Measuring International Mobility of Russian Scientists: a Bibliometric Approach

DOI: 10.20542/0131-2227-2020-64-9-53-62
M. Yurevich (,
Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation, 49, Leningradskii Prosp., Moscow, 125993, Russian Federation;
Russian Research Institute of Economics, Politics and Law in Science and Technology, 20a, Dobrolyubova Str., 127254, Moscow, Russian Federation;
I. Tsapenko (,
Primakov National Research Institute of World Economy and International Relations, Russian Academy of Sciences (IMEMO), 23, Profsoyuznaya Str., Moscow, 117997, Russian Federation

Acknowledgments. The article has been supported by a grant of the Russian Foundation for Basic Research (RFBR). Project no. 19-511-04002. The research is conducted within a planned research topic of the IMEMO RAN, project no. -17-117030310137-3 “Trends and Alternatives of Socioeconomic Development: the New Social Reality”.

Abstract. Traditionally, the international mobility of researchers is measured by official statistical survey or sociological research tools. Official statistical sources, although generally characterized by a fairly high degree of data reliability, cannot provide information directly about scientists who continue to work in their field, having changed their country of residence. On the contrary, sociological studies of cross-border movements of researchers reach the maximum depth of investigation, but are always affected by a limited sample size, and can hardly give a representative picture of the whole national science. The authors of the article consider an alternative method based on the analysis of bibliometric data. The observation of migration processes in science based on bibliometric information has two undeniable advantages: wide coverage and possibility of in-depth analysis of patterns of international mobility. However, this approach has its drawbacks, including focusing on the field of basic research and overlaying the framework used in the analysis of the publication database. The research accomplished proves and demonstrates the applicability and adequacy of the bibliometric approach for studying cross-border movements of Russian scientific personnel. This approach was tested on a sample of Russian scientists specializing in social sciences. The original bibliometric data was obtained from the Web of Science database. As a result, there were 969 authors of articles identified who had signs of international scientific mobility. Among these mobile researchers there were 138 who were constantly engaged in work in foreign scientific centers and who could be attributed to the Russian scientific diaspora members. Most of the identified mobile scientists represent rather global circulation of scientific personnel associated with short-term international research projects, internships abroad, etc.

Keywords: international mobility of researchers, migration of scientific personnel, circulation of researchers, social sciences, scientific diaspora, statistics, measurement, bibliometric analysis, affiliations


1. Miguelez E., Fink C. Measuring the International Mobility of Inventors: a New Database. WIPO Working Paper, 2013, no. 8. Available at: (accessed 02.05.2020).

2. Franzoni Ch., Scellato G., Stephan P. Foreign-Born Scientists: Mobility Patterns for 16 Countries. Nature Biotechnology, 2012, vol. 30, no. 12, pp. 1250-1253. DOI:

3. National Science Foundation. Science and Engineering Indicators 2020: Science and Engineering Labor Force. 2019. Available at: (accessed 31.05.2020).

4. Johnson J., Regets M. International mobility of scientists and engineers to the US – brain drain or brain circulation? National Science Foundation SRS Issue Brief, 10.11.1998. 4 p. Available at: (accessed 31.05.2020).

5. Tsapenko I. Transformatsii global’noi migratsii naseleniya [Transformations of Global Migration of Population]. Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya, 2018, vol.62, no. 8, pp. 65-76. DOI:

6. Auriol L., Misu M., Freeman R. Careers of Doctorate Holders: Analysis of Labour Market and Mobility Indicators. Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers, 2013, no. 04. 61 . DOI:

7. Laudel G. Studying the Brain Drain: Can Bibliometric Methods Help? Scientometrics, 2003, vol. 57, no. 2, pp. 215-237. DOI:

8. Yurevich M.A., Aushkap D.S. “Utechka umov” v komp’yuternykh i informatsionnykh naukakh: bibliometricheskaya otsenka [“Brain Drain” in Computer and Information Sciences: Bibliometric Assessment]. Informatsionnoe obshchestvo, 2018, no. 6, pp. 46-53.

9. The Russian Academy of Sciences Said that the “Brain Drain” has Doubled in Three Years (In Russ.) Available at: (accessed 31.05.2020).

10. Dezhina I.G., Soldatova S.E., Ushakova S.E. Migratsiya nauchnykh kadrov baltiiskogo regiona: prognoz i faktory vliyaniya [Migration of Scientific Personnel of the Baltic Region: Forecast and Factors of Influence]. Baltiiskii region, 2020, no, 1, pp. 115-131. DOI:10.5922/2079-8555-2020-1-7

11. RANEPA Experts Told about the Increased Brain Drain from Russia (In Russ.) Available at: (accessed 31.05.2020).

12. Number and Migration of the Population of the Russian Federation. Moscow, Rosstat, Releases 2011–2019 years. (In Russ.)

13. Ryazantsev S.V., Pis’mennaya E.E. Emigratsiya uchenykh iz Rossii: “tsirkulyatsiya” ili “utechka” umov [Emigration of Scientists from Russia: “Circulation” or “Leakage” of Minds]. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya, 2013, no. 4, pp. 24-35.

14. Database Containing Information about the Performance of Scientific Organizations that Perform Research, Development and Technological Work (In Russ.) Available at: (accessed 31.05.2020).

15. Trubnikov G.V., Anikeev A.V., Il’ina I.E., Andrianov V.L., Malakhov V.A., Vasil’eva I.N. Formy i modeli mezhdunarodnogo nauchnotekhnicheskogo sotrudnichestva v Rossii [Forms and Models of International Scientific and Technical Cooperation in Russia]. Moscow, IMG Print, 2019. 36 p.

16. Kulagin A.S. Otsenka i samootsenka nauchnoi organizatsii. Teoriya i praktika. [Evaluation and Self-assessment of Scientific Organizations. Theory and Practice]. Moscow, IPRAN RAN, 2018. 200 p.

17. Yurevich M.A., Malakhov V.A., Aushkap D.S. Plyuralizm otsenok migratsionnykh potokov nauchnykh kadrov v Rossii [Pluralism of Estimates of Migration Flows of Scientific Personnel in Russia]. Nauka. Innovatsii. Obrazovanie, 2017, no. 4 (26), pp. 116-124.

18. Information and Analytical Materials on the Results of Monitoring the Effectiveness of Educational Organizations of Higher Education (In Russ.) Available at: (accessed 31.05.2020).

19. Popov D.S., Tvorogova S.V., Fedyukin I.I., Frumin I.D. Rossiiskaya diaspora v oblasti sotsial’nykh i ekonomicheskikh nauk: problemy i perspektivy sotrudnichestva [The Russian Diaspora in the Field of Social and Economic Sciences: Problems and Prospects of Cooperation]. Mir Rossii. Sotsiologiya. Etnologiya, 2011, no. 1 (20), pp. 51-71.

20. Antoshchuk I.A., Ledeneva V.Yu. Iz Rossii v Velikobritaniyu: o mekhanizmakh migratsii molodykh uchenykh v oblasti komp’yuternykh nauk [From Russia to Great Britain: on the Mechanisms of Migration of Young Scientists in the Field of Computer Science]. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya, 2019, no. 2 (2), pp. 108-118. DOI:10.31857/S013216250004015-9

21. Dezhina I.G., Kuznetsov E.N., Korobkov A.V., Vasil’ev N.V. Razvitie sotrudnichestva s russkoyazychnoi nauchnoi diasporoi: opyt, problemy, perspektivy [Development of Cooperation with the Russian-Speaking Scientific Diaspora: Experience, Problems, Prospects]. Moscow, Spetskniga, 2015. 104 p.

22. Fontes M. Scientific Mobility Policies: How Portuguese Scientists Envisage the Return Home. Science and Public Policy, 2007, vol. 34, is. 4, pp. 284-298.

23. OECD. Science, Technology and Industry Scoreboard 2017. Available at: (accessed 31.05.2020).

24. Moed H.F., Aisati M., Plume A. Studying Scientific Migration in Scopus. Scientometrics, 2013, vol. 94, no. 3, pp. 929-942. DOI:

25. Moed H.F., Halevi G.A Bibliometric Approach to Tracking International Scientific Migration. Scientometrics, 2014, vol. 101, no. 3, pp. 1987-2001. DOI:10.1007/s11192-014-1307-6

26. Appelt S., van Beuzekom B., Galindo-Rueda F., de Pinho R. Which Factors Influence the International Mobility of Research Scientists? Global Mobility of Research Scientists, 2015/02, pp. 177-213. DOI:

27. Halevi G., Moed H.F., Bar-Ilan J. Researchers’ Mobility, Productivity and Impact: Case of Top Producing Authors in Seven Disciplines. Publishing Research Quarterly, 2016, no. 1, pp. 22-37. DOI:10.1007/s12109-015-9437-0

28. Dyachenko E.L. Internal Migration of Scientists in Russia and the USA: the Case of Physicists. Scientometrics, 2017, no. 1, pp. 105-122. DOI:

29. Markova Y.V., Shmatko N.A., Katchanov Y.L. Synchronous International Scientific Mobility in the Space of Affiliations: Evidence from Russia. SpringerPlus, 2016, vol. 5, no. 1. DOI:

30. Koksharov V.A., Agarkov G.A. Mezhdunarodnaya nauchnaya migratsiya: progress ili ugroza nauchno-tekhnicheskoi bezopasnosti Rossii [International Scientific Migration: Progress or Threat to Scientific and Technical Security of Russia]. Ekonomika regiona, 2018, no. 1 (14), pp. 243-252. DOI:10.17059/2018-1-19

31. Malakhov V.A., Erkina D.S. Rossiiskie matematiki v mezhdunarodnoi tsirkulyatsii nauchnykh kadrov: bibliometricheskii analiz [Russian Mathematicians in the International Circulation of Scientific Personnel: Bibliometric Analysis]. Sotsiologiya nauki i tekhnologii, 2020, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 63-74. DOI:10.24411/2079-0910-2020-11005

Registered in System SCIENCE INDEX

For citation:
Yurevich M., Tsapenko I. Measuring International Mobility of Russian Scientists: a Bibliometric Approach. World Eonomy and International Relations, 2020, vol. 64, no. 9, pp. 53-62.

Comments (0)

No comments

Add comment






Dear authors! Please note that in the VAK List of peer-reviewed scientific journals, in which the main scientific results of dissertations for the degree of candidate and doctor of sciences should be published for the “MEMO Journal” the following specialties are recorded:
economic sciences:
5.2.5. World Economy.
5.2.1. Economic Theory
5.2.3. Regional and Branch Economics
political sciences:
5.5.4. International Relations
5.5.1. History and Theory of Politics
5.5.2. Political Institutions, Processes, Technologies


Current Issue
2024, vol. 68, No. 6
Topical Themes of the Issue:
  • The “Pivot to Asia”: AUKUS in the Perception of American Politicum
  • The Collapse of the European Collective Security System
  • Public Investment and Sustainability of World Economy
  • Sub-Saharan Africa: Trends, Proportions and Factors of Development
Submit an Article
The Editorial Board invites authors to write analytical articles on the following topics:
  • changes in the processes of globalization in modern conditions
  • formation of the new world order
  • shifts in civilization at the stage of transition to a digital society

The editors are also interested in publishing synthesis articles / scientific reviews revealing the main trends in the development of certain regions of the world - Latin America, Africa, South Asia, etc.