Bioenergy in EU: Problems and Prospects

DOI: 10.20542/0131-2227-2020-64-8-81-90
A. Zimakov (,
Primakov National Research Institute of World Economy and International Relations, Russian Academy of Sciences (IMEMO), 23, Profsoyuznaya Str., Moscow, 117997, Russian Federation


Bioenergy remains the main source of renewable energy in EU. Unlike other renewables, biomass provides solution for decarbonisation of power generation, heating and cooling, and transport. In transportation and heating biomass effectively holds leading role because of lack of other mature and economically feasible low-carbon technologies. In the power generation sector, the role of bioelectricity is rather limited facing competitive wind and solar power. Nevertheless, bioelectricity is crucial for phasing out coal as it allows retaining thermal power plants through their conversion to biomass. Such conversion is especially important for combined heat and power plants (CHPs) as far as it enables decarbonisation of both electricity generation and heating sectors. Thermal bioelectricity can also balance the power grids with a higher share of intermittent renewable power supply. Despite outlooks for a resilient growth, bioenergy in the EU is facing strong criticism regarding CO2 emissions and associated carbon debt. Another issue is connected wtih ensuring sustainability of biofuels what engulfs a broad range of questions ranging from low-carbon production to biodiversity, ecosystem benefits and social impacts. EU climate and energy policy addresses those issues by passing corresponding regulations. Meanwhile some EU countries are facing strong political pressures from environmental groups and are introducing even more strict sustainability criteria for domestic biofuels production and consumption. Further enhancement of sustainability requirements in EU is possible, including those for imported biofuels. In a longer term a decrease of biomass share in EU renewables mix can be expected caused by political pressure on bioenergy as carbon-emitting technology and in a separate development as a consequence of innovations and growth of other competitive non-carbon technologies able to replace biofuels.


EU, energy transition, decarbonization, environmental policy, renewables, biofuels, biomass, biogas


1. The European Green Deal. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the European Council, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. Brussels, 2019. 640 p. Available at: (accessed 10.03.2020).

2. Linnik V.Yu., Linnik Yu.N. Sostoyanie i perspektivy razvitiya bioenergetiki [State and prospects of bioenergy development]. Vestnik universiteta, 2019, no. 10, pp. 59-66. DOI:10.26425/1816-4277-2019-10-59-66

3. On the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources. Directive 2009/28/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council. April, 2009. Available at: (accessed 10.03.2020).

4. On the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources (recast). Directive 2018/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. December, 2018. Available at: (accessed 10.03.2020).

5. Bioenergy in Germany facts and figures 2019. 2019. 51 p. Available at: (accessed 10.03.2020).

6. Zimakov A.V. Est’ li budushchee dlya ugol’nykh TES v Evrope? [Is there any future for coal power plants in Europe?]. MGIMO Review of International Relations, 2017, no. 5 (56), pp. 130-150. DOI:10.24833/2071-8160-2017-5-56-130-150

7. Roni M.S., Chowdhury S., Mamun S., Marufuzzaman M., Lein W., Johnson S. Biomass co-firing technology with policies, challenges, and opportunities: A global review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2017, pp. 1089-1101. DOI:10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.023

8. Zimakov A. Transformatsiya setevoi infrastruktury v protsesse ekologizatsii energetiki ES [Energy infrastructure transformation as part of clean energy transition in the EU]. Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya, 2018, vol. 62, no. 12, pp. 46-54. DOI:10.20542/0131-2227-2018-62-12-46-54

9. Heating and Cooling Future of Europe and Interactions with Electricity. IEEE European Public Policy Committee Position Statement, 2018. Available at: (accessed 10.03.2020).

10. Flamme S. et al. Energieerzeugung aus Abfallen. Umweltbundesamt: Dessau-Ro.lau, 2018. Available at: (accessed 10.03.2020).

11. Faaij A.P.C. Securing sustainable resource availability of biomass for energy applications in Europe; review of recent literature. TNO EnergieTransitie, 2018. Available at: (accessed 10.03.2020).

12. Sustainable and optimal use of biomass for energy in the EU beyond 2020. EC Directorate General for Energy, 2017. Available at: (accessed 10.03.2020).

13. A Clean Planet for all. A European long-term strategic vision for a prosperous, modern, competitive and climate neutral economy. 2018. 24 p. Available at: (accessed 10.03.2020).

14. Playing with fire. An assessment of company plans to burn biomass in EU coal power stations. Sandbag, 2019. 30 p. Available at: (accessed 10.03.2020).

15. Statistical Report 2019. Brussels, Bioenergy Europe, 2019. Available at: (accessed 10.03.2020).

16. Sterman J.D., Siegel L., Rooney-Varga J.N. Does replacing coal with wood lower CO2 emissions? Dynamic lifecycle analysis of wood bioenergy. Environmental Research Letters, 2018, no. 13(1). 10 p. DOI:10.1088/1748-9326/aaa512

17. Timmons D.S., Buchholz T., Veeneman C.H. Forest biomass energy: Assessing atmospheric carbon impacts by discounting future carbon flows. Gcb Bioenergy, 2016, no. 8 (3), pp. 631-643. DOI:10.1111/gcbb.12276

18. Schlesinger W.H. Are wood pellets a green fuel? Science, 2018, no. 359 (6382), pp. 1328-1329. DOI:10.1126/science.aat2305

19. Madsen K., Bentsen N.S. Carbon Debt Payback Time for a Biomass Fired CHP Plant – A Case Study from Northern Europe. Energies, 2018, no. 11 (4), pp. 807-819. DOI:10.3390/en11040807

20. Carbon impacts of biomass consumed in the EU: quantitative assessment. Forest Research, Farnham, December, 2015. 341 p. Available at: (accessed 10.03.2020).

21. Berndes G. et al. Forest biomass, carbon neutrality and climate change mitigation. From science to policy, 2016, pp. 3-27. Available at: (accessed 10.03.2020).

22. Reid W.V., Ali M.K., Field C.B. The future of bioenergy. Global change biology, 2019. DOI:10.1111/gcb.14883

23. Banja M. et al. Biomass for energy in the EU – The support framework. Energy policy, 2019, no. 131, pp. 215-228. DOI:10.1016/j.enpol.2019.04.038

24. Meden N. Energeticheskaya transformatsiya v sotsial’nom rynochnom khozyaistve. Opyt Germanii [Energy revolution in social market economy. German experience]. Contemporary Europe, 2019, no. 2, pp. 142-150.

Registered in system SCIENCE INDEX

For citation:
Zimakov A. Bioenergy in EU: Problems and Prospects. Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya, 2020, vol. 64, No 8, pp. 81-90.

Comments (0)

No comments

Add comment

Current Issue
2021, vol. 65, No. 1
Topical Themes of the Issue:
  • Globalization and Nation-State: Yesterday, Today, Tomorrow
  • Global Value Chains (GVCS) and COVID 19 Pandemic
  • Middle East Conflicts Today: Between Religion and Geopolitics
  • Beijing’s Pain Points – 2 (Glance from Mid 2020)
  • Social Sciences and Global Turbulence: Rebooting the Mainstream
View This Issue (2021, vol. 65, No. 1)
Submit an Article

Dear readers!
Please note that free access to full-text issues of the Journal is being opened at our WEB-site after 6 months of the date of publications.The work on deepening the open archive of full-text issues will be continued.

Dear colleagues, authors and readers!
We kindly request you to turn to editor-in-chief and executive secretary directly concerning reviewing scientific publications in our journal. Only editor-in-chief takes decision on order and publication the reviews!

Dear readers!
This is to inform the researchers of the Institute of World Economy and International Relations that electronic versions of the I, II, III issues of 2020 of French magazine Politique étrangère are now available. Those who are interested, please personally address to the editorial staff of MEMO Journal (room 18-17) with an electronic media.

In response to the challenges of our time the Editorial board continues to open new thematic rubrics:

“World Energy Sector after Pandemic”. We plan to publish articles presenting in-depth analysis of influence of Pandemic on the global energy sector and forecasts of further developments in its various branches.

“Civilization processes of modern development” is a new rubric opened by MEMO Journal in 2020. It will be devoted to the analysis of the influence of civilizational factors and inter-civilizational interactions on the political and socio-economic development of the world at whole, regions and countries.

“Africa today and tomorrow”The rubric devoted to contemporary issues of Africa which is attracting growing interest of the world's leading actors. We plan to publish the articles analyzing the status of statehood, socio-economic and political development of the countries of Black continent, as well as the integration processes between them.


"World Eсonomy and International Relations" announces a contest for the best joint academic publications of domestic and foreign researchers and experts in topical issues of the world economy and international relations. The winners will be selected according to the results of peer reviewing and discussion at the Editorial Board. The articles will be published in priority order.


The print version of “World Economy and International Relations” journal is distributed by advance subscription only, and is not offered for retail sale. To subscribe please address to any post office in Russia by referring to the Federal Postal Service Union Catalogue, section “ARSMI”, the journal index is 70542. The subscription may be made for the whole subscription period or starting from any nearest available month for desired number of issues.

To purchase the full-text electronic version of the journal’s issue/article please address to the WEB portal of Scientific electronic library or URL:

In journal
2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999 | 1998 | 1997 |

The author’s opinions may not coincide with the position of editorial