  1. Startsev Ya.Yu. 60 tezisov o yazyke politicheskoi nauki [60 Theses on the Language of the Political Science]. Nauchnyi ezhegodnik Instituta filosofii i prava UrO RAN, 2013, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 67-77.
  2. Wallerstein I. Konets znakomogo mira. Sotsiologiya XXI veka [The End of the Familiar World. Sociology of the XXI century]. Moscow, Logos, 2004. 368 p.
  3. Fishman L.G. V ozhidanii Ptolemeya. Transformatsiya metaparadigmy sotsial’no-politicheskikh nauk [Waiting for Ptolemy. Transformation of the Metaparadigm of Socio-Political Sciences]. Ekaterinburg, UrO RAN, 2004. 168 p.
  4. Kondrashov P.N., Vakhrusheva E.A. Nabroski k istolkovaniyu dialektiki Fredric Jameson [Approaching the Interpretation of Dialectics of Fredric Jameson]. Elektronnyi filosofskii zhurnal Vox, 19.12.2015. Available at: http://vox-journal.org/content/Vox19/Vox19-KondrashovPN.pdf (accessed 20.04.2020).
  5. Mart’yanov V.S. Gosudarstvo i geterarkhiya: sub’ekty i faktory obshchestvennykh izmenenii [State and Hierarchy: Actors and Factors of Social Change]. Nauchnyi ezhegodnik Instituta filosofii i prava UrO RAN, 2009, vol. 9, pp. 230-248.
  6. Vakhrusheva .A. Kritika globalizatsii i antiglobalistskie strategii Fredric Jameson [Criticism of Globalization and the Anti-Globalist Strategies of Fredrick Jameson]. Politiya, 2016, no. 1, pp. 43-53.
  7. Fishman L.G., Mart’yanov V.S., Davydov D.A. Rentnoe obshchestvo: v teni truda, kapitala i demokratii [Rental Society: In the Shadow of Capital, Labor and Democracy]. Moscow, Izd. dom VSE, 2019. 416 p.
  8. Mason P. Postkapitalizm: gid po nashemu budushchemu [Post-Capitalism: a Guide to Our Future]. Moscow, Ad Marginem Press, 2016. 416 p.
  9. Piketti T. Kapital v XXI veke [Capital in the Twenty-First Century]. Moscow, Ad Marginem Press, 2015. 592 p.
  10. Quiggin J. Zombi-ekonomika: Kak mertvyye idei prodolzhayut bluzhdat’ sredi nas [Zombie Economics: How Dead Ideas Keep Wandering Among Us]. Moscow, Izd. dom VSE, 2016. 272 p.
  11. Fishman L.G. Liberal’nyi konsensus: dreif ot neoliberalizma k kommunitarizmu? [Liberal Consensus: a Drift from Neoliberalism to Communitarianism?]. Polis. Political Studies, 2014, no. 4, pp. 152-165. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2014.04.10
  12. Mart’yanov V. Proshchai, srednii klass [Farewell to the Middle Class]. Svobodnaya mysl’, 2016, no. 5, pp. 53-70.
  13. Rawls J. Teoriya spravedlivosti [Theory of Justice]. Novosibirsk, NGU, 1995. 532 p.
  14. Mart’yanov V.S., Fishman L.G. Etika dobrodeteli dlya novykh soslovii: transformatsiya politicheskoi morali v sovremennoi Rossii [Ethics of Virtue for the New Classes: the Transformation of Political Morality in Modern Russia]. Voprosy filosofii, 2016, no. 10, pp. 58-68.
  15. Fishman L.G. Upadok demokratii i “zakat” politologii [The Decline of Democracy and the “Demise” of Political Science]. Politiya, 2008, no. 3, pp. 79-88.
  16. Brown V. Razrushenie demokratii: kak neoliberalizm preobrazovyvaet gosudarstvo i sub’ekta [The Destruction of Democracy: How Neoliberalism Transforms the State and the Subject]. Neprikosnovennyi zapas, 2018, no. 4, pp. 99-129.
  17. Lash K. Vosstanie elit i predatel’stvo demokratii [The Rise of the Elites and the Betrayal of Democracy]. Moscow, Logos, 2002. 224 p.
  18. Urbinati N. Iskazhennaya demokratiya. Mnenie, istina i narod [Distorted Democracy. Opinion, Truth and People]. Moscow, Izd-vo Instituta Gaydara, 2016. 448 p.
  19. Crouch K. Postdemokratiya [Post-Democracy]. Moscow, Izd. dom. VSE, 2010. 192 p.
  20. Mayr P. Upravlyaya pustotoi. Razmyvanie zapadnoi demokratii [Managing the Void]. Moscow, Izd-vo Instituta Gaydara, 2019. 216 p.
  21. Claassen C. In the Mood for Democracy? Democratic Support as Thermostatic Opinion. American Political Science Review, 2020, vol. 114, iss. 1, pp. 36-53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055419000558
  22. Burnheim J. Is Democracy Possible? The Alternative to Electoral Politics, London, Polity Press, 1985. 205 p.
  23. Allison G. The Myth of the Liberal Order. Foreign Aaffairs, July/August 2018. Available at: https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/2018-06-14/myth-liberal-order (accessed 20.04.2020).
  24. Porter P. A World Imagined: Nostalgia and Liberal Order. CATO Institute, Policy Analysis, no. 843, June 5, 2018. Available at: https://www.cato.org/publications/policy-analysis/world-imagined-nostalgia-liberal-order (accessed 20.04.2020).
  25. Bruff I. The Rise of Authoritarian Neoliberalism, Rethinking Marxism. Journal of Economics, Culture & Society, 2014, vol. 26, iss. 1, pp. 113-129. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08935696.2013.843250
  26. Borokh O.N. Sovremennyi kitaiskii vzglyad na istoriyu ekonomicheskoi mysli [The modern Chinese view of the history of economic thought]. Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost’, 2019, no. 2, pp. 91-103.
  27. Alexander J. Prochnye utopii i grazhdanskii remont [Durable Utopia and Civil Repair]. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya, 2002, no. 10, pp. 3-11.
  28. Shtompka P. Sotsial’noe izmenenie kak travma [Social Change as Trauma]. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya, 2001, no. 1, pp. 6-16.
  29. Friedman T. Ploskii mir 3.0. Kratkaya istoriya XXI veka [The World is Flat 3.0. A Brief History of the XXI Century]. Moscow, AST, 2014. 640 p.
  30. Orekhovskii P.A. Struktury kognitivnosti i rossiiskie reformy: Nauchnyi doklad, preprint [Cognitive Structures and Russian Reforms: Scientific Report, Preprint]. Moscow, Institut ekonomiki RAN, 2019. 47 p.
  31. Fishman L.G. Populizm – eto nadolgo [Populism Will Be Long Lasting]. Polis. Political Studies, 2017, no. 3, pp. 55-70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2017.03.04
  32. Efimov V.M. Kak kapitalizm, universitet i matematika sformirovali magistral’noe napravlenie ekonomicheskoi distsipliny [How capitalism, university and mathematics formed the mainstream of economic discipline]. Nauchnyi ezhegodnik Instituta filosofii i prava UrO RAN, 2014, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 5-52.
  33. Olson M. Dictatorship, Democracy, and Development. The American Political Science Review, 1993, vol. 87, no. 3, pp. 567-576.
  34. North D., Weingast B. and Wallis D. Nasilie i sotsial’nye poryadki. Kontseptual’nye ramki dlya interpretatsii pis’mennoi istorii chelovechestva [Violence and Social Order. Conceptual Framework for the Interpretation of the Written History of Mankind]. Moscow, Izd-vo Instuta Gaydara, 2011. 480 p.
  35. Harrison L., Huntington S., eds. Kul’tura imeet znachenie. Kakim obrazom tsennosti sposobstvuyut obshchestvennomu progressu [Culture Matters. How Values Contribute to Social Progress]. Moscow, MShPI, 2002. 320 p.
  36. Shapiro I. Begstvo ot real’nosti v gumanitarnykh naukakh [The Escape from Reality in the Humanities]. Moscow, Izd. dom VSE, 2011. 368 p.
  37. Harvey D. Kratkaya istoriya neoliberalizma [A Brief History of Neoliberalism]. Moscow, Pokolenie, 2007. 288 p.
  38. Efimov V.M. Ekonomicheskaya nauka pod voprosom: inye metodologiya, istoriya i issledovatel’skie praktiki [Economic science is in doubt: other methodology, history and research practices]. Moscow, INFRA-M, 2016. 352 p.
  39. Koshovets O.B., Orekhovskii P.A. Strukturalist skaya revolyutsiya i metamorfozy ekonomicheskoi teorii: ot nauki k skazke [Structuralist revolution and metamorphoses of economic theory: from science to fairy tale]. Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost’, 2018, no. 5, pp. 143-157.
  40. Zaostrovtsev A.P., ed. Ekonomicheskaya teoriya: triumf ili krizis? [Economic Theory: Triumph or Crisis?]. St. Petersburg, Leont’evskii tsentr, 2018. 292 p.
  41. Chan H.D. Zlye samarityane: mif o svobodnoi torgovle i sekretnaya istoriya kapitalizma [Evil Samaritans: the Myth of Free Trade and the Secret History of Capitalism]. Moscow, Mann, Ivanov i Ferber, 2018. 245 p.
  42. Kapelyushnikov R.I. Contra paninstitutsionalizm [Contra Pan-Institutionalism]. Institutsional’naya ekonomicheskaya teoriya: istoriya, problemy i perspektivy [Institutional economic theory: history, problems and prospects]. Zaostrovtsev A.P., ed. St. Petersburg, Leont’evskii tsentr, 2019, pp. 7-31.
  43. Mart’yanov V.S., Fishman L.G. Posle pandemii: ot optimizirovannogo starogo k novomu miru? [After the Pandemic: From an Optimized Old to a New World?]. Svobodnaya mysl’, 2020, no. 3, pp. 9-28.
  44. Mart’yanov V.S. Paradigmy rossiiskoi politologii [Paradigms of Russian Political Science]. Politiya, 2009, no. 1, pp. 167-181.
  45. Mills Ch. Vlastvuyushchaya elita [The Power Elite]. Moscow, Direktmedia Pablishing, 2007. 844 p.

Registered in System SCIENCE INDEX

For citation:
Mart'yanov V., Fishman L. Social Sciences and Global Turbulence: Rebooting the Mainstream. World Eonomy and International Relations, 2021, vol. 65, no. 1, pp. 100-113. https://doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227-2021-65-1-100-113



Comments (0)

No comments

Add comment







Indexed

 

 

 

 

Dear authors! Please note that in the VAK List of peer-reviewed scientific journals, in which the main scientific results of dissertations for the degree of candidate and doctor of sciences should be published for the “MEMO Journal” the following specialties are recorded:
economic sciences:
5.2.5. World Economy.
5.2.1. Economic Theory
5.2.3. Regional and Branch Economics
political sciences:
5.5.4. International Relations
5.5.1. History and Theory of Politics
5.5.2. Political Institutions, Processes, Technologies

 

Current Issue
2024, vol. 68, No. 4
Topical Themes of the Issue:
  • Financial Contagion Propagation in Europe under the Impact of Global Shocks
  • Regional Powers on the African Continent: Trends and Prospects
  • Investment Activity of the PRC in the Kyrgyz Republic
  • “Land Grabbing” Concept: Global and National Aspects
Submit an Article
INVITATION FOR PUBLICATION
The Editorial Board invites authors to write analytical articles on the following topics:
  • changes in the processes of globalization in modern conditions
  • formation of the new world order
  • shifts in civilization at the stage of transition to a digital society

The editors are also interested in publishing synthesis articles / scientific reviews revealing the main trends in the development of certain regions of the world - Latin America, Africa, South Asia, etc.